-
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical... 2017Valganciclovir 900 mg/day is approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, but 450 mg/day is seems also effective. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Valganciclovir 900 mg/day is approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, but 450 mg/day is seems also effective. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of low-dose versus high-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplantation recipients.
METHODS
An electronic search was conducted up to November 29, 2016. The primary outcomes were incidences of CMV, CMV disease, mortality and opportunistic infection. The second outcomes were acute rejection, allograft loss, adverse drug reaction (ADR).
RESULTS
7 cohort studies, all with high quality involving (1431 patients) were included. There was no significant difference of the incidence of following CMV disease (1271 patients, odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.43, p=0.36), acute rejection (1343 patients, OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.53-1.14, p=0.19), allograft loss (1271 patients, OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.31-1.35, p=0.24), mortality (1271 patients, OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.20-1.47, p=0.23) and opportunistic infections (OI) (985 patients, OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.52-1.10, p=0.14) between the low-dose and the high-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis. And no significant difference was observed for premature valganciclovir discontinuation (1010 patients, OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.52-1.25, p=0.33) and the incidence of leukopenia (1082 patients, OR 0.65, 95%CI 0.34-1.22, p=0.18) between the two regimens.
CONCLUSION
450 mg and 900 mg doses of valganciclovir are equipotent for CMV universal prophylaxis. CMV 450 mg prophylaxis should be used for renal transplant recipients. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.
Topics: Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ganciclovir; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 28719361
DOI: 10.18433/J3805B -
Medicine Apr 2019Clinical researches indicate that acyclovir can be used to herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). However, no systematic review has explored its efficacy for the treatment...
BACKGROUND
Clinical researches indicate that acyclovir can be used to herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). However, no systematic review has explored its efficacy for the treatment of HSE. Therefore, this study systematically will investigate the efficacy and safety of acyclovir for patients with HSE.
METHODS
We will search the following databases from inceptions to March 1, 2019 without any language restrictions: Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDICINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. This study will include randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy and safety of acyclovir for patients with HSE. Two authors will independently carry out the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess the risk of bias assessment.
RESULTS
This study will systematically assess the efficacy and safety of acyclovir for HSE. The primary outcome is mortality rate, which is measured by Glasgow coma score, or other instruments. The secondary outcomes include quality of life, as assessed by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey or relevant scales; overall survival, the number of patient who died; the number of patient who had severe sequelae, and adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this study may provide the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of acyclovir for HSE.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42019125999.
Topics: Acyclovir; Antiviral Agents; Encephalitis, Herpes Simplex; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design
PubMed: 30985731
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015254 -
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2020Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) has worldwide prevalence. The primary objective of this systematic review was to compare penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior...
Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) has worldwide prevalence. The primary objective of this systematic review was to compare penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) regarding the efficacy and complications of the treatment of corneal scarring caused by herpes simplex keratitis. Out of the 469 articles identified during the combined search of the literature based on the PubMed and Cochrane libraries, 10 retrospective and 2 prospective studies published from January 2010 to December 2019 were included. The study outcomes indicated that both surgical approaches resulted in a comparable improvement of visual acuity (VA). However, DALK demonstrated fewer complications in the majority of studies. Higher graft survival rates were associated with higher acyclovir (ACV) doses (above 800 mg/day), topical steroid and antibiotic drops. In conclusion, in terms of postoperative VA, both PK and DALK demonstrate comparable efficacy. However, DALK, which is applied in less severe HSK cases, is associated with fewer complications and better graft survival rates. High dosages of ACV, topical steroids and antibiotics contribute significantly to improved postoperative outcomes.
Topics: Corneal Transplantation; Graft Survival; Humans; Keratitis, Herpetic; Keratoplasty, Penetrating
PubMed: 33355075
DOI: 10.14712/18059694.2020.57 -
Neuro-oncology Practice Jul 2019Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) occurring within 30 days after neurosurgery for solid CNS tumors is underrecognized and underreported but remains important because of...
BACKGROUND
Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) occurring within 30 days after neurosurgery for solid CNS tumors is underrecognized and underreported but remains important because of high morbidity and mortality. We present the case of a 41-year-old woman who had HSE after craniopharyngioma surgery, and delayed recognition and treatment led to a poor outcome. Subsequently, we review reported HSE cases after neurosurgery for solid CNS tumors and describe outcomes after treatment with and without acyclovir.
