-
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics &... Aug 2016This study aimed to systematically review the articles on factors affecting sexual function during menopause. Searching articles indexed in Pubmed, Science Direct,... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to systematically review the articles on factors affecting sexual function during menopause. Searching articles indexed in Pubmed, Science Direct, Iranmedex, EMBASE, Scopus, and Scientific Information Database databases, a total number of 42 studies published between 2003 and 2013 were selected. Age, estrogen deficiency, type of menopause, chronic medical problems, partner's sex problems, severity of menopause symptoms, dystocia history, and health status were the physical factors influencing sexual function of menopausal women. There were conflicting results regarding the amount of androgens, hormonal therapy, exercise/physical activity, and obstetric history. In the mental-emotional area, all studies confirmed the impact of depression and anxiety. Social factors, including smoking, alcohol consumption, the quality of relationship with husband, partner's loyalty, sexual knowledge, access to health care, a history of divorce or the death of a husband, living apart from a spouse, and a negative understanding of women's health were found to affect sexual function; however, there were conflicting results regarding the effects of education, occupation, socioeconomic status, marital duration, and frequency of sexual intercourse.
Topics: Age Factors; Anxiety; Depression; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Menopause; Middle Aged; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological; Sexual Partners; Spouses
PubMed: 27590367
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.001 -
Cancer Epidemiology Dec 2023Lung cancer is associated with high mortality, and significant health burden. Marital status has been associated with lung cancer survival. This systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Lung cancer is associated with high mortality, and significant health burden. Marital status has been associated with lung cancer survival. This systematic review and meta-analysis set out to investigate the association between marital status and treatment receipt in lung cancer. The search was conducted across three databases: Medline (OVID), Embase and CINAHL, from inception to June 2022. Retrospective or prospective observational studies that quantified treatment receipt by marital status were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was assessed via a modified checklist for retrospective databased-based studies. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was undertaken by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and any treatment relative to married or not married. Pooled unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each type of treatment. 837 papers were screened and 18 met the inclusion criteria with eight being eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Studies were excluded from meta-analysis due to overlap in the data reported in papers; the mean quality score of the 18 included papers was 12/17. Being married was associated with increased odds of overall treatment OR 1.43 (95 % CI 1.14-1.79; I = 82 %; Tau = 0.07; six studies) and also increased receipt of: chemotherapy 1.40 (95 % CI 1.35-1.44; I2 = 82 %; Tau = 0.00); radiotherapy 1.29 (95 % CI 0.96-1.75; I = 100 %; Tau= 0.09; four studies) and surgery (95 % CI 1.31-1.52; I = 86 %; Tau = 0.00; five studies). The results indicate that those who are married are more likely to receive treatment for lung cancer compared to those who are not married. This requires further investigation to better understand the explanations behind this finding and how we can work to combat this inequality.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Lung Neoplasms; Marital Status; Cognition; Marriage; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37992417
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102494 -
PloS One 2016Our study examined the psychological outcomes associated with failed ART treatment outcomes in men and women. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Our study examined the psychological outcomes associated with failed ART treatment outcomes in men and women.
SEARCH STRATEGY
A systematic search for studies published between January 1980 and August 2015 was performed across seven electronic databases.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Studies were included if they contained data on psychosocial outcomes taken pre and post ART treatment.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
A standardised form was used to extract data and was verified by two independent reviewers. Studies were meta-analysed to determine the association of depression and anxiety with ART treatment outcomes. Narrative synthesis identified factors to explain variations in the size and directions of effects and relationships explored within and between the studies.
MAIN RESULTS
Both depression and anxiety increased after a ART treatment failure with an overall pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.27, 0.55) for depression and 0.21 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.29) for anxiety. In contrast, depression decreased after a successful treatment, SMD of -0.24 (95% CI: -0.37,-0.11). Both depression and anxiety decreased as time passed from ART procedure. Nonetheless, these remained higher than baseline measures in the group with the failed outcome even six months after the procedure. Studies included in the narrative synthesis also confirmed an association with negative psychological outcomes in relation to marital satisfaction and general well-being following treatment failure.
