-
Health Technology Assessment... Oct 2016Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) affects up to 85% of all women during pregnancy, but for the majority self-management suffices. For the remainder, symptoms are... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) affects up to 85% of all women during pregnancy, but for the majority self-management suffices. For the remainder, symptoms are more severe and the most severe form of NVP - hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) - affects 0.3-1.0% of pregnant women. There is no widely accepted point at which NVP becomes HG.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to determine the relative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for NVP and HG.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (CAB) Abstracts, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, British Nursing Index, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Scopus, Conference Proceedings Index, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Economic Evaluations Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched from inception to September 2014. References from studies and literature reviews identified were also examined. was hand-searched, as were websites of relevant organisations. Costs came from NHS sources.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for effectiveness, and population-based case series for adverse events and fetal outcomes. Treatments: vitamins B6 and B12, ginger, acupressure/acupuncture, hypnotherapy, antiemetics, dopamine antagonists, 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists, intravenous (i.v.) fluids, corticosteroids, enteral and parenteral feeding or other novel treatment. Two reviewers extracted data and quality assessed studies. Results were narratively synthesised; planned meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity and incomplete reporting. A simple economic evaluation considered the implied values of treatments.
RESULTS
Seventy-three studies (75 reports) met the inclusion criteria. For RCTs, 33 and 11 studies had a low and high risk of bias respectively. For the remainder ( = 20) it was unclear. The non-randomised studies ( = 9) were low quality. There were 33 separate comparators. The most common were acupressure versus placebo ( = 12); steroid versus usual treatment ( = 7); ginger versus placebo ( = 6); ginger versus vitamin B6 ( = 6); and vitamin B6 versus placebo ( = 4). There was evidence that ginger, antihistamines, metoclopramide (mild disease) and vitamin B6 (mild to severe disease) are better than placebo. Diclectin [Duchesnay Inc.; doxylamine succinate (10 mg) plus pyridoxine hydrochloride (10 mg) slow release tablet] is more effective than placebo and ondansetron is more effective at reducing nausea than pyridoxine plus doxylamine. Diclectin before symptoms of NVP begin for women at high risk of severe NVP recurrence reduces risk of moderate/severe NVP compared with taking Diclectin once symptoms begin. Promethazine is as, and ondansetron is more, effective than metoclopramide for severe NVP/HG. I.v. fluids help correct dehydration and improve symptoms. Dextrose saline may be more effective at reducing nausea than normal saline. Transdermal clonidine patches may be effective for severe HG. Enteral feeding is effective but extreme method treatment for very severe symptoms. Day case management for moderate/severe symptoms is feasible, acceptable and as effective as inpatient care. For all other interventions and comparisons, evidence is unclear. The economic analysis was limited by lack of effectiveness data, but comparison of costs between treatments highlights the implications of different choices.
LIMITATIONS
The main limitations were the quantity and quality of the data available.
CONCLUSION
There was evidence of some improvement in symptoms for some treatments, but these data may not be transferable across disease severities. Methodologically sound and larger trials of the main therapies considered within the UK NHS are needed.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013006642.
FUNDING
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Topics: Antiemetics; Clinical Trials as Topic; Complementary Therapies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Nausea; Pregnancy
PubMed: 27731292
DOI: 10.3310/hta20740 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2015Nausea, retching and vomiting are very commonly experienced by women in early pregnancy. There are considerable physical, social and psychological effects on women who... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Nausea, retching and vomiting are very commonly experienced by women in early pregnancy. There are considerable physical, social and psychological effects on women who experience these symptoms. This is an update of a review of interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy last published in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of all interventions for nausea, vomiting and retching in early pregnancy, up to 20 weeks' gestation.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field's Trials Register (19 January 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials of any intervention for nausea, vomiting and retching in early pregnancy. We excluded trials of interventions for hyperemesis gravidarum, which are covered by another Cochrane review. We also excluded quasi-randomised trials and trials using a cross-over design.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Four review authors, in pairs, reviewed the eligibility of trials and independently evaluated the risk of bias and extracted the data for included trials.
