-
PloS One 2016Limited treatment options, long duration of treatment and associated toxicity adversely impact the physical and mental well-being of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Limited treatment options, long duration of treatment and associated toxicity adversely impact the physical and mental well-being of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients. Despite research advances in the microbiological and clinical aspects of MDR-TB, research on the psychosocial context of MDR-TB is limited and less understood.
METHODOLOGY
We searched the databases of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Google Scholar to retrieve all published articles. The final manuscripts included in the review were those with a primary focus on psychosocial issues of MDR-TB patients. These were assessed and the information was thematically extracted on the study objective, methodology used, key findings, and their implications. Intervention studies were evaluated using components of the methodological and quality rating scale. Due to the limited number of studies and the multiple methodologies employed in the observational studies, we summarized these studies using a narrative approach, rather than conducting a formal meta-analysis. We used 'thematic synthesis' method for extracting qualitative evidences and systematically organised to broader descriptive themes.
RESULTS
A total of 282 published articles were retrieved, of which 15 articles were chosen for full text review based on the inclusion criteria. Six were qualitative studies; one was a mixed methods study; and eight were quantitative studies. The included studies were divided into the following issues affecting MDR-TB patients: a) psychological issues b) social issues and economic issues c) psychosocial interventions. It was found that all studies have documented range of psychosocial and economic challenges experienced by MDR-TB patients. Depression, stigma, discrimination, side effects of the drugs causing psychological distress, and the financial constraints due to MDR-TB were some of the common issues reported in the studies. There were few intervention studies which addressed these psychosocial issues most of which were small pilot studies. There is dearth of large scale randomized psychosocial intervention studies that can be scaled up to strengthen management of MDR-TB patients which is crucial for the TB control programme.
CONCLUSION
This review has captured the psychosocial and economic issues challenging MDR patients. However there is urgent need for feasible, innovative psychosocial and economic intervention studies that help to equip MDR-TB patients cope with their illness, improve treatment adherence, treatment outcomes and the overall quality of life of MDR-TB patients.
Topics: Absenteeism; Adult; Alcoholism; Antitubercular Agents; Anxiety; Caregivers; Comorbidity; Cost of Illness; Depression; Emotions; Global Health; HIV Infections; Health Services Needs and Demand; Home Care Services; Humans; Interpersonal Relations; Psychological Distance; Psychology; Quality of Life; Social Isolation; Social Support; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Unemployment
PubMed: 26807933
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147397 -
The European Respiratory Journal Jan 2017Only 25% of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) cases are currently diagnosed. Line probe assays (LPAs) enable rapid drug-susceptibility testing for rifampicin... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Only 25% of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) cases are currently diagnosed. Line probe assays (LPAs) enable rapid drug-susceptibility testing for rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistance and Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection. Genotype MTBDRplusV1 was WHO-endorsed in 2008 but newer LPAs have since been developed.This systematic review evaluated three LPAs: Hain Genotype MTBDRplusV1, MTBDRplusV2 and Nipro NTM+MDRTB. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2. Bivariate random-effects meta-analyses were performed for direct and indirect testing. Results for RIF and INH resistance were compared to phenotypic and composite (incorporating sequencing) reference standards. M. tuberculosis detection results were compared to culture.74 unique studies were included. For RIF resistance (21 225 samples), pooled sensitivity and specificity (with 95% confidence intervals) were 96.7% (95.6-97.5%) and 98.8% (98.2-99.2%). For INH resistance (20 954 samples), pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90.2% (88.2-91.9%) and 99.2% (98.7-99.5%). Results were similar for direct and indirect testing and across LPAs. Using a composite reference standard, specificity increased marginally. For M. tuberculosis detection (3451 samples), pooled sensitivity was 94% (89.4-99.4%) for smear-positive specimens and 44% (20.2-71.7%) for smear-negative specimens.In patients with pulmonary TB, LPAs have high sensitivity and specificity for RIF resistance and high specificity and good sensitivity for INH resistance. This meta-analysis provides evidence for policy and practice.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; DNA Probes; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Humans; Isoniazid; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques; Rifampin; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sputum; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 28100546
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01075-2016 -
PloS One 2023To date, isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is becoming an emerging global public health problem. It is associated with poor treatment outcome. Different studies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To date, isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is becoming an emerging global public health problem. It is associated with poor treatment outcome. Different studies have assessed the treatment outcome of isoniazid mono-resistant TB cases, however, the findings are inconsistent and there is limited global comprehensive report. Thus, this study aimed to assess the poor treatment outcome and its associated risk factors among patients with isoniazid mono-resistant TB.
