-
BMC Surgery Mar 2021The best treatment for perforated colonic diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis is still under debate. Concurrent strategies are resection with primary anastomosis...
BACKGROUND
The best treatment for perforated colonic diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis is still under debate. Concurrent strategies are resection with primary anastomosis (PRA) with or without diverting ileostomy (DI), Hartmann's procedure (HP), laparoscopic lavage (LL) and damage control surgery (DCS). This review intends to systematically analyze the current literature on DCS.
METHODS
DCS consists of two stages. Emergency surgery: limited resection of the diseased colon, oral and aboral closure, lavage, vacuum-assisted abdominal closure. Second look surgery after 24-48 h: definite reconstruction with colorectal anastomosis (-/ + DI) or HP after adequate resuscitation. The review was conducted in accordance to the PRISMA-P Statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) and EMBASE were searched using the following term: (Damage control surgery) AND (Diverticulitis OR Diverticulum OR Peritonitis).
RESULTS
Eight retrospective studies including 256 patients met the inclusion criteria. No randomized trial was available. 67% of the included patients had purulent, 30% feculent peritonitis. In 3% Hinchey stage II diverticulitis was found. In 49% the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) was greater than 26. Colorectal anastomosis was constructed during the course of the second surgery in 73%. In 15% of the latter DI was applied. The remaining 27% received HP. Postoperative mortality was 9%, morbidity 31% respectively. The anastomotic leak rate was 13%. 55% of patients were discharged without a stoma.
CONCLUSION
DCS is a safe technique for the treatment of acute perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis, allowing a high rate of colorectal anastomosis and stoma-free hospital discharge in more than half of the patients.
Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Diverticulitis, Colonic; Humans; Peritonitis; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33726727
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01130-5 -
Journal of Clinical GastroenterologyThere is limited evidence on the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with esophageal diverticula. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There is limited evidence on the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with esophageal diverticula.
AIMS
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of POEM in patients with Zenker (ZD) and epiphrenic diverticula.
METHODS
With a literature search through August 2020, we identified 12 studies (300 patients) assessing POEM in patients with esophageal diverticula. The primary outcome was treatment success. Results were expressed as pooled rates and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
Pooled rate of technical success was 95.9% (93.4%-98.3%) in ZD patients and 95.1% (88.8%-100%) in patients with epiphrenic diverticula. Pooled rate of treatment success was similar for ZD (90.6%, 87.1%-94.1%) and epiphrenic diverticula (94.2%, 87.3%-100%). Rates of treatment success were maintained at 1 year (90%, 86.4%-97.4%) and 2 years (89.6%, 82.2%-96.9%) in ZD patients. Pooled rate of symptom recurrence was 2.6% (0.9%-4.4%) in ZD patients and 0% in patients with epiphrenic diverticula. Pooled rates of adverse events and severe adverse events were 10.6% (4.6%-16.6%) and 3.5% (0%-7.4%) in ZD and 8.4% (0%-16.8%) and 8.4% (0%-16.8%) in epiphrenic diverticula, respectively.
CONCLUSION
POEM represents an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of esophageal diverticula.
Topics: Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Diverticulum, Esophageal; Esophageal Achalasia; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower; Humans; Myotomy; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34608024
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001622 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024: The right-sided aortic arch (RAA) is an uncommon variation of the aortic arch (AA), characterized by the aorta crossing over the right main bronchus. In the RAA, the... (Review)
Review
: The right-sided aortic arch (RAA) is an uncommon variation of the aortic arch (AA), characterized by the aorta crossing over the right main bronchus. In the RAA, the descending aorta can be found on either the right or left side of the spine. The current study comprises a comprehensive retrospective computed tomography angiography (CTA) investigation into the prevalence of the RAA within the Greek population. Additionally, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate both common and rare morphological variants of the RAA. This research is significant as it sheds light on the prevalence and characteristics of the RAA in a specific population, providing valuable insights for clinical practice. : Two hundred CTAs were meticulously investigated for the presence of a RAA. In addition, the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus online databases were thoroughly searched for studies referring to the AA morphology. The R programming language and RStudio were used for the pooled prevalence meta-analysis, while several subgroup analyses were conducted. : A unique case of 200 CTAs (0.5%) was identified with an uncommon morphology. The following branches emanated from the RAA under the sequence: the right subclavian artery (RSA), the right common carotid artery (RCCA), the left common carotid artery (LCCA), and the left vertebral artery (LVA) in common origin with the aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA). The ALSA originated from a diverticulum (of Kommerell) and followed a retroesophageal course. : Sixty-two studies (72,187 total cases) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of the RAA with a mirror-image morphology was estimated at 0.07%, and the RAA with an ALSA was estimated at <0.01%. AA anomalies, specifically the RAA, raise clinical interest due to their coexistence with developmental heart anomalies and possible interventional complications. Congenital heart anomalies, such as the Tetralogy of Fallot and patent foramen ovale, coexisted with RAA mirror-image morphology.