MAIN RESULTS
Forty-one trials involving 5449 women, met the inclusion criteria. These trials covered many interventions, including acupressure, acustimulation, acupuncture, ginger, chamomile, lemon oil, mint oil, vitamin B6 and several antiemetic drugs. There were no included studies of dietary and other lifestyle interventions. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of P6 acupressure, auricular (ear) acupressure and acustimulation of the P6 point was limited. Acupuncture (P6 or traditional) showed no significant benefit to women in pregnancy. The use of ginger products may be helpful to women, but the evidence of effectiveness was limited and not consistent, though three recent studies support ginger over placebo. There was only limited evidence from trials to support the use of pharmacological agents including vitamin B6, Doxylamine-pyridoxoine and other anti-emetic drugs to relieve mild or moderate nausea and vomiting. There was little information on maternal and fetal adverse outcomes and on psychological, social or economic outcomes.We were unable to pool findings from studies for most outcomes due to heterogeneity in study participants, interventions, comparison groups, and outcomes measured or reported. The methodological quality of the included studies was mixed. Risk of bias was low related to performance bias, detection bias and attrition bias for most studies. Selection bias risk was unclear for many studies and almost half of the studies did not fully or clearly report all pre-specified outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Given the high prevalence of nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy, women and health professionals need clear guidance about effective and safe interventions, based on systematically reviewed evidence. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support any particular intervention. This is not the same as saying that the interventions studied are ineffective, but that there is insufficient strong evidence for any one intervention. The difficulties in interpreting and pooling the results of the studies included in this review highlight the need for specific, consistent and clearly justified outcomes and approaches to measurement in research studies.
Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Antiemetics; Female; Zingiber officinale; Humans; Morning Sickness; Nausea; Phytotherapy; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin B 6; Vitamin B Complex; Vomiting
PubMed: 26348534
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007575.pub4 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Sep 2022Hyperemesis gravidarum is characterized by severe nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, frequently resulting in severe maternal nutritional deficiency. Maternal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Hyperemesis gravidarum is characterized by severe nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, frequently resulting in severe maternal nutritional deficiency. Maternal undernutrition is associated with adverse offspring health outcomes. Whether hyperemesis gravidarum permanently affects offspring health remains unclear. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of maternal hyperemesis gravidarum on offspring health.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to September 6, 2021.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies reporting on health at any age beyond the perinatal period of children born to mothers with hyperemesis gravidarum were included.
METHODS
Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess risk of bias. We conducted a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis where possible. In meta-analyses with high heterogeneity (I>75%), we did not provide a pooled odds ratio.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies were included in this systematic review (n=1,814,785 offspring). Meta-analysis (n=619, 2 studies: 1 among adolescents and 1 among adults) showed that hyperemesis gravidarum was associated with anxiety disorder (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.91; I, 0%) and sleep problems in offspring (odds ratio, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-6.93; I, 0%). Hyperemesis gravidarum was associated with testicular cancer in male offspring aged up to 40 years on meta-analysis (5 studies, n=20,930 offspring), although heterogeneity was observed on the basis of a wide 95% prediction interval (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.39; I, 0%; 95% prediction interval, 0.83-3.08). All 6 studies reporting on attention deficit (hyperactivity) disorder and autism spectrum disorder reported an increase among children of mothers with hyperemesis gravidarum in comparison with children of unaffected mothers. Meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity, precluding us from reporting a pooled odds ratio. Most studies reporting on cognitive and motor problems found an increase among hyperemesis gravidarum-exposed children. One study investigated brain structure and found smaller cortical volumes and areas among children from hyperemesis gravidarum-affected pregnancies than among those from unaffected pregnancies. Studies evaluating anthropometry and cardiometabolic disease risk of hyperemesis gravidarum-exposed children had inconsistent findings.
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review showed that maternal hyperemesis gravidarum is associated with small increases in adverse health outcomes among children, including neurodevelopmental disorders, mental health disorders, and possibly testicular cancer, although evidence is based on few studies of low quality.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Child; Female; Humans; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Male; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pregnancy; Testicular Neoplasms
PubMed: 35367190
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.052 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Ondansetron is a selective antagonist of the serotonin 5-HT3 receptor that is commonly used to treat morning sickness. It is estimated that 70%-80% of pregnant women...
