-
American Journal of Otolaryngology 2023Parathyroid carcinoma is rarely encountered in clinical practice. When faced with this clinical challenge, there is currently a paucity of evidence available for the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Parathyroid carcinoma is rarely encountered in clinical practice. When faced with this clinical challenge, there is currently a paucity of evidence available for the optimal management of patients with parathyroid carcinoma. This systematic review synthesizes the available literature to evaluate the optimal management approach, thus providing guidance for future management.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for studies, published in English, reporting on parathyroid carcinoma. Full text of potentially eligible articles were reviewed by two authors independently and eligible studies selected. Treatment options and associated outcomes were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to describe pooled patient cohorts.
RESULTS
3203 articles were initially identified using the search criteria with 59 full-text articles then screened for eligibility. Seven articles, all retrospective studies, concerning 2307 patients (median 224/study). Parathyroidectomy alone was the most frequently utilised surgical approach across all studies, followed by en-bloc resection (with adjacent thyroid and/or nodal tissue). There was no difference in post-operative morbidity, mortality or survival between surgical approaches (p < 0.005). Patients who underwent either form of surgery had longer overall survival than those managed non-operatively (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSION
Surgical resection is the optimal treatment of parathyroid carcinoma. However there remains no consensus on the optimal extent of surgery, and as such future randomised prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the effects of different surgical approaches on morbidity, mortality and oncologic outcomes. Following resection, long-term surveillance with PTH is advised.
Topics: Humans; Parathyroid Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36989753
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103843 -
Biomedicines Dec 2022Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder is one of the complications associated with chronic kidney disease. About 10-50% of patients following kidney... (Review)
Review
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder is one of the complications associated with chronic kidney disease. About 10-50% of patients following kidney transplantation have persistent hyperparathyroidism. Hypercalcaemic hyperparathyroidism has a negative impact on the kidney transplant outcome; therefore, it requires treatment. The data regarding the treatment of persistent hyperparathyroidism provided in scientific publications are divergent and contradictory. Therefore, the aim of our systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of persistent hyperparathyroidism treatment in patients following kidney transplantation. The Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were browsed independently by two authors. The search strategy included controlled vocabulary and keywords. The effectiveness of calcitriol, paricalcitol, cinacalcet, and parathyroidectomy was compared and analysed. The mean calcium and parathormone (PTH) concentrations per patient in the group of paricalcitol increased by 1.27% and decreased by 35.14% (n = 248); in the group of cinacalcet decreased by 12.09% and 32.16% (n = 368); and in the group of parathyroidectomy decreased by 19.06% and 86.49% (n = 15) at the end of the study compared to the baseline (n = 244, n = 342 and n = 15), respectively. Paricalcitol, cinacalcet, and parathyroidectomy decreased the intact PTH level. Cinacalcet and parathyroidectomy lowered calcium levels in renal transplant patients with hypercalcaemia. Conversely, paricalcitol increased the serum calcium concentration. Cinacalcet seems to be a good candidate in the treatment of post-transplant hyperparathyroidism.
PubMed: 36672533
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11010025 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2023Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), a disorder in which the parathyroid glands produce excessive amounts of parathyroid hormone, is most common in older adults and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), a disorder in which the parathyroid glands produce excessive amounts of parathyroid hormone, is most common in older adults and postmenopausal women. While most people with PHPT are asymptomatic at diagnosis, symptomatic disease can lead to hypercalcaemia, osteoporosis, renal stones, cardiovascular abnormalities and reduced quality of life. Surgical removal of abnormal parathyroid tissue (parathyroidectomy) is the only established treatment for adults with symptomatic PHPT to prevent exacerbation of symptoms and to be cured of PHPT. However, the benefits and risks of parathyroidectomy compared to simple observation or medical therapy for asymptomatic and mild PHPT are not well established.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of parathyroidectomy in adults with PHPT compared to simple observation or medical therapy.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP from their date of inception until 26 November 2021. We applied no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing parathyroidectomy with simple observation or medical therapy for the treatment of adults with PHPT.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. cure of PHPT, 2. morbidity related to PHPT and 3. serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. health-related quality of life and 3. hospitalisation for hypercalcaemia, acute renal impairment or pancreatitis. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified eight eligible RCTs that included 447 adults with (mostly asymptomatic) PHPT; 223 participants were randomised to parathyroidectomy. Follow-up duration varied from six months to 24 months. Of the 223 participants (37 men) randomised to surgery, 164 were included in the analyses, of whom 163 were cured at six to 24 months (overall cure rate 99%). Parathyroidectomy compared to observation probably results in a large increase in cure rate at six to 24 months follow-up: 163/164 participants (99.4%) in the parathyroidectomy group and 0/169 participants in the observation or medical therapy group were cured of their PHPT (8 studies, 333 participants; moderate certainty). No studies explicitly reported intervention effects on morbidities related to PHPT, such as osteoporosis, osteopenia, kidney dysfunction, urolithiasis, cognitive dysfunction or cardiovascular disease, although some studies reported surrogate outcomes for osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. A post-hoc analysis revealed that parathyroidectomy, compared to observation or medical therapy, may have little or no effect after one to two years on bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (mean difference (MD) 0.03 g/cm,95% CI -0.05 to 0.12; 5 studies, 287 participants; very low certainty). Similarly, compared to observation, parathyroidectomy may have little or no effect on femoral neck BMD after one to two years (MD -0.01 g/cm, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.11; 3 studies, 216 participants; very low certainty). However, the evidence is very uncertain for both BMD outcomes. Furthermore, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of parathyroidectomy on improving left ventricular ejection fraction (MD -2.38%, 95% CI -4.77 to 0.01; 3 studies, 121 participants; very low certainty). Four studies reported serious adverse events. Three of these reported zero events in both the intervention and control groups; consequently, we were unable to include data from these three studies in the pooled analysis. The evidence suggests that parathyroidectomy compared to observation may have little or no effect on serious adverse events (RR 3.35, 95% CI 0.14 to 78.60; 4 studies, 168 participants; low certainty). Only two studies reported all-cause mortality. One study could not be included in the pooled analysis as zero events were observed in both the intervention and control groups. Parathyroidectomy compared to observation may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.11, 95% CI 0.20 to 22.60; 2 studies, 133 participants; very low certainty). Three studies measured health-related quality of life using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and reported inconsistent differences in scores for different domains of the questionnaire between parathyroidectomy and observation. Six studies reported hospitalisations for the correction of hypercalcaemia. Two studies reported zero events in both the intervention and control groups and could not be included in the pooled analysis. Parathyroidectomy, compared to observation, may have little or no effect on hospitalisation for hypercalcaemia (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.20 to 4.25; 6 studies, 287 participants; low certainty). There were no reported hospitalisations for renal impairment or pancreatitis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In accordance with the literature, our review findings suggest that parathyroidectomy, compared to simple observation or medical (etidronate) therapy, probably results in a large increase in cure rates of PHPT (with normalisation of serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels to laboratory reference values). Parathyroidectomy, compared with observation, may have little or no effect on serious adverse events or hospitalisation for hypercalcaemia, and the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of parathyroidectomy on other short-term outcomes, such as BMD, all-cause mortality and quality of life. The high uncertainty of evidence limits the applicability of our findings to clinical practice; indeed, this systematic review provides no new insights with regard to treatment decisions for people with (asymptomatic) PHPT. In addition, the methodological limitations of the included studies, and the characteristics of the study populations (mainly comprising white women with asymptomatic PHPT), warrant caution when extrapolating the results to other populations with PHPT. Large-scale multi-national, multi-ethnic and long-term RCTs are needed to explore the potential short- and long-term benefits of parathyroidectomy compared to non-surgical treatment options with regard to osteoporosis or osteopenia, urolithiasis, hospitalisation for acute kidney injury, cardiovascular disease and quality of life.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Aged; Hypercalcemia; Hyperparathyroidism, Primary; Parathyroidectomy; Cardiovascular Diseases; Parathyroid Hormone; Osteoporosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36883976
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013035.pub2 -
Renal Failure Nov 2017Total parathyroidectomy (tPTX) and total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation (tPTX + AT) are effective and inexpensive treatments for secondary... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Total parathyroidectomy (tPTX) and total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation (tPTX + AT) are effective and inexpensive treatments for secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT), but we do not know which one is the optimal approach. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of these two surgical procedures.
METHODOLOGY
Studies published in English on PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to 27 September 2016 were searched systematically. Eligible studies comparing tPTX with tPTX + AT for sHPT were included and Review Manager v5.3 was used.
