-
Medicine Dec 2015Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as an alternative treatment to surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) in the treatment of small renal tumors (SRTs). But its safety... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as an alternative treatment to surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) in the treatment of small renal tumors (SRTs). But its safety and oncological efficacy are still controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the peritoperative and oncological outcomes of RFA and PN in the treatment of SRTs. Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched to identify eligible studies that compared the RFA and PN in the treatment of SRTs. Twelve retrospective studies that compared RFA with PN in the treatment of SRTs met our selection criterion and were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that the local recurrence rate (4.14% vs 4.10%, RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.68, 2.07, P = 0.550) and distant metastases rate (2.76% vs 1.89%, RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.70, 2.46, P = 0.686) were not significantly different between the RFA group and the PN group. In terms of perioperative outcomes, RFA was associated with shorter length of stay (LOS) (WMD: -2.02 days, 95% CI: -2.77, -1.27, P < 0.001), lower eGFR decline after treatment (WMD: -3.90, 95% CI: -6.660, -1.140, P = 0.006). However, the overall perioperative complication rate (7.5% vs 6.2%, RR:1.10, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.87, P = 0.740) and the major complication rate (3.7% vs 4.4%, RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.60, P = 0.579) were both similar between RFA and PN groups. Compared with PN, RFA achieves an equal oncological outcome for SRTs with similar local recurrence rate and distant metastases rate. Additionally, RFA is associated with a similar perioperative complication rate, lower decline of eGFR, and shorter LOS. Therefore, RFA is an effective option in the treatment of SRTs for selected patients.
Topics: Catheter Ablation; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy
PubMed: 26683944
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002255 -
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical... Dec 2015Our study was to collect the data available in the literature on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) and conduct a cumulative analysis on... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Our study was to collect the data available in the literature on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) and conduct a cumulative analysis on perioperative outcomes, renal function outcomes, and survival to evaluate the overall safety and efficacy of RFA versus PN for small renal cell cancer (SRCC). A literature search was carried out using various electronic databases. Data including age, tumor size, comorbid disease, operation duration, hospital stay, pre- and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), major and minor complications, and local tumor recurrence and metastasis were collected for meta-analysis. Sixteen studies were included for this meta-analysis. The age of patients treated with RFA was significantly older than that of patients treated with PN [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 5.07 years]. There were more patients with cardiovascular disease in RFA group as compared with PN group [odds ratio (OR) = 4.24] before treatment. RFA was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay compared with PN (WMD = -2.02 days). No significant difference was found in major and minor complications between the two groups (major: OR = 0.74; minor: OR = 0.45). Preoperative eGFR and eGFR decline in RFA patients was significantly lower than that in PN patients (WMD = -7.27 and -4.82, respectively), whereas there was no significant difference in postoperative eGFR (WMD = -1.18). The local tumor recurrence rate in RFA group was higher than that in PN group (OR = 1.81). However, the distant metastasis rate was no statistical difference between the two groups (OR = 1.63). RFA is a suitable therapeutic option for older patients and those at high risk for SRCC because of a low risk of operation and better preservation of renal function.
Topics: Catheter Ablation; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Nephrectomy; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Burden
PubMed: 26709228
DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.09.007 -
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica = the... Feb 2019In the past years, several authors have focused on the role of retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopy in the treatment of urological diseases. Aim of our study is to...
INTRODUCTION
In the past years, several authors have focused on the role of retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopy in the treatment of urological diseases. Aim of our study is to systematically review the available literature on retro-peritoneoscopic laparoscopy in urology.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review of the literature using the Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant articles published until June 2018 was performed using both the Medical Subjects Heading and free test protocols. The MeSH search was conducted by combining the following terms: "retroperitoneoscopy," "posterior laparoscopy," "retroperitoneoscopic." Only randomized clinical trials were included in the analysis. Risk of bias assessment and forest plots were used to summarize data.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Nine RCTs on simple, partial and radical nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, ureterolithotomy and nephrolithotomy comparing RP to other techniques were included in the analysis. Retroperitoneoscopic approach in simple or radical nephrectomy is to be considered a valid alternative to transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Outcomes and safety profiles (6-8% conversion rate) are similar and the approach depends on surgeon's preferences. Randomized studies analyzing retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty showed better results in terms of perioperative morbidity (tramadol use: 147 vs. 179 mg, P=0.002) and return to normal activities when compared to either anterior laparoscopic either to minimally invasive open approach. Two randomized studies have confirmed the efficacy (stone-free rate: 94%) and safety (no Clavien-Dindo >II complications) of ureterolithotomy and nephrolithotomy (stone-free rate: 95%) in the management of large renal and ureteral stones.