Ondansetron is a selective antagonist of the serotonin 5-HT3 receptor that is commonly used to treat morning sickness. It is estimated that 70%-80% of pregnant women suffer from morning sickness, a condition characterized by nausea and vomiting. However, it is still controversial regarding its safety during pregnancy, and continued research will be necessary to fully understand the risks and benefits associated with its use. Therefore, we aimed to identify and provide details of the efficacy and safety of ondansetron in clinical trials. A search was conducted of the ClinicalTrials.gov database on 13 April 2023, using the search term "ondansetron and pregnancy." Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined to identify relevant clinical trials. The inclusion criteria encompassed clinical trials related to pregnancy that utilized ondansetron as a treatment, while other clinical trials were excluded from consideration. All data extractions such as study title, study status, study type, intervention details, and outcome were collected. A total of 18 clinical trials were identified, of which only 6 focused on studying the effects of ondansetron. Their respective study titles, statuses, conditions, interventions, outcome measures, and enrollment sizes have been written in detail. The information collected from these trials will contribute to our understanding of the potential benefits and risks of ondansetron in the context of pregnancy and its complications. Ondansetron has been shown to be an effective treatment for nausea and vomiting, including pregnancy-related morning sickness. Further research is needed to better understand the potential risks and benefits associated with its use in pregnant women. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier.
PubMed: 37936910
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1291235 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Jan 2024Hyperemesis gravidarum affects 0.3%-3% of pregnant women each year and is the leading cause of hospitalization in early pregnancy. Previous systematic reviews of...
INTRODUCTION
Hyperemesis gravidarum affects 0.3%-3% of pregnant women each year and is the leading cause of hospitalization in early pregnancy. Previous systematic reviews of available treatments have found a lack of consistent evidence, and few studies of high quality. Since 2016, no systematic review has been conducted and an up-to date review is requested. In a recent James Lind Alliance collaboration, it was clear that research on effective treatments is a high priority for both patients and clinicians.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Searches without time limits were performed in the AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases until June 26, 2023. Studies published before October 1, 2014 were identified from the review by O'Donnell et al., 2016. Selection criteria were randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies of interventions comparing treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum with another treatment or placebo. Outcome variables included were: degree of nausea; vomiting; inability to tolerate oral fluids or food; hospital treatment; health-related quality of life, small-for-gestational-age infant; and preterm birth. Abstracts and full texts were screened, and risk of bias of the studies was assessed independently by two authors. Synthesis without meta-analysis was performed, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. PROSPERO (CRD42022303150).
RESULTS
Twenty treatments were included in 25 studies with low or moderate risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was very low for all treatments except for acupressure in addition to standard care, which showed a possible moderate decrease in nausea and vomiting, with low certainty of evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
Several scientific knowledge gaps were identified. Studies on treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum are few, and the certainty of evidence for different treatments is either low or very low. To establish more robust evidence, it is essential to use validated scoring systems, the recently established diagnostic criteria, clear descriptions and measurements of core outcomes and to perform larger studies.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Nausea; Pregnant Women; Premature Birth; Quality of Life
PubMed: 37891710
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14706 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2023Nausea and vomiting affect up to 80% of all pregnancies, sometimes so severely that the condition of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is established. HG may in addition be a... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Nausea and vomiting affect up to 80% of all pregnancies, sometimes so severely that the condition of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is established. HG may in addition be a predisposing factor for Wernicke encephalopathy (WE), a severe and life-threatening condition due to vitamin B1 (thiamin) deficiency. If untreated, WE may progress to Korsakoff's syndrome, an irreversible cognitive disorder. We reported a case that recently occurred at our clinic and performed a systematic review of the literature to investigate the clinical presentation, maternal and perinatal outcomes and treatment of WE in women with HG.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of case series and case reports searching the Medline database on Pubmed from inception until December 2021. We used as search terms (Wernicke encephalopathy) OR (Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome) AND (hyperemesis gravidarum) AND (pregnancy) AND (thiamin deficiency). Articles were considered eligible for inclusion in our review if they described at least one case of WE due to thiamin deficiency in relation to HG. An overall of 82 cases of WE due to HG in pregnancy from 66 manuscripts, including our own, were selected.
