-
BMC Geriatrics Mar 2024To analyse and discuss the association of gender differences with the risk and incidence of poststroke aphasia (PSA) and its types, and to provide evidence-based... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To analyse and discuss the association of gender differences with the risk and incidence of poststroke aphasia (PSA) and its types, and to provide evidence-based guidance for the prevention and treatment of poststroke aphasia in clinical practice.
DATA SOURCES
Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from January 1, 2002, to December 1, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Including the total number of strokes, aphasia, the number of different sexes or the number of PSA corresponding to different sex.
DATA EXTRACTION
Studies with missing data, aphasia caused by nonstroke and noncompliance with the requirements of literature types were excluded.
DATA SYNTHESIS
36 papers were included, from 19 countries. The analysis of 168,259 patients with stroke and 31,058 patients with PSA showed that the risk of PSA was 1.23 times higher in female than in male (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.19-1.29, P < 0.001), with a prevalence of PSA of 31% in men and 36% in women, and an overall prevalence of 34% (P < 0.001). Analysis of the risk of the different types of aphasia in 1,048 patients with PSA showed a high risk in females for global, broca and Wenicke aphasia, and a high risk in males for anomic, conductive and transcortical aphasia, which was not statistically significant by meta-analysis. The incidence of global aphasia (males vs. females, 29% vs. 32%) and broca aphasia (17% vs 19%) were higher in females, and anomic aphasia (19% vs 14%) was higher in males, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
There are gender differences in the incidence and types of PSA. The risk of PSA in female is higher than that in male.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Incidence; Aphasia; Stroke; Patient Compliance
PubMed: 38438862
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04765-0 -
Medicine Nov 2023The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of combining acupuncture with speech rehabilitation training, compared to acupuncture alone or speech... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of combining acupuncture with speech rehabilitation training, compared to acupuncture alone or speech rehabilitation training alone, in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia.
METHODS
To gather data for this study, we searched 6 databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and Chongqing VIP Database. We included clinical randomized controlled trials on acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training for post-stroke aphasia published between January 1, 2011 and October 8, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, evaluated its quality, and extracted the data using Stata 15.1 SE and RevMan 5.4 software. We conducted a meta-analysis using the random effects model, and expressed dichotomous variables as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and continuous variables as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Specifically, the odds of improvement were significantly higher in the combination group (OR = 3.89, 95% CI = [2.62, 5.78]). Improvements were also seen in several language functions, including expression (WMD = 5.14, 95% CI = [3.87, 6.41]), understanding (WMD = 9.16, 95% CI = [5.20, 13.12]), retelling (WMD = 11.35, 95% CI = [8.70, 14.00]), naming (WMD = 11.36, 95% CI = [8.12, 14.61] ), reading (WMD = 9.20, 95% CI = [4.87, 13.52]), writing (WMD = 5.65, 95% CI = [3.04, 8.26]), and reading aloud (WMD = 7.45, 95% CI = [3.12, 11.78]). Scores on the Chinese Aphasia Complete Test Scale, Western Aphasia Complete Test Scale, and China Rehabilitation Research Center Aphasia Check Scale were also significantly higher in the combination group, with improvements of 7.89, 9.89, and 9.27, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 16 clinical randomized controlled trials, including 1258 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that compared to simple rehabilitation training or acupuncture treatment alone, the combination of acupuncture and language rehabilitation training was more effective in improving clinical outcomes for patients with post-stroke aphasia.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this meta-analysis indicate that acupuncture combined with language rehabilitation training can effectively improve the language function of post-stroke aphasia patients and increase clinical effectiveness. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and provide a more reliable evidence-based basis for clinical practice. In particular, additional studies with large sample sizes, high quality, and more specific and standardized outcome measures are needed to strengthen the evidence. The limited quantity and quality of the current studies may affect the generalizability of the results.
