-
Renal Failure Dec 2022Diabetes mellitus is a common "non-gout" disease with high incidence. Several studies have shown that serum uric acid level in patients with diabetes is higher than that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
Diabetes mellitus is a common "non-gout" disease with high incidence. Several studies have shown that serum uric acid level in patients with diabetes is higher than that in healthy individuals, and is accompanied by severe albuminuria and high serum creatinine (Scr). Recent clinical studies have found that uric acid-lowering therapy (such as allopurinol) could reduce urinary albumin excretion rates (UAER) and Scr, increase eGFR, and thus reduce kidney damage in patients with diabetes. Therefore, this meta-analysis [PROSPERO CRD42021274465] intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of allopurinol in patients with diabetes mellitus.
METHODS
We thoroughly searched five electronic resource databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of allopurinol versus conventional treatment or placebo for the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus. Predetermined outcomes were considered continuous variables, mean difference (MD) was used for the determination of effect size (standardized mean difference [SMD] was used to determine the effect size when there were different evaluation criteria in different articles), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. All outcome measures were analyzed using a random-effects model for data analysis.
RESULTS
Ten eligible trials with a total of 866 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Allopurinol was more effective in decreasing serum uric acid (SUA) levels compared with conventional treatment ( = 0.0001) or placebo ( < 0.00001). Moreover, the levels of 24-hour urine protein were significantly lower in the allopurinol group ( < 0.00001). The subgroup analysis of Scr showed that the Scr of patients with an allopurinol treatment duration of fewer than six months was significantly lower than that of the control group ( = 0.03). No significant difference in adverse events (AEs) was identified between the treatment and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis of RCTs showed that oral administration of allopurinol effectively reduced SUA levels in patients with diabetes, and patients' renal function was protected. More RCTs with larger sample sizes and higher quality are needed to clarify the role of allopurinol use in decreasing blood pressure, maintaining blood glucose levels, and improving renal function in patients with diabetes.
Topics: Allopurinol; Diabetes Mellitus; Gout; Gout Suppressants; Humans; Hyperuricemia; Kidney; Uric Acid
PubMed: 35856157
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2068443 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2017High blood pressure represents a major public health problem. Worldwide, approximately one-fourth of the adult population has hypertension. Epidemiological and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
High blood pressure represents a major public health problem. Worldwide, approximately one-fourth of the adult population has hypertension. Epidemiological and experimental studies suggest a link between hyperuricemia and hypertension. Hyperuricemia affects 25% to 40 % of individuals with untreated hypertension; a much lower prevalence has been reported in normotensives or in the general population. However, whether lowering serum uric acid (UA) might lower blood pressure (BP) is an unanswered question.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether UA-lowering agents reduce BP in patients with primary hypertension or prehypertension compared with placebo.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials up to February 2016: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2016, Issue 2), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched LILACS up to March 2016 and contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work.
SELECTION CRITERIA
To be included in this review, the studies had to meet the following criteria: 1) randomized or quasi-randomized, with a group assigned to receive a UA-lowering agent and another group assigned to receive placebo; 2) double-blind, single-blind or open-label; 3) parallel or cross-over trial; 4) cross-over trials had to have a washout period of at least two weeks; 5) minimum treatment duration of four weeks; 6) participants had to have a diagnosis of essential hypertension or prehypertension, and hyperuricemia (serum UA greater than 6 mg/dL in women, 7 mg/dL in men and 5.5 mg/dL in children/adolescents); 7) outcome measures assessed included change in clinic systolic, diastolic or 24-hour ambulatory BP.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The two review authors independently collected the data using a data extraction form, and resolved any disagreements via discussion. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration' Risk of bias' tool.
