-
PloS One 2016Biomechanical tests are widely used in animal studies on osteoporotic fracture healing. However, the biomechanical recovery process is still unknown, leading to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Biomechanical tests are widely used in animal studies on osteoporotic fracture healing. However, the biomechanical recovery process is still unknown, leading to difficulty in choosing time points for biomechanical tests and in correctly assessing osteoporotic fracture healing. To determine the biomechanical recovery process during osteoporotic fracture healing, studies on osteoporotic femur fracture healing with biomechanical tests in ovariectomized rat (OVX) models were collected from PUBMED, EMBASE, and Chinese databases. Quadratic curves of fracture healing time and maximum load were fitted with data from the analyzed studies. In the fitted curve for normal fractures, the predicted maximum load was 145.56 N, and the fracture healing time was 88.0 d. In the fitted curve for osteoporotic fractures, the predicted maximum load was 122.30 N, and the fracture healing time was 95.2 d. The maximum load of fractured femurs in OVX rats was also lower than that in sham rats at day 84 post-fracture (D84 PF). The fracture healing time was prolonged and maximum load at D84 PF decreased in OVX rats with closed fractures. The maximum load of Wister rats was higher than that of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, but the fracture healing time of SD and Wister rats was similar. Osteoporotic fracture healing was delayed in rats that were < = 12 weeks old when ovariectomized, and at D84 PF, the maximum load of rats < = 12 weeks old at ovariectomy was lower than that of rats >12 weeks old at ovariectomy. There was no significant difference in maximum load at D84 PF between rats with an osteoporosis modeling time <12 weeks and > = 12 weeks. In conclusion, fracture healing was delayed and biomechanical property decreased by osteoporosis. Time points around D95.2 PF should be considered for biomechanical tests of osteoporotic femur fracture healing in OVX rat models. Osteoporotic fracture healing in OVX rats was affected by the fracture type but not by the strain of the rat.
Topics: Animals; Biomechanical Phenomena; Female; Femur; Fracture Healing; Osteoporotic Fractures; Ovariectomy; Rats
PubMed: 27055104
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153120 -
Diabetic Medicine : a Journal of the... Sep 2015To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in order to assess the association between Type 1 diabetes and fractures. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in order to assess the association between Type 1 diabetes and fractures.
BACKGROUND
The risk of fracture in men and women with Type 1 diabetes has not been studied in a large prospective well designed cohort.
METHODS
Data were selected from Medline and Embase and abstracts from annual scientific meetings of various diabetes and bone and mineral societies. Published studies that reported the fracture risk in people with Type 1 diabetes in comparison with people without diabetes between 1990 and July 2014 and abstracts from various annual meeting (2005 onwards) were included in the present meta-analysis. Data were extracted from the text of included publications or from abstracts of conferences.
RESULTS
The 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria reported 2066 fracture events among 27 300 people with Type 1 diabetes (7.6%) and 136 579 fracture events among 4 364 125 people without diabetes (3.1%). The pooled relative risk of any fracture in people with Type 1 diabetes was 3.16 (95% CI 1.51-6.63; P = 0.002). Women and men with Type 1 diabetes had a four and two times higher risk of any fractures, respectively, compared with people without diabetes. The pooled relative risks of hip fractures and spinal fractures were 3.78 (95% CI 2.05-6.98; P < 0.001) and 2.88 (95% CI 1.71-4.82; P < 0.001), respectively, among people with Type 1 diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis suggests that both men and women with Type 1 diabetes might have an increased risk of any fractures. A large prospective epidemiological study is needed to confirm our findings.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Osteoporotic Fractures; Risk Factors; Young Adult
PubMed: 26096918
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12734 -
JBMR Plus Nov 2022Thiazide diuretics are commonly used antihypertensive agents. Until today, whether their use reduces fracture risk remains unclear. Our objective was to conduct a...
