-
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Jun 2022Blount disease is a developmental abnormality characterized by abnormal ossification of proximal tibia, resulting in lower limb deformities with tibia vara. The... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Blount disease is a developmental abnormality characterized by abnormal ossification of proximal tibia, resulting in lower limb deformities with tibia vara. The condition worsens into knee deformity, gait abnormalities, and premature medial compartment osteoarthritis if left untreated. Managements of those deformities have also advanced in line with the understanding of the deformities. Without proper care management, they could lead into residual and translational deformities, increase of recurrence, and complicate the revision surgery.
METHODS
This study aims to enrich our understanding about the recent advances of treatments for Blount disease by reviewing 15 articles published with osteotomy surgeries and fixation methods. We also highlight many aspects of pre-operative assessment and planning, post-operative complications and recurrence, patients' follow-up, and overall satisfaction from patients' self-assessment.
RESULTS
The scope of this review is considered small but still covers various efforts to manage Blount diseases, including single-stage double osteotomy, grafting fibular fragments into tibia, two comparison studies, two unique case study, and experimental techniques to manage special cases requiring novel procedures.
CONCLUSION
Careful surgical planning, acute or gradual correction options, and the use of fixator should be tailored to individual cases.
PubMed: 35734736
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103784 -
Journal of Oral Biology and... 2022Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (PCVDO) has become the treatment of choice in specific indications within 12 years since its introduction in 2009. It is... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (PCVDO) has become the treatment of choice in specific indications within 12 years since its introduction in 2009. It is used to treat or prevent Intracranial hypertension secondary to craniosynostosis. However, there is still a lack of evidence describing this procedure's safety concerning the osteotomy line being close to the torcula. This systematic review aims to generate evidence regarding the safety of this new technique.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
A systematic search of Pubmed and Embase database were done without any time limit until the last search date of July 31, 2021. Articles focused on posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis were shortlisted using defined inclusion criteria. In addition, complications, volume gain, and distraction protocols in patients with craniosynostosis were assessed.
RESULTS
The review included 11 articles from 11 different centres. Of the Total 241 patients, 51 were non-syndromic patients, and 190 were syndromic patients. There were 242 procedures done on 241 patients. The proportion of patients with complications was 30%. Wound infection was the most commonly reported complication. PCVDO resulted in 20-25% volume gain and successfully prevented increased intracranial pressure (ICP).
CONCLUSION
The systematic review has significantly identified a 30.606% incidence of complications in PCVDO. No mortality was linked directly to the Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis procedure (PCVDO). The authors identified the evolution of many unique vectors and osteotomy designs customized for patients and practices for safe surgery. The effects of PCVDO on the anterior cranial fossa remain a topic of interest and require observational studies for better understanding.
PubMed: 36186267
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.09.009 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2014Pectus excavatum is characterized by a depression of the anterior chest wall (sternum and lower costal cartilages) and is the most frequently occurring chest wall... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pectus excavatum is characterized by a depression of the anterior chest wall (sternum and lower costal cartilages) and is the most frequently occurring chest wall deformity. The prevalence ranges from 6.28 to 12 cases per 1000 around the world. Generally pectus excavatum is present at birth or is identified after a few weeks or months; however, sometimes it becomes evident only at puberty. The consequence of the condition on a individual's life is variable, some live a normal life and others have physical and psychological symptoms such as: precordial pain after exercises; impairments of pulmonary and cardiac function; shyness and social isolation. For many years, sub-perichondrial resection of the costal cartilages, with or without transverse cuneiform osteotomy of the sternum and placement of a substernal support, called conventional surgery, was the most accepted option for surgical repair of these patients. From 1997 a new surgical repair called, minimally invasive surgery, became available. This less invasive surgical option consists of the retrosternal placement of a curved metal bar, without resections of the costal cartilages or sternum osteotomy, and is performed by videothoracoscopy. However, many aspects that relate to the benefits and harms of both techniques have not been defined.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the conventional surgery compared with minimally invasive surgery for treating people with pectus excavatum.
SEARCH METHODS
With the aim of increasing the sensitivity of the search strategy we used only terms related to the individual's condition (pectus excavatum); terms related to the interventions, outcomes and types of studies were not included. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and ICTPR. Additionally we searched yet reference lists of articles and conference proceedings. All searches were done without language restriction.Date of the most recent searches: 14 January 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared traditional surgery with minimally invasive surgery for treating pectus excavatum.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of the trials identified and agreed trial eligibility after a consensus meeting. The authors also assessed the risk of bias of the eligible trials.
MAIN RESULTS
Initially we located 4111 trials from the electronic searches and two further trials from other resources. All trials were added into reference management software and the duplicates were excluded, leaving 2517 studies. The titles and abstracts of these 2517 studies were independently analyzed by two authors and finally eight trials were selected for full text analysis, after which they were all excluded, as they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence from randomized controlled trials to conclude what is the best surgical option to treat people with pectus excavatum.