RESULTS
The maternal mean age was 26.38 ± 5.23 years, while mean gestational week at hospitalization was 14.57 ± 4.12 after a mean of 6.6 ± 3.14 weeks of vomiting duration. WE manifestation occurred at a mean gestational age of 16.54 ± 3.06 weeks. Regarding clinical presentation, ocular signs and symptoms were reported by 77/82 (93.9%) women, 61/82 (74.4%) presented with ataxia and 63/82 (76.8%) with confusion. Dysarthria affected 15/82 women (18,3%), while muscular weakness was present in 36/82 (43.9%) and impaired reflexes in 42/82 (51.2%). Memory impairment involved 25/82 (30.5%) of the study population. Almost all cases reported a thiamin administration treatment, however data regarding the clinical course of the neurological condition and the perinatal outcomes were often missing and showed a great heterogeneity when reported.
CONCLUSION
WE is a challenging diagnosis, as its clinical presentation is nonspecific. A high clinical suspicion and the awareness of its possible predisposing conditions such as HG may help clinicians to get a prompt diagnosis and starting treatment, which are vital to prevent possible life-impairing neurological sequelae.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Young Adult; Adult; Infant; Male; Wernicke Encephalopathy; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Korsakoff Syndrome; Brain; Thiamine
PubMed: 37322816
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2223678 -
The British Journal of Nutrition Jul 2022Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), severe nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, can lead to vitamin deficiencies. Little is known about HG-related vitamin K deficiency. We aimed...
Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), severe nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, can lead to vitamin deficiencies. Little is known about HG-related vitamin K deficiency. We aimed to summarise available evidence on the occurrence of HG-related vitamin K deficiency and corresponding maternal and neonatal complications. A systematic review was conducted, searching Medline and EMBASE from inception to 12 November 2020. We identified 1564 articles, of which we included fifteen in this study: fourteen case reports ( 21 women) and one retrospective cohort study ( 109 women). Nine out of twenty-one women reported in case reports had a prolonged prothrombin time (PT). The cohort study measured PT in 39/109 women with HG, of whom 10/39 women (26 %) had prolonged PT. In total, 30-50 % women received vitamin K supplementation after vitamin K deficiency had been diagnosed. Four case reports ( 4 women) reported corresponding maternal complications, all consisting of coagulopathy-related haemorrhage. Nine case reports ( 16 neonates) reported corresponding neonatal complications including intracranial haemorrhage ( 2 neonates) and embryopathy ( 14 neonates), which consisted of Binder phenotype ( 14 neonates), chondrodysplasia punctata ( 9 neonates) and grey matter heterotopia ( 3 neonates). In conclusion, vitamin K deficiency and related complications occur among women with HG. In our systematic review, we were unable to assess the incidence rate.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Male; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Cohort Studies; Retrospective Studies; Vitamin K Deficiency; Vitamin K
PubMed: 34325760
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114521002865 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... May 2023Hyperemesis gravidarum is the severe form of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy and can lead to undernutrition and low maternal weight gain. Previous epidemiologic and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Hyperemesis gravidarum is the severe form of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy and can lead to undernutrition and low maternal weight gain. Previous epidemiologic and animal studies have shown that undernutrition and low maternal weight gain in pregnancy can increase the risk of unfavorable perinatal outcomes, like shorter gestational age, small for gestational age and lower weight at birth.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of hyperemesis gravidarum on perinatal outcomes.
SEARCH STRATEGY
OVID Medline and Embase were searched from inception to February 9th, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY
Studies reporting on perinatal outcomes of infants born to mothers with hyperemesis gravidarum or severe nausea and vomiting in pregnancy were included. Case reports, case series, animal studies, reviews, editorials and conference abstracts were excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. We conducted meta-analyses where possible.
