-
Cureus Sep 2021Tuberculosis (TB) is the most common etiology of constrictive pericarditis in the developing world. In this study, we collected currently available data to evaluate the... (Review)
Review
Tuberculosis (TB) is the most common etiology of constrictive pericarditis in the developing world. In this study, we collected currently available data to evaluate the outcomes following pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive tuberculous pericarditis. We retrieved electrical databases, including PubMed and PubMed Central, from 1985 AD and onwards. We included articles that had more than 80% TB as the etiology and articles with mixed etiologies. Pooled analysis was done in Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.2 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen). and Stata Statistical Software,Release 16 ( StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX). We compared the mortality in patients after pericardiectomy due to TB with other etiologies. In-hospital mortality versus one-year mortality was analyzed in studies with constrictive pericarditis of mixed etiologies. We also compared pre-operative New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade to post-operative NYHA grade one year after pericardiectomy. We calculated the pooled mean of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and in-hospital mortality. A total of 12 articles and 859 patients were included in the final analysis. Pericardiectomy was performed mostly on middle-aged men with or without previous comorbidity. Total pericardiectomy was the preferred surgical procedure performed on a mean of 93% of patients. The pooled analysis shows a significant decrease in all-cause mortality in patients with TB as compared to other etiologies (pooled risk ratios (RR) 0.34 CI [0.12,1.01] I2 = 61%) and a lower but insignificant in-hospital mortality in comparison to one-year mortality in studies with mixed etiologies (RR 0.59 [0.11,3.11] I2= 61%). There was a significant improvement in the NYHA grade of the patients one year following pericardiectomy (RR 8.04, CI [5.20,12.45], I2= 0%). The mean postoperative hospital stay and the postoperative ICU stay were calculated and reported in terms of days. The mean postoperative hospital stays in studies with more than 80% of TB cases is 13.34 (10.21, 16.47) with a mean standard deviation of 4.46 (2.87, 6.05). The mean postoperative ICU stay is 1.93 (1.47, 2.39), with a mean standard deviation of 3.26 (2.51, 4.00), and the mean in-hospital mortality is 0.07 (0.02, 0.12). Similarly, the mean postoperative hospital stay in studies with mixed etiologies is 19.40 (11.93, 26.87) with a mean standard deviation of 8.26 (4.21, 12.52). The mean postoperative ICU stay is 3.52 (1.93, 5.10) with a mean standard deviation of 2.34 (1.36, 3.32). The mean in-hospital mortality is 0.06 (0.04, 0.08). There is significant heterogeneity along with a number of methodological concerns, and therefore, generalization of the data should be done with caution, and a randomized controlled trial in the future may be beneficial.
PubMed: 34722042
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18252 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2017Tuberculous pericarditis can impair the heart's function and cause death; long term, it can cause the membrane to fibrose and constrict causing heart failure. In... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Tuberculous pericarditis can impair the heart's function and cause death; long term, it can cause the membrane to fibrose and constrict causing heart failure. In addition to antituberculous chemotherapy, treatments include corticosteroids, drainage, and surgery.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of treatments for tuberculous pericarditis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (27 March 2017); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published in the Cochrane Library (2017, Issue 2); MEDLINE (1966 to 27 March 2017); Embase (1974 to 27 March 2017); and LILACS (1982 to 27 March 2017). In addition we searched the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal using 'tuberculosis' and 'pericard*' as search terms on 27 March 2017. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and contacted researchers in the field of tuberculous pericarditis. This is a new version of the original 2002 review.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened search outputs, evaluated study eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data; and we resolved any discrepancies by discussion and consensus. One trial assessed the effects of both corticosteroid and Mycobacterium indicus pranii treatment in a two-by-two factorial design; we excluded data from the group that received both interventions. We conducted fixed-effect meta-analysis and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