MAIN RESULTS
In this review update, we examined the abstracts of 349 identified papers and selected 21 for evaluation. We also identified three ongoing studies, the results of which are not yet available. Three other randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (two new), enrolling individuals with hypertension or prehypertension, and hyperuricemia, met the inclusion criteria for the review and were included in the meta-analysis. Low quality of evidence from three RCTs indicate no reduction in systolic (MD -6.2 mmHg, 95% CI -12.8 to 0.5) or diastolic (-3.9 mmHg, 95% CI -9.2 to 1.4) 24-hour ambulatory BP with UA-lowering drugs compared with placebo. Low quality of evidence from two RCTs reveal a reduction of systolic clinic BP (-8.43 mmHg, 95% CI -15.24 to -1.62) but not diastolic clinic BP (-6.45 mmHg, 95% CI -13.60 to 0.70). High quality of evidence from three RCTs indicates that serum UA levels were reduced by 3.1 mg/dL (95% CI 2.4 to 3.8) in the participants that received UA-lowering drugs. Very low quality of evidence from three RCTs suggests that withdrawals due to adverse effects were not increased with UA-lowering therapy (RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.43 to 8.10).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In this updated systematic review, the RCT data available at present are insufficient to know whether UA-lowering therapy also lowers BP. More studies are needed.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allopurinol; Blood Pressure; Child; Humans; Hypertension; Hyperuricemia; Patient Dropouts; Prehypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Uricosuric Agents
PubMed: 28406263
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008652.pub3 -
Clinical and Translational Science Mar 2024The cardiovascular (CV) safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of hyperuricemia among Asian patients is uncertain. In this study, we conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The cardiovascular (CV) safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of hyperuricemia among Asian patients is uncertain. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the CV safety profiles of febuxostat with allopurinol in Asian patients with hyperuricemia. A total of 13 studies were included. On the basis of the pooled results of cohort studies, febuxostat users were at a significantly higher risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.09, p < 0.01), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.35, p < 0.01) than allopurinol users, whereas no significant difference between febuxostat and allopurinol existed for urgent coronary revascularization (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.16, p = 0.13), and stroke (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91-1.01, p = 0.13). Nevertheless, that difference in results of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF; HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35-1.53, p = 0.40) and all-cause death (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.49-1.51, p = 0.60) was not significant based on randomized controlled trials. In the Chinese subgroup, febuxostat could increase the risk of ADHF (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.48, p < 0.05), CV death (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.50, p < 0.05), and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p < 0.05) compared to allopurinol. In conclusion, the use of febuxostat, compared with allopurinol among Asian patients, was associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse CV events.
Topics: Humans; Allopurinol; Febuxostat; Hyperuricemia; Gout Suppressants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Gout; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38488426
DOI: 10.1111/cts.13757 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2021Hyperuricemia is a common metabolic disease and has become a public health problem because of its increasing prevalence and association with comorbidities. Allopurinol...
Hyperuricemia is a common metabolic disease and has become a public health problem because of its increasing prevalence and association with comorbidities. Allopurinol and febuxostat are recommended as the first-line treatments for hyperuricemia and gout. But cardiovascular safety between febuxostat and allopurinol is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the cardiovascular safety of XOIs and placebo in hyperuricemic patients with or without gout. PubMed, Embase via OVID, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from their earliest records to February 8th 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov was also searched for unpublished data. The reference lists of included studies and relevant review articles investigating the cardiovascular safety of XOIs in hyperuricemia patients are screened for potentially eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating allopurinol (100~900 mg/d), febuxostat (20~120 mg/d), or placebo for hyperuricemia were included. The outcomes were incidence of MACE, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death. We conducted a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis on the included randomized controlled trials using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation method. The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assesses the certainty of the evidence. Ten RCTs with 18,004 participants were included. The network estimates showed that there was no significant difference observed among febuxostat, allopurinol, and placebo regarding outcomes. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate. The probabilities of rankings and SUCRA showed that compared to placebo, febuxostat, and allopurinol might prevent adverse cardiovascular events. Febuxostat is not associated with increasing risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared to allopurinol; and compared to placebo, whether febuxostat and allopurinol reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events remains uncertain.