METHODS
Studies that reported the treatment outcomes and associated factors among isoniazid mono-resistant TB were searched from electronic databases and other sources. We used Joana Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool to assess the study's quality. We assessed publication bias through visual inspection of the funnel plot and confirmed by Egger's regression test. We used STATA version 17 for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Among 347 studies identified from the whole search, data were extracted from 25 studies reported from 47 countries. The pooled successful and poor treatment outcomes were 78% (95%CI; 74%-83%) and 22% (95%CI; 17%-26%), respectively. Specifically, complete, cure, treatment failure, mortality, loss to follow-up and relapse rates were 34%(95%CI; 17%-52%), 62% (95%CI; 50%-73%), 5% (95%CI; 3%-7%), 6% (95%CI; 4%-8%), 12% (95%CI; 8%-17%), and 1.7% (95%CI; 0.4%-3.1%), respectively. Higher prevalence of pooled poor treatment outcome was found in the South East Asian Region (estimate; 40%, 95%C; 34%-45%), and African Region (estimate; 33%, 95%CI; 24%-42%). Previous TB treatment (OR; 1.74, 95%CI; 1.15-2.33), having cancer (OR; 3.53, 95%CI; 1.43-5.62), and being initially smear positive (OR; 1.26, 95%CI; 1.08-1.43) were associated with poor treatment outcome. While those patients who took rifampicin in the continuation phase (OR; 0.22, 95%CI; 0.04-0.41), had extrapulmonary TB (OR; 0.70, 95%CI; 0.55-0.85), and took second-line injectable drugs (OR; 0.54, 95%CI; 0.33-0.75) had reduced risk of poor treatment outcome.
CONCLUSION
Isoniazid mono-resistant TB patients had high poor treatment outcome. Thus, determination of isoniazid resistance pattern for all bacteriologically confirmed TB cases is critical for successful treatment outcome. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022372367.
Topics: Humans; Isoniazid; Antitubercular Agents; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37467275
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286194 -
PloS One 2018Knowledge of tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes is substantially needed to assess the performance of national TB controls programs (NTPs). To date, the overall... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Knowledge of tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes is substantially needed to assess the performance of national TB controls programs (NTPs). To date, the overall estimates of treatment outcomes have not been determined in Ethiopia. Therefore, this meta-analysis was undertaken to produce pooled estimates of TB treatment outcomes and to analyze the impact of prior anti-TB drug exposure and HIV co-infection.
METHODS
Potentially relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE online databases. The unpublished studies have been retrieved from the grey literature through Google and Google Scholar. The pooled estimates were calculated using random effect model. The summary estimates were also presented using Forest plots and Tables. The outcome measures were successful and unsuccessful treatment outcomes. Patients who were cured or with completed treatment defined as successful treatment outcome and patients meeting the definition of death, defaulting and failure are considered as unsuccessfully treated cases.
RESULTS
A total of 34 studies are included for meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of successful TB treatment outcomes amounts to 83.7% (95% CI 81.1%-86.3%). Of successfully treated cases, 33.9% were cured and the remaining completed cases. Besides, among patients with unsuccessful treatment outcome, nearly 50% were dead and the rest were treatment failures and defaulters. Sub-group analysis shows that high treatment success rate was estimated in Afar; 88.9% (95% CI 83.8%-94.2%), followed by Oromia; 88.5% (95% CI 82.6%-94.5%) and Gambella; 86.1% (95% CI 84.4%-87.9%), whereas relatively poor treatment outcome was noted in Tigray; 20.0% (95% CI 2.1%-37.9%) and Amhara; 19.0% (95% CI 12.6%-25.5%). The unsuccessful TB treatment outcome was found to be higher among HIV/TB co-infected cases with an odds ratio of 1.98 (95%CI, 1.56-2.52) and re-treated cases with an odds ratio of 2.17 (95%CI, 1.55-3.03). The time trend was assessed from 2003 to 2016, but it shows insignificant variation with treatment outcome (P = 0.108).