Seven trials met the inclusion criteria; all were from sub-Saharan Africa and included 1959 participants, with 1051/1959 (54%) HIV-positive. All trials evaluated corticosteroids and one each evaluated colchicine, M. indicus pranii immunotherapy, and open surgical drainage. Four trials (1841 participants) were at low risk of bias, and three trials (118 participants) were at high risk of bias.In people who are not infected with HIV, corticosteroids may reduce deaths from all causes (risk ratio (RR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.09; 660 participants, 4 trials, low certainty evidence) and the need for repeat pericardiocentesis (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.04; 492 participants, 2 trials, low certainty evidence). Corticosteroids probably reduce deaths from pericarditis (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.80; 660 participants, 4 trials, moderate certainty evidence). However, we do not know whether or not corticosteroids have an effect on constriction or cancer among HIV-negative people (very low certainty evidence).In people living with HIV, only 19.9% (203/1959) were on antiretroviral drugs. Corticosteroids may reduce constriction (RR 0.55, 0.26 to 1.16; 575 participants, 3 trials, low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether corticosteroids have an effect on all-cause death or cancer (very low certainty evidence); and may have little or no effect on repeat pericardiocentesis (RR 1.02, 0.89 to 1.18; 517 participants, 2 trials, low certainty evidence).For colchicine among people living with HIV, we found one small trial (33 participants) which had insufficient data to make any conclusions about any effects on death or constrictive pericarditis.Irrespective of HIV status, due to very low certainty evidence from one trial, it is uncertain whether adding M. indicus pranii immunotherapy to antituberculous drugs has an effect on any outcome.Open surgical drainage for effusion may reduce repeat pericardiocentesis In HIV-negative people (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.76; 122 participants, 1 trial, low certainty evidence) but may make little or no difference to other outcomes. We did not find an eligible trial that assessed the effects of open surgical drainage in people living with HIV.The review authors found no eligible trials that examined the length of antituberculous treatment needed nor the effects of other adjunctive treatments for tuberculous pericarditis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
For HIV-negative patients, corticosteroids may reduce death. For HIV-positive patients not on antiretroviral drugs, corticosteroids may reduce constriction. For HIV-positive patients with good antiretroviral drug viral suppression, clinicians may consider the results from HIV-negative patients more relevant.Further research may help evaluate percutaneous drainage of the pericardium under local anaesthesia, the timing of pericardiectomy in tuberculous constrictive pericarditis, and new antibiotic regimens.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antitubercular Agents; Cause of Death; Colchicine; Drainage; HIV Seronegativity; HIV Seropositivity; Humans; Immunotherapy; Pericardiectomy; Pericarditis, Tuberculous; Pericardium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28902412
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000526.pub2 -
Cureus Dec 2022Cardiac tamponade is a rare presentation in breast cancer and may be associated with poor prognosis. In this article, we reviewed the characteristics and survival... (Review)
Review
Cardiac tamponade is a rare presentation in breast cancer and may be associated with poor prognosis. In this article, we reviewed the characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with breast cancer who developed cardiac tamponade. Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS) were searched for relevant articles published from 1978 to 2022 and 16 articles were identified comprising 64 cases. The median age of the cases was 52 years. Cardiac tamponade was diagnosed with echocardiogram or computerized tomography of the chest or both in 91.9%, 1.6% and 6.5% of the cases, respectively. Cytology of the pericardial fluid was done in 90.5% of the cases while biopsy in addition to cytology was done in 9.5% of cases. Tamponade was proven to be malignant in 97.4% of the cases. The initial treatment for tamponade was pericardiocentesis. Adjunct therapies ranged from the insertion of a pericardial window, pericardiectomy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The median time from the first treatment of breast cancer to the onset of tamponade was 24 months while the median survival following diagnosis of tamponade was 13 months. There was no significant correlation (spearman rank-sum correlation coefficient= 0.35, p = 0.165) between time to tamponade (interval time from the first diagnosis of breast cancer and the onset of cardiac tamponade) and survival. Cardiac tamponade may adversely affect survival in patients with breast cancer. Early diagnosis with echocardiogram and cytology may guide management and expectations. Further observational studies are needed to determine the predictors of cardiac tamponade and optimal treatment in patients with breast cancer.
PubMed: 36721600
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33123 -
Cardiology in ReviewInflammation of the pericardium (pericarditis) is characterized by excruciating chest pain. This systematic literature review summarizes clinical, humanistic, and...
