-
Frontiers in Immunology 2021IKAROS and CTLA4 deficiencies are inborn errors of immunity and show similar clinical phenotypes, including hypogammaglobulinemia and autoimmune diseases (ADs). However,...
IKAROS and CTLA4 deficiencies are inborn errors of immunity and show similar clinical phenotypes, including hypogammaglobulinemia and autoimmune diseases (ADs). However, the differences in clinical features and pathogenesis of these are not fully understood. Therefore, we performed systematic literature reviews for IKAROS and CTLA4 deficiencies. The reviews suggested that patients with IKAROS deficiency develop AD earlier than hypogammaglobulinemia. However, no study assessed the detailed changes in clinical manifestations over time; this was likely due to the cross-sectional nature of the studies. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective longitudinal study on IKAROS and CTLA4 deficiencies in our cohort to evaluate the clinical course over time. In patients with IKAROS deficiency, AD and hypogammaglobulinemia often develop in that order, and AD often resolves before the onset of hypogammaglobulinemia; these observations were not found in patients with CTLA4 deficiency. Understanding this difference in the clinical course helps in the clinical management of both. Furthermore, our results suggest B- and T-cell-mediated ADs in patients with IKAROS and CTLA4 deficiencies, respectively.
Topics: Autoimmune Diseases; CTLA-4 Antigen; Humans; Ikaros Transcription Factor; Longitudinal Studies; Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35087518
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.784901 -
Clinical Oncology (Royal College of... Dec 2022Programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have had a major impact on the approach to care of patients with lung... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have had a major impact on the approach to care of patients with lung cancer. An important issue that is not known is whether they benefit men and women the same. We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine if clinical response and survival are influenced by gender.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A PubMed search was carried out to identify all randomised controlled trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with conventional chemotherapy in NSCLC. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) and whether there were differences in these outcomes between men and women.
RESULTS
In total, 12 studies with data for overall survival and 11 studies with data for PFS were included. Immunotherapy showed a statistically significant benefit over chemotherapy for overall survival (pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.65-0.81, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (pooled hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.54-0.72, P < 0.001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between men and women in terms of overall survival (males versus females: pooled hazard ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval = 0.66-0.83 versus pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.82, P = 0.709) or progression-free survival (males versus females: pooled hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.53-0.75 versus pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.58-0.88, P = 0.372).
CONCLUSION
This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effect of gender and response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in patients solely with NSCLC. We examined 9270 and 6193 patients in terms of overall survival and PFS, respectively. Although there are significant biological differences between men's and women's immune responses, we have shown that these drugs offer the same survival benefit in patients with NSCLC regardless of gender.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Lung Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; B7-H1 Antigen; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Sex Factors
PubMed: 35400597
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.03.010 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2024Recent evidence suggests that PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy improves outcomes in patients with brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Recent evidence suggests that PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy improves outcomes in patients with brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
METHODS
Records were searched electronically on MEDLINE, Embase and BIOSIS. Hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for overall survival and progression free survival, and treatment-related adverse events data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed in included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials.
RESULTS
PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy increased overall survival by 33% and progression free survival by 47% compared with chemotherapy. Two studies had a high risk of bias. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 95%, 89% and 65% of patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy,chemotherapy and single agent immunotherapy, respectively.
CONCLUSION
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in addition to chemotherapy increase overall and progression free survival when compared with chemotherapy alone. Chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy patients experienced the most treatment-related adverse events.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; B7-H1 Antigen; Immunotherapy; Brain
PubMed: 38331301
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104288 -
BMC Cancer Nov 2023Paclitaxel and carboplatin is the standard chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. However, the benefit of adding programmed cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
Paclitaxel and carboplatin is the standard chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. However, the benefit of adding programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to chemotherapy is still unclear.
METHOD
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models for all endpoints. Heterogeneity was assessed using I statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses.
RESULTS
A total of three studies and 1,431 patients were included. Compared with carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) rate (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.23-0.44; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) at 30 months (RR 3.13; 95% CI 1.26-7.78; p = 0.01) were significant in favor of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel group in the mismatch repair-deficient subgroup. However, there were no significant differences in the mismatch repair-proficient subgroup for PFS (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50-1.08; p = 0.117) or OS at 30 months (RR 2.24; 95% CI 0.79-6.39; p = 0.13).
CONCLUSION
Immunotherapy plus carboplatin-paclitaxel increased significantly PFS and OS among patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a significant benefit in the mismatch repair-deficient and high microsatellite instability population.