Topics: Funnel Chest; Humans; Osteotomy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
PubMed: 25352359
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008889.pub2 -
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery Jun 2016High tibia osteotomy is a common procedure in orthopedic surgery. A precise overview on indications, patients selection, pre-operative planning, surgical technique,... (Review)
Review
High tibia osteotomy is a common procedure in orthopedic surgery. A precise overview on indications, patients selection, pre-operative planning, surgical technique, methods of fixation, and complications have been presented. This paper focused on the points that should be considered to achieve good long-term outcomes.
PubMed: 27517063
DOI: No ID Found -
Sports Health 2022Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is a joint preservation procedure that corrects genu valgum deformities and patellofemoral maltracking, thereby restoring kinematics and...
CONTEXT
Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is a joint preservation procedure that corrects genu valgum deformities and patellofemoral maltracking, thereby restoring kinematics and unloading contact pressures in the lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the rates of return to work (RTW) and return to sport (RTS) after DFO for valgus malalignment and lateral compartment osteoarthritis through a systematic review of the literature.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted on the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases.
STUDY SELECTION
The search terms AND ( OR ) were used. Studies in which patients underwent concomitant total knee arthroplasty were excluded.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level 4 (systematic review of level 4 studies).
DATA EXTRACTION
Data included the number of patients, age, gender, laterality of operation, time to follow-up, rate of RTW and RTS, time to RTS, activity level on return, and activity level scores (Tegner, Marx, Lysholm, and the International Knee Documentation Committee). Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.
RESULTS
Seven articles with 194 patients were included. The average age ranged from 19 to 49 years with a mean postoperative follow-up range of 36 to 90 months. RTW data were available for 125 patients, of whom 42.1% to 91.3% returned by final follow-up. Data on RTS were available for 149 patients, of whom 70% to 100% returned at a range of 8.3 to 16.9 months postoperatively, and 41.6% to 100% returned to the same or greater level of sports activity. The Tegner and Marx activity level scores ranged from 3 to 4 and from 5 to 11, respectively, at final follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Patients treated with DFO reported high rates of RTW and RTS, with most patients being able to return to recreational sport after surgery.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Femur; Humans; Infant; Knee Joint; Osteotomy; Return to Sport; Return to Work
PubMed: 34486439
DOI: 10.1177/19417381211041072 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine May 2023The extent to which concomitant cartilage repair provides an improvement in clinical outcomes after osteotomy is unclear. (Review)
Review
Isolated Osteotomy Versus Combined Osteotomy and Cartilage Repair for Osteoarthritis or Focal Chondral Defects of the Medial Compartment of the Knee Joint: A Systematic Review.
BACKGROUND
The extent to which concomitant cartilage repair provides an improvement in clinical outcomes after osteotomy is unclear.
PURPOSE
To compare studies reporting clinical outcomes after isolated osteotomy with or without cartilage repair for osteoarthritis (OA) or focal chondral defects (FCDs) of the knee joint.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The search was done to identify comparative studies that directly compared outcomes between isolated osteotomy-high tibial osteotomy or distal femoral osteotomy-and osteotomy with concomitant cartilage repair for OA or FCDs of the knee joint. Patients were evaluated based on reoperation rate, magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score, macroscopic International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society score, and patient-reported outcomes.
RESULTS
In total, 6 studies-level 2 evidence (n = 2);, level 3 evidence (n = 3);, and level 4 evidence (n = 1)-met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 228 patients undergoing osteotomy alone (group A) and 255 patients undergoing osteotomy with concomitant cartilage repair (group B). The mean patient age was 53.4 and 54.8 years, respectively, and the mean preoperative alignment was 6.6° and 6.7° of varus in groups A and B, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 71.5 months. All studies assessed medial compartment lesions with varus deformity. One study compared osteotomy alone for patients with medial compartment OA versus osteotomy with autologous chondrocyte implantation for patients with FCDs of the medial compartment. Three other studies included a heterogeneous cohort of patients with OA and FCDs in both groups. Only 1 study isolated its comparison to patients with medial compartment OA and 1 study isolated its comparison to patients with FCDs.
CONCLUSION
There is limited evidence with substantial heterogeneity between studies on clinical outcomes after osteotomy alone versus osteotomy with cartilage repair for OA or FCDs of the knee joint. At this time, no conclusion can be made regarding the role of additional cartilage procedures in treating medial compartment OA or FCDs. Further studies are needed that isolate specific disease pathology and specific cartilage procedures.
PubMed: 37179710
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231162030 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2023We aimed to systematically compare the clinical and functional outcomes between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We aimed to systematically compare the clinical and functional outcomes between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Literatures were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, Wanfang DATA, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and SinoMed database until December 2020. Studies comparing postoperative clinical and functional outcomes of UKA versus HTO were included. Totally, 38 studies were included, including 2368 patients with 2393 knees in HTO group and 6536 patients with 6571 knees in UKA group. There was significant difference in postoperative pain, revision rate, complications, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between HTO and UKA groups ( < 0.05). No significant difference was found in excellent/good surgical results, Lysholm, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Knee Society Knee (KSS) score, knee and function score of Knee Society (KSFS) score and Tegner score between these two groups ( > 0.05). UKA produced less postoperative pain, less complications and superior WOMAC score, whereas HTO offered extended range of motion (ROM) and less revision rate.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Treatment Outcome; Tibia; Knee Joint; Pain, Postoperative; Osteotomy
PubMed: 36893443
DOI: 10.1177/10225536231162829 -
PloS One 2018In orthognathic surgery, antibiotics are prescribed to reduce the risk of postoperative infection. However, there is lack of consensus over the appropriate drug, the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
In orthognathic surgery, antibiotics are prescribed to reduce the risk of postoperative infection. However, there is lack of consensus over the appropriate drug, the dose and duration of administration. The aim of this complex systematic review was to assess the effect of antibiotics on postoperative infections in orthognathic surgery.
