-
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Jul 2022Aggressive angiomyxoma is a rare benign mesenchymal tumor and occurs rarely in males. This study aimed to review all the cases of AAM in men in the English literature up... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Aggressive angiomyxoma is a rare benign mesenchymal tumor and occurs rarely in males. This study aimed to review all the cases of AAM in men in the English literature up to September 2020 and investigate the clinical, histochemical, and radiological characteristics of AAM and discuss the best treatment choices according to available data.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase databases up to September 2020 was performed looking for reported cases of male patients with AAM. The search excluded articles in languages other than English, reported female cases, and superficial angiomyxoma cases.
RESULTS
Among the 97 patients, the mean age was 48.2 years with an incidence peak between 40 and 60 years. The sites commonly involved were the scrotum (42.3%). On ultrasound, the tumor was hypoechoic (85.7%) with a well-defined margin (100%), whereas on MRI, most cases were isointense on T1-weighted images (53.8%), and hyperintense on T2-weighted images (85.7%). Immunohistochemistry revealed that the tumor tended to be positive for vimentin (100%), CD34 (63.4%), ER (50%), and PR (53.3%) while S-100 showed 91% negativity. Wide and complete surgical excision was conducted in most cases (72%), and follow-up duration ranged from 1 month to 144 months with a recurrence rate of 11.8%.
CONCLUSION
Although the occurrence of AAM is rare in men, consideration should be taken in the differential diagnosis of a mass in the genitourinary region. According to our review, the most decisive immunohistochemistry profile is the positivity of Vimentin and CD34 with the negativity of S-100. Although hormonal treatment is controversial, we suggest a novel algorithm for the management of aggressive angiomyxoma.
PubMed: 35860056
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103880 -
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and... Oct 2021To evaluate clinical outcomes after intraosseous injection for knee osteoarthritis systematically with available clinical evidence. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate clinical outcomes after intraosseous injection for knee osteoarthritis systematically with available clinical evidence.
METHODS
A systematic search methodology of the PUBMED, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases was conducted in November 2020. The search workflow was in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The following inclusion criteria were adopted: clinical trials of any level of evidence, reporting clinical outcomes following intraosseous injections of bone substitutes or biologic agents, and mesenchymal stem cells or platelet-rich plasma into the knee as treatment modalities for osteoarthritis. Duplicate data and articles not written in English were excluded from this review.
RESULTS
Six studies were identified and included in this review, with a total of 167 patients. Two studies used subchondroplasty CaP injections, while 4 studies used intraosseous injections of platelet-rich plasma. Two studies provided Level II evidence, 2 studies provided Level III evidence, and a further 2 provided Level IV evidence. Five out of 6 studies reported data using the visual analog scale, 4 studies used the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, while 3 studies used the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Clinical improvements in pain and functionality were documented in all trials, with only a few patients experiencing adverse events.
CONCLUSION
Intraosseous injections for knee osteoarthritis are safe and effective. However, multiple pertinent variables such as safety, cost of treatment, and performance against placebos and other treatment modalities require further evaluation before intraosseous injections can be considered as standard treatment for patients presenting with osteoarthritis of the knee.
PubMed: 34712993
DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.006 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Steroids-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a life-threatening condition in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Steroids-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a life-threatening condition in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but the optimal second-line therapy still has not been established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of different second-line therapy regimens.
METHODS
Literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and China Biology Medicine databases were performed to retrieve RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of different therapy regimens for patients with SR aGVHD. Meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager version 5.3. The primary outcome is the overall response rate (ORR) at day 28. Pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with the Mantel-Haenszel method.
RESULTS
Eight eligible RCTs were included, involving 1127 patients with SR aGVHD and a broad range of second-line therapy regimens. Meta-analysis of 3 trials investigating the effects of adding mesenchymal stroma cells (MSCs) to other second-line therapy regimens suggested that the addition of MSCs is associated with significantly improvement in ORR at day 28 (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01-1.32, = 0.04), especially in patients with severe (grade III-IV or grade C-D) aGVHD (RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.04-1.52, = 0.02) and patients with multiorgan involved (RR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.05-1.55, = 0.01). No significant difference was observed betwwen the MSCs group and control group in consideration of overall survival and serious adverse events. Treatment outcomes of the other trials were comprehensively reviewed, ruxolitinib showed significantly higher ORR and complete response rate at day 28, higher durable overall response at day 56 and longer failure-free survival in comparison with other regimens; inolimomab shows similar 1-year therapy success rate but superior long-term overall survial in comparison with anti-thymocyte globulin, other comparisons did not show significant differences in efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS
Adding MSCs to other second-line therapy regimens is associated with significantly improved ORR, ruxolitinib showed significantly better efficacy outcomes in comparison with other regimens in patients with SR aGVHD. Further well-designed RCTs and integrated studies are required to determine the optimal treatment.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022342487.