METHODS
A literature search was performed for cases meeting the above criteria. Information was gathered regarding patient demographics, tumor types, symptoms, diagnostic workup, therapy, and outcomes.
RESULTS
Eighteen cases were studied. Encephalopathy, fever, and seizures were the most common symptoms. A majority of patients (78%) received IV acyclovir, with a 79% survival rate with treatment. Mortality rate was 100% in untreated cases. The median time to starting acyclovir was 17 postoperative days (range, 8-53 days). Most patients received steroids, but its use was not associated with a specific outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
HSE may develop following neurosurgical resection, and the threshold for suspicion of this condition should be extremely low in a patient who shows compatible symptoms (encephalopathy, fever, or seizures) or does not recover as planned. Moreover, in case of suspicion of HSE, acyclovir should be promptly started until infection can be definitely ruled out. A delay in diagnosis of HSE and failure to treat may result in severe morbidity as well as mortality. This observation may warrant further study.
PubMed: 31386089
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz007 -
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2024Equine herpes virus type 1 (EHV-1) infection in horses is associated with upper respiratory disease, neurological disease, abortions, and neonatal death. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Equine herpes virus type 1 (EHV-1) infection in horses is associated with upper respiratory disease, neurological disease, abortions, and neonatal death.
REVIEW QUESTION
Does pharmacological therapy decrease either the incidence or severity of disease or infection caused by EHV-1 in domesticated horses?
METHODS
A systematic review was preformed searching AGRICOLA, CAB Abstracts, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, and WHO Global Health Index Medicus Regional Databases to identify articles published before February 15, 2021. Selection criteria were original research reports published in peer reviewed journals, and studies investigating in vivo use of therapeutic agents for prevention or treatment of EHV-1 in horses. Outcomes assessed included measures related to clinical outcomes that reflect symptomatic EHV-1 infection or virus infection. We evaluated risk of bias and performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
RESULTS
A total of 7009 unique studies were identified, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies evaluated valacyclovir or small interfering RNAs, and single studies evaluated the use of a Parapoxvirus ovis-based immunomodulator, human alpha interferon, an herbal supplement, a cytosine analog, and heparin. The level of evidence ranged between randomized controlled studies and observational trials. The risk of bias was moderate to high and sample sizes were small. Most studies reported either no benefit or minimal efficacy of the intervention tested.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE
Our review indicates minimal or limited benefit either as a prophylactic or post-exposure treatment for any of the studied interventions in the mitigation of EHV-1-associated disease outcome.
Topics: Animals; Horses; Herpesvirus 1, Equid; Horse Diseases; Herpesviridae Infections; Antiviral Agents; Valacyclovir
PubMed: 38380685
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17016 -
Developmental Medicine and Child... Aug 2017To conduct a systematic literature review on patients with biphasic disease with herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis followed by anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor... (Review)
Review
AIM
To conduct a systematic literature review on patients with biphasic disease with herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis followed by anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis.
METHOD
We conducted a case report and systematic literature review (up to 10 December 2016), focused on differences between herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) and anti-NMDAR encephalitis phases, age-related characteristics of HSV-induced anti-NMDAR encephalitis, and therapy. For statistical analyses, McNemar's test, Fisher's test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used (two-tailed significance level set at 5%).
RESULTS
Forty-three patients with biphasic disease were identified (31 children). Latency between HSE and anti-NMDAR encephalitis was significantly shorter in children than adults (median 24 vs 40.5d; p=0.006). Compared with HSE, anti-NMDAR encephalitis was characterized by significantly higher frequency of movement disorder (2.5% vs 75% respectively; p<0.001), and significantly lower rate of seizures (70% vs 30% respectively; p=0.001). Compared with adults, during anti-NMDAR encephalitis children had significantly more movement disorders (86.7% children vs 40% adults; p=0.006), fewer psychiatric symptoms (41.9% children vs 90.0% adults; p=0.025), and a slightly higher median modified Rankin Scale score (5 in children vs 4 in adults; p=0.015). During anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 84.6 per cent of patients received aciclovir (for ≤7d in 22.7%; long-term antivirals in 18.0% only), and 92.7 per cent immune therapy, but none had recurrence of HSE clinically or using cerebrospinal fluid HSV polymerase chain reaction (median follow-up 7mo).