CONCLUSION
The rate of successful treatment outcome in Ethiopia appears generally high, only slightly below the threshold suggested by the World Health Organization. History of tuberculosis treatment and HIV/TB co-infection were inversely associated with favorable treatment outcomes.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Coinfection; Ethiopia; HIV Infections; Humans; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 29554144
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194675 -
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and... Jun 2016Treatment options for drug-resistant tuberculosis are still limited. Linezolid has been recommended for treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy and safety profile of linezolid in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Treatment options for drug-resistant tuberculosis are still limited. Linezolid has been recommended for treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively-drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis, although uncertainties remain regarding its safety and tolerability in these circumstances.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the existing evidence regarding the efficacy and tolerability of linezolid in the treatment of MDR or XDR tuberculosis.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE followed by direct search of abstracts in the International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease to retrieve primary studies published between January 2000 and January 2016 assessing linezolid efficacy and safety in the treatment of drug-resistant TB. We evaluated the occurrence of outcomes including culture conversion, treatment success and incidence of adverse events such as myelosuppression and neuropathy.
RESULTS
Twenty-three (23) studies conducted in fourteen (14) countries and involving 507 patients were retrieved. Only 1 randomized controlled trial was identified and none of the identified studies involved participants from Africa. The pooled proportion for treatment success was 77.36 % (95 % CI = 71.38-82.83 %, I(2) = 37.6 %) with culture conversion rate determined as 88.45 % (95 % CI = 83.82-92.38 %, I(2) = 45.4 %). There was no strong evidence for both culture conversion (p = 0.0948) and treatment success (p = 0.0695) between linezolid daily doses ≤ 600 and > 600 mg. Only myelosuppression showed a strong statistical significance (p < 0.0001) between dose comparisons. The incidence of neuropathy and other adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation of linezolid also showed no significance upon dose comparisons (p = 0.3213, p = 0.9050 respectively).
CONCLUSION
Available evidence presents Linezolid as a viable option in the treatment of MDR/XDR TB although patients ought to be monitored closely for the incidence of major adverse events such as myelosuppression and neuropathy. Additionally, highly powered randomized controlled trials including participants from endemic regions are urgently needed to better inform the magnitude and significance of Linezolid treatment effect in MDR and XDR TB patients.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis; Humans; Linezolid; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Myeloid Cells; Polyneuropathies; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 27334498
DOI: 10.1186/s12941-016-0156-y -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jul 2023Limited data are available on the utilization of sodium thiosulfate (STS) treatment for calciphylaxis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, while it is well-studied in... (Review)
Review
Limited data are available on the utilization of sodium thiosulfate (STS) treatment for calciphylaxis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, while it is well-studied in hemodialysis (HD) patients. A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EBM Reviews-Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify reported cases of PD patients with calciphylaxis who received STS. The search covered the inception of the databases through August 2022. Across 19 articles, this review identified 30 PD patients with calciphylaxis who received STS. These included 15 case reports, 2 case series, and 2 cohort studies. The administration routes and doses varied depending on the study. For intravenous (IV) administration ( = 18), STS doses ranged from 3.2 g twice daily to 25 g three times weekly for 5 weeks to 8 months. Outcomes included 44% of patients experiencing successful wound healing, 6% discontinuing STS due to adverse effects, 67% transitioning to HD, and 50% dying from calciphylaxis complications. For intraperitoneal (IP) administration ( = 5), STS doses ranged from 12.5 to 25 g three to four times weekly for 12 h to 3 months. Results showed 80% of patients achieving successful wound healing, 80% discontinuing STS due to adverse effects, 40% transitioning to HD, and 20% dying from IP STS-related chemical peritonitis. In cases where patients switched from IV to IP STS ( = 3), doses ranged from 12.5 to 25 g two to three times weekly for 2.5 to 5 months. Among them, 67% experienced successful wound healing, while 33% died from sepsis. Two cases utilized oral STS at a dose of 1500 mg twice daily for 6 and 11 months, resulting in successful wound healing without adverse effects or need for HD. However, one patient (50%) died due to small bowel obstruction. This systematic review provides an overview of STS treatment for PD patients with calciphylaxis. Although successful treatment cases exist, adverse effects were significant. Further research, including larger clinical studies and pharmacokinetic data, is necessary to establish the optimal route, dose, and efficacy of STS in PD patients.