CONCLUSION
Linking ART failure and psychosocial outcomes may elucidate the experience of treatment subgroups, influence deliberations around recommendations for resource allocation and health policy and guide patient and clinician decision making.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Adult; Anxiety; Depression; Female; Humans; Infertility, Female; Infertility, Male; Male; Quality of Life; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Treatment Failure
PubMed: 27835654
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165805 -
European Journal of Paediatric... May 2022Socioeconomic factors play a role in the outcome of chronic diseases in childhood. Epilepsy is the most common chronic neurological disease in childhood. The... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Socioeconomic factors play a role in the outcome of chronic diseases in childhood. Epilepsy is the most common chronic neurological disease in childhood. The relationship between socioeconomic factors and prevalence, adherence and outcome in children with epilepsy has not been systematically reviewed and therefore the aim of our study.
METHODS
Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases from the first documented publications until 31st May 2020. The keywords included socioeconomic status, epilepsy, anticonvulsant, children and systematic review.
RESULTS
The search generated 4687 abstracts. 26 articles were included in the final analysis after the screening process. We found one paper regarding prevalence, 12 regarding adherence and 13 regarding outcome and their relationship to socioeconomic factors. Socioeconomic factors of caregivers impacted school performance, seizure freedom, quality of life and risk of unemployment in adulthood. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with non-adherence. Epilepsy may be more prevalent in children living in lower socioeconomic neighborhoods.
CONCLUSION
Socioeconomic factors of the caregiver, especially their level of education, annual income and marital status, had a significant impact on the outcome and adherence to anticonvulsants in children with epilepsy. Children belonging to a lower socioeconomic group are at risk of having poorer outcomes regarding adherence and hence remission, quality of life and academic achievement. We need to recognize this important aspect and take it into account when making a treatment plan for children with epilepsy.
Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsy; Humans; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Social Class
PubMed: 35248913
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.01.021 -
BMJ Open Apr 2018To summarise the evidence on determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in Asian patients with breast cancer. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To summarise the evidence on determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in Asian patients with breast cancer.
DESIGN
Systematic review conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015032468).
METHODS
According to the PRISMA guidelines, databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and PsycINFO were systematically searched using the following terms and synonyms: breast cancer, quality of life and Asia. Articles reporting on HRQL using EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BR23, FACT-G and FACT-B questionnaires in Asian patients with breast cancer were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of each article was assessed using the quality assessment scale for cross-sectional studies or the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven articles were selected for this qualitative synthesis, of which 43 (75%) were cross-sectional and 14 (25%) were longitudinal studies. Over 75 different determinants of HRQL were studied with either the EORTC or FACT questionnaires. Patients with comorbidities, treated with chemotherapy, with less social support and with more unmet needs have poorer HRQL. HRQL improves over time. Discordant results in studies were found in the association of age, marital status, household income, type of surgery, radiotherapy and hormone therapy and unmet sexuality needs with poor global health status or overall well-being.
CONCLUSIONS
In Asia, patients with breast cancer, in particular those with other comorbidities and those treated with chemotherapy, with less social support and with more unmet needs, have poorer HRQL. Appropriate social support and meeting the needs of patients may improve patients' HRQL.
Topics: Asia; Breast Neoplasms; Comorbidity; Female; Health Services Needs and Demand; Healthy Lifestyle; Humans; Quality of Life; Social Support; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 29678980
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020512 -
Heliyon Jan 2024Marital infidelity is a highly distressing experience for those involved. Understanding the psychological factors related to infidelity can help develop targeted...
OBJECTIVES
Marital infidelity is a highly distressing experience for those involved. Understanding the psychological factors related to infidelity can help develop targeted interventions. The primary aim of this study was to assess the association between attachment styles and marital infidelity.