RESULTS
Eleven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Ten cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 1108 patients with sHPT were identified. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of surgical complications (relative risk [RR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-3.79; p = .19), all-cause mortality (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.33-1.39; p = .29), sHPT persistence (RR, 3.81; 95% CI, 0.56-25.95; p = .17) or symptomatic improvement (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.91-1.13; p = .79). tPTX could reduce the risk of sHPT recurrence (RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.41; p < .0001) and reoperation because of recurrence or persistence of sHPT (RR, 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.86; p = .01) compared with tPTX + AT. Simultaneously, tPTX increased the risk of hypoparathyroidism (RR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.06-6.51; p = .04).
CONCLUSIONS
We found tPTX and tPTX + AT to be useful methods for sHPT treatment. tPTX was superior for reducing the risk of sHPT recurrence and reoperation than tPTX + AT but, due to a lack of high statistical-power RCTs, comparative studies will be needed in the future.
Topics: Humans; Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary; Parathyroidectomy; Reoperation; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 28853301
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1363779 -
The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear... Jun 2023Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is a common endocrine disorder caused by an autonomous overproduction of parathyroid hormone (PTH) by a parathyroid gland. Over the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is a common endocrine disorder caused by an autonomous overproduction of parathyroid hormone (PTH) by a parathyroid gland. Over the last decade, F-choline (FCH) PET has emerged as a highly performant imaging technique for guiding parathyroidectomy. As cure is the goal of surgery, the main aims of this study were to summarize patient-based sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and cure rate of FCH PET guided surgery in the surgical management of pHPT.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis according to the PRISMA Guidelines. A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane databases, last updated November 2022. Original articles on choline PET in patients with pHPT mentioning patient-based sensitivity, PPV and cure rate were retained. Quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 Tool. Patient-based sensitivity, PPV and cure rate were pooled by using a random-effects model.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Twenty-three studies including 1716 patients were included for quantitative assessment. FCH PET showed a pooled patient-based sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI: 89.8-96.3) and PPV of 97% (95% CI: 92.8-98.8) in patients with pHPT. Parathyroid surgery was performed in 1129 patients. The pooled cure rate of PET-guided surgery was 92.8% (95% CI: 87.4-96.0). Heterogeneity was shown to be moderate for all effect sizes.
CONCLUSIONS
FCH PET showed a high patient-based sensitivity, PPV and cure rate of PET guided surgery in patients with pHPT.
Topics: Humans; Hyperparathyroidism, Primary; Parathyroid Glands; Choline; Positron-Emission Tomography; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
PubMed: 36756935
DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.23.03512-4 -
Cureus Nov 2023Various minimally invasive techniques exist for surgical parathyroidectomy. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing two popular minimally invasive... (Review)
Review
Various minimally invasive techniques exist for surgical parathyroidectomy. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing two popular minimally invasive techniques: minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) and open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (OMIP). An extensive search was conducted of online databases to identify all previous studies that had compared MIVAP and OMIP. The primary outcome measures considered were visual analog scale (VAS) score 24 hours postoperatively, conversion of operation (to open), failure rate and analgesic consumption. The data from these studies was extracted and compiled into a meta-analysis. The literature search yielded 104 studies of which four were included, enrolling 903 patients in this analysis. A significant difference was found regarding rates of conversion to open parathyroidectomy between the two groups, with the OMIP group demonstrating fewer conversions (MD = 3.52, CI = (2.04-6.08), P< 0.00001). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups when comparing postoperative VAS scores at 24 hours (MD = -1.75, CI = (-9.8-6.3), P = 0.67), consumption of analgesia (OR = 0.49, CI = 0.07-3.54, P = 0.48) or failure rates (OR = 1.81, CI = 0.58-5.72, P = 0.31). OMIP was seen to require less need to convert to open parathyroidectomy with shorter operative times, while similar complication rates and scar lengths to MIVAP. More studies are required to evaluate the superior technique for parathyroidectomy.
PubMed: 38046707
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48153 -
BJS Open Dec 2018The majority of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) have a single overactive adenoma. Advances in preoperative imaging and surgical adjuncts have given rise... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The majority of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) have a single overactive adenoma. Advances in preoperative imaging and surgical adjuncts have given rise to minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP), with lower complication rates in comparison with bilateral neck exploration. Misdiagnosis and undertreatment of multiglandular disease, leading to potentially higher recurrence rates, remains a concern. This study evaluated risks of long-term (1 year or more) recurrence following 'targeted' MIP in PHPT.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched for studies published between January 2004 and March 2017, looking at long-term outcomes (1 year or more) following targeted MIP for PHPT. English-language studies, with at least 50 patients and a mean follow-up of 1 year, were included.
