-
European Respiratory Review : An... Sep 2019Debulking surgery and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) has been successfully used in the treatment of thoracic tumours. Few authors report on the...
INTRODUCTION
Debulking surgery and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) has been successfully used in the treatment of thoracic tumours. Few authors report on the feasibility of its use in patients with lung cancer and malignant pleural effusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and results of debulking surgery and HITHOC in the treatment of selected patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant pleural effusion.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The word search included: "hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy and/or HITHOC or hyperthermic intrapleural". Inclusion criteria were only those studies reporting a sufficient amount of data on HITHOC and surgery for lung cancer. Single case reports and review articles were excluded.
RESULTS
20 articles were selected as they related to the topic of HITHOC and lung cancer. Most were from China (n=8) and Japan (n=6). Only four out of the 20 articles had sufficient data for this review. In total, data for 21 patients were collected. Debulking surgery ranged from wedge resection to pneumonectomy and pleurectomy. Mean survival was 27 months and median survival was 18 months (range 1-74 months). 13 patients out of 21 (62%) were alive at 1 year and six (28.5%) were alive at 2 years. 10 patients were still alive at the time of the respective publication in the 21 patients included. Systemic toxicity and treatment-related mortality were nil. There were insufficient data to perform a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Although reported survival in this systematic review is encouraging, available evidence concerning debulking surgery and HITHOC in N0-N1 NSCLC with malignant pleural effusion is weak. Better evidence in the form of a randomised controlled trial is mandatory.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Hyperthermia, Induced; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Pneumonectomy; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31366459
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0018-2019 -
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2017Hypothermia is a rare, but potentially fatal adverse effect of antipsychotic drug (APD) use. Although the opposite condition, thermia, has been researched extensively in...
BACKGROUND
Hypothermia is a rare, but potentially fatal adverse effect of antipsychotic drug (APD) use. Although the opposite condition, thermia, has been researched extensively in the context of the malignant antipsychotic syndrome, little is known about thermia due to APDs.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to review the literature on hypothermia in the context of APD use, and formulate implications for research and clinical care.
METHODS
A systematic search was made in PubMed and Ovid Medline.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 433 articles, including 57 original case descriptions of hypothermia developed during APD use with non-toxic plasma levels. All cases together indicate that the risk of developing hypothermia is highest during the 7 days following initiation, or increase in dosage, of APDs, especially in the presence of additional predisposing factors, such as advanced age, exposure to cold, adjuvant use of benzodiazepines, and (subclinical) hypothyroidism. In addition, data derived from drug-monitoring agencies suggest that the prevalence of APD-related hypothermia is at least 10 times higher than suggested by the literature.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that health-care professionals need to monitor the body temperature of patients starting with (an increased dose of) APDs for a duration of 7-10 days to prevent hypothermia, especially in the presence of multiple risk factors. Moreover, systematic studies are needed to establish the actual prevalence of APD-related hypothermia as well as the relative risk for individual APDs.
PubMed: 28936184
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00165 -
International Journal of Hyperthermia :... 2024A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of cryoablation (CRA) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of cryoablation (CRA) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases was conducted to identify clinical controlled studies comparing CRA versus RFA for hepatic malignancies up to July 2022. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.
RESULTS
A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 8 clinical controlled studies involving a total of 943 patients. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications, complete ablation of lesions, local recurrence, and 1-year survival between the CRA and RFA groups (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.61-1.55, = 0.92; OR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.62-1.90, = 0.78; OR = 1.28, 95%CI: 0.49-3.36, = 0.61; and OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.63-2.06, = 0.66, respectively).
CONCLUSION
The efficacy and safety profile of CRA was comparable to that of RFA in the context of ablation therapy for hepatic malignancies. These findings suggested that CRA may be a valuable alternative to RFA in the treatment of hepatic malignancies.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cryosurgery; Liver Neoplasms; Radiofrequency Ablation
PubMed: 38190758
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2300347