PubMed: 38892815
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113105 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Feb 2022The perforated duodenal diverticulum remains a rare clinical entity, the optimal management of which has not been well established. Historically, primary surgery has...
BACKGROUND
The perforated duodenal diverticulum remains a rare clinical entity, the optimal management of which has not been well established. Historically, primary surgery has been the preferred treatment modality. This was called into question during the last decade, with the successful application of non-operative therapy in selected patients. The aim of this systematic review is to identify cases of perforated duodenal diverticula published over the past decade and to assess any subsequent evolution in treatment.
METHODS
A systematic review of English and non-English articles reporting on perforated duodenal diverticula using MEDLINE (2008-2020) was performed. Only cases of perforated duodenal diverticula in adults (> 18 years) that reported on diagnosis and treatment were included.
RESULTS
Some 328 studies were identified, of which 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies included a total of 47 patients with perforated duodenal diverticula. This series suggests a trend towards conservative management with 34% (16/47) of patients managed non-operatively. In 31% (5/16) patients initially managed conservatively, a step-up approach to surgical intervention was required.
CONCLUSION
Conservative treatment of perforated duodenal diverticula appears to be an acceptable and safe treatment strategy in stable patients without signs of peritonitis under careful observation. For patients who fail to respond to conservative treatment, a step-up approach to percutaneous drainage or surgery can be applied. If surgery is required, competence in techniques ranging from simple diverticulectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric diversion or even Whipple's procedure may be required depending on tissue friability and diverticular collar size.
Topics: Adult; Conservative Treatment; Diverticulum; Drainage; Duodenal Diseases; Humans; Intestinal Perforation
PubMed: 34164722
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02238-1 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jan 2015To investigate the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of giant colonic diverticulum (GCD, by means of a complete and updated literature review). GCD is a... (Review)
Review
AIM
To investigate the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of giant colonic diverticulum (GCD, by means of a complete and updated literature review). GCD is a rare manifestation of diverticular disease of the colon. Less than 200 studies on GCD were published in the literature, predominantly case reports or small patient series.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Embase and PubMed databases to identify all the GCD studies. The following MESH search headings were used: "giant colonic diverticulum"; "giant sigmoid diverticulum". The "related articles" function was used to broaden the search, and all of the abstracts, studies, and citations were reviewed by two authors. The following outcomes were of interest: the disease and patient characteristics, study design, indications for surgery, type of operation, and post-operative outcomes. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of cases treated in the last 5 years was performed to show the current trends in the treatment of GCD. A GCD case in an elderly patient treated in our department by a sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis and a diverting ileostomy is presented as a typical example of the disease.
RESULTS
In total, 166 GCD cases in 138 studies were identified in the literature. The most common clinical presentation was abdominal pain, which occurred in 69% of the cases. Among the physical signs, an abdominal mass was detected in 48% of the cases, whereas 20% of the patients presented with fever and 14% with abdominal tenderness. Diagnosis is based predominantly on abdominal computed tomography. The most frequent treatment was colic resection with en-bloc resection of the diverticulum, performed in 57.2% of cases, whereas Hartmann's procedure was followed in 11.4% of the cases and a diverticulectomy in 10.2%. An analysis of sixteen cases reported in the last 5 years showed that the majority of patients were treated with sigmoidectomy and en-bloc resection of the diverticulum; the postoperative mortality was null, morbidity was very low (1 patient was hospitalized in the intensive care unit for postoperative hypotension), and the patients were discharged 4-14 d after surgery.
CONCLUSION
Giant colonic diverticulum is a rare manifestation of diverticular diseases. Surgical treatment, consisting predominantly of colonic resection with en bloc resection of the diverticulum, is the preferred option for GCD and guarantees excellent results.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Colectomy; Diverticulum, Colon; Female; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25574112
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.360 -
BMC Pediatrics Dec 2021While necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a prevalent condition in preterm neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), intussusception is exceedingly...