INTERPRETATION
Our review suggests that movement disorder may help differentiate clinically an episode of HSV-induced anti-NMDAR encephalitis from HSE relapse. Compared with adults, children have shorter latency between HSE and anti-NMDAR encephalitis and, during anti-NMDAR encephalitis, more movement disorder, fewer psychiatric symptoms, and slightly more severe disease. According to our results, immune therapy given for HSV-induced anti-NMDAR encephalitis does not predispose patients to HSE recurrence.
Topics: Adult; Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis; Child; Encephalitis, Herpes Simplex; Female; Humans; Mental Disorders; Movement Disorders; Simplexvirus
PubMed: 28439890
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13448 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Feb 2015Recurrent herpes labialis (RHL) is one of the most common viral infections worldwide. The available treatments have limited efficacy in preventing the recurrence of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recurrent herpes labialis (RHL) is one of the most common viral infections worldwide. The available treatments have limited efficacy in preventing the recurrence of ulcerative lesions and reducing the duration of illness. The objective of this review was to identify the effectiveness of topical corticosteroids in addition to antiviral therapy in the treatment of RHL infection.
METHODS
A systematic review of randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of combined therapy (topical corticosteroids with antiviral) with placebo or antiviral alone in the management of RHL was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane library, and Google Scholar databases were searched. We used RevMan software to conduct the meta-analysis. A fixed-effects model was used for mild to moderate heterogeneity, whereas a random-effects model was used for significant heterogeneity. Heterogeneity among trials was established using I(2) and chi-square test for heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Four studies that fulfilled the selection criteria were included in this review. The total number of participants across included studies was 1,891 (range, 29 to 1,443). The antiviral drugs used were acyclovir, famciclovir, and valacyclovir. Corticosteroids used were 1% hydrocortisone and 0.05% fluocinonide. Pooled results showed that patients receiving combined therapy had a significantly lower recurrence rate of ulcerative lesions compared to those in both the placebo group (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39-0.66; P < .001) and the antiviral treatment alone group (OR, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.58-0.92; P = .007). The healing time was also significantly shorter in combined therapy in comparison to placebo (P < .001). However, there were no significant differences in healing time between combined therapy and antiviral alone. The adverse reactions in combined therapy were not significantly different than the placebo group (OR, 1.09; 95% C, 0.75-1.59; P = .85).
CONCLUSION
Treatment with combined therapy is safe and more effective than placebo or antiviral alone for preventing the recurrence of ulcerative lesions in RHL infection.
Topics: 2-Aminopurine; Acyclovir; Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Famciclovir; Female; Herpes Labialis; Humans; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Valacyclovir; Valine
PubMed: 25887308
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-0824-0 -
Canada Communicable Disease Report =... Feb 2016Among individuals with genital herpes simplex virus (HSV), co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been shown to increase the frequency and severity of...
BACKGROUND
Among individuals with genital herpes simplex virus (HSV), co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been shown to increase the frequency and severity of HSV symptoms, HSV shedding, and risk of HSV transmission.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether suppressive antivirual therapy for genital HSV in an HIV-positive populatation prevents HSV transmission to a susceptible partner.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify randomized controlled trials published between January 2005 and June 2015. Inclusion criteria were trials written in English or French utilizing suppressive antiviral therapies for HSV. Studies had to report on outcomes related to HSV transmission from HIV-positive populations. Surrogate markers of HSV transmission risk, such as HSV detection and viral load, were also included. Articles underwent a risk of bias assessment, and those with low risk of bias underwent data extraction to complete a narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
This review identified thirteen papers. Only one study directly measured transmission of HSV. The overall transmission rate was <10%, and suppressive antiviral therapy had no significant protective effect (9% transmission rate in the acyclovir group vs. 6% in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.83-2.20). The remaining 12 papers addressed surrogate markers of transmission risk: HSV detection and viral load. Suppressive acyclovir appears to be effective in reducing HSV detection among HIV-positive populations, but it does not appear to reduce viral load. Suppressive valacyclovir may be effective in reducing HSV detection and viral load among HIV-positive patients who are antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve, but its effect appears to be nullified among those concurrently on ART.
CONCLUSION
Based on current evidence, suppressive antiviral therapy may reduce HSV detection and viral load, but its impact on HSV transmission is unclear. Clinicians should caution HIV-positive patients with HSV that suppressive therapy may not reduce risk of HSV transmission to susceptible partners.
PubMed: 29770002
DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v42i02a03