METHODS
Seventeen studies were included, sourced from electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycInfo, with no time limitations, up to April 2023. The search employed terms like "attachment AND marital infidelity." Study quality was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool from RevMan version 5.3.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis involved a total of 13,666 participants, ranging from 208 to 4047 individuals. Findings showed that higher levels of anxiety and avoidance in attachment were significantly associated with increased marital infidelity ( = 0.18, 95 % CI = 0.14-0.22, p < 0.0001). Conversely, weaker attachment insecurity was linked to reduced rates of marital infidelity. Additionally, both dismissive and fearful attachment styles correlated with marital infidelity, with respective weighted effect sizes of = 0.07, p < 0.001 (95 % CI = 0.04-0.10) and = 0.19, p < 0.001 (95 % CI = 0.10-0.29). No association was found between preoccupied attachment and infidelity.
CONCLUSION
Individuals with insecure attachment styles, specifically those with high levels of anxiety or avoidance, are more likely to engage in marital infidelity. Attachment styles should be a focus in couples therapy, especially for treatment related to infidelity. Assessing and addressing these underlying attachment issues can better guide therapists in their work with couples facing infidelity.
PubMed: 38163207
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23261 -
The American Journal of Managed Care Feb 2016Case-mix adjustment is generally considered indispensable for fair comparison of healthcare performance. Inaccurate results are also unfair to patients as they are... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Case-mix adjustment is generally considered indispensable for fair comparison of healthcare performance. Inaccurate results are also unfair to patients as they are ineffective for improving quality. However, little is known about what factors should be adjusted for. We reviewed case-mix factors included in adjustment models for key diabetes indicators, the rationale for their inclusion, and their impact on performance.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
This systematic review included studies published up to June 2013 addressing case-mix factors for 6 key diabetes indicators: 2 outcomes and 2 process indicators for glycated hemoglobin (A1C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and blood pressure. Factors were categorized as demographic, diabetes-related, comorbidity, generic health, geographic, or care-seeking, and were evaluated on the rationale for inclusion in the adjustment models, as well as their impact on indicator scores and ranking.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies were included, mainly addressing A1C value and measurement. Twenty-three different case-mix factors, mostly demographic and diabetes-related, were identified, and varied from 1 to 14 per adjustment model. Six studies provided selection motives for the inclusion of case-mix factors. Marital status and body mass index showed a significant impact on A1C value. For the other factors, either no or conflicting associations were reported, or too few studies (n ≤ 2) investigated this association.
CONCLUSIONS
Scientific knowledge about the relative importance of case-mix factors for diabetes indicators is emerging, especially for demographic and diabetes-related factors and indicators on A1C, but is still limited. Because arbitrary adjustment potentially results in inaccurate quality information, meaningful stratification that demonstrates inequity in care might be a better guide, as it can be a driver for quality improvement.
Topics: Age Factors; Body Mass Index; Cholesterol, LDL; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Diagnosis-Related Groups; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Status; Humans; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Risk Adjustment; Sex Factors; Socioeconomic Factors
PubMed: 26881319
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ Open Jan 2015To evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for improving pregnancy rates and reducing distress for couples in treatment with assisted... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for improving pregnancy rates and reducing distress for couples in treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library between 1978 and April 2014.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies were considered eligible if they evaluated the effect of any psychosocial intervention on clinical pregnancy and/or distress in infertile participants, used a quantitative approach and were published in English.
DATA EXTRACTION
Study characteristics and results were extracted and the methodological quality was assessed. Effect sizes (ES; Hedges g) were pooled using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I(2), and publication bias was evaluated using Egger's method. Possible moderators and mediators were explored with meta-analyses of variances (ANOVAs) and meta-regression.