PubMed: 34211992
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.698437 -
Scientific Reports Sep 2016The prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout has been increasing, but the comparative effectiveness and safety of different treatments remain uncertain. We aimed to compare... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout has been increasing, but the comparative effectiveness and safety of different treatments remain uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different treatments for hyperuricemia using network meta-analysis methodology. We systematically reviewed fifteen randomized controlled trials (involving 7,246 patients through January 2016) that compared the effects of different urate-lowering drugs (allopurinol, benzbromarone, febuxostat, pegloticase and probenecid) on hyperuricemia. Drug efficacy and safety, as outcomes, were measured by whether the target level of serum urate acid was achieved and whether any adverse events occurred, respectively. We derived pooled effect sizes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The efficacy and safety of the drugs were ranked by cumulative ranking probabilities. Our findings show that febuxostat, benzbromarone, probenecid, pegloticase, and allopurinol were all highly effective at reducing the risk of hyperuricemia compared to placebo. Febuxostat had the best efficacy and safety compared to the other drugs. Furthermore, febuxostat 120 mg QD was more effective at achieving urate-lowering targets (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12-0.24) and safer (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.56-0.91) than allopurinol.
Topics: Gout; Gout Suppressants; Humans; Hyperuricemia; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; Probability; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Uric Acid
PubMed: 27605442
DOI: 10.1038/srep33082 -
Kidney & Blood Pressure Research 2022Hyperuricemia is an independent risk factor for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) progression. Previous animal and cohort studies have reported that allopurinol... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hyperuricemia is an independent risk factor for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) progression. Previous animal and cohort studies have reported that allopurinol administration could be of therapeutic benefit in diabetic subjects. However, there has been controversy regarding the effects of allopurinol on DKD.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy of allopurinol on renal function in patients with DKD by meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
METHOD
PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2020. The primary outcome was a change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The secondary outcome was the change in albuminuria and serum uric acid (UA). Two reviewers independently assessed for risk of bias and extracted data. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated with random effects models and was reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) of the evidence was performed after meta-analysis. International prospective register of systematic reviews registration CRD42020219132.
RESULTS
From 642 potentially relevant citations, 3 studies were ultimately included. Our results showed evident reduction in serum UA after allopurinol intervention (WMD = -103.80, 95% CI -159.05, -48.55, I2 = 76%; p = 0.04), with a high GRADE of evidence. However, allopurinol did not significantly improve GFR (WMD = 1.07, 95% CI -1.68, 3.82, I2 = 33%; p = 0.45), with a moderate GRADE of evidence. There was no significant difference on improvement of albuminuria in patients of allopurinol and those in placebo groups (SMD = -0.26, 95% CI -1.03, 0.52, I2 = 94%; p = 0.52), with a moderate GRADE of evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
The present research showed that allopurinol did not significantly improve renal function and albuminuria in patients with DKD.
Topics: Albuminuria; Allopurinol; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Nephropathies; Female; Humans; Kidney; Male; Uric Acid
PubMed: 35130544
DOI: 10.1159/000522248 -
Cureus Oct 2022Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients with solid tumors is a rare and potentially fatal condition associated with anti-cancer treatment. Its outcome depends on... (Review)
Review
Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients with solid tumors is a rare and potentially fatal condition associated with anti-cancer treatment. Its outcome depends on awareness, identification of high-risk patients, and implementation of appropriate preventive measures. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines of case reports describing the occurrence of TLS in patients with solid tumors, primarily to identify potentially unrecognized or unusual clinical findings and outcomes. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and conference abstracts and performed manual searches for case reports and case series published in English and describing patients who developed TLS. A total of 124 studies (118 case reports and six case series) describing the findings for 132 patients were included. The most common cancers were hepatocellular carcinoma (17%, n = 22), lung cancer (13%, n = 17), and melanoma (10%, n = 13). The most common risk factor was metastatic disease (75%, n = 100). TLS was induced by chemotherapy in 48% (n = 64) of the patients. Clinical manifestations of TLS developed within three days of anti-cancer treatment in 37% of the patients (n = 49), while 52% (n = 68) received the full dose of anti-cancer treatment. Gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 33% of the patients (n = 44), hyperuricemia in 95% (n = 125), and elevated creatinine level occurred in 85% of the patients (n = 112), While 58% (n = 77) of the patients received intravenous fluids, only 49% received allopurinol, and 24% (n = 32) received rasburicase. A total of 101 patients (77%) were treated in the ward, and 54% (n = 71) died. The mortality rate associated with TLS in patients with solid tumors remains high. Adequate management requires awareness, early recognition, and identification of patients at high risk. Interdisciplinary team management is essential to reduce mortality.
