-
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and... Oct 2018Fondaparinux is commonly used for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) despite lack of approval for this indication. High quality randomized controlled...
BACKGROUND
Fondaparinux is commonly used for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) despite lack of approval for this indication. High quality randomized controlled trials of this agent are unlikely to be forthcoming.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this systematic review is to update the literature on the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for treatment of confirmed and probable HIT based on the available evidence.
METHODS
Primary articles were identified using Web of Science and PubMed database searches for English-language studies from January 2006 to November 2017. Selected studies enrolled consecutive adult patients who received fondaparinux as the primary anticoagulant to treat acute HIT; confirmed the diagnosis by serological testing with a serotonin-release assay; heparin-induced platelet activation assay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; provided clinical criteria used to define HIT and reported clinically important outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 9 studies were identified with 154 HIT positive patients. Ten experienced a new thrombotic event while receiving fondaparinux (6.5%, 95% CI, 3.4 to 11.7%) and 26 experienced major bleeding (16.9%, 95% CI, 11.7 to 23.6%). Mortality due to thrombosis or bleeding was reported in 5 patients (3.2%, 95% CI, 1.2 to 7.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
Fondaparinux appears to be an effective and safe anticoagulant for treatment of acute HIT despite the absence of randomized trials. Caution should exercised when using fondaparinux in patients with renal insufficiency.
PubMed: 30349886
DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12145 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Feb 2020To systematically assess the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on in vitro cellular behavior.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically assess the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on in vitro cellular behavior.
METHODS
A systematic electronic search using MEDLINE database was performed. In vitro studies using PRF were considered and articles published up to June 31, 2018 were screened. Eligible studies were selected based on the use of human PRF.
RESULTS
In total, 1746 titles were identified with the search terms, from these 37 met the inclusion criteria and were chosen for data extraction. In addition, 16 new studies, mainly published in 2019, were also included in the analysis resulting in 53 studies. No meta-analysis could be performed due to the heterogeneity of study designs. Included studies show that PRF enhances proliferation, migration, adhesion, and osteogenic differentiation on a variety of cell types along with cell signaling activation. Furthermore, PRF reduces inflammation, suppresses osteoclastogenesis, and increases the expression of various growth factors in mesenchymal cells. Despite some notable differences of the studies, the overall findings suggest a positive effect of PRF on cell proliferation, migration, adhesion, differentiation, and inflammation pointing towards a therapeutic potential in regenerative dentistry.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
PRF serves as a reservoir of bioactive molecules to support wound healing and bone regeneration. Although the cellular mechanisms by which PRF supports the clinical outcomes remain unclear, in vitro research provides possible explanations. This systematic review aims to provide an update of the existing research on how PRF affects basic physiological processes in vitro. The overall findings suggest that PRF induces cell proliferation, migration, adhesion, and differentiation along with possessing anti-inflammatory properties further supporting its therapeutic potential in wound healing and bone regeneration.
Topics: Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Humans; Inflammation; Osteogenesis; Platelet-Rich Fibrin
PubMed: 31879804
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03156-9 -
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical... 2018Concomitant use of some non-Aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) reduces the extent of platelet aggregation of Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). This is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Concomitant use of some non-Aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) reduces the extent of platelet aggregation of Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). This is while many observational studies and clinical trials suggest that Aspirin reduces cardiovascular (CV) risk attributed to the use of NANSAIDs. Thus, the therapeutic outcome of the interaction needs to be assessed.
METHODS
We searched various databases up to October 2017 for molecular interaction studies between the drugs and long-term clinical outcomes based on randomized clinical trials and epidemiological observations that reported the effect estimates of CV risks (OR, RR or HR; 95% CI) of the interacting drugs alone or in combinations. Comparisons were made between outcomes after Aspirin alone, NANSAIDs alone and Aspirin with naproxen, ibuprofen, celecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac or rofecoxib.
RESULTS
In total, 32 eligible studies (20 molecular interactions studies and 12 observational trials) were found. Conflicting in vitro/in vivo/ex vivo platelet aggregation data were found for ibuprofen, naproxen and celecoxib. Nevertheless, for naproxen, the interaction at the aggregation level did not amount to a loss of cardioprotective effects of Aspirin. Similarly, for ibuprofen, the results overwhelmingly suggest no negative clinical CV outcomes following the combination therapy. Meloxicam and rofecoxib neither interacted with Aspirin at the level of platelet aggregation nor altered clinical outcomes. The clinical outcomes data for celecoxib and diclofenac are in conflict.
