-
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults, and immunotherapies and genetic therapies for GBM have evolved dramatically over the past decade,... (Review)
Review
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults, and immunotherapies and genetic therapies for GBM have evolved dramatically over the past decade, but GBM therapy is still facing a dilemma due to the high recurrence rate. The inflammatory microenvironment is a general signature of tumors that accelerates epigenetic changes in GBM and helps tumors avoid immunological surveillance. GBM tumor cells and glioma-associated microglia/macrophages are the primary contributors to the inflammatory condition, meanwhile the modification of epigenetic events including DNA methylation, non-coding RNAs, and histone methylation and deacetylases involved in this pathological process of GBM, finally result in exacerbating the proliferation, invasion, and migration of GBM. On the other hand, histone deacetylase inhibitors, DNA methyltransferases inhibitors, and RNA interference could reverse the inflammatory landscapes and inhibit GBM growth and invasion. Here, we systematically review the inflammatory-associated epigenetic changes and regulations in the microenvironment of GBM, aiming to provide a comprehensive epigenetic profile underlying the recognition of inflammation in GBM.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Epigenesis, Genetic; Glioblastoma; Humans; Inflammation; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 35572545
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.869307 -
Cells Apr 2022Glioblastoma and neuroblastoma are the most common central nervous system malignant tumors in adult and pediatric populations. Both are associated with poor survival.... (Review)
Review
Glioblastoma and neuroblastoma are the most common central nervous system malignant tumors in adult and pediatric populations. Both are associated with poor survival. These tumors are highly heterogeneous, having complex interactions among different cells within the tumor and with the tumor microenvironment. One of the main challenges in the neuro-oncology field is achieving optimal conditions to evaluate a tumor's molecular genotype and phenotype. In this respect, the zebrafish biological model is becoming an excellent alternative for studying carcinogenic processes and discovering new treatments. This review aimed to describe the results of xenotransplantation of patient-derived CNS tumors in zebrafish models. The reviewed studies show that it is possible to maintain glioblastoma and neuroblastoma primary cell cultures and transplant the cells into zebrafish embryos. The zebrafish is a suitable biological model for understanding tumor progression and the effects of different treatments. This model offers new perspectives in providing personalized care and improving outcomes for patients living with central nervous system tumors.
Topics: Animals; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Glioblastoma; Humans; Neuroblastoma; Tumor Microenvironment; Zebrafish
PubMed: 35406768
DOI: 10.3390/cells11071204 -
Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) Mar 2023Glioblastoma is the most common primary neoplasm of the central nervous system. Standard treatment includes surgery with maximum safe resection and radiotherapy plus...
BACKGROUND
Glioblastoma is the most common primary neoplasm of the central nervous system. Standard treatment includes surgery with maximum safe resection and radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy; however, almost invariably, tumor relapse occurs. We aimed to describe signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms present in tumor relapse of glioblastoma.
METHODS
This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. We included studies that enrolled patients 15 years or older with a diagnosis of glioblastoma according to Louis criteria and focused on signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms present in tumor relapse of glioblastoma. The outcome of interest was progression-free survival.
RESULTS
We identified 1470 articles; 31 met the inclusion criteria. From each publication, we obtained the associated markers O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, mRNA, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53, and others. All publications were evaluated with the Q-Genie checklist tool for quality assessment.
CONCLUSIONS
We identified a wide variety of signaling pathways and molecular processes that are involved in glioblastoma relapse. This diversity would explain intra- and intertumor heterogeneity, treatment evasion, and relapse. However, only a few molecular processes have robust evidence for clinical utility.
Topics: Humans; Glioblastoma; Brain Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Recurrence; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 36961958
DOI: 10.46883/2023.25920986 -
International Journal of Molecular... Mar 2024Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and malignant type of primary brain tumor in adults. Despite important advances in understanding the molecular... (Review)
Review
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and malignant type of primary brain tumor in adults. Despite important advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of this tumor in the past decade, the prognosis for GBM patients remains poor. GBM is characterized by aggressive biological behavior and high degrees of inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Increased understanding of the molecular and cellular heterogeneity of GBM may not only help more accurately define specific subgroups for precise diagnosis but also lay the groundwork for the successful implementation of targeted therapy. Herein, we systematically review the key achievements in the understanding of GBM molecular pathogenesis, mechanisms, and biomarkers in the past decade. We discuss the advances in the molecular pathology of GBM, including genetics, epigenetics, transcriptomics, and signaling pathways. We also review the molecular biomarkers that have potential clinical roles. Finally, new strategies, current challenges, and future directions for discovering new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for GBM will be discussed.