Topics: Humans; Aphasia; Stroke; Acupuncture Therapy; Recovery of Function; Treatment Outcome; Stroke Rehabilitation
PubMed: 38013378
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036160 -
Cancers Nov 2022Awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation (DES) is the standard treatment for patients with gliomas in eloquent areas. Even though language is monitored... (Review)
Review
Awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation (DES) is the standard treatment for patients with gliomas in eloquent areas. Even though language is monitored carefully during surgery, many patients suffer from postoperative aphasia, with negative effects on their quality of life. Some perioperative factors are reported to influence postoperative language outcome. However, the influence of different intraoperative speech and language errors on language outcome is not clear. Therefore, we investigate this relation. A systematic search was performed in which 81 studies were included, reporting speech and language errors during awake craniotomy with DES and postoperative language outcomes in adult glioma patients up until 6 July 2020. The frequencies of intraoperative errors and language status were calculated. Binary logistic regressions were performed. Preoperative language deficits were a significant predictor for postoperative acute (OR = 3.42, p < 0.001) and short-term (OR = 1.95, p = 0.007) language deficits. Intraoperative anomia (OR = 2.09, p = 0.015) and intraoperative production errors (e.g., dysarthria or stuttering; OR = 2.06, p = 0.016) were significant predictors for postoperative acute language deficits. Postoperatively, the language deficits that occurred most often were production deficits and spontaneous speech deficits. To conclude, during surgery, intraoperative anomia and production errors should carry particular weight during decision-making concerning the optimal onco-functional balance for a given patient, and spontaneous speech should be monitored. Further prognostic research could facilitate intraoperative decision-making, leading to fewer or less severe postoperative language deficits and improvement of quality of life.
PubMed: 36358884
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215466 -
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 2022Non-invasive brain stimulation methods have been widely utilized in research settings to manipulate and understand the functioning of the human brain. In the last two...
BACKGROUND
Non-invasive brain stimulation methods have been widely utilized in research settings to manipulate and understand the functioning of the human brain. In the last two decades, transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) has opened new doors for treating impairments caused by various neurological disorders. However, tES studies have shown inconsistent results in post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation, and there is no consensus on the effectiveness of tES devices in improving cognitive skills after the onset of stroke.
OBJECTIVES
We aim to systematically investigate the efficacy of tES in improving post-stroke global cognition, attention, working memory, executive functions, visual neglect, and verbal fluency. Furthermore, we aim to provide a pathway to an effective use of stimulation paradigms in future studies.
METHODS
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were systematically searched in four different databases, including Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and PsychInfo. Studies utilizing any tES methods published in English were considered for inclusion. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for each cognitive domain was used as the primary outcome measure.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis includes 19 studies assessing at least one of the six cognitive domains. Five RCTs studying global cognition, three assessing visual neglect, five evaluating working memory, three assessing attention, and nine studies focusing on aphasia were included for meta-analysis. As informed by the quantitative analysis of the included studies, the results favor the efficacy of tES in acute improvement in aphasic deficits (SMD = 0.34, CI = 0.02-0.67, = 0.04) and attention deficits (SMD = 0.59, CI = -0.05-1.22, = 0.07), however, no improvement was observed in any other cognitive domains.
CONCLUSION
The results favor the efficacy of tES in an improvement in aphasia and attentive deficits in stroke patients in acute, subacute, and chronic stages. However, the outcome of tES cannot be generalized across cognitive domains. The difference in the stimulation montages and parameters, diverse cognitive batteries, and variable number of training sessions may have contributed to the inconsistency in the outcome. We suggest that in future studies, experimental designs should be further refined, and standardized stimulation protocols should be utilized to better understand the therapeutic effect of stimulation.