Topics: Humans; Calciphylaxis; Peritoneal Dialysis; Renal Dialysis
PubMed: 37512116
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071306 -
PloS One 2017Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) undermines control efforts and its burden is poorly understood in resource-limited settings. We performed a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) undermines control efforts and its burden is poorly understood in resource-limited settings. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide an up-to-date summary of the extent of drug-resistant TB in Nigeria.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, HINARI, AJOL, the Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for reports published before January 31 2017, that included any resistance, mono-resistance or multidrug resistance to anti-TB drugs in Nigeria. Summary estimates were calculated using random effects models.
RESULTS
We identified 34 anti-TB drug resistance surveys with 8002 adult TB patients consisting of 2982 new and 5020 previously-treated cases. The prevalence rate of any drug resistance among new TB cases was 32.0% (95% CI 24.0-40.0%; 734/2892) and among previously-treated cases, the rate was 53.0% (95% CI 35.0-71.0%; 1467/5020). Furthermore, multidrug resistance among new and previously-treated cases was 6.0% (95% CI 4.0-8.0%;161/2502)and 32.0% (95%CI 20.0-44.0; 357/949), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies (p<0.001, I2 tests). The prevalence of drug-resistant TB varied according to methods of drug susceptibility testing and geographic region of Nigeria.
CONCLUSION
The burden of drug-resistant TB in Nigeria is high. We recommend that a national anti-TB drug resistance survey be carried out, and strategies for case detection and programmatic management of drug-resistant TB in Nigeria need to be strengthened.
Topics: Adult; Antitubercular Agents; Humans; Nigeria; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
PubMed: 28704459
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180996 -
Journal of the Chinese Medical... Jul 2016Antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury (ATDILI) is a major safety concern for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). The impact of chronic hepatitis B infection (CHBI)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury (ATDILI) is a major safety concern for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). The impact of chronic hepatitis B infection (CHBI) on the risk of ATDILI is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to assess systematically the influence of CHBI on the susceptibility to ATDILI.
METHODS
We reviewed all English-language medical literature with the medical subject search headings hepatitis B and antitubercular agents from the major medical databases. Thereafter, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on those publications that qualified.
RESULTS
A total of 938 citations were retrieved on the initial major database search, from which 15 studies were determined to be eligible for analysis. While undergoing anti-TB treatment, 575 cases with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and 4128 controls without DILI were enrolled into this analysis. The pooled odds ratio of all studies for the CHBI to ATDILI was 2.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.41-3.37). Among the studies with a strict definition of DILI (alanine aminotransferase > 5 × upper limit of normal value) and combination anti-TB regimen, the impact of CHBI on ATDILI was significant only in the prospective studies (odds ratio, 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-6.59), but not in the case-control studies. However, in the studies with a strict definition of DILI and isoniazid only treatment, the association between CHBI and ATDILI was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis suggests that CHBI may increase the risk of ATDILI in the standard combination therapy for active TB. Close follow-up and regular liver test monitoring are mandatory to treat TB in chronic hepatitis B carriers.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Risk
PubMed: 27032895
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.12.006 -
PharmacoEconomics Sep 2015Novel tuberculosis (TB) drugs and the need to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) are likely to bring about substantial transformations in TB treatment in coming... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Novel tuberculosis (TB) drugs and the need to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) are likely to bring about substantial transformations in TB treatment in coming years. An evidence base for cost and cost-effectiveness analyses of these developments is needed.
