-
Blood Advances Jun 2019The terminology applied to autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) seems inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate the consistency of definitions used for diagnosis and treatment.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
The terminology applied to autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) seems inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate the consistency of definitions used for diagnosis and treatment. In this systematic review of literature from January 2006 to December 2015, we assessed heterogeneity in the definition of AIHA and its subtypes, refractory disease, disease phase, severity, criteria for treatment response, and response durability. A Medline search for anemia, hemolytic, autoimmune was supplemented with keyword searches. Main exclusions were conference abstracts, animal and non-English studies, and studies with <10 cases. Of 1371 articles retrieved, 1209 were excluded based on titles and abstracts. Two authors independently reviewed 10% and 16% of abstracts and full papers, respectively. After full-paper review, 84 studies were included. AIHA was most frequently (32 [52%] of 61) defined as hemolytic anemia with positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and exclusion of alternatives, but 10 of 32 also recognized DAT-negative AIHA. A lower threshold for diagnosis of DAT-negative AIHA was observed in literature on chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Definitions of anemia, hemolysis, and exclusion criteria showed substantial variation. Definitions of primary/secondary cold agglutinin disease/syndrome were not consistent. Forty-three studies provided criteria for treatment response, and other than studies from 1 center, these were almost entirely unique. Other criteria were rarely defined. Only 7, 0, 3, 2, 2, and 3 studies offered definitions of warm AIHA, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, mixed AIHA, AIHA severity, disease phase, and refractory AIHA, respectively. Marked heterogeneity in the time period sampled indicates the need to standardize AIHA terminology.
Topics: Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune; Coombs Test; Erythrocytes; Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal; Hemolysis; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Publications; Severity of Illness Index; Terminology as Topic
PubMed: 31235526
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000036 -
JAMA Network Open Oct 2020Several antifungal drugs are available for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological disease or who are undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparison of Antifungal Prophylaxis Drugs in Patients With Hematological Disease or Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
IMPORTANCE
Several antifungal drugs are available for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological disease or who are undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the evidence on the efficacy and adverse effects of antifungal agents using an integrated comparison.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials were searched to collect all relevant evidence published in randomized clinical trials that assessed antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological disease. Sources were search from inception up to October 2019.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies that compared any antifungal agent with a placebo, no antifungal agent, or another antifungal agent among patients with hematological disease or undergoing HSCT were included. Of 39 709 studies identified, 69 met the criteria for inclusion.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The outcome from each study was estimated using the relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used. The reliability and validity of the networks were estimated by addressing inconsistencies in the evidence from comparative studies of different treatments. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to February 2020. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Network Meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) guideline.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcomes were invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and mortality. The secondary outcomes were fungal infections, proven IFIs, invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, fungi-related death, and withdrawal owing to adverse effects of the drug.
RESULTS
We identified 69 randomized clinical trials that reported comparisons of 12 treatments with at total of 14 789 patients. Posaconazole was the treatment associated with the best probability of success against IFIs (surface under the cumulative ranking curve, 86.7%; mean rank, 2.5). Posaconazole treatment was associated with a significant reduction in IFIs (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.79) and invasive aspergillosis (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85) compared with placebo. Voriconazole was associated with a significant reduction in invasive candidiasis (RR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09-0.26) compared with placebo. However, posaconazole was associated with a higher incidence of withdrawal because of the adverse effects of the drug (surface under the cumulative ranking curve, 17.5%; mean rank, 9.2). In subgroup analyses considering efficacy and tolerance, voriconazole might be the best choice for patients undergoing HSCT, especially allogenic HSCT; however, posaconazole was ranked as the best choice for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings suggest that voriconazole may be the best prophylaxis option for patients undergoing HSCT, and posaconazole may be the best prophylaxis option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antifungal Agents; Female; Hematologic Diseases; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mycoses; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Triazoles; Voriconazole
PubMed: 33030550
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17652 -
BMC Cancer Aug 2023Currently, there is no standard treatment for managing relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) after allogeneic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Currently, there is no standard treatment for managing relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Venetoclax-based therapies have been increasingly used for treating post-transplantation relapse of AML. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) for AML/MDS relapse post-transplantation.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Library, and Clinical. gov for eligible studies from the inception to February 2022. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of the included literatures. The inverse variance method calculated the pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 10 studies involving a total of 243 patients. The pooled complete response and complete response with incomplete blood count recovery rate of Venetoclax combined with HMAs for post-transplantation relapse in AML/MDS was 32% (95% CI, 26-39%, I = 0%), with an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI, 39-56%, I = 37%). The 6-month survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 29-55%, I = 62%) and the 1-year survival rate was 23% (95% CI, 11-38%, I = 78%).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated a moderate benefit of Venetoclax in combination with HMAs for patients with relapsed AML/MDS post-transplantation (including those who have received prior HMAs therapy), and may become one of treatment options in the future. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential benefit from venetoclax combined with HMAs.