Inflammation of the pericardium (pericarditis) is characterized by excruciating chest pain. This systematic literature review summarizes clinical, humanistic, and economic burdens in acute, especially recurrent, pericarditis, with a secondary aim of understanding United States treatment patterns and outcomes. Short-term clinical burden is well characterized, but long-term data are limited. Some studies report healthcare resource utilization and economic impact; none measure health-related quality-of-life. Pericarditis is associated with infrequent but potentially life-threatening complications, including cardiac tamponade (weighted average: 12.7% across 10 studies), constrictive pericarditis (1.84%; 9 studies), and pericardial effusion (54.7%; 16 studies). There are no approved pericarditis treatments; treatment guidelines, when available, are inconsistent on treatment course or duration. Most recommend first-line use of conventional treatments, for example, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with or without colchicine; however, 15-30% of patients experience recurrence. Second-line therapy may involve conventional therapies plus long-term utilization of corticosteroids, despite safety issues and the difficulty of tapering or discontinuation. Other exploratory therapies (eg, azathioprine, immunoglobulin, methotrexate, anakinra) present steroid-sparing options, but none are supported by robust clinical evidence, and some present tolerability challenges that may impact adherence. Pericardiectomy is occasionally pursued in treatment-refractory patients, although data are limited. This lack of an evidence-based treatment pathway for patients with recurrent disease is reflected in readmission rates, for example, 12.2% at 30 days in 1 US study. Patients with continued recurrence and inadequate treatment response need approved, safe, accessible treatments to resolve pericarditis symptoms and reduce recurrence risk without excessive treatment burden.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chest Pain; Humans; Pericardial Effusion; Pericarditis; United States
PubMed: 32956167
DOI: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000356 -
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aug 2023Post-pericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) is a common complication of cardiac surgery. This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of colchicine, indomethacin, and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Post-pericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) is a common complication of cardiac surgery. This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of colchicine, indomethacin, and dexamethasone in the treatment and prophylaxis of PPS.
METHODS
Literature research was carried out using PubMed. Studies investigating ≥ 10 patients with clinically PPS treated with colchicine, dexamethasone, and indomethacin and compared with placebo were included. Animal or in vitro experiments, studies on < 10 patients, case reports, congress reports, and review articles were excluded. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) was used for the quality assessment of studies.
RESULTS
Seven studies were included. Among studies with postoperative colchicine treatment, two of them demonstrated a significant reduction of PPS. In the single pre-surgery colchicine administration study, a decrease of PPS cases was registered. Indomethacin pre-surgery administration was linked to a reduction of PPS. No significant result emerged with preoperative dexamethasone intake.
CONCLUSION
Better outcomes have been registered when colchicine and indomethacin were administered as primary prophylactic agents in preventing PPS and PE. Further RCT studies are needed to confirm these results.
Topics: Humans; Pericardiectomy; Postpericardiotomy Syndrome; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Colchicine; Indomethacin; Dexamethasone
PubMed: 34546452
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-021-07261-4 -
Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) Jan 2024Tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) is an important cause of pericarditis worldwide while being infrequent in childhood, especially in low-TB-incidence countries. We report a... (Review)
Review
Tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) is an important cause of pericarditis worldwide while being infrequent in childhood, especially in low-TB-incidence countries. We report a case of TBP and provide a systematic review of the literature, conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane to find cases of TBP in pediatric age published in the English language between the year 1990 and the time of the search. Of the 587 search results obtained, after screening and a backward citation search, 45 studies were selected to be included in this review, accounting for a total of 125 patients. The main signs and symptoms were fever, cough, weight loss, hepatomegaly, dyspnea, and increased jugular venous pressure or jugular vein turgor. A definitive diagnosis of TBP was made in 36 patients, either thanks to microbiological investigations, histological analysis, or both. First-line antitubercular treatment (ATT) was administered in nearly all cases, and 69 children underwent surgical procedures. Only six patients died, and only two died of TBP. TBP in childhood is relatively uncommon, even in high-TB-prevalence countries. Clinical manifestations, often suggestive of right-sided cardiac failure, are subtle, and diagnosis is challenging. TBP has an excellent prognosis in childhood; however, in a significant proportion of cases, invasive surgical procedures are necessary.
PubMed: 38392848
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13020110 -
EuroIntervention : Journal of EuroPCR... Jul 2023Atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with postoperative pericardial effusion is the most commonly reported adverse event after cardiac surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with postoperative pericardial effusion is the most commonly reported adverse event after cardiac surgery.
AIMS
We aimed to determine the role of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing postoperative AF (POAF).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and EBSCO from inception until 30 June 2022. We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that compared posterior pericardiotomy (PP) versus control (no PP) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery. The secondary endpoints were supraventricular arrhythmias, early/late pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, pleural effusion, length of hospital/intensive care unit stay, intra-aortic balloon pump use, revision surgery for bleeding, and mortality.
RESULTS
Twenty-five RCTs comprising 4,467 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall incidence rate of POAF was 11.7% in the PP group compared with 23.67% in the no PP or control group, with a significant decrease in the risk of POAF following PP (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-0.61). Compared with the control group, the risk of supraventricular tachycardia (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43-0.89), early pericardial effusion (OR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.22-0.46), late pericardial effusion (OR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09-0.25), and pericardiac tamponade (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33) were lower in the PP group.