CONCLUSIONS
Retroperitoneoscopic approach in urological diseases is a valid alternative to the anterior approach. Evidence suggest lower morbidity for the retroperitoneoscopic approach however technical complexity may limit its widespread.
Topics: Humans; Kidney; Laparoscopy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retroperitoneal Space; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 30607927
DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03235-6 -
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica = the... Apr 2019Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly used for the surgical management of renal masses. Aim of this study was to analyze the available literature... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
INTRODUCTION
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly used for the surgical management of renal masses. Aim of this study was to analyze the available literature regarding the outcomes of RAPN compared to those of open partial nephrectomy (OPN).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A literature search was performed up to October 2018 using PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase. Article selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) principles and Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) methodology was used. Population (P) was patients with renal masses who underwent RAPN (I). RAPN was compared with OPN (C). Outcomes of interest were perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes of both surgical procedures (O). Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled studies andobservational cohort studies comparing RAPN versus OPN, which reported at least one outcome of interest.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Twenty-two manuscripts met our inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. RAPN was superior to OPN in terms of complication rate in 11 studies while similar results were observed in 9 studies. Positive surgical margins were similar in 13 studies while RAPN had lower surgical margins in 6 studies. Operative and warm ischemia times were longer in OPN in 13 and 10 studies, respectively. Seventeen and 19 studies showed that estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were higher in RAPN. Estimated glomerular filtration rate decline and chronic kidney disease upstaging decline were similar in the majority of studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence demonstrate that RAPN is a reasonable alternative to OPN with regard to oncological and early functional outcomes with a straightforward advantage of improved perioperative morbidity, as expected by minimally invasive techniques. Nevertheless, there is still a great need for well-designed randomized studies with an extended follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30895768
DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03391-5 -
Central European Journal of Urology 2024The aim of this review was to assess the outcomes of partial nephrectomy using indocyanine green (ICG) regarding ischemia time, positive surgical margins (PSM),... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this review was to assess the outcomes of partial nephrectomy using indocyanine green (ICG) regarding ischemia time, positive surgical margins (PSM), estimated blood loss (EBL) and estimated GFR reduction while also suggesting the optimal dosage scheme.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed using Medline (PubMed), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases, in concordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies in English regarding the use of indocyanine green in partial nephrectomy were reviewed. Reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the editors were excluded.
RESULTS
Individual ICG dose was 5 mg in most of the studies. The mean warm ischemia time (WIT) on each study ranged from 11.6 minutes to 27.2 minutes. The reported eGFR reduction ranged from 0% to 15.47%. Lowest mean EBL rate was 48.2 ml and the highest was 347 ml. Positive surgical margin rates were between 0.3% to 11%.
CONCLUSIONS
Indocyanine green seems to be a useful tool in partial nephrectomy as it can assist surgeons in identifying tumor and its related vasculature. Thereby, warm ischemia time can be reduced and, in some cases, selective ischemia can be implemented leading to better renal functional preservation.
PubMed: 38645804
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.155 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Aug 2016Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been widely used worldwide, to determine whether RAPN is a safe and effective alternative to open partial nephrectomy (OPN)... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been widely used worldwide, to determine whether RAPN is a safe and effective alternative to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) via the comparison of RANP and OPN.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed within the databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase updated on 30 September 2015. Summary data with their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects or fixed effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated.
RESULTS
A total of 16 comparative studies including 3024 cases were used for this meta-analysis. There are no significant differences in the demographic characteristic between the two groups, but the age was lower and the tumor size was smaller for the RAPN group. RAPN had a longer operative time and warm ischemia time but which showed less estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and perioperative complications. No differences existed in the margin status, the change of glomerular filtration rate, transfusion rate, and conversion rate between the two groups. There was no significant publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
RAPN offered a lower rate of perioperative complications, less estimated blood loss, and shorter length of hospital stay than OPN, suggesting that RAPN can be an effective alternative to OPN. Well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials will be helpful in validating our findings.
Topics: Blood Component Transfusion; Blood Loss, Surgical; Conversion to Open Surgery; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Length of Stay; Margins of Excision; Nephrectomy; Operative Time; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Warm Ischemia
PubMed: 27549155
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0971-9 -
BMJ Open Sep 2017The provision of complex surgery is increasingly centralised to high-volume (HV) specialist hospitals. Evidence to support nephrectomy centralisation however has been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The provision of complex surgery is increasingly centralised to high-volume (HV) specialist hospitals. Evidence to support nephrectomy centralisation however has been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between hospital case volumes and perioperative outcomes in radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy.
METHODS
Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2016. Pooled effect estimates for nephrectomy mortality and complications were calculated for each nephrectomy type using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the effects of heterogeneity on the pooled effect estimates by excluding studies with the heaviest weighting, lowest methodological score and most likely to introduce bias from misclassification of standardised hospital volume.