PubMed: 36188889
DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.795737 -
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Apr 2018Impairments of short-term and working memory (STM, WM), both verbal and non-verbal, are ubiquitous in aphasia. Increasing interest in assessing STM and WM in aphasia... (Review)
Review
Impairments of short-term and working memory (STM, WM), both verbal and non-verbal, are ubiquitous in aphasia. Increasing interest in assessing STM and WM in aphasia research and clinical practice as well as a growing evidence base of STM/WM treatments for aphasia warrant an understanding of the range of standardised STM/WM measures that have been utilised in aphasia. To date, however, no previous systematic review has focused on aphasia. Accordingly, the goals of this systematic review were: (1) to identify standardised tests of STM and WM utilised in the aphasia literature, (2) to evaluate critically the psychometric strength of these tests, and (3) to appraise critically the quality of the investigations utilising these tests. Results revealed that a very limited number of standardised tests, in the verbal and non-verbal domains, had robust psychometric properties. Standardisation samples to elicit normative data were often small, and most measures exhibited poor validity and reliability properties. Studies using these tests inconsistently documented demographic and aphasia variables essential to interpreting STM/WM test outcomes. In light of these findings, recommendations are provided to foster, in the future, consistency across aphasia studies and confidence in STM/WM tests as assessment and treatment outcome measures.
Topics: Aphasia; Humans; Memory, Short-Term; Neuropsychological Tests; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 27143500
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1174718 -
Journal of Neurology Feb 2017Aphasia has a large impact on the quality of life and adds significantly to the costs of stroke care. Early recognition of aphasia in stroke patients is important for... (Review)
Review
Aphasia has a large impact on the quality of life and adds significantly to the costs of stroke care. Early recognition of aphasia in stroke patients is important for prognostication and well-timed treatment planning. We aimed to identify available screening tests for differentiating between aphasic and non-aphasic stroke patients, and to evaluate test accuracy, reliability, and feasibility. We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO for published studies on screening tests aimed at assessing aphasia in stroke patients. The reference lists of the selected articles were scanned, and several experts were contacted to detect additional references. Of each screening test, we estimated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio of a positive test, likelihood ratio of a negative test, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and rated the degree of bias of the validation method. We included ten studies evaluating eight screening tests. There was a large variation across studies regarding sample size, patient characteristics, and reference tests used for validation. Many papers failed to report on the consecutiveness of patient inclusion, time between aphasia onset and administration of the screening test, and blinding. Of the three studies that were rated as having an intermediate or low risk of bias, the DOR was highest for the Language Screening Test and ScreeLing. Several screening tools for aphasia in stroke are available, but many tests have not been verified properly. Methodologically sound validation studies of aphasia screening tests are needed to determine their usefulness in clinical practice.
Topics: Aphasia; Humans; Stroke
PubMed: 27260296
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8170-8 -
Frontiers in Psychology 2024Time reference is used to build the temporal framework of discourse and is essential in ensuring efficient communication. Several studies have reported time reference... (Review)
Review
Time reference is used to build the temporal framework of discourse and is essential in ensuring efficient communication. Several studies have reported time reference deficits in fluent and non-fluent aphasia and have shown that tenses (past, present, future) are not all impaired to the same extent. However, there is little consensus on the dissociations between tenses, and the question of the influence of the type of aphasia (fluent vs. non-fluent) on time reference remains open. Therefore, a systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis (or mega-analysis) were conducted to determine (1) whether one tense is more impaired than another in fluent and non-fluent aphasia and, if so, (2) which task and speaker-related factors moderate tense effects. The systematic review resulted in 35 studies reporting the performance in time reference of 392 participants. The mega-analysis was then performed on 23 studies for a total of 232 participants and showed an alteration of past tense compared to present and future tenses in both types of aphasia. The analysis also showed a task and an age effect on time reference but no gender effect, independently of tenses. These results add to our knowledge of time reference in aphasia and have implications for future therapies.
PubMed: 38406299
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1322539 -
Physics of Life Reviews Dec 2022The past three decades have seen multiple reports of people with neurodegenerative disorders, or other forms of changes in their brains, who also show putative changes... (Review)
Review
Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease.
