-
World Neurosurgery Jun 2022Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Therefore, therapies targeting reversal of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas have been suggested. However, the utility of epigenetic treatments in gliomas remains unclear. Here, we present the first clinical systematic review of epigenetic therapies in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas and highlight their safety and efficacy.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from 2000 to January 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened to include clinical usage of epigenetic therapies in case reports, prospective case series, or clinical trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability of epigenetic therapies and progression-free survival/overall survival, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 133 patients across 8 clinical studies were included in our analysis. IDH inhibitors appear to have the best safety profile, with an overall grade 3/grade 4 adverse event rate of 9%. Response rates to IDH-mutant inhibitors were highest in nonenhancing gliomas (stable disease achieved in 55% of patients). In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors demonstrate a lower safety profile with single-study adverse events as high as 28%.
CONCLUSION
IDH inhibitors appear promising given their benign toxicity profile and ease of monitoring. Histone deacetylase inhibitors appear to have a narrow therapeutic index, as lower concentrations do not appear effective, while increased doses can produce severe immunosuppressive effects. Preliminary data suggest that epigenetic therapies are generally well tolerated and may control disease in certain patient groups, such as those with nonenhancing lesions.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Epigenesis, Genetic; Glioma; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase; Mutation
PubMed: 35314408
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.051 -
Gaceta Medica de Mexico 2016Biomarkers are a subcategory of clinical signs that can be measured and reproduced with precision and influence to predict outcome. Tissue, cells, and fluid conform the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Biomarkers are a subcategory of clinical signs that can be measured and reproduced with precision and influence to predict outcome. Tissue, cells, and fluid conform the biological process. Biomarker usefulness is to determine and specify illness predisposition counting with variability and validity. Process systematization can reduce operative costs. To date, four major biomarkers have been described for high-grade gliomas: 1p/19q deletion, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter mutation, IDH1/IDH2 mutation, and microRNA. In this manuscript we present a systematic review according to the MOOSE protocol to establish the bases to describe the utility of biomarkers in high-grade tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA and MOOSE guides of all the published data from January 2004 to November 2014 with the key words: "biological markers" and "glioblastoma" that included OR and 95% CI. One researcher performed data extraction and analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 169 articles were found in three major medical search engines: PubMed (42), Embase (30) and Ovid (96).
CONCLUSION
Biomarkers are tools designed for early detection of specific illnesses such as high-grade glioma. Lack of methodological standardization slows down the speed of progress.
Topics: Genetic Markers; Glioma; Humans; Neoplasm Grading
PubMed: 26927648
DOI: No ID Found -
Nutrients Feb 2022People consume nitrates, nitrites, nitrosamines, and NOCs compounds primarily through processed food. Many studies have yielded inconclusive results regarding the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
People consume nitrates, nitrites, nitrosamines, and NOCs compounds primarily through processed food. Many studies have yielded inconclusive results regarding the association between cancer and dietary intakes of nitrates and nitrites. This study aimed to quantify these associations across the reported literature thus far.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A literature search was performed using Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane library, and google scholar up to January 2020. STATA version 12.0 was used to conduct meta-regression and a two-stage meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 41 articles with 13 different cancer sites were used for analysis. Of these 13 cancer types/sites, meta-regression analysis showed that bladder and stomach cancer risk was greater, and that pancreatic cancer risk was lower with increasing nitrite intakes. Kidney and bladder cancer risk were both lower with increasing nitrate intakes. When comparing highest to lowest (reference) categories of intake, meta-analysis of studies showed that high nitrate intake was associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.77). When pooling all intake categories and comparing against the lowest (reference) category, higher nitrite intake was associated with an increased risk of glioma (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.22). No other associations between cancer risk and dietary intakes of nitrates or nitrites were observed.
CONCLUSION
This study showed varied associations between site-specific cancer risks and dietary intakes of nitrate and nitrite. Glioma, bladder, and stomach cancer risks were higher and pancreatic cancer risk was lower with higher nitrite intakes, and thyroid cancer risk was higher and kidney cancer risk lower with higher nitrate intakes. These data suggest type- and site-specific effects of cancer risk, including protective effects, from dietary intakes of nitrate and nitrite.