Topics: Female; Humans; Carboplatin; Paclitaxel; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Endometrial Neoplasms; B7-H1 Antigen; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 38031003
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11654-z -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022An influx of systematic reviews (SRs) of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment with or without... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
An influx of systematic reviews (SRs) of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment with or without meta-analysis and with different methodological quality and inconsistent results have been published, confusing clinical decision making. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate and summarize the current evidence of PD-(L)1 inhibitors in the treatment of cancer.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of SRs, which included meta-analyses of PD-(L)1 inhibitors on cancer, was performed on eight databases with a cutoff date of 1 January 2022. Two authors independently identified SRs, extracted data, assessed the report quality according to the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, evaluated the methodological quality by the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2), and appraised the quality of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS
A total of 172 SRs with meta-analysis met the inclusion criteria. The report quality of included SRs was quite good, with 128 (74.42%) SRs of high quality and 44 (25.58%) of moderate quality. The methodological quality was alarming, as only one (0.58%) SR had high quality, five (2.91%) SRs had low quality, and the other 166 (96.51%) SRs had critically low quality. For GRADE, 38 (3.77%) outcomes had high-quality evidence, 288 (28.57%) moderate, 545 (54.07%) low, and 137 (13.59%) critically low-quality evidence. Current evidence indicated that treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitors were significantly effective in non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with PD-L1 expression level≥1%, whereas the evidence in gastroesophageal and colorectal tumors is still controversial. Monotherapy with PD-(L)1 inhibitors was associated with a lower frequency of any grade and high-grade adverse events (AEs). The incidence of any grade and high-grade AEs caused by PD-(L)1 inhibitors in combination with other therapies was no lower than the controls. However, PD-(L)1 inhibitors were associated with a higher frequency of any grade and high-grade immune-related AEs.
CONCLUSIONS
PD-(L)1 inhibitors appeared to be effective and safe for cancer treatment, except for gastrointestinal tumors; however, the quality of the evidence is not convincing. Future studies should improve methodological quality and focus on the sequential trial analysis of subgroups and safety.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42020194260.
Topics: Apoptosis; B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 35911744
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.953761 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Accurate prediction of efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors is of critical importance. To address this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Accurate prediction of efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors is of critical importance. To address this issue, a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing existing common measurements for curative effect of PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was conducted.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library database, and relevant clinical trials to find out studies published before Feb 22, 2023 that use PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), tumor mutational burden (TMB), gene expression profiling (GEP), microsatellite instability (MSI), multiplex IHC/immunofluorescence (mIHC/IF), other immunohistochemistry and hematoxylin-eosin staining (other IHC&HE) and combined assays to determine objective response rates to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Study-level data were extracted from the published studies. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the predictive efficacy and rank these assays mainly by NMA, and the second objective was to compare them in subgroup analyses. Heterogeneity, quality assessment, and result validation were also conducted by meta-analysis.
FINDINGS
144 diagnostic index tests in 49 studies covering 5322 patients were eligible for inclusion. mIHC/IF exhibited highest sensitivity (0.76, 95% CI: 0.57-0.89), the second diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (5.09, 95% CI: 1.35-13.90), and the second superiority index (2.86). MSI had highest specificity (0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94), and DOR (6.79, 95% CI: 3.48-11.91), especially in gastrointestinal tumors. Subgroup analyses by tumor types found that mIHC/IF, and other IHC&HE demonstrated high predictive efficacy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while PD-L1 IHC and MSI were highly efficacious in predicting the effectiveness in gastrointestinal tumors. When PD-L1 IHC was combined with TMB, the sensitivity (0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.94) was noticeably improved revealed by meta-analysis in all studies.
INTERPRETATION
Considering statistical results of NMA and clinical applicability, mIHC/IF appeared to have superior performance in predicting response to anti PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Combined assays could further improve the predictive efficacy. Prospective clinical trials involving a wider range of tumor types are needed to establish a definitive gold standard in future.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; B7-H1 Antigen; Network Meta-Analysis; Prospective Studies; Biomarkers, Tumor; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37822932
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1265202 -
Immunotherapy Sep 2017Chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells targeting CD19 and CD20 have shown activity in Phase I, II trials of patients with hematological malignancies. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells targeting CD19 and CD20 have shown activity in Phase I, II trials of patients with hematological malignancies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published clinical trials studying the role of efficacy as well as safety of CD-19 and CD-20 chimeric antigen receptor-T therapy for B-cell hematologic malignancies. A total of 16 studies with 195 patients were identified. The pooled analysis showed an overall response rate of 61% (118/195) with complete response of 42% (81/195) and partial response of 19% (37/195). Major adverse events were cytokine release syndrome 33%, neurotoxicity 33% and B-cell aplasia 54%. Collectively, the results indicate encouraging response in relapsed/refractory B lymphoma and leukemia, especially in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients.