Topics: Humans; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Chronic Disease; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neoplasms, Second Primary
PubMed: 37592239
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11259-6 -
Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) Dec 2023Purpose To study the potential utility of danazol for treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, with a focus on efficacy and adverse effects (AEs). Methods... (Review)
Review
Purpose To study the potential utility of danazol for treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, with a focus on efficacy and adverse effects (AEs). Methods MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus were searched for relevant publications from inception June 1, 1950, until June 28, 2022. The studies were screened by title and abstract, followed by full-text screening. The quality of the included studies was assessed via a prespecified set of questionnaires. Data on the efficacy measures and adverse outcomes were extracted and included in a descriptive summary. Results Nine studies consisting of 246 participants were included in our review. The overall quality of the included studies was fair. The age of the participants ranged from 61 to 78 years. In all 9 studies, more male patients had been enrolled than female patients. Overall, a proportion of patients in all the studies reported a desired major response to a danazol dose of 400 to 800 mg/day. Few studies did not observe any improvement in the platelet count. Elevated liver enzyme levels, weight gain, headache, dermatitis, and weakness were the most common AEs observed. One study reported a fatal intracerebral hemorrhage in 1 participant. Conclusions Danazol has been effective in increasing platelet count and hemoglobin level. Despite a few AEs, danazol is a safe drug for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Topics: Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Danazol; Myelodysplastic Syndromes
PubMed: 38133562
DOI: 10.46883/2023.25921009 -
Skin Health and Disease Apr 2024Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may present with specific skin lesions, such as leukaemia cutis, which is a well known poor prognostic marker of leukaemia with a high...
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may present with specific skin lesions, such as leukaemia cutis, which is a well known poor prognostic marker of leukaemia with a high risk of acute leukaemic transformation. However, less is known regarding non-specific cutaneous manifestations of MDS including the prevalence, types and their prognostic and therapeutic significance, which we aimed to determine through this systematic review. We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Medline and EMBASE) from inception up to 26 January 2023 for studies reporting cutaneous manifestations of MDS. Eighty eight articles (case reports = 67, case series = 21), consisting of 134 patients were identified. We identified 6 common cutaneous manifestations: neutrophilic dermatoses ( = 64), vasculitis ( = 21), granulomatous ( = 8), connective tissue disease (CTD) ( = 7; composed of dermatomyositis ( = 5), cutaneous lupus erythematosus ( = 1), and systemic sclerosis ( = 1)), panniculitis ( = 4), immunobullous ( = 1), and other ( = 29). Cutaneous features either occurred at time of MDS diagnosis in 25.3%, preceding the diagnosis in 34.7% (range 0.5-216 months), or after diagnosis in 40.0% (range 1-132 months). Prognosis was poor (40.2% death) with 34.1% progressing to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). 50% of those with MDS who progressed to AML had neutrophilic dermatoses ( = 0.21). Myelodysplastic syndrome was fatal in 39.2% of neutrophilic dermatoses (median time from onset of cutaneous manifestation: 12 months), 50% of vasculitis (7.5 months), 62.5% of granulomatous (15.5 months) and 14.3% of CTD (7 months). Recognition of patterns of cutaneous features in MDS will improve early diagnosis and risk stratification according to subtype and associated prognosis.
PubMed: 38577044
DOI: 10.1002/ski2.323 -
BMC Hematology 20185-Azacitidine administered as a 7-day dosing regimen (7-0-0) is approved in high risk IPSS myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Alternative regimens such as a 5-day...
BACKGROUND
5-Azacitidine administered as a 7-day dosing regimen (7-0-0) is approved in high risk IPSS myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Alternative regimens such as a 5-day (5-0-0) or 7-day with a weekend break (5-2-2) are commonly used. No randomized controlled trial has been done directly comparing all three dosing regimens. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacies of the 5-0-0, 5-2-2, and 7-0-0 regimens in MDS and AML.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational prospective and retrospective studies. The primary clinical outcomes were Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the sum of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and hematological improvement (HI) as defined by the IWG 2006 criteria. A meta-analysis of simple proportions was conducted using a random effects model with weights defined according to Laird and Mosteller. Comparisons between groups were not attempted due to the heterogeneity of study designs.
RESULTS
The only RCT directly comparing alternative azacitidine regimens showed no difference in ORR between the 5-0-0 and 5-2-2 regimens. All other RCTs compared a dosing regimen to conventional care. The pooled proportion of ORR was 44.8% with 95% CI (42.8%, 45.5%) for 7-0-0, 41.2% with 95% CI (39.2%, 41.9%) for 5-0-0, and 45.8% with 95% CI (42.6%, 46.4%) for 5-2-2.
CONCLUSIONS
Indirect comparison of alternative azacitidine dosing regimens in MDS and AML shows a benefit for the 7-day regimen in attaining ORR. Additional RCTs are required to definitively address this comparison.
PubMed: 29435331
DOI: 10.1186/s12878-017-0094-8 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Feb 2021This review and meta-analysis examined published evidence of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) re-treatment efficacy and safety in patients with advanced... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This review and meta-analysis examined published evidence of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) re-treatment efficacy and safety in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
METHODS
Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Progress, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched (database inception-present) to identify evidence of efficacy and safety of PRRT re-treatment in adults with NETs previously treated with Lu- and/or Y-PRRT. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) from time of re-treatment were assessed. Data were pooled using medians and variance for time-to-event outcomes and inverse-variance weighted proportions (Freeman-Tukey method) for binary outcomes.