The past three decades have seen multiple reports of people with neurodegenerative disorders, or other forms of changes in their brains, who also show putative changes in how they approach and produce visual art. Authors argue that these cases may provide a unique body of evidence, so-called 'artistic signatures' of neurodegenerative diseases, that might be used to understand disorders, provide diagnoses, be employed in treatment, create patterns of testable hypotheses for causative study, and also provide unique insight into the neurobiological linkages between the mind, brain, body, and the human penchant for art-making itself. However-before we can begin to meaningfully build from such emerging findings, much less formulate applications-not only is such evidence currently quite disparate and in need of systematic review, almost all case reports and artwork ratings are entirely subjective, based on authors' personal observations or a sparse collection of methods that may not best fit underlying research aims. This leads to the very real question of whether we might actually find patterns of systematic change if fit to a rigorous review-Can we really 'read' art to illuminate possible changes in the brain? How might we best approach this topic in future neuroscientific, clinical, and art-related research? This paper presents a review of this field and answer to these questions. We consider the current case reports for seven main disorders-Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, frontotemporal and Lewy body dementia, corticobasal degeneration, aphasia, as well as stroke-consolidating arguments for factors and changes related to art-making and critiquing past methods. Taking the published artworks from these papers, we then conduct our own assessment, employing computerized and human-rater-based approaches, which we argue represent best practice to identify stylistic or creativity/quality changes. We suggest, indeed, some evidence for systematic patterns in art-making for specific disorders and also find that case authors showed rather high agreement with our own assessments. More important, through opening this topic and past evidence to a systematic review, we hope to open a discussion and provide a theoretical and empirical foundation for future application and research on the intersection of art-making and the neurotypical, the changed, and the artistic brain.
Topics: Humans; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Brain; Art; Creativity; Lewy Body Disease
PubMed: 36179555
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.07.005 -
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Jan 2022Language assessment in post-comatose patients is difficult due to their limited behavioral repertoire; yet associated language deficits might lead to an underestimation... (Review)
Review
Language assessment in post-comatose patients is difficult due to their limited behavioral repertoire; yet associated language deficits might lead to an underestimation of consciousness levels in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimally conscious state (MCS; -/+) diagnoses. We present a systematic review of studies from 2002 assessing residual language abilities with neuroimaging, electrophysiological or behavioral measures in patients with severe brain injury. Eighty-five articles including a total of 2278 patients were assessed for quality. The median percentages of patients showing residual implicit language abilities (i.e., cortical responses to specific words/sentences) were 33 % for UWS, 50 % for MCS- and 78 % for MCS + patients, whereas explicit language abilities (i.e., command-following using brain-computer interfaces) were reported in 20 % of UWS, 33 % of MCS- and 50 % of MCS + patients. Cortical responses to verbal stimuli increased along with consciousness levels and the progressive recovery of consciousness after a coma was paralleled by the reappearance of both implicit and explicit language processing. This review highlights the importance of language assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness.
Topics: Consciousness; Consciousness Disorders; Humans; Language; Persistent Vegetative State; Wakefulness
PubMed: 34864003
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.001 -
International Journal of Environmental... Aug 2021Primary care clinicians in Asia employed the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to aid dementia diagnosis post-stroke. Recent... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Primary care clinicians in Asia employed the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to aid dementia diagnosis post-stroke. Recent studies questioned their clinical utility in stroke settings for relying on verbal abilities and education level, as well as lack of consideration for aphasia and neglect. We aimed to review the clinical utility of the MMSE and MoCA for stroke patients in Asia and provide recommendations for clinical practice.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct were searched for relevant articles. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias. RevMan 5.4 was used for data synthesis (sensitivity and specificity) and covariates were identified.
RESULTS
Among the 48 full-text articles reviewed, 11 studies were included with 3735 total subjects; of these studies, 7 (77%) were conducted in China, 3 (27%) in Singapore, and 1 (9%) in South Korea. Both the MMSE and MoCA generally showed adequate sensitivity and specificity. Education was identified as a covariate that significantly affected detection accuracy. Due to heterogeneity in cutoff scores, methodologies, and languages, it was not feasible to suggest a single cutoff score. One additional point is recommended for MoCA for patients with <6 years of education.
CONCLUSION
Clinicians in Asia are strongly recommended to consider the education level of stroke patients when interpreting the results of the MMSE and MoCA. Further studies in other Asian countries are needed to understand their clinical value in stroke settings.
Topics: Cognitive Dysfunction; Humans; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Neurologic Examination; Neuropsychological Tests; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke
PubMed: 34501552
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18178962