Topics: Animals; Antigens, CD19; Antigens, CD20; B-Lymphocytes; Cell Count; Genetic Therapy; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Antigen; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Remission Induction; T-Lymphocytes
PubMed: 28971751
DOI: 10.2217/imt-2017-0062 -
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... Jun 2016Dermatologic adverse events (AEs) are some of the most frequently observed toxicities of immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy, but they have received little attention.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Dermatologic adverse events (AEs) are some of the most frequently observed toxicities of immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy, but they have received little attention. The drugs, pembrolizumab and nivolumab are recently approved inhibitors of the programmed death (PD)-1 receptor that have overlapping AE profiles however, the incidence, relative risk (RR), and clinico-morphological pattern of the associated dermatologic AEs are not known.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature, and performed a meta-analysis of dermatologic AEs observed with the use of pembrolizumab and nivolumab in cancer patients. An electronic search was conducted using the PubMed, and Web of Science, and on the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meeting abstracts' libraries for potentially relevant oncology trials, that employed the drugs at Food and Drug Administration-approved doses and reported dermatologic AEs. The incidence, RR and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either random- or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies. The clinical presentation, histology of affected skin areas, and management strategies (based on institutional experience), are also presented.
RESULTS
Rash, pruritus and vitiligo were found to be the most frequently reported dermatologic AEs. The calculated incidence of all-grade rash with pembrolizumab and nivolumab was 16.7% (RR = 2.6) and 14.3% (RR = 2.5), respectively. Other significant all-grade AEs included pruritus (pembrolizumab: incidence, 20.2% [RR = 49.9]; nivolumab: incidence, 13.2% [RR = 34.5]) and vitiligo (pembrolizumab: incidence, 8.3% [RR = 17.5]; nivolumab: 7.5% [RR = 14.6]). Interestingly, all the vitiligo events were reported in trials investigating melanoma. The RR for developing dermatologic AEs in general, was 2.95 with pembrolizumab, and 2.3 with nivolumab.
CONCLUSION
We found that pembrolizumab and nivolumab are both associated with dermatologic AEs, primarily low-grade rash, pruritus, and vitiligo, which are reminiscent of those seen with ipilimumab. Knowledge of these findings is critical for optimal care, maintaining dose intensity, and health-related quality of life in cancer patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Eruptions; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Pruritus; Vitiligo; Young Adult
PubMed: 27043866
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.010 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Sep 2020In the highly dynamic field of advanced malignancies, biomarkers from liquid samples are urgently needed to improve treatment tailoring. However, the heterogenic data... (Review)
Review
In the highly dynamic field of advanced malignancies, biomarkers from liquid samples are urgently needed to improve treatment tailoring. However, the heterogenic data lack direct comparison of assays, vectors and relevant validations are rarely found. Therefore, we classified the available studies based on three categories: Measured vectors, applied technique and detected biomarker. High blood tumor mutational burden and low baseline levels of soluble programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) appear to predict treatment responses to immunotherapy. A high PD-1 CD4 T-cell count was associated with poor overall survival, PD-1CD8 T-cells connect to a favorable outcome. Circulating tumor cells expressing PD-L1 were mainly associated with poor overall survival and treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Measurement of immunological factors as liquid biomarkers is feasible and has shown promising results. The use of coherent nomenclatures, cross-platform assay comparisons and validations through appropriate powered clinical trials are urgently required to push this auspicious field.
Topics: B7-H1 Antigen; Biomarkers, Tumor; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
PubMed: 32645684
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102948 -
Medicine Nov 2015Several individual studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin (sCD14-ST) for sepsis, but the results are inconsistent.The present systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Several individual studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin (sCD14-ST) for sepsis, but the results are inconsistent.The present systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data to better ascertain the value of circulatory presepsin as a biomarker for sepsis.Studies published in English before November 7, 2014 and assessing the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis were retrieved from medical databases.The quality of eligible studies was assessed using a revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2). The overall diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis was pooled according to a bivariate model. Publication bias was assessed using Deek funnel plot asymmetry test.Eleven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The overall diagnostic sensitivity of presepsin for sepsis was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88), and specificity was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.83). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). The pretest probability of sepsis was 0.56 among all subjects. When presepsin was introduced as the diagnostic test for sepsis, the posttest probabilities were 0.81 for a positive result and 0.19 for a negative. The major design deficits of the included studies were lack of prespecified thresholds and patient selection bias. The publication bias was negative.Presepsin is an effective adjunct biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis, but is insufficient to detect or rule out sepsis when used alone.
Topics: Biomarkers; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Lipopolysaccharide Receptors; Peptide Fragments; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sepsis
PubMed: 26632748
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002158