Topics: Humans; Glioblastoma; Pathology, Molecular; Brain Neoplasms; Biomarkers; Gene Expression Profiling; Biomarkers, Tumor
PubMed: 38474286
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25053040 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021Possible treatment strategies for recurrent malignant gliomas include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined treatments. Among different reirradiation...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Possible treatment strategies for recurrent malignant gliomas include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined treatments. Among different reirradiation modalities, the CyberKnife System has shown promising results. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis to establish the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from 2000 to 2021 for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of CyberKnife treatment for recurrent WHO grade III and grade IV gliomas of the brain. Two independent reviewers selected studies and abstracted data. Missing information was requested from the authors via email correspondence. The primary outcomes were median Overall Survival, median Time To Progression, and median Progression-Free Survival. We performed subgroup analyses regarding WHO grade and chemotherapy. Besides, we analyzed the relationship between median Time To Recurrence and median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment. The secondary outcomes were complications, local response, and recurrence. Data were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies reporting on 398 patients were included. Median Overall Survival from initial diagnosis and CyberKnife treatment was 22.6 months and 8.6 months. Median Time To Progression and median Progression-Free Survival from CyberKnife treatment were 6.7 months and 7.1 months. Median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment was 8.4 months for WHO grade IV gliomas, compared to 11 months for WHO grade III gliomas. Median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment was 4.4 months for patients who underwent CyberKnife treatment alone, compared to 9.5 months for patients who underwent CyberKnife treatment plus chemotherapy. We did not observe a correlation between median Time To Recurrence and median Overall Survival from CyberKnife. Rates of acute neurological and acute non-neurological side effects were 3.6% and 13%. Rates of corticosteroid dependency and radiation necrosis were 18.8% and 4.3%.
CONCLUSIONS
Reirradiation of recurrent malignant gliomas with the CyberKnife System provides encouraging survival rates. There is a better survival trend for WHO grade III gliomas and for patients who undergo combined treatment with CyberKnife plus chemotherapy. Rates of complications are low. Larger prospective studies are warranted to provide more accurate results.
PubMed: 33854978
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652646 -
Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt... 2022Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) makes 60-70% of gliomas and 15% of primary brain tumors. Despite the availability of standard multimodal therapy, 2 years, 3 years, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) makes 60-70% of gliomas and 15% of primary brain tumors. Despite the availability of standard multimodal therapy, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years survival rate of GBM are still low. Active immunotherapy is a relatively new treatment option for GBM that seems promising.
METHODS
An electronic database search on PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov was performed to include all relevant studies. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Reported parameters are OS, PFS, AEs, post treatment KPS, and 2 year mortality.
RESULTS
Active immunotherapy provided better OS (HR = .85; 95% CI = .71-1.01; = .06) and PFS (HS = .83; 95% CI= .66 - 1.03; = .11) side albeit not statistically significant. Active immunotherapy reduces the risk of 2 year mortality as much as 2.5% compared to control group (NNT and RRR was 56.7078 and 0,0258, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Active immunotherapy might be beneficial in terms of survival rate in patients with GBM although not statistically significant. It could be a treatment option for GBM in the future.
Topics: Humans; Glioblastoma; Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Combined Modality Therapy; Immunotherapy, Active; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 36748348
DOI: 10.1177/10732748221079474 -
Cancers Apr 2022Proline has attracted growing interest because of its diverse influence on tumor metabolism and the discovery of the regulatory mechanisms that appear to be involved. In... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Proline has attracted growing interest because of its diverse influence on tumor metabolism and the discovery of the regulatory mechanisms that appear to be involved. In contrast to general oncology, data on proline metabolism in central nervous system malignancies are limited.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a systematic literature review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases according to PRISMA guidelines, searching for articles concerning proline metabolism in malignant glial tumors. From 815 search results, we identified 14 studies pertaining to this topic.
RESULTS
The role of the proline cycle in maintaining redox balance in IDH-mutated gliomas has been convincingly demonstrated. Proline is involved in restoring levels of glutamate, the main glial excitatory neurotransmitter. Proline oxidase influences two major signaling pathways: p53 and NF- κB. In metabolomics studies, the metabolism of proline and its link to the urea cycle was found to be a prognostic factor for survival and a marker of malignancy. Data on the prolidase concentration in the serum of glioblastoma patients are contradictory.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite a paucity of studies in the literature, the available data are interesting enough to encourage further research, especially in terms of extrapolating what we have learned of proline functions from other neoplasms to malignant gliomas.