CONCLUSIONS
PP is an effective intervention for reducing the risk of POAF after cardiac surgery. Also, PP is economically efficient in terms of decreasing the length of hospital stay.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Pericardiectomy; Pericardial Effusion; Treatment Outcome; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36927670
DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00948 -
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology :... Jan 2024Cardiovascular disease commonly affects advanced liver disease patients. They undergo cardiac interventions to improve cardiac outcomes. Cirrhosis increases complication...
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular disease commonly affects advanced liver disease patients. They undergo cardiac interventions to improve cardiac outcomes. Cirrhosis increases complication risk, including bleeding, renal and respiratory failure, and further decompensation, including death, posing a clinical dilemma to proceduralists. Predicting outcomes is crucial in managing patients with cirrhosis. Our aim was to systematically review clinical parameters to assess the mortality and complication risk in patients with cirrhosis undergoing cardiac interventions.
METHODS
We searched cirrhosis and cardiovascular intervention terminology in PubMed and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) from inception to January 8, 2023. We included studies reporting clinical scores (e.g. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT), cardiovascular interventions, mortality, and morbidity outcomes). We independently abstracted data from eligible studies and performed qualitative summaries.
RESULTS
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Procedures included tricuspid valve surgery, catheterization-related procedures, aortic valve replacement (AVR), pericardiectomy, and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. MELD primarily predicted mortality (n = 4), followed by CPT (n = 2). Mortality is significantly increased for MELD > 15 after tricuspid valve surgery. Albumin, creatinine, and MELD were significantly associated with increased mortality after transcatheter AVR (TAVR), although specific values lacked stratification. CPT was significantly associated with increased mortality after cardiac catheterization or pericardiectomy. In LVAD placement, increasing MELD increased the unadjusted odds for perioperative mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
Our systematic review showed that clinical parameters predict mortality and morbidity risk in patients with cirrhosis undergoing cardiac procedures.
Topics: Humans; End Stage Liver Disease; Liver Cirrhosis; Morbidity; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37988070
DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_263_23 -
The Journal of Thoracic and... Feb 2016
Review
Topics: Adipose Tissue; Decompression, Surgical; Female; Heart Diseases; Humans; Hypertrophy; Lipomatosis; Middle Aged; Pericardiectomy; Pericardium; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26414152
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.083 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Aug 2021Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with adverse events after cardiac surgery. Multiple studies have reported that posterior pericardiotomy (PP) may be effective for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Posterior pericardiotomy to prevent new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with adverse events after cardiac surgery. Multiple studies have reported that posterior pericardiotomy (PP) may be effective for preventing AF after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but some conflicting results have been reported and the quality of evidence from previous meta-analyses has been limited. The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of PP for preventing AF after CABG in adults.
METHODS
We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before May 31, 2021. The primary outcome was AF after CABG under cardiopulmonary bypass. Secondary outcomes included early pericardial effusion, late pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, pleural effusion, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, pulmonary complications, intra-aortic balloon pump use, revision surgery for bleeding, and mortality.
RESULTS
Ten RCTs with 1829 patients (910 in the PP group and 919 in the control group) were included in the current meta-analysis. The incidence of AF was 10.3% (94/910) in the PP group and 25.7% (236/919) in the control group. A random-effects model indicated that incidence of AF after CABG significantly lower in the PP group than in the control group (risk ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.64, P < 0.0001). PP also effectively reduced the post-CABG occurrence of early pericardial effusion (RR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.50; P < 0.05), late pericardial effusion (RR = 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.16; P < 0.05), and pericardial tamponade (RR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.33; P < 0.05) as well as the length of ICU stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.91,95% CI 0.57-1.24; P < 0.05), while increasing the occurrence pleural effusion (RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.19-1.92; P < 0.05). No significant differences length of hospital stay (WMD = - 0.45, 95% CI - 2.44 to 1.54, P = 0.66), pulmonary complications (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.71-1.39, P = 0.97), revision surgery for bleeding (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.43-1.63, P = 0.60), use of IABP (RR = 1, 95% CI 0.61-1.65, P = 1.0), or death (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.07-3.03, P = 0.41) were observed between the PP and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS
PP may be a safe, effective, and economical method for preventing AF after CABG in adult patients.
Topics: Adult; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Bypass; Humans; Male; Pericardial Effusion; Pericardiectomy; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34391454
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-021-01611-x