RESULTS
A total of 5282 patients from 14 studies were included. Overall mean recurrence and cure rates were 1·6 (range 0-3·5) and 96·9 (95·5-100) per cent respectively. Mean follow-up was 33·5 (1-145) months. When intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurements were not done, cure rates were higher (99·3 per cent versus 98·1 per cent with use of intraoperative PTH measurement; P < 0·001) and recurrence rates lower (0·2 versus 1·5 per cent respectively; P < 0·001).
CONCLUSION
Targeted MIP for a presumed single overactive adenoma was associated with very low recurrence rates, without the need for intraoperative PTH measurement when preoperative imaging studies were concordant. Targeted MIP should be encouraged.
PubMed: 30511037
DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.77 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023This study aimed to systematically review research on cinacalcet and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) using machine learning-based statistical analyses. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to systematically review research on cinacalcet and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) using machine learning-based statistical analyses.
METHODS
Publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database on Cinacalcet and SHPT published between 2000 and 2022 were retrieved. The R package "Bibliometrix," VOSviewer, CiteSpace, meta, and latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) in Python were used to generate bibliometric and meta-analytical results.
RESULTS
A total of 959 articles were included in our bibliometric analysis. In total, 3753 scholars from 54 countries contributed to this field of research. The United States, Japan, and China were found to be among the three most productive countries worldwide. Three Japanese institutions (Showa University, Tokai University, and Kobe University) published the most articles on Cinacalcet and SHPT. Fukagawa, M.; Chertow, G.M.; Goodman W.G. were the three authors who published the most articles in this field. Most articles were published in , , and . Research on Cinacalcet and SHPT has mainly included three topics: 1) comparative effects of various treatments, 2) the safety and efficacy of cinacalcet, and 3) fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23). Integrated treatments, cinacalcet use in pediatric chronic kidney disease, and new therapeutic targets are emerging research hotspots. Through a meta-analysis, we confirmed the effects of Cinacalcet on reducing serum PTH ( = -0.56, 95% = -0.76 to -0.37, = 0.001) and calcium ( = -0.93, 95% = -1.21to -0.64, = 0.001) and improving phosphate ( = 0.17, 95% = -0.33 to -0.01, = 0.033) and calcium-phosphate product levels ( = -0.49, 95% = -0.71 to -0.28, = 0.001); we found no difference in all-cause mortality ( = 0.97, 95% = 0.90 to 1.05, = 0.47), cardiovascular mortality ( = 0.69, 95% = 0.36 to 1.31, = 0.25), and parathyroidectomy ( = 0.36, 95% = 0.09 to 1.35, = 0.13) between the Cinacalcet and non-Cinacalcet users. Moreover, Cinacalcet was associated with an increased risk of nausea ( = 2.29, 95% = 1.73 to 3.05, = 0.001), hypocalcemia ( = 4.05, 95% = 2.33 to 7.04, = 0.001), and vomiting ( = 1.90, 95% = 1.70 to 2.11, = 0.001).
DISCUSSION
The number of publications indexed to Cinacalcet and SHPT has increased rapidly over the past 22 years. Literature distribution, research topics, and emerging trends in publications on Cinacalcet and SHPT were analyzed using a machine learning-based bibliometric review. The findings of this meta-analysis provide valuable insights into the efficacy and safety of cinacalcet for the treatment of SHPT, which will be of interest to both clinical and researchers.
Topics: Child; Humans; Calcimimetic Agents; Calcium; Cinacalcet; Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary; Phosphates; United States; Machine Learning
PubMed: 37538795
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1146955 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is characterized by increased bone remodeling and hypercalcemia. Parathyroidectomy (PTX), the current standard of care, is recommended... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy of antiresorptive agents bisphosphonates and denosumab in mitigating hypercalcemia and bone loss in primary hyperparathyroidism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is characterized by increased bone remodeling and hypercalcemia. Parathyroidectomy (PTX), the current standard of care, is recommended in all symptomatic and some groups of asymptomatic patients. Anti-resorptive therapies (bisphosphonates and denosumab) have been used in patients where PTX is refused or contraindicated. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effectiveness of anti-resorptives in preventing/treating PHPT-induced bone loss and mitigating hypercalcemia.
METHOD
PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles with keywords containing PHPT, bisphosphonates, and denosumab in various combinations. We extracted and tabulated areal BMD (aBMD), serum mineral, and bone turnover parameters from the qualified studies and used comprehensive meta-analysis software for analysis.