BACKGROUND
While necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a prevalent condition in preterm neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), intussusception is exceedingly uncommon and often overlooked. This is due to the fact that they share many clinical characteristics. The initial misdiagnosis of intussusception in preterm neonates (IPN) especially has led to a delay in their management, which increases the risk of developing compromised bowel. Additionally, it is difficult to reach a diagnosis as neonatal intussusception does not have any classical radiological signs even when contrast enema is used. This systematic review is based on the published literature including case reports and case series to review the clinical features of IPN and how to differentiate it from NEC in order to shed the light on this rare disease and how having a high index of suspicion would help practitioners to make an early and accurate diagnosis METHODS: A systematic literature search to report all cases of relevant articles that reported IPN till date. All cases that were born before 37 weeks gestational age, presented within the neonatal period and having well established documentation were included in the study. Any case that did not have these criteria was excluded from our study.
RESULTS
Only 52 cases met these criteria during the period from 1963 till date. An average of 10 days had elapsed before the cases were confirmed to have IPN either clinically or intraoperatively. The most frequent manifestations were abdominal distension and bilious gastric residuals, occurring in 85% and 77% of the cases respectively, followed by bloody stools in 43% of cases. However, this triad was present only in approximately one-third of the cases. Only 13 cases were diagnosed as having intussusception preoperatively. About two thirds of the intussusception were located in the ileum. Pathological lead point was present in 7 cases only; 4 of them were due to Meckel's diverticulum. Nine cases only out of the 52 cases with IPN died.
CONCLUSION
It is crucial to detect the clues for diagnosis of intussusception because in contrast to NEC, it is unresponsive to conservative management, affects the viability of the bowel and surgery is essential.
Topics: Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Intussusception; Rare Diseases
PubMed: 34952564
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-03065-5 -
Medicine Sep 2023Capsule endoscopy is the first-line investigation for small bowel disorders. Capsule retention in the small bowel is the most common adverse event. Retention has also...
Capsule endoscopy is the first-line investigation for small bowel disorders. Capsule retention in the small bowel is the most common adverse event. Retention has also been reported in the upper esophagus; however, guidance for diagnosis and management is lacking. This review aims to summarize the diagnostic workup and management of this complication. We conducted a systematic literature review by searching 5 databases; relevant keywords and MeSH terms were used. Exclusion criteria included publications of non-adult patients in non-English languages. Data from eligible studies were analyzed using IBM SPSS 29. Twelve case reports were found (9 males, median age of 76 years); 10 capsule retentions in Zenker's diverticulum and 2 in the cricopharyngeus. Most patients were asymptomatic before capsule endoscopy. Capsule retention was symptomatic in half of the patients (6/12). A neck X-ray confirmed the diagnosis in all patients. Endoscopic capsule retrieval was achieved by different tools (9/12) (Roth's net was the most used tool, 6 patients); retrieval required rigid endoscopy in a few cases (3/12). Endoscopic capsule re-insertion was successful; using an overtube to bypass the upper esophagus was the safest method. In conclusion, capsule retention in the upper esophagus is uncommon yet exposes patients to the risk of unnecessary procedures. Symptoms of swallowing and medium-to-large size Zenker's diverticulum should be considered contra-indications for capsule endoscopy. Neck and chest X-rays are required for elderly patients who do not pass the capsule 2 weeks after ingestion. Endoscopic retrieval using Roth's net and re-insertion through an overtube should be considered first-line management.
Topics: Aged; Male; Humans; Capsule Endoscopy; Zenker Diverticulum; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper; Databases, Factual; Deglutition
PubMed: 37682178
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035113 -
Medical Science Monitor : International... Mar 2021Kommerell diverticulum (KD) combined with right-sided aortic arch (RAA) and aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) are rare and limited to a few case reports and small...