Topics: Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Graft vs Host Disease; Steroids
PubMed: 37409129
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1211171 -
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Sep 2023Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID-19... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID-19 highly infectious; publicly accessible literature and other sources of information continue to expand in volume. The mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy efficacy for COVID-19 is debatable.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) aimed to evaluate the usefulness of MSCs in treating COVID-19.
METHODS
Relevant publications were retrieved from databases up to April 30, 2022. In the case of dichotomous data, the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were estimated with a random effects model (REM) or fixed effects model (FEM). The pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs were calculated with REM or FEM in continuous data. In the outcomes, studies with insufficient or unusable data were reported descriptively.
RESULTS
A total of eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 464 people were chosen for this SRMA. Relative to the control group, mortality was significantly lower in the MSCs group (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.99, Z = 2.01, p = .04); other secondary outcomes, such as the clinical symptom improvement rate improved in the MSCs group (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.99, Z = 2.24, p = .03), clinical symptom improvement time (MD: -4.01, 95% CI: -6.33, -1.68, Z = 3.38, p = .0007), C-reactive protein (CRP) (MD: -39.16, 95% CI: -44.39, -33.94, Z = 14.70, p < .00001) and days to hospital discharge (MD: -3.83, 95% CI: -6.19, -1.48, Z = 3.19, p = .001) reduced significantly in MSCs group. However, the adverse reaction incidence did not change significantly.
CONCLUSIONS
MSCs are a viable therapy option for COVID-19 because of their safety and potential efficacy. With no significant adverse effects, MSCs can reduce mortality, clinical symptom improvement time, and days to hospital discharge, improve clinical symptoms, and reduce inflammatory cytokines CRP in COVID-19. However, further high-quality clinical studies are required to confirm these results.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19
PubMed: 37773722
DOI: 10.1002/iid3.1000 -
International Journal of Molecular... Mar 2024Wound healing is an intricate process involving coordinated interactions among inflammatory cells, skin fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells. Successful... (Review)
Review
Wound healing is an intricate process involving coordinated interactions among inflammatory cells, skin fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells. Successful tissue repair hinges on controlled inflammation, angiogenesis, and remodeling facilitated by the exchange of cytokines and growth factors. Comorbid conditions can disrupt this process, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Stem cell therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for enhancing wound healing, utilizing cells from diverse sources such as endothelial progenitor cells, bone marrow, adipose tissue, dermal, and inducible pluripotent stem cells. In this systematic review, we comprehensively investigated stem cell therapies in chronic wounds, summarizing the clinical, translational, and primary literature. A systematic search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library yielded 22,454 articles, reduced to 44 studies after rigorous screening. Notably, adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) emerged as an optimal choice due to their abundant supply, easy isolation, ex vivo proliferative capacities, and pro-angiogenic factor secretion. AD-MSCs have shown efficacy in various conditions, including peripheral arterial disease, diabetic wounds, hypertensive ulcers, bullous diabeticorum, venous ulcers, and post-Mohs micrographic surgery wounds. Delivery methods varied, encompassing topical application, scaffold incorporation, combination with plasma-rich proteins, and atelocollagen administration. Integration with local wound care practices resulted in reduced pain, shorter healing times, and improved cosmesis. Stem cell transplantation represents a potential therapeutic avenue, as transplanted stem cells not only differentiate into diverse skin cell types but also release essential cytokines and growth factors, fostering increased angiogenesis. This approach holds promise for intractable wounds, particularly chronic lower-leg wounds, and as a post-Mohs micrographic surgery intervention for healing defects through secondary intention. The potential reduction in healthcare costs and enhancement of patient quality of life further underscore the attractiveness of stem cell applications in wound care. This systematic review explores the clinical utilization of stem cells and stem cell products, providing valuable insights into their role as ancillary methods in treating chronic wounds.