RESULTS
Our search yielded 1387 unique papers, of which 61 studies (n = 20,532,671 participants) were included in our systematic review. Meta-analyses showed that hyperemesis gravidarum was associated with preterm birth < 34 weeks (2 studies n = 2,882: OR 2.81, 95 %CI: 1.69-4.67), birth weight < 1500 g (2 studies, n = 489,141: OR 1.43, 95 %CI: 1.02-1.99), neonatal resuscitation (2 studies, n = 4,289,344: OR 1.07, 95 %CI: 1.05-1.10), neonatal intensive care unit admission (7 studies, n = 6,509,702: OR 1.20, 95 %CI: 1.14-1.26) and placental abruption (6 studies, n = 9,368,360: OR 1.15, 95 %CI: 1.05-1.25). Hyperemesis gravidarum was associated with reductions in birthweight > 4000 g (2 studies, n = 5,503,120: OR 0.74, 95 %CI: 0.72-0.76) and stillbirth (9 studies, n = 3,973,154: OR 0.92, 95 %CI: 0.85-0.99). Meta-analyses revealed no association between hyperemesis gravidarum and Apgar scores < 7 at 1 and 5 min; fetal loss, perinatal deaths and neonatal deaths.
CONCLUSION
Hyperemesis gravidarum is associated with several adverse perinatal outcomes including low birth weight and preterm birth. We also found that pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum less frequently were complicated by macrosomia and stillbirth. We were unable to investigate underlying mechanisms.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Pregnancy Outcome; Stillbirth; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Premature Birth; Birth Weight; Gestational Weight Gain; Placenta; Resuscitation; Nausea; Malnutrition; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
PubMed: 36924660
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.004 -
BMC Complementary and Alternative... Jan 2016Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) and hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) have a significant impact on quality of life. Medication to relieve symptoms of NVP and HG are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) and hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) have a significant impact on quality of life. Medication to relieve symptoms of NVP and HG are available but pregnant women and their caregivers have been concerned about the teratogenic effect, side effects and poor efficacy. The aim of this review was to investigate if there is any clinical evidence for the efficacy of acustimulation in the treatment of NVP or HG.
METHODS
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including both English and Chinese databases was conducted to assess the efficacy of various techniques of acustimulation for NVP and HG. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane's risks of bias tool. Revised STRICTA (2010) criteria were used to appraise acustimulation procedures. Pooled relative risks (RRp) and standard mean deviations (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from the data provided by the investigators of the original trials.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine trials including 3519 patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty trials could be included in statistical pooling. The overall effect of different acustimulation techniques shows a significant reduction for the combined outcome for NVP or HG in pregnancy as a dichotomous variable (RRp 1.73, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.08). Studies with continuous outcome measures for nausea, vomiting and the combined outcome did not show any evidence for relieving symptoms of NVP and HG (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS
Although there is some evidence for an effect of acustimulation on nausea and vomiting or hyperemesis in pregnancy, results are not conclusive. Future clinical trials with a rigorous design and large sample sizes should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these interventions for NVP and HG.
Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; China; Female; Humans; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Nausea; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Western World
PubMed: 26758211
DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-0985-4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2016Hyperemesis gravidarum is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy affecting 0.3% to 1.0% of pregnancies, and is one of the most common indications for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Hyperemesis gravidarum is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy affecting 0.3% to 1.0% of pregnancies, and is one of the most common indications for hospitalization during pregnancy. While a previous Cochrane review examined interventions for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, there has not yet been a review examining the interventions for the more severe condition of hyperemesis gravidarum.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety, of all interventions for hyperemesis gravidarum in pregnancy up to 20 weeks' gestation.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register and the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field's Trials Register (20 December 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized controlled trials of any intervention for hyperemesis gravidarum. Quasi-randomized trials and trials using a cross-over design were not eligible for inclusion.We excluded trials on nausea and vomiting of pregnancy that were not specifically studying the more severe condition of hyperemesis gravidarum.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently reviewed the eligibility of trials, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. Data were checked for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty-five trials (involving 2052 women) met the inclusion criteria but the majority of 18 different comparisons described in the review include data from single studies with small numbers of participants. The comparisons covered a range of interventions including acupressure/acupuncture, outpatient care, intravenous fluids, and various pharmaceutical interventions. The methodological quality of included studies was mixed. For selected important comparisons and outcomes, we graded the quality of the evidence and created 'Summary of findings' tables. For most outcomes the evidence was graded as low or very low quality mainly due to the imprecision of effect estimates. Comparisons included in the 'Summary of findings' tables are described below, the remaining comparisons are described in detail in the main text.No primary outcome data were available when acupuncture was compared with placebo, There was no clear evidence of differences between groups for anxiodepressive symptoms (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.40; one study, 36 women, very low-quality evidence), spontaneous abortion (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.03; one study, 57 women, low-quality evidence), preterm birth (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.26; one study, 36 women, low-quality evidence), or perinatal death (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.30; one study, 36 women, low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to identify clear differences between acupuncture and metoclopramide in a study with 81 participants regarding reduction/cessation in nausea or vomiting (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.49 and RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.48, respectively; very low-quality evidence).In a study with 92 participants, women taking vitamin B6 had a slightly longer hospital stay compared with placebo (mean difference (MD) 0.80 days, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.52, moderate-quality evidence). There was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a difference in other outcomes including mean number of episodes of emesis (MD 0.50, 95% CI -0.40 to 1.40, low-quality evidence) or side effects.A comparison between metoclopramide and ondansetron identified no clear difference in the severity of nausea or vomiting (MD 1.70, 95% CI -0.15 to 3.55, and MD -0.10, 95% CI -1.63 to 1.43; one study, 83 women, respectively, very low-quality evidence). However, more women taking metoclopramide complained of drowsiness and dry mouth (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.69, and RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.11, respectively; moderate-quality evidence). There were no clear differences between groups for other side effects.In a single study with 146 participants comparing metoclopramide with promethazine, more women taking promethazine reported drowsiness, dizziness, and dystonia (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87, RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.69, and RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.90, respectively, moderate-quality evidence). There were no clear differences between groups for other important outcomes including quality of life and other side effects.In a single trial with 30 women, those receiving ondansetron had no difference in duration of hospital admission compared to those receiving promethazine (MD 0.00, 95% CI -1.39 to 1.39, very low-quality evidence), although there was increased sedation with promethazine (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.94, low-quality evidence) .Regarding corticosteroids, in a study with 110 participants there was no difference in days of hospital admission compared to placebo (MD -0.30, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.10; very low-quality evidence), but there was a decreased readmission rate (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.94; four studies, 269 women). For other important outcomes including pregnancy complications, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth and congenital abnormalities, there was insufficient evidence to identify differences between groups (very low-quality evidence for all outcomes). In other single studies there were no clear differences between groups for preterm birth or side effects (very low-quality evidence).For hydrocortisone compared with metoclopramide, no data were available for primary outcomes and there was no difference in the readmission rate (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.28;one study, 40 women).In a study with 80 women, compared to promethazine, those receiving prednisolone had increased nausea at 48 hours (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.72; low-quality evidence), but not at 17 days (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.15, very low-quality evidence). There was no clear difference in the number of episodes of emesis or subjective improvement in nausea/vomiting. There was insufficient evidence to identify differences between groups for stillbirth and neonatal death and preterm birth.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of this review, there is little high-quality and consistent evidence supporting any one intervention, which should be taken into account when making management decisions. There was also very limited reporting on the economic impact of hyperemesis gravidarum and the impact that interventions may have.The limitations in interpreting the results of the included studies highlights the importance of consistency in the definition of hyperemesis gravidarum, the use of validated outcome measures, and the need for larger placebo-controlled trials.
Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antiemetics; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hyperemesis Gravidarum; Metoclopramide; Ondansetron; Placebo Effect; Prednisolone; Pregnancy; Promethazine; Pyridoxine
PubMed: 27168518
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010607.pub2