RESULTS
Some 226 372 patients from 16 publications were included in our review and meta-analysis. Considerable between-study heterogeneity was noted and only a few reported volume-outcome relationships specifically in partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy.HV hospitals were correlated with a 26% and 52% reduction in mortality for radical nephrectomy (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.90, p<0.01) and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.81, p<0.01), respectively. In addition, radical nephrectomy in HV hospitals was associated with an 18% reduction in complications (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92, p<0.01). No significant volume-outcome relationship in mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.26, p=0.73) or complications (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.30, p=0.44) was observed for partial nephrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that patients undergoing radical nephrectomy have improved outcomes when treated by HV hospitals. Evidence of this in partial nephrectomy and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy is however not yet clear and could be secondary to the low number of studies included and the small patient number in our analyses. Further investigation is warranted to establish the full potential of nephrectomy centralisation particularly as existing evidence is of low quality with significant heterogeneity.
Topics: Hospitals, High-Volume; Hospitals, Low-Volume; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 28877947
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016833 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2016This review is being updated and replaced following the publication of a protocol (Krabbe L‐M, Kunath F, Schmidt S, Miernik A, Cleves A, Walther M, Kroeger N. Partial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This review is being updated and replaced following the publication of a protocol (Krabbe L‐M, Kunath F, Schmidt S, Miernik A, Cleves A, Walther M, Kroeger N. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal masses [Protocol]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD012045. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012045) for a new review with a narrower scope. It will remain withdrawn when the new review is published. The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.
Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 26945259
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006579.pub3 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aug 2017The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) partial nephrectomy (MIPN) for large renal masses. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) partial nephrectomy (MIPN) for large renal masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed up to September 2016 using multiple search engines to identify studies comparing MIPN for tumors larger than 4 cm (>cT1a) with MIPN for tumors smaller than 4 cm (cT1a). The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria were used for article selection. Baseline demographics and surgical, functional, and oncological parameters were extracted from the included studies whenever available. An overall analysis including all studies was performed, then sensitivity analyses were performed for studies on laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) only, and, finally, for studies on robotic PN only.
RESULTS
Overall, 13 case-control studies comparing the outcomes of PN in tumors <4 cm (n = 4441) with those of PN for tumors >4 cm (n = 1024) were included. Warm ischemia time was shorter for the <4 cm group [weighted mean difference (WMD) 3.75 min; 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.4 to -0.7; p = 0.01] and the odds of perioperative complications was lower [odds ratio (OR) 0.62; 95% CI 0.5-0.8; p < 0.001]. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (WMD 4.2 ml/min; 95% CI 0.45-8.97; p = 0.08), as well as onset of postoperative chronic kidney disease (risk ratio 0.71; 95% CI 0.48-1.04; p = 0.08). In addition, no difference was found in the likelihood of positive surgical margins (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.43-1.28; p = 0.29).
CONCLUSIONS
MIPN represents a viable treatment option for renal masses larger than 4 cm (higher than cT1a) as it offers good functional outcomes, without increased risk of positive surgical margins. An increased rate of complications should be taken into account when approaching these tumors.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy; Postoperative Complications; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28303428
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5831-5 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jul 2023Urology has been at the forefront of adopting laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques to improve patient outcomes. This systematic review aimed to examine the...
BACKGROUND
Urology has been at the forefront of adopting laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques to improve patient outcomes. This systematic review aimed to examine the literature relating to the learning curves of major urological robotic and laparoscopic procedures.
METHODS
In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature search strategy was employed across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2021, alongside a search of the grey literature. Two independent reviewers completed the article screening and data extraction stages using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale as a quality assessment tool. The review was reported in accordance with AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) guidelines.
RESULTS
Of 3702 records identified, 97 eligible studies were included for narrative synthesis. Learning curves are mapped using an array of measurements including operative time (OT), estimated blood loss, complication rates as well as procedure-specific outcomes, with OT being the most commonly used metric by eligible studies. The learning curve for OT was identified as 10-250 cases for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and 40-250 for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The robot-assisted partial nephrectomy learning curve for warm ischaemia time is 4-150 cases. No high-quality studies evaluating the learning curve for laparoscopic radical cystectomy and for robotic and laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were identified.
CONCLUSION
There was considerable variation in the definitions of outcome measures and performance thresholds, with poor reporting of potential confounders. Future studies should use multiple surgeons and large sample sizes of cases to identify the currently undefined learning curves for robotic and laparoscopic urological procedures.
Topics: Male; Humans; Robotics; Urology; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Learning Curve; Laparoscopy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37132184
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345