RESULTS
We identified 39 eligible studies (total N=2746 men and women) assessing the effects of psychological treatment on pregnancy rates and/or adverse psychological outcomes, including depressive symptoms, anxiety, infertility stress and marital function. Statistically significant and robust overall effects of psychosocial intervention were found for both clinical pregnancy (risk ratio=2.01; CI 1.48 to 2.73; p<0.001) and combined psychological outcomes (Hedges g=0.59; CI 0.38 to 0.80; p=0.001). The pooled ES for psychological outcomes were generally larger for women (g: 0.51 to 0.73) than men (0.13 to 0.34), but the difference only reached statistical significance for depressive symptoms (p=0.004). Meta-regression indicated that larger reductions in anxiety were associated with greater improvement in pregnancy rates (Slope 0.19; p=0.004). No clear-cut differences were found between effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT; g=0.84), mind-body interventions (0.61) and other intervention types (0.50).
CONCLUSIONS
The present meta-analysis suggests that psychosocial interventions for couples in treatment for infertility, in particular CBT, could be efficacious, both in reducing psychological distress and in improving clinical pregnancy rates.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infertility; Male; Mental Disorders; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Rate; Psychotherapy; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25631310
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006592 -
Cancer Medicine Jul 2023Distress is prevalent among lymphoma patients/survivors. Current processes of distress identification rely on self-reporting by patients/survivors, which may be limited... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Distress is prevalent among lymphoma patients/survivors. Current processes of distress identification rely on self-reporting by patients/survivors, which may be limited by their willingness to report symptoms. To help identify patients/survivors at greater risk, this systematic review aims to comprehensively review factors that may contribute to distress in lymphoma patients/survivors.
METHODS
PubMed was systematically searched for peer-reviewed primary articles (1997-2022) consisting of standardised keywords "lymphoma" and "distress." Information from 41 articles was integrated via narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
Consistent risk factors of distress include younger age, relapsed disease, and greater comorbidities and symptom burden. Active treatment and the transition from treatment to post-treatment could be challenging phases. Adequate social support, adaptive adjustment to cancer, engaging in work and healthcare professionals' support may mitigate distress. There is some evidence that older age may be associated with greater depression and life changes/experiences may shape how individuals cope with lymphoma. Gender and marital status were not robust predictors of distress. Other clinical, psychological and socioeconomic factors are understudied or have mixed findings.
CONCLUSIONS
While several factors of distress align with that of other cancers, more research is needed to identify significant factors of distress in lymphoma patients/survivors. The identified factors may support clinicians in identifying distressed lymphoma patients/survivors and providing interventions where necessary. The review also highlights avenues for future research and a need to routinely collect data on distress and its factors in registries.
Topics: Humans; Stress, Psychological; Quality of Life; Lymphoma; Neoplasms; Psychological Distress
PubMed: 37199079
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6069 -
Medicine Apr 2021Gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (GB-NEC) is rare and there are few reports at present. We sought to review the current knowledge of GB-NEC and provide... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (GB-NEC) is rare and there are few reports at present. We sought to review the current knowledge of GB-NEC and provide recommendations for clinical management.
METHODS
A systemic literature research was conducted in the websites of Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data using the keywords including gallbladder combined with neuroendocrine carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumor or neuroendocrine neoplasm. Two reviewers independently screened the articles by reading the title, abstract and full-text.
RESULTS
In computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination, a well-defined margin, gallbladder replacing type with larger hepatic and lymphatic metastases could be helpful for differential diagnosis of GB-NEC and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GB-ADC). Older age, unmarried status, large tumor size (>5 cm), positive margins, and distant Surveillance, Epidemiology and End result (SEER) stage are independently associated with poor survival. Surgical resection remains as the preferred and primary treatment. The potential survival benefit of lymphadenectomy for patients remains controversial. Platinum-based postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the survival. The efficacy of other treatments including immunotherapy, targeted therapy and somatostatin analogue needs further investigation.
CONCLUSION
Typical imaging features could be helpful for preoperative diagnosis. Age, margin status, tumor size, marital status, histopathologic subtype and SEER stage may be independent predictors for the survival. Remarkable advances regarding the treatment for GB-NEC have been achieved in recent years. Further studies are needed to investigate the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy for patients with GB-NEC.
Topics: Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Combined Modality Therapy; Gallbladder Neoplasms; Humans; Prognosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 33832150
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025449