RESULTS
Of 567 studies screened, 13 reported re-treatment efficacy outcomes. In random-effects meta-analyses of Lu-PRRT re-treatment, median PFS (N = 7 studies [414patients]) was 12.52 months (95% CI 9.82-15.22) with moderate heterogeneity across studies (I = 50.5%), median OS (N = 2 [194 patients]) was 26.78 months (95% CI 18.73-34.83) with moderate-to-high heterogeneity (I = 57.5%), and DCR (N = 8 [347 patients]) was 71% (95% CI 66-75) with high heterogeneity (I = 81.5%). PFS was similar with either Lu-PRRT re-treatment alone or in combination with Y-PRRT. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 5% (95% CI 2-8) of patients receiving Lu-PRRT re-treatment (N = 5 [271 patients]) with few grade 3/4 renal toxicities (0% [95% CI 0-1]). Pooled myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia incidence was 0% (95%CI 0-2).
CONCLUSION
Re-treatment with Lu-PRRT provided encouraging median PFS in patients with NETs with a safety profile similar to initial PRRT.
Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Progression-Free Survival; Radiopharmaceuticals; Radiotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Peptide; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33418096
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102141 -
Blood Reviews Sep 2023Anemia is common in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). Different anemia treatments have been tested in clinical studies, but the full impact on patients' health-related... (Review)
Review
Anemia is common in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). Different anemia treatments have been tested in clinical studies, but the full impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical function is unknown. The main aim of this review was to assess whether improvements in anemia are associated with changes in HRQoL/physical function. Twenty-six full-text publications were identified, enrolling 2211 patients: nine randomized trials (RCTs), fourteen non-randomized studies of interventions and three cross-sectional studies. Interventions included: growth factors/erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (n = 14), red cell transfusion (n = 9), erythroid maturation agents (n = 1), or a combination (n = 2). Five RCTs reported no changes in HRQoL despite erythroid response to the intervention, raising the question of whether anemia treatment alone can effectively improve HRQoL. Many studies were considered at high risk of bias for assessing HRQoL. There is a pressing need for future clinical trials to better define the nature of the relationship between anemia and HRQoL/functional outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Anemia; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Hematinics; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Quality of Life
PubMed: 37479599
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101114 -
Blood Reviews Nov 2023Despite recent advancements, treatment of cytopenia due to bone marrow failures (BMF) and myeloid neoplasms remains challenging. Androgens promote renewal and maturation... (Review)
Review
Despite recent advancements, treatment of cytopenia due to bone marrow failures (BMF) and myeloid neoplasms remains challenging. Androgens promote renewal and maturation of blood cells and may be beneficial in these forms. Here we report a systematic review of androgens use as single agent in hematologic conditions. Forty-six studies, mainly retrospective with various androgen types and doses, were included: 12 on acquired aplastic anemia (AA), 11 on inherited BMF, 17 on myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and 7 on myelofibrosis. Responses ranged from 50 to 70% in inherited BMF, 40-50% in acquired AA and MDS, while very limited evidence emerged for myelofibrosis. In acquired AA, response was associated with presence of non-severe disease; in MDS androgens were more effective on thrombocytopenia or mild to moderate anemia, whilst limited benefit was observed for transfusion dependent anemia. Toxicity profile mainly consisted of virilization and liver enzyme elevation, whilst the risk of leukemic evolution remains controversial.
Topics: Humans; Androgens; Primary Myelofibrosis; Retrospective Studies; Neoplasms; Anemia, Aplastic; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Bone Marrow Failure Disorders; Pancytopenia; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Thrombocytopenia
PubMed: 37709654
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101132 -
British Journal of Haematology Sep 2016We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy of darbepoetin alpha (DA) for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related anaemia.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy of darbepoetin alpha (DA) for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related anaemia. Eligible studies were prospective, interventional, and reported World Health Organization, French-American-British, or International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) criteria. Outcomes included erythroid response rate (primary); haemoglobin response; change in haemoglobin, transfusion status, and quality-of-life (QoL); and safety. Ten studies (N = 647) were analysed. Erythroid response rate range was 38-72%; median response duration range was 12-51+ months. Patients with erythropoietin (EPO) <100 iu/l had 35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 22-48%; P < 0·001) better response than patients with EPO >100 iu/l. Erythropoesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naïve patients had 17% (95% CI: 3-32%; P = 0·022) greater response rate than those previously treated with ESA. Nonetheless, previously treated patients had response rates of 25-75%. Higher baseline haemoglobin levels, higher dose, transfusion-independence and low-risk IPSS status were reported by several studies to be associated with better response. QoL, transfusion rates and haemoglobin levels improved with treatment. Hypertension, thromboembolism and progression to acute myeloid leukaemia were reported in 2%, 1% and 1% of patients, respectively. This meta-analysis suggests that DA treatment can be useful for improving erythroid response in MDS patients with anaemia, even among patients previously treated with ESA.
Topics: Blood Transfusion; Darbepoetin alfa; Hemoglobins; Humans; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27214305
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14116