Kommerell diverticulum (KD) combined with right-sided aortic arch (RAA) and aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) are rare and limited to a few case reports and small series. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), which is mini-invasive, is widely utilized in complicated aortic disease. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all patients who underwent endovascular repair for KD in terms of technical feasibility and procedural outcomes. Published and accepted studies only in English as well as article reference lists were searched and extracted to assess case series reporting solely TEVAR in KD patients. There were 28 patients with KD/RAA identified from 19 studies. All of them underwent endovascular technique for KD exclusion and the median age was 69 years (range 39-83 years). Hypertension (n=17) was the most common comorbidity in this cohort, followed by diabetes mellitus (n=3), hyperlipidemia (n=3), and smoking (n=3). The presenting symptoms were dysphagia (n=8, 29%), intermittent back pain (n=4, 14%), and acute aortic dissection (n=6, 21%), while asymptomatic was found in 9 patients (n=9, 32%). A technical success rate of 100% was reported associated with various managements of ALSA, proximal embolization (n=19, 68%), in-situ revascularization (n=3, 11%), and left carotid-subclavian bypass (n=3, 11%). All patients survived without severe complications and were discharged home within less than 14 days. The mean follow-up time was 9.3 months, patency was found in all patients, thrombosis and distinct shrinkage of KD aneurysm as indicated by CT-scans were noted (n=20, 71%), and type II endoleak was found in only 4 patients (n=4, 14%). TEVAR appears to be safe and offers favorable results, but it still needs substantial evidence to support routine use in KD. TEVAR is an alternative to open repair in selected cases, but it needs further investigation in a large cohort.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Dissection; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Diseases; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Diverticulum; Embolization, Therapeutic; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Stents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33755659
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.930031 -
Annals of Pediatric Surgery 2022Perforation of Meckel Diverticulum (MD) is a rare cause of pneumoperitoneum in neonates. We hereby report six cases of perforation of MD in neonates, with addition of 53...
BACKGROUND
Perforation of Meckel Diverticulum (MD) is a rare cause of pneumoperitoneum in neonates. We hereby report six cases of perforation of MD in neonates, with addition of 53 cases from systematic review of the literature. A systematic review was performed using Mesh terms "Neonate, Meckel Diverticulum, Perforation, Pneumoperitoneum." All reports of perforated MD in the English literature were identified. Details of our 6 cases were analyzed in similar fashion.
RESULTS
A total of 3027 manuscripts were screened and 59 cases including 6 of our own were identified. The vast majority (78%) were female. Fifty patients (84.7%) presented in the newborn period. Half of the cases (52.5%) had associated anomalies and 13 neonates (22%) required oxygen supplementation including CPAP or ventilatory support before surgery. In 73% of the cases, a resection of gut was undertaken. Histopathological assessment in 44 cases (74.6%) revealed no ectopic gastric mucosa. Three cases demised prior to treatment. The outcome in the vast majority was excellent with 84.7% surviving and discharged well.
CONCLUSION
Perforated MD is an unusual cause of a pneumoperitoneum in the newborns. Diagnosis is established at laparotomy and it rare to find ectopic mucosa histopathologically. The overall outcome is excellent.
PubMed: 35281619
DOI: 10.1186/s43159-021-00154-z -
Morphological Aspects of the Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery-A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of Personalized Medicine Mar 2024The aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery (ARSA), also known as the lusoria artery, is a congenital malformation with an incidence of 0.5-4.4%. Most cases are... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery (ARSA), also known as the lusoria artery, is a congenital malformation with an incidence of 0.5-4.4%. Most cases are incidental due to minimal clinical manifestations. Computer tomography (CT) is important in diagnosing and evaluating these patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conduct a computerized search in two databases, PubMed and EMBASE, for articles published between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023, PROSPERO code: CRD42024511791. Eligible for inclusion were case reports and case series that presented the aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery. The main outcome was the highlighting of the morphological types of ARSA. In this context, we proposed a new classification system of this anomaly. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the demographic distribution of the lusoria artery.
RESULTS
Our search identified 47 articles describing 51 patients with ARSA. The typical course for ARSA is retroesophageal, being registered in 49 out of 51 patients. This malformation is frequently associated with Kommerell diverticulum (15 out of 51), troncus bicaroticus (7 out of 51), and aberrant origins of the right vertebral artery (7 out of 51). We observed a higher incidence of the condition among women (32 out of 51) compared to men (19 out of 51). From a demographic point of view, ARSA is more frequent in the "44 to 57 years" and "58 to 71 years" age ranges.
CONCLUSIONS
ARSA is a congenital malformation resulting from a defect in the development of the aortic arches. The imaging studies such as computer tomography play a defined diagnostic role.
PubMed: 38672962
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040335