Thiazide diuretics are commonly used antihypertensive agents. Until today, whether their use reduces fracture risk remains unclear. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of thiazide diuretics' effects on fractures and bone mineral density (BMD) in randomized clinical trials (RCT) of adults. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the WHO's ICTRP registry were searched from inception to July 31, 2019. Two reviewers assessed studies for eligibility criteria: (i) RCTs; (ii) including adults; (iii) comparing thiazides, alone or in combination; (iv) to placebo or another medication; and (v) reporting fractures or BMD. Conference abstracts and studies comparing thiazides to antiresorptive or anabolic bone therapy were excluded. Bias was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool-2. The primary outcome was fracture at any anatomical site. Secondary outcomes were osteoporotic fractures, hip fractures, and BMD at femoral neck, lumbar spine, and/or total hip. Fractures were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) using random-effect models. Prespecified subgroup analyses and post hoc sensitivity analyses were conducted. From 15,712 unique records screened, 32 trials (68,273 patients) met eligibility criteria. Thiazides were associated with decreased fractures at any site (RR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.98; = 0%) and osteoporotic fractures (RR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.69-0.94; = 0%). Results were consistent in most subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Few studies reported hip fractures, and no association was found between thiazides and this outcome (RR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.67-1.04; = 0%). Only four studies reported BMD; a meta-analysis was not conducted because BMD reporting was inconsistent. Trials were deemed at low (3 studies, weight = 3%), some concerns (16 studies; 71%), or high (11 studies; 26%) risk of bias for the primary outcome. In conclusion, thiazide diuretics decreases the risk of fractures at any and at osteoporotic sites in a meta-analysis of RCTs. Additional studies are warranted in patients with high fracture risk. © 2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
PubMed: 36398110
DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10683 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Apr 2021The role of anti-osteoporotic treatment as part of the secondary prevention after hip fracture in terms of mortality and re-fracture risk has been studied, and the... (Review)
Review
The role of anti-osteoporotic treatment as part of the secondary prevention after hip fracture in terms of mortality and re-fracture risk has been studied, and the results are promising. Decreased treatment adherence and compliance is a problem that needs to be addressed by healthcare professionals. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database with terms that included hip fracture, mortality, second fracture, and specific anti-osteoporotic treatment. We included 28 articles, 21 regarding mortality and 20 re-fracture rates in hip fracture patients. All studies showed lower mortality after hip fracture associated with anti-osteoporotic treatment, mostly bisphosphonate agents. The re-fracture risk is still debatable, since conflicting data were found. Although most of the studies showed notable effects on mortality and re-fracture rates associated with anti-osteoporotic treatment, we still need more data to validate the actual results.
PubMed: 33923261
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050341 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jul 2023Prevalence information is the first step in developing preventive procedures or health services. This study was conducted to systematically evaluate the epidemiology of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Prevalence information is the first step in developing preventive procedures or health services. This study was conducted to systematically evaluate the epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese elderly aged ≥ 60 years and to provide evidence-based evidence for the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures.
METHODS
We identified relevant studies by searching the literature published in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases from the establishment of the database until August 2022. We used a random-effects model to obtain prevalence estimates and identified sources of heterogeneity and comparisons of prevalence among different groups through subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 29 articles were included in this study, and the prevalence of osteoporosis fractures in elderly Chinese was high (18.9%). The prevalence has increased significantly over the past decade (from 13.2% in 2000-2010 to 22.7% in 2012-2022). The prevalence of osteoporosis is higher in women than in men (18.5% vs 14.3%) and increases with age. The northern region was higher than the southern region (20.3% vs 18.9%), and the spine, hip, and distal forearm were the most common sites of fracture.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in the Chinese elderly is 18.9%, and timely prevention and treatment are necessary.
Topics: Aged; Male; Humans; Female; Osteoporotic Fractures; Prevalence; Osteoporosis; China; Spine
PubMed: 37501170
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04030-x -
The Indian Journal of Medical Research Jan 2023Calcium and vitamin D, separately or in combination are usually prescribed to prevent fragility fractures in elderly population. However, there are conflicting results... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES
Calcium and vitamin D, separately or in combination are usually prescribed to prevent fragility fractures in elderly population. However, there are conflicting results regarding the ideal dosage and overall efficacy obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in the past. The objective of this study was to assess the fracture risk with the administration of calcium or vitamin D alone or in combination in elderly population (>60 yr).