PubMed: 36439565
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30652 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Apr 2018To compare the effects of the four most commonly used preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantations. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To compare the effects of the four most commonly used preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantations.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases up to January 31, 2017. The inclusion criteria were comparative, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for deceased donor liver (DDL) allografts with adult and pediatric donors using the gold standard University of Wisconsin (UW) solution or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK), Celsior (CS) and Institut Georges Lopez (IGL-1) solutions. Fifteen RCTs (1830 livers) were included; the primary outcomes were primary non-function (PNF) and one-year post-transplant graft survival (OGS-1).
RESULTS
All trials were homogenous with respect to donor and recipient characteristics. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of PNF with the use of UW, HTK, CS and IGL-1 (RR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.01-0.03, = 0.356). Comparing OGS-1 also failed to reveal any difference between UW, HTK, CS and IGL-1 (RR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.80-0.80, = 0.369). Two trials demonstrated higher PNF levels for UW in comparison with the HTK group, and individual studies described higher rates of biliary complications where HTK and CS were used compared to the UW and IGL-1 solutions. However, the meta-analysis of the data did not prove a statistically significant difference: the UW, CS, HTK and IGL-1 solutions were associated with nearly equivalent outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Alternative solutions for UW yield the same degree of safety and effectiveness for the preservation of DDLs, but further well-designed clinical trials are warranted.
Topics: Adenosine; Allopurinol; Disaccharides; Electrolytes; Glucose; Glutamates; Glutathione; Graft Survival; Histidine; Humans; Insulin; Liver Transplantation; Mannitol; Odds Ratio; Organ Preservation; Organ Preservation Solutions; Potassium Chloride; Primary Graft Dysfunction; Procaine; Raffinose; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29713134
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1812 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Apr 2024There is uncertainty about the optimal time to start urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in the setting of a gout flare. The aim was to perform a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
There is uncertainty about the optimal time to start urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in the setting of a gout flare. The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of ULT initiation during a gout flare.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA methodology. MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between database inception to 1 March 2023. RCTs published in English that examined ULT initiation during a gout flare in adults ≥18 years were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Data were extracted for the following outcomes: patient-rated pain score, duration of gout flare, recurrent gout flares, time to achieve target serum urate, adherence to ULT, patient satisfaction with treatment and adverse events. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager v5.4. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42023404680.
RESULTS
A total of 972 studies were identified and of these, six RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Three studies were assessed as having high risk of bias, one study as having some concerns, and two studies as having low risk of bias. In total, there were 445 pooled participants; 226 participants randomised to early initiation of ULT and 219 to placebo or delayed initiation of ULT. Allopurinol was used in three studies, febuxostat in two studies and probenecid in one study. Few participants (n = 62, 13.9 %) had tophaceous gout. Participants with renal impairment were excluded from most studies. There were no differences in patient-rated pain scores at baseline, days 3-4, days 7-8, day 10 or days 14-15 (p ≥ 0.42). Additionally, there was no significant difference in time to resolution of gout flare (standardised mean difference 0.77 days; 95 % CI -0.26 to 1.79; p = 0.14) or the risk of recurrent gout flare in the subsequent 28 to 30 days (RR 1.06; 95 % CI 0.59 to 1.92; p = 0.84). Adverse events were similar between groups. The included studies did not report time to achieve target serum urate, long-term adherence to ULT, or patient satisfaction with treatment.
CONCLUSION
There appears to be no evidence for harm or for benefit to initiating ULT during a gout flare. These findings have limited applicability to patients with tophaceous gout, or those with renal impairment.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Uric Acid; Gout Suppressants; Gout; Allopurinol; Pain; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38215627
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152367