RESULTS
Of the 1,914 articles screened, 13 were eligible for meta-analysis. In the pooled analysis, 12 months of anti-resoptives (bisphosphonates and denosumab) therapy significantly increased aBMD at the lumbar spine (Standard difference in means (SDM)=0.447, 95% CI=0.230 to 0.664, p=0.0001), femoral neck (SDM=0.270, 95% CI=0.049 to 0.491, p=0.017) and increased serum PTH (SDM=0.489, 95% CI=0.139 to 0.839, p=0.006), and decreased serum calcium (SDM=-0.545, 95% CI=-0.937 to -0.154, p=0.006) compared with baseline. 12 months of bisphosphonate use significantly increased aBMD only at the lumbar spine (SDM=0.330, 95% CI=0.088 to 0.571, p=0.007) with a significant increased in serum PTH levels (SDM=0.546, 95% CI= 0.162 to 0.930, p=0.005), and a decreased in serum calcium (SDM=-0.608, 95% CI=-1.048 to -0.169, p=0.007) and bone-turnover markers (BTMs) compared with baseline. Denosumab use for 12 months significantly increased aBMD at both the lumbar spine (SDM=0.828, 95% CI=0.378 to 1.278, p=0.0001) and femur neck (SDM=0.575, 95% CI=0.135 to 1.015, p=0.010) compared with baseline. Mean lumbar spine aBMD (SDM=0.350, 95% CI=0.041 to 0.659, p=0.027) and serum PTH (SDM=0.602, 95% CI= 0.145 to 1.059, p=0.010) were significantly increased after 12 months of alendronate use compared with placebo. When compared with baseline, alendronate significantly decreased BTMs after 12 months and increased aBMD without altering the PTH and calcium levels after 24 months.
CONCLUSION
Anti-resorptives are effective in mitigating bone loss and hypercalcemia in PHPT while maintaining or increasing aBMD. PTX reversed all changes in PHPT and normalized PTH levels.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diphosphonates; Alendronate; Denosumab; Hypercalcemia; Calcium; Hyperparathyroidism, Primary; Bone Density; Parathyroid Hormone; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Lumbar Vertebrae
PubMed: 36817591
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1098841 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jan 2015Previous studies have shown that parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) improve the function and quality of life of patients. The aim of this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The extent of improvement of health-related quality of life as assessed by the SF36 and Paseika scales after parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism--a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have shown that parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) improve the function and quality of life of patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the health-related quality of life outcomes among those having surgical management for PHPT.
METHODS
Several databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Current Contents) for studies in which health-related quality of life was measured by reliable and validated instruments (SF-36 and Paseika Questionnaire) before and after parathyroidectomy for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). For the SF-36, score differences greater than 5 points indicate clinically relevant changes.
RESULTS
There were six studies with quality of life data. The SF-36 data was derived from 238 patients, with a mean age of 59 years and 71% were females. The range of follow up after surgery was 6 months to one year. The pre- and post-parathyroidectomy SF-36 quality of life scale scores were vitality (44 vs. 60, p<0.001), physical functioning (51 vs. 69, p<0.001), bodily pain (50 vs. 65, p<0.001), general health (54 vs. 64, p<0.001), role physical (34 vs. 52, p<0.001), role emotional (43 vs. 59, p<0.001), role social (60 vs. 74, p<0.001), and mental health (55 vs. 71, p<0.001). The Paseika data was derived from 203 patients, with a mean age of 54 years and 67% were females. The pre- and post-parathyroidectomy Paseika scores were feeling tired (51 vs. 19, p<0.001), feeling thirsty (29 vs. 12, p<0.001), mood swings (33 vs. 12, p<0.001), joint pains (32 vs. 14, p<0.001), irritability (31 vs. 10, p<0.001), feeling blue (31 vs. 14, p<0.001), feeling weak (37 vs. 15, p<0.001), itchy (17 vs. 7, p<0.001), forgetful (27 vs. 16, p<0.001), headache (18 vs. 5, p<0.001), abdominal pain (19 vs. 8, p<0.001), bone pain (38 vs. 17, p<0.001), ability to move off chair (27 vs. 11, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Parathyroidectomy significantly improves the short to medium-term health-related quality of life of patients suffering from primary hyperparathyroidism.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hyperparathyroidism, Primary; Middle Aged; Parathyroidectomy; Prospective Studies; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 25542340
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.004