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to perform a review of papers assessing provider-incurred as well as patient-incurred costs of treating both drug-susceptible (DS) and multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB.
METHODS
Five databases (EMBASE, Medline, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Services Literature) were searched for cost and economic evaluation full-text papers containing primary DS-TB and MDR-TB treatment cost data published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1990 and February 2015. No language restrictions were set. The search terms were a combination of 'tuberculosis', 'multidrug-resistant tuberculosis', 'cost', and 'treatment'. In the selected papers, study methods and characteristics, quality indicators and costs were extracted into summary tables according to pre-defined criteria. Results were analysed according to country income groups and for provider costs, patient costs and productivity losses. All values were converted to $US, year 2014 values, so that studies could be compared.
RESULTS
We selected 71 treatment cost papers on DS-TB only, ten papers on MDR-TB only and nine papers that included both DS-TB and MDR-TB. These papers provided evidence on the costs of treating DS-TB and MDR-TB in 50 and 16 countries, respectively. In 31 % of the papers, only provider costs were included; 26 % included only patient-incurred costs, and the remaining 43 % estimated costs incurred by both. From the provider perspective, mean DS-TB treatment costs per patient were US$14,659 in high-income countries (HICs), US$840 in upper middle-income countries (UMICs), US$273 in lower middle-income (LMICs), and US$258 in low-income countries (LICs), showing a strong positive correlation. The respective costs for treating MDR-TB were US$83,365, US$5284, US$6313 and US$1218. Costs incurred by patients when seeking treatment for DS-TB accounted for an additional 3 % of the provider costs in HICs. A greater burden was seen in the other income groups, increasing the costs of DS-TB treatment by 72 % in UMICs, 60 % in LICs and 31 % in LMICs. When provider costs, patient costs and productivity losses were combined, productivity losses accounted for 16 % in HICs, 29 % in UMICs, 40 % in LMICs and 38 % in LICs.
CONCLUSION
Cost data for MDR-TB treatment are limited, and the variation in delivery mechanisms, as well as the rapidly evolving diagnosis and treatment regimens, means that it is essential to increase the number of studies assessing the cost from both provider and patient perspectives. There is substantial evidence available on the costs of DS-TB treatment from all regions of the world. The patient-incurred costs illustrate that the financial burden of illness is relatively greater for patients in poorer countries without universal healthcare coverage.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Health Services; Humans; National Health Programs; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
PubMed: 25939501
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0279-6 -
Microbes and Infection 2023The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effect of clofazimine on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effect of clofazimine on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE databases to identify eligible studies published up to July 10, 2021. The search terms were as follows: "clofazimine," "tuberculosis," "multidrug resistant tuberculosis" or "extensively drug resistant tuberculosis" and their synonyms or similar words. Two researchers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata version 16.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas, USA). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the treatment outcome.
RESULTS
Eight studies including 3219 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found that the rates of treatment completion was higher in patients receiving clofazimine-containing regimens than in those not receiving clofazimine-containing regimens (RR: 1.185 (1.060-1.325), P = 0.003). Significant reduction in treatment failure (RR: 0.598 (0.473-0.756), P < 0.001) was found in the clofazimine treatment group. The subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found a higher rates of favorable outcomes, treatment completion and cure in the clofazimine group than in the control group (RR: 1.203 (1.029-1.407), P = 0.020; RR: 3.167 (2.043-4.908), P < 0.001; and RR: 1.251 (1.031-1.518), P = 0.023, respectively). Patients receiving clofazimine had a lower risk of treatment failure than those not receiving clofazimine (RR: 0.529 (0.454-0.616), P < 0.001). However, clofazimine treatment did not have a statistically significant effect on all-cause mortality in RCTs.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated that compared with patients who do not receive clofazimine, this drug has the potential to achieve a higher favorable outcome, treatment completion and cure rates, and a lower treatment failure risk among drug-resistant tuberculosis cases.
Topics: Humans; Antitubercular Agents; Clofazimine; Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
PubMed: 35792202
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2022.105020