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched to identify the studies from inception to February 2021 with keywords, 'vitamin D', 'calcium' and 'fracture' to identify RCTs. The trials with comparing vitamin D, calcium or combination with either no medication or placebo were included for final analyses. The data were extracted and the study quality was assessed by two reviewers. The principal outcome measure was fractures around hip joint and secondary outcomes assessed were vertebral and any other fracture.
RESULTS
Eighteen RCTs were considered for the final analysis. Neither calcium nor vitamin D supplementation was associated with risk of fractures around hip joint [risk ratio (RR) 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91 to 2.69, I=28%; P=0.11]. In addition, the combined administration of calcium and vitamin D was also not associated with fractures around the hip joint in comparison to either no treatment or placebo. The incidence of vertebral (RR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.10, I=0%; P=0.49) or any other fracture (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.06, I=0%; P=0.14) was not significantly associated with the administration of calcium and vitamin D either individually or in combination. Further subgroup analysis of the results did not vary with the dosage of calcium or vitamin D, dietary calcium intake sex, or serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS
The present meta-analysis of RCTs on calcium, vitamin D or a combination of the two in comparison to no treatment or placebo did not support the routine administration protocol of calcium and vitamin D either alone or in combination to lower the risk of fractures in elderly population.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Calcium, Dietary; Calcium; Osteoporotic Fractures; Vitamins; Dietary Supplements
PubMed: 37602580
DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1946_21 -
Value in Health : the Journal of the... Apr 2022This study aimed to quantify the relative importance of barriers to better secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures and of care expectations expressed by patients...
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to quantify the relative importance of barriers to better secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures and of care expectations expressed by patients with osteoporotic fractures in France.
METHODS
A qualitative exploration of potential barriers to care and expectations was undertaken through a systematic literature review and in-depth patients interviews. A list of 21 barriers and 21 expectations was identified. These were presented to 324 subjects with osteoporotic fractures, identified in a representative sample of the French population, in the form of best-worst scaling questionnaires. Patients rated the relative importance of the attributes, and arithmetic mean importance scores were calculated and ranked. A Bayesian hierarchical model was also performed to generate a relative importance score. Latent class analysis was performed to identify potential subgroups of patients with different response profiles.
RESULTS
A total of 7 barriers were rated as the most important, relating to awareness of osteoporosis and coordination of care. The highest-ranked barrier, "my fracture is not related to osteoporosis," was significantly more important than all the others (mean importance score 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.56). A similar ranking of attributes was obtained with both the arithmetic and the Bayesian approach. For expectations, no clear hierarchy of attributes was identified. Latent class analysis discriminated 3 classes of respondents with significant differences in response profiles (the educated environmentalists, the unaware, and the victims of the system).
CONCLUSIONS
Better quality of care of osteoporosis and effective secondary fracture prevention will require improvements in patient education, training of healthcare professionals, and coordination of care.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Humans; Motivation; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 35365301
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.005 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Circulating adipokines and ghrelin affect bone remodeling by regulating the activation and differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Although the correlation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CONTEXT
Circulating adipokines and ghrelin affect bone remodeling by regulating the activation and differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Although the correlation between adipokines, ghrelin, and bone mineral density (BMD) has been studied over the decades, its correlations are still controversial. Accordingly, an updated meta-analysis with new findings is needed.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to explore the impact of serum adipokine and ghrelin levels on BMD and osteoporotic fractures through a meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Studies published till October 2020 in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were reviewed.
STUDY SELECTION
We included studies that measured at least one serum adipokine level and BMD or fracture risk in healthy individuals. We excluded studies with one or more of the following: patients less than 18 years old, patients with comorbidities, who had undergone metabolic treatment, obese patients, patients with high physical activities, and a study that did not distinguish sex or menopausal status.