Topics: Diet; Glioma; Humans; Nitrates; Nitrites; Risk
PubMed: 35277025
DOI: 10.3390/nu14030666 -
Scientific Reports Aug 2022High-grade gliomas remain the most common primary brain tumour with limited treatments options and early recurrence rates following adjuvant treatments. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
High-grade gliomas remain the most common primary brain tumour with limited treatments options and early recurrence rates following adjuvant treatments. However, differentiating true tumour progression (TTP) from treatment-related effects or pseudoprogression (PsP), may critically influence subsequent management options. Structural MRI is routinely employed to evaluate treatment responses, but misdiagnosis of TTP or PsP may lead to continuation of ineffective or premature cessation of effective treatments, respectively. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses method. Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched for methods applied to differentiate PsP and TTP, and studies were selected using pre-specified eligibility criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of included studies were summarised. Three of the identified methods were compared in a separate subgroup meta-analysis. Thirty studies assessing seven distinct neuroimaging methods in 1372 patients were included in the systematic review. The highest performing methods in the subgroup analysis were DWI (AUC = 0.93 [0.91-0.95]) and DSC-MRI (AUC = 0.93 [0.90-0.95]), compared to DCE-MRI (AUC = 0.90 [0.87-0.93]). 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET (18F-FET PET) and amide proton transfer-weighted MRI (APTw-MRI) also showed high diagnostic accuracy, but results were based on few low-powered studies. Both DWI and DSC-MRI performed with high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating PsP from TTP. Considering the technical parameters and feasibility of each identified method, the authors suggested that, at present, DSC-MRI technique holds the most clinical potential.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35918373
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16726-x -
International Journal of Public Health 2023To study the prevalence and the association of HPV infection in retinoblastoma and to determine the most common genotype presented in RB. Following the PRIMSA... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To study the prevalence and the association of HPV infection in retinoblastoma and to determine the most common genotype presented in RB. Following the PRIMSA guideline, 14 studies reporting HPV infection in RB acquired from six databases were included. The prevalence of HPV from 941 RB samples was 15.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.3-30]. Mexico followed by India and Brazil had the highest HPV prevalence in RB samples, 61.7% (95% CI: 17-93), 22.5% (95% CI: 9-47), and 12.1% (95% CI: 2-52), in order. HPV 16 was the most common genotype presented in RB samples 23% (95% CI: 9-47), followed by HPV 18 10% (95% CI: 3-30) and the combined HPV 16-18 6% (95% CI: 0-50). We did not find a significant association between HPV and RB [odds ratio (OR): 12.2; 95% CI: 0.65-232; = 0.09]. However, after removing the largest-weighted study, a significant association between HPV and RB was observed (OR: 45.9; 95% CI; 8.6-245; < 0.001). HPV prevalence in RB samples was 15% and HPV 16 was the most presented genotype in RB samples. There may be an association between HPV and RB that is needed to be confirmed by high quality future studies. Preventive and treatment measures against HPV infection are essential for the prevention of any possible consequences, in particular, RB.
Topics: Humans; Retinoblastoma; Papillomavirus Infections; Human Papillomavirus Viruses; Cross-Sectional Studies; Human papillomavirus 16; Prevalence; Retinal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37497122
DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605284 -
International Journal of Molecular... Apr 2022The invasive capabilities of glioblastoma (GBM) define the cancer's aggressiveness, treatment resistance, and overall mortality. The tumor microenvironment influences... (Review)
Review
The invasive capabilities of glioblastoma (GBM) define the cancer's aggressiveness, treatment resistance, and overall mortality. The tumor microenvironment influences the molecular behavior of cells, both epigenetically and genetically. Current forces being studied include properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM), such as stiffness and "sensing" capabilities. There is currently limited data on the physical forces in GBM-both relating to how they influence their environment and how their environment influences them. This review outlines the advances that have been made in the field. It is our hope that further investigation of the physical forces involved in GBM will highlight new therapeutic options and increase patient survival. A search of the PubMed database was conducted through to 23 March 2022 with the following search terms: (glioblastoma) AND (physical forces OR pressure OR shear forces OR compression OR tension OR torsion) AND (migration OR invasion). Our review yielded 11 external/applied/mechanical forces and 2 tumor microenvironment (TME) forces that affect the ability of GBM to locally migrate and invade. Both external forces and forces within the tumor microenvironment have been implicated in GBM migration, invasion, and treatment resistance. We endorse further research in this area to target the physical forces affecting the migration and invasion of GBM.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Extracellular Matrix; Glioblastoma; Humans; Mechanical Phenomena; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 35409420
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23074055 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Malignant glioma is the most common intracranial malignant tumor with the highest mortality. In the era of immunotherapy, it is important to determine what type of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Malignant glioma is the most common intracranial malignant tumor with the highest mortality. In the era of immunotherapy, it is important to determine what type of immunotherapy provides the best chance of survival.
METHOD
Here, the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in high-grade glioma (HGG) were evaluated by systematic review and meta-analysis. The differences between various types of immunotherapy were explored. Retrieved hits were screened for inclusion in 2,317 articles. We extracted the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratios (HRs) as two key outcomes for examining the efficacy of immunotherapy. We also analyzed data on the reported corresponding adverse events to assess the safety of immunotherapy. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019112356).