METHODS
Both systematic reviews and primary studies were assessed. Medline (OVID), The Cochrane Library (Wiley) and EMBASE (embase.com), PubMed (non-indexed articles) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publications were searched. The primary studies were assessed using GRADE and the systematic reviews by AMSTAR.
RESULTS
Screening of abstracts yielded 6 systematic reviews and 36 primary studies warranting full text scrutiny. In total,14 primary studies were assessed for risk of bias. Assessment of the included systematic reviews identified two studies with a moderate risk of bias, due to inclusion in the meta-analyses of primary studies with a high risk of bias. Quality assessment of the primary studies disclosed one with a moderate risk of bias and one with a low risk. The former compared a single dose of antibiotic with 24 hour prophylaxis using the same antibiotic; the latter compared oral and intravenous administration of antibiotics. Given the limited number of acceptable studies, no statistical analysis was undertaken, as it was unlikely to contribute any relevant information.
CONCLUSION
With respect to antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery, most of the studies to date have been poorly conducted and reported. Thus scientific uncertainty remains as to the preferred antibiotic and the optimal duration of administration.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Humans; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 29385159
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191161 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Mar 2023Cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been attempted to improve articular cartilage regeneration in varus knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients... (Review)
Review
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate versus Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Combined Cartilage Regeneration Procedure in Patients Undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been attempted to improve articular cartilage regeneration in varus knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and human umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (hUCB-MSCs) have been reported to be effective. However, whether BMAC is superior to hUCB-MSCs remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the clinical efficacy of cartilage repair procedures with BMAC or hUCB-MSCs in patients undergoing HTO. A systematic search was conducted using three global databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for studies in which the clinical outcomes after BMAC or hUCB-MSCs were used in patients undergoing HTO for varus knee OA. Data extraction, quality control, and meta-analysis were performed. To compare the clinical efficacy of BMAC and hUCB-MSCs, reported clinical outcome assessments and second-look arthroscopic findings were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The present review included seven studies of 499 patients who received either BMAC (BMAC group, = 169) or hUCB-MSCs (hUCB-MSC group, = 330). Improved clinical outcomes were found in both BMAC and hUCB-MSC groups; however, a significant difference was not observed between procedures (International Knee Documentation Committee score; = 0.91, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index; = 0.05, Knee Society Score (KSS) Pain; = 0.85, KSS Function; = 0.37). On second-look arthroscopy, the hUCB-MSC group showed better International Cartilage Repair Society Cartilage Repair Assessment grade compared with the BMAC group ( < 0.001). Both BMAC and hUCB-MSCs with HTO improved clinical outcomes in varus knee OA patients, and there was no difference in clinical outcomes between them. However, hUCB-MSCs were more effective in articular cartilage regeneration than BMAC augmentation.
Topics: Humans; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Bone Marrow; Fetal Blood; Cartilage, Articular; Treatment Outcome; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Osteotomy
PubMed: 36984635
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59030634 -
The Knee Jan 2023Osteoarthritis is a prolific condition in an increasingly ageing and obese population. Research into treatments of this condition and their efficacy are vital. Outcomes... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Osteoarthritis is a prolific condition in an increasingly ageing and obese population. Research into treatments of this condition and their efficacy are vital. Outcomes of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for the varus knee is widely reported. There is less evidence for HTO in the valgus knee. This systematic review aimed to compile all literature reporting the outcomes of HTO to correct the valgus knee, focusing on post-operative clinical outcomes.
METHODS
Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched using key terms: Osteoarthritis [All Fields] AND High tibial osteotomy [All Fields] AND Lateral OR Valgus [All Fields]. Papers were screened for eligibility based on an inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full text screening was completed by two reviewers and data was extracted from the agreed included papers by one reviewer. Quality assessments of the papers were also conducted.
PROSPERO ID
CRD42021239045.
RESULTS
Across 17 papers reporting 517 knees, the average pre-operative femorotibial and hip-knee-ankle angles were corrected from 13.6 ± 7.0° and 4.9 ± 1.9° valgus to 2.8 ± 2.9° and 1.2 ± 1.7° varus. Studies show that the procedure is successful at offloading the lateral knee compartment and some evidence it can delay the need for a total knee replacement. However, its impact on overall quality of life remains poorly understood.
CONCLUSIONS
High tibial osteotomy may be a viable treatment option for valgus knee deformities caused by lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, research into the procedure remains limited. Importantly, our understanding of the relationship between the achieved alignment and outcome remains largely unknown.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Quality of Life; Tibia; Knee Joint; Osteotomy
PubMed: 36413904
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.11.007