DATA EXTRACTION
We extracted the data that include the correlation coefficient between adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, and resistin) and ghrelin and BMD, fracture risk by osteoporotic status from eligible studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A meta-analysis of the pooled correlations between adipokines and BMD was performed, demonstrating that the correlation between leptin and BMD was prominent in postmenopausal women. In most cases, adiponectin levels were inversely correlated with BMD. A meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the mean differences in adipokine levels according to the osteoporotic status. In postmenopausal women, significantly lower leptin (SMD = -0.88) and higher adiponectin (SMD = 0.94) levels were seen in the osteoporosis group than in the control group. By predicting fracture risk, higher leptin levels were associated with lower fracture risk (HR = 0.68), whereas higher adiponectin levels were associated with an increased fracture risk in men (HR = 1.94) and incident vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women (HR = 1.18).
CONCLUSIONS
Serum adipokines levels can utilize to predict osteoporotic status and fracture risk of patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021224855, identifier CRD42021224855.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Adolescent; Bone Density; Leptin; Adipokines; Adiponectin; Ghrelin; Osteoporotic Fractures
PubMed: 37181034
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1044039 -
Journal of the American Board of Family... Feb 2023There are multiple classes of pharmacologic agents approved for treatment of osteoporosis, but their costs vary widely, and systematic data on their efficacy compared... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There are multiple classes of pharmacologic agents approved for treatment of osteoporosis, but their costs vary widely, and systematic data on their efficacy compared with the traditional standard, bisphosphonates, for reducing fractures in postmenopausal women are lacking. The objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of denosumab compared with bisphosphonates.
METHODS
Researchers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing denosumab to bisphosphonates that included information on clinical and/or osteoporotic fracture events over the follow-up period. Each clinical outcome was meta-analyzed using a fixed-effects analysis, with clinical and osteoporotic fractures as the outcomes of interest. A meta-regression was performed using change in bone mineral density (BMD) as the moderator variable.
RESULTS
Seven RCTs were included. Denosumab was not associated with a reduction in clinical or osteoporotic fractures compared with bisphosphonates. There was no association between the change in BMD with denosumab and bisphosphonates and denosumab's effect on both osteoporotic and clinical fractures.
DISCUSSION
Existing data do not support the use of the more expensive denosumab as a first-line agent over bisphosphonates for reduction of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. One limitation in this study was each RCT was not individually powered for fracture incidences.
Topics: Female; Humans; Diphosphonates; Osteoporotic Fractures; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Postmenopause; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Osteoporosis; Bone Density
PubMed: 36653115
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220099R1 -
Pain Physician May 2023Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). In addition to rapid and effective pain relief, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). In addition to rapid and effective pain relief, the ability to recover the lost height of fractured vertebral bodies and reduce the risk for complications are believed to be the main advantages of this procedure. However, there is no consensus on the appropriate surgical timing for PKP.
OBJECTIVES
This study systematically evaluated the relationship between the surgical timing of PKP and clinical outcomes to provide more evidence for clinicians to choose the intervention timing.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials and prospective, and retrospective cohort trials published up to November 13, 2022. All included studies explored the influence of PKP intervention timing for OVCFs. Data regarding clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications were extracted and analyzed.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies involving 930 patients with symptomatic OVCFs were included. Most patients with symptomatic OVCFs achieved rapid and effective pain relief after PKP. In comparison to delayed PKP intervention, early PKP intervention was associated with similar or better outcomes in terms of pain relief, improvement of function, restoration of vertebral height, and correction of kyphosis deformity. The meta-analysis results showed there was no significant difference in cement leakage rate between early PKP and late PKP (odds ratio [OR] = 1.60, 95% CI, 0.97-2.64, P = 0.07), whereas delayed PKP had a higher risk for adjacent vertebral fractures (AVFs) than early PKP (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13-0.76, P = 0.01).
LIMITATIONS
The number of included studies was small, and the overall quality of the evidence was very low.
CONCLUSIONS
PKP is an effective treatment for symptomatic OVCFs. Early PKP may achieve similar or better clinical and radiographic outcomes for treating OVCFs than delayed PKP. Furthermore, early PKP intervention had a lower incidence of AVFs and a similar rate of cement leakage compared with delayed PKP. Based on current evidence, early PKP intervention might be more beneficial to patients.
Topics: Humans; Kyphoplasty; Fractures, Compression; Spinal Fractures; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Osteoporotic Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Bone Cements; Pain
PubMed: 37192225
DOI: No ID Found