RESULTS
We included a total of 1,271 patients, of which 524 received a combination of immunotherapy and standard of care (SOC), while 747 received SOC alone. We found that immunotherapy extended the OS (HR = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.99; = -2.00, = 0.0458 < 0.05) and PFS (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99; = -1.99, = 0.0466 < 0.05), although certain adverse events occurred (proportion = 0.0773, 95% CI, 0.0589-0.1014). Our data have demonstrated the efficacy of the dendritic cell (DC) vaccine in prolonging the OS (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.68; Z = -3.23; = 0.0012 < 0.05) of glioma patients. Oncolytic viral therapy (VT) only extended patient survival in a subgroup analysis (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.80; = -3.53; = 0.0004 < 0.05). By contrast, immunopotentiation (IP) did not prolong OS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.96; = -2.23; = 0.0256).
CONCLUSION
Thus, DC vaccination significantly prolonged the OS of HGG patients, however, the efficacy of VT and IP should be explored in further studies. All the therapeutic schemes evaluated were associated with certain side effects.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=112356.
Topics: Humans; Standard of Care; Glioma; Brain Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 37483593
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.966696 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Aug 2022High-grade gliomas cause cognitive impairment in those who suffer from them. However, there is a lack of precise data describing the cognitive deficit that occurs in... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
High-grade gliomas cause cognitive impairment in those who suffer from them. However, there is a lack of precise data describing the cognitive deficit that occurs in this population, which would allow to better focus neuropsychological evaluations and make better clinical decisions in favor of the patient's recovery and quality of life. For this purpose, a systematic review of the literature was carried out to search for studies on neurocognitive alterations in patients with malignant brain tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The systematic review was conducted under the criteria of the PRISMA guideline for reporting systematic review and meta-analysis reports, with a search of the PubMed database (MEDLINE). Descriptive and analytical observational studies between 2015 and 2020 were considered.
RESULTS
506 articles were identified, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria and were selected in the qualitative synthesis and described in the manuscript.
CONCLUSIONS
High-grade gliomas cause significant alterations in cognitive domains such as language, attention, memory, empathy and executive functions. However, more studies focused on describing the neuropsychological alterations in this population are needed in order to make better clinical treatment and rehabilitation decisions.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Glioma; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35662053
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107296 -
International Journal of Molecular... Feb 2022Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant tumour of the central nervous system. Recent appreciation of the heterogeneity amongst these tumours not only changed... (Review)
Review
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant tumour of the central nervous system. Recent appreciation of the heterogeneity amongst these tumours not only changed the WHO classification approach, but also created the need for developing novel and personalised therapies. This systematic review aims to highlight recent advancements in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of the GBM and discuss related novel treatment targets. A systematic search of the literature in the PubMed library was performed following the PRISMA guidelines for molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic advances. Original and meta-analyses studies from the last ten years were reviewed using pre-determined search terms. The results included articles relevant to GBM development focusing on the aberrancy in cell signaling pathways and intracellular events. Theragnostic targets and vaccination to treat GBM were also explored. The molecular pathophysiology of GBM is complex. Our systematic review suggests targeting therapy at the stemness, p53 mediated pathways and immune modulation. Exciting novel immune therapy involving dendritic cell vaccines, B-cell vaccines and viral vectors may be the future of treating GBM.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Glioblastoma; Humans; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 35269752
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052607 -
Cancer May 2022H3G34-mutant diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG) is recognized as a new, distinct entity in the latest World Health Organization classification for central nervous system... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
H3G34-mutant diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG) is recognized as a new, distinct entity in the latest World Health Organization classification for central nervous system tumors and is associated with a particularly aggressive course. The authors performed a systematic review and pooled analysis to investigate the frequency of genetic events in these tumors and to determine whether these events were associated with survival trends.
METHODS
Two electronic databases were accessed to search for relevant data. Included criteria were studies that had individual patient data on H3.3 G34-mutant gliomas. To analyze the impact of genetic events on overall survival, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were used, and corresponding hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed.
RESULTS
In total, 20 studies with 257 H3G34-mutant DHGs were included for integrated analyses. The H3 glycine-to-valine (H3G34V) mutation showed a significantly worse prognosis than the glycine-to-arginine (H3G34R) mutation (median overall survival, 9.9 vs 14.8 months; hazard ratio, 3.040; 95% confidence interval, 1.208-7.651; P = .018), and this result remained statistically significant in the multivariate Cox regression model. Among H3G34 DHGs, TP53 mutation was the most common genetic alteration (94.9%), followed by ATRX alterations (87.5%), MGMT methylation (79.5%), and PDGFRA alterations (33.2%). The presence of PDGFRA amplification or EGFR amplification conferred poor survival. After adjusting for age and sex, these alterations were still independent indicators for adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The authors highlight the important role of molecular stratification of H3G34 DHGs, which may help refine our understanding of the natural history of this group of malignant tumors.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Genotype; Glioma; Glycine; Humans; Prognosis
PubMed: 35195909
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34156