Topics: Humans; Endothelial Cells; Quality of Life; Wound Healing; Pluripotent Stem Cells; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Cytokines; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
PubMed: 38474251
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25053006 -
Systematic Reviews May 2022Stem cell transplantation (SCT) has paved the way for treatment of autoimmune diseases. SCT has been investigated in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) as an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Stem cell transplantation (SCT) has paved the way for treatment of autoimmune diseases. SCT has been investigated in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) as an autoimmune-based disorder, but previous studies have not presented a comprehensive view of its effect on treatment of T1DM.
METHODOLOGY
After registration of the present systematic review and meta-analysis in the PROSPERO, a search was done according to the Cochrane guidelines for evaluation of clinical trials to find eligible clinical trials that investigated the effect of SCT on T1DM (based on ADA® diagnostic criteria) from PubMed, Web of science, Scopus, etc, as well as registries of clinical trials from January 1, 2000, to September 31, 2019. A search strategy was designed using MeSH and EM-tree terms. Primary outcome included the changes in the insulin total daily dose (TDD) (U/kg) level, and secondary outcomes included the changes in the HbA1c, c-peptide, and adjusted HbA1c levels. The Q Cochrane test and I statistic were performed to assess the heterogeneity and its severity in primary clinical trials. The Cochrane ROB was used to determine risk of bias, and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used in the full text papers. The meta-analysis was accomplished in the STATA software, and the results were shown on their forest plots. Confounders were evaluated by the meta-regression test.
RESULTS
A total of 9452 studies were electronically screened, and 35 papers were included for data extraction. The results of this review study showed that 173 (26.5%) diabetic patients experienced insulin-free period (from 1 to 80 months), and 445 (68%) showed reduction in TDD of insulin after the SCT. Combination of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) with mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation were significantly associated with improvement of the TDD (SMD: - 0.586, 95% CI: - 1.204/- 0.509, I: 0%), HbA1c (SMD: - 0.736, 95% CI: - 1.107/- 0.365, I: 0%), adjusted HbA1c (SMD: - 2.041, 95% CI: - 2.648/- 1.434, I: 38.4%), and c-peptide (SMD: 1.917, 95% CI: 0.192/3.641, I: 92.5%) on month 3 of follow-up, while its association had a growing trend from 3 to 12 months after the transplantation. Considering severe adverse events, HSC transplantation accompanied with conditioning could not be suggested as a safe treatment.
CONCLUSION
Most of the clinical trials of SCT in T1DM were single arm. Although meta-analysis illustrated the SCT is associated with T1DM improvement, well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify its efficacy.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the results of this meta-analysis, the MSC and its combination with HSC could be considered as "Safe Cell" for SCT in T1DM. Furthermore, to evaluate the SCT efficacy, calculation of insulin TDD (U/kg/day), AUC of c-peptide, and adjusted HbA1c are highly recommended.
Topics: C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Insulin; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
PubMed: 35501872
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-01950-3 -
Stem Cells Translational Medicine Sep 2021Regenerative, cell-based therapy is a promising treatment option for diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which has no cure. To prepare for clinical translation, this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Regenerative, cell-based therapy is a promising treatment option for diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which has no cure. To prepare for clinical translation, this systematic review and meta-analysis summarized the effect of cell-based interventions in DKD animal models and treatment-related factors modifying outcomes. Electronic databases were searched for original investigations applying cell-based therapy in diabetic animals with kidney endpoints (January 1998-May 2019). Weighted or standardized mean differences were estimated for kidney outcomes and pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses tested treatment-related factor effects for outcomes (creatinine, urea, urine protein, fibrosis, and inflammation). In 40 studies (992 diabetic rodents), therapy included mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC; 61%), umbilical cord/amniotic fluid cells (UC/AF; 15%), non-MSC (15%), and cell-derived products (13%). Tissue sources included bone marrow (BM; 65%), UC/AF (15%), adipose (9%), and others (11%). Cell-based therapy significantly improved kidney function while reducing injury markers (proteinuria, histology, fibrosis, inflammation, apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal-transition, oxidative stress). Preconditioning, xenotransplantation, and disease-source approaches were effective. MSC and UC/AF cells had greater effect on kidney function while cell products improved fibrosis. BM and UC/AF tissue sources more effectively improved kidney function and proteinuria vs adipose or other tissues. Cell dose, frequency, and administration route also imparted different benefits. In conclusion, cell-based interventions in diabetic animals improved kidney function and reduced injury with treatment-related factors modifying these effects. These findings may aid in development of optimal repair strategies through selective use of cells/products, tissue sources, and dose administrations to allow for successful adaptation of this novel therapeutic in human DKD.
Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Nephropathies; Fibrosis; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Umbilical Cord
PubMed: 34106528
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.19-0419 -
Stem Cell Research & Therapy Jun 2022Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a diffuse connective tissue disease characterized by the invasion of exocrine glands such as lacrimal and salivary glands, abnormal... (Review)
Review
Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a diffuse connective tissue disease characterized by the invasion of exocrine glands such as lacrimal and salivary glands, abnormal proliferation of T and B lymphocytes, and infiltration of tissue lymphocytes. With the development of modern medicine, although research on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of pSS has made significant progress, its pathogenesis has not been fully understood. Meanwhile, in the era of individualized treatment, it remains essential to further explore early diagnosis and treatment methods. Exosomes, small vesicles containing proteins and nucleic acids, are a subtype of extracellular vesicles secreted by various cells and present in various body fluids. Exosomes contribute to a variety of biological functions, including intercellular signal transduction and pathophysiological processes, and may play a role in immune tolerance. Therefore, exosomes are key to understanding the pathogenesis of diseases. Exosomes can also be used as a therapeutic tool for pSS because of their biodegradability, low immunogenicity and toxicity, and the ability to bypass the blood-brain barrier, implying the prospect of a broad application in the context of pSS. Here, we systematically review the isolation, identification, tracing, and mode of action of extracellular vesicles, especially exosomes, as well as the research progress in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of pSS.
Topics: B-Lymphocytes; Exosomes; Extracellular Vesicles; Humans; Salivary Glands; Sjogren's Syndrome
PubMed: 35659085
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-022-02912-1 -
International Journal of Molecular... Oct 2023Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based exosomes have garnered attention as a viable therapeutic for post-traumatic cartilage injury and osteoarthritis of the knee; however,... (Review)
Review
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based exosomes have garnered attention as a viable therapeutic for post-traumatic cartilage injury and osteoarthritis of the knee; however, efforts for application have been limited due to issues with variable dosing and rapid clearance in vivo. Scaffolds laden with MSC-based exosomes have recently been investigated as a solution to these issues. Here, we review in vivo studies and highlight key strengths and potential clinical uses of exosome-scaffold therapeutics for treatment of post-traumatic cartilage injury and osteoarthritis. In vivo animal studies were gathered using keywords related to the topic, revealing 466 studies after removal of duplicate papers. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied for abstract screening and full-text review. Thirteen relevant studies were identified for analysis and extraction. Three predominant scaffold subtypes were identified: hydrogels, acellular extracellular matrices, and hyaluronic acid. Each scaffold-exosome design showcased unique properties with relation to gross findings, tissue histology, biomechanics, and gene expression. All designs demonstrated a reduction in inflammation and induction of tissue regeneration. The results of our review show that current exosome-scaffold therapeutics demonstrate the capability to halt and even reverse the course of post-traumatic cartilage injury and osteoarthritis. While this treatment modality shows incredible promise, future research should aim to characterize long-term biocompatibility and optimize scaffold designs for human treatment.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Exosomes; Cartilage Diseases; Knee Joint; Cartilage; Cartilage, Articular; Tissue Scaffolds
PubMed: 37894859
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242015178 -
BMC Medicine Jul 2016Bone tissue engineering and the research surrounding peptides has expanded significantly over the last few decades. Several peptides have been shown to support and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Bone tissue engineering and the research surrounding peptides has expanded significantly over the last few decades. Several peptides have been shown to support and stimulate the bone healing response and have been proposed as therapeutic vehicles for clinical use. The aim of this comprehensive review is to present the clinical and experimental studies analysing the potential role of peptides for bone healing and bone regeneration.
METHODS
A systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Articles presenting peptides capable of exerting an upregulatory effect on osteoprogenitor cells and bone healing were included in the study.
RESULTS
Based on the available literature, a significant amount of experimental in vitro and in vivo evidence exists. Several peptides were found to upregulate the bone healing response in experimental models and could act as potential candidates for future clinical applications. However, from the available peptides that reached the level of clinical trials, the presented results are limited.
CONCLUSION
Further research is desirable to shed more light into the processes governing the osteoprogenitor cellular responses. With further advances in the field of biomimetic materials and scaffolds, new treatment modalities for bone repair will emerge.
Topics: Animals; Bone Regeneration; Bone and Bones; Fracture Healing; Humans; Peptides; Tissue Engineering
PubMed: 27400961
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0646-y