PubMed: 35454935
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14082030 -
European Review For Medical and... Nov 2021The phenomenon is that few randomized control trials (RCTs) directly compared the effects of bevacizumab with other types of standard treatments for recurrent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The phenomenon is that few randomized control trials (RCTs) directly compared the effects of bevacizumab with other types of standard treatments for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of bevacizumab in recurrent GBM patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) contrasting the bevacizumab with standard treatments up to May 2021. For the continuous outcomes of median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS), we summarized the mean difference (MD) as the effective index. We used relative risk (RR) to estimate the data with a random-effects model to get the outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), 12-month OS, 6-month PFS, and any mentioned adverse events.
RESULTS
A total of 807 patients in 5 RCTs included into our systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed bevacizumab could provide benefits of the ORR (RR, 2.67; 95% CI: 1.14-6.26, p = 0.02), median PFS (MD, 1.12 months; 95% CI: 0.35-1.90 months, p = 0.005), but not the median OS (MD, -0.19 months; 95% CI: -1.37-0.99 months, p = 0.75). Whereas the rates of the secondary outcomes of interest were similar between the bevacizumab group and control group, including 6 month-PFS (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.82-1.84, p = 0.32) and 12 month-OS (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79-1.09, p = 0.36). As for adverse events, patients with bevacizumab showed higher rates of grade 3/4 and any grade hypertension compared with those with standard treatments (RR, 3.71; 95% CI: 1.17-11.76, p = 0.03; RR, 2.68; 95% CI: 1.26-5.76, p = 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides clear proof of the beneficial effects of bevacizumab treatment in recurrent GBM patients. The only observed adverse event was grade 3/4 or any grade hypertension.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Brain Neoplasms; Glioblastoma; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34787852
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202111_27092 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2022Hemorrhage into optic pathway-hypothalamic glioma (OPHG) is rare. Variable clinical presentations and outcomes are associated with such pathology. We aim to present two... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hemorrhage into optic pathway-hypothalamic glioma (OPHG) is rare. Variable clinical presentations and outcomes are associated with such pathology. We aim to present two infants presented with OPHG and a systematic review of the literature.
METHODS
We describe two cases of infants presenting with sudden decreased vision, poor feeding, and irritability due to OPHG. Both patients underwent urgent craniotomy and subtotal resection followed by chemotherapy. We systematically reviewed the literature using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. In addition, we included all English published reports for all ages discussing the optic pathway (optic nerve and optic chiasm) or hypothalamic glioma associated with hemorrhage from the year of the first reported case (1970) to January 2022.
RESULTS
Of 17,949, 44 articles met the inclusion criteria of this review. A total of 56 cases were described with a mean of 21.35 years (0.5-70), with the male gender 52% and the female gender 45%. The hemorrhage location was sellar/suprasellar in 43% cases. Histopathology of included cases was pilocytic astrocytoma in 41%, followed by pilomyxoid astrocytoma in 16% cases. The outcome was unfavorable; 37.5% cases showed improvement, whereas 18% cases resulted in death.
CONCLUSION
Apoplexy of the OPHG can be fatal and associated with poor outcomes. A systematic review of the literature has shown that younger age, pilocytic or pilomexyoid astrocytoma histopathology, and chiasmal/hypothalamic locations are associated with a higher risk of intertumoral hemorrhage and poor prognosis. Further genetic studies for OPHG may provide information for high-risk patients.
PubMed: 35733436
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.891556 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jun 2024Pilocytic astrocytoma (PCA) are commonly observed as slow-growing noncancerous brain tumors in pediatric populations, but they can also occur in adults, albeit rarely.... (Review)
Review
Pilocytic astrocytoma (PCA) are commonly observed as slow-growing noncancerous brain tumors in pediatric populations, but they can also occur in adults, albeit rarely. When located in diencephalic regions, particularly in the hypothalamus, they present unique diagnostic and management challenges due to their rarity and overlapping clinical and radiological features with other intracranial pathologies. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of hypothalamic PCA in adults, focusing on their differential diagnosis, neurological presentation, diagnostic modalities, treatment strategies. A case illustration is also described in order to better underline all the difficulties related to the diagnostic process. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases up to November 2023 to identify studies. The systematic literature search identified a total of 214 articles. Following screening by title and abstract and full-text review, 12 studies were deemed eligible and are included here. Adult-onset PCA in diencephalic regions pose diagnostic challenges due to their rarity and overlapping features with other intracranial lesions. Advanced imaging techniques play a crucial role in diagnosis, while surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for the optimal management and long-term follow-up of these patients.
PubMed: 38930064
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123536