CONCLUSION
Aspirin appears to maintain its cardioprotective effect in the presence of naproxen, ibuprofen, meloxicam and rofecoxib. The limited available data suggest that the effect of interaction at the platelet aggregation level may dissipate shortly, or the reduced platelet aggregation yielded by the interaction may be sufficient for cardioprotection; i.e., no need for near complete aggregation. In addition, cardioprotective effect of Aspirin, despite reduced platelet aggregation caused by NANSAIDs, may be through its involvement in other mechanisms such as the renin-angiotensin system and/or metabolism of arachidonic acid to biologically active compounds mediated by cytochrome P450. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29891025
DOI: 10.18433/jpps29854 -
Cerebrovascular Diseases (Basel,... 2022Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a prothrombotic syndrome observed after adenoviral vector-based vaccines for severe acute respiratory...
INTRODUCTION
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a prothrombotic syndrome observed after adenoviral vector-based vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. It is characterized by thrombocytopenia, systemic activation of coagulation, extensive venous thrombosis, and anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies. Arterial thrombosis is less common and mainly affects the aorta, peripheral arteries, heart, and brain. Several cases of ischemic stroke have been reported in VITT, often associated with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Here, we describe a case of ischemic stroke with LVO after Ad26.COV2.S vaccine, then we systematically reviewed the published cases of ischemic stroke and VITT following COVID-19 vaccination.
METHODS
We describe a 58-year-old woman who developed a thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome with extensive splanchnic vein thrombosis and ischemic stroke due to right middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, 13 days after receiving Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. Then, we performed a systematic review of the literature until December 3, 2021 using PubMed and EMBASE databases. The following keywords were used: ("COVID-19 vaccine") AND ("stroke"), ("COVID-19 vaccine") AND ("thrombotic thrombocytopenia"). We have selected all cases of ischemic stroke in VITT.
RESULTS
Our study included 24 patients. The majority of the patients were females (79.2%) and younger than 60 years of age (median age 45.5 years). Almost all patients (96%) received the first dose of an adenoviral vector-based vaccine. Ischemic stroke was the presenting symptom in 18 patients (75%). Splanchnic venous thrombosis was found in 10 patients, and cerebral venous thrombosis in 5 patients (21%). Most patients (87.5%) had an anterior circulation stroke, mainly involving MCA. Seventeen patients (71%) had an intracranial LVO. We found a high prevalence of large intraluminal thrombi (7 patients) and free-floating thrombus (3 patients) in extracranial vessels, such as the carotid artery, in the absence of underlying atherosclerotic disease. Acute reperfusion therapy was performed in 7 of the 17 patients with LVO (41%). One patient with a normal platelet count underwent intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase, while 6 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy. A malignant infarct occurred in 9 patients and decompressive hemicraniectomy was performed in 7 patients. Five patients died (21%).
CONCLUSION
Our study points out that, in addition to cerebral venous thrombosis, adenoviral vector-based vaccines also appear to have a cerebral arterial thrombotic risk, and clinicians should be aware that ischemic stroke with LVO, although rare, could represent a clinical presentation of VITT.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ad26COVS1; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Ischemic Stroke; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombosis; Vaccines
PubMed: 35512656
DOI: 10.1159/000524290 -
Immune Cell Alterations in Psychotic Disorders: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biological Psychiatry Jan 2024A comprehensive meta-analysis on the composition of circulating immune cells from both the myeloid and the lymphoid lines including specialized subsets in blood and...
BACKGROUND
A comprehensive meta-analysis on the composition of circulating immune cells from both the myeloid and the lymphoid lines including specialized subsets in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with psychotic disorders compared with healthy control participants has been lacking.
METHODS
Multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PsycINFO) were searched for eligible studies up until October 18, 2022. All studies investigating circulating immune cells in the blood and CSF from patients with psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F20 and F22-29) compared with healthy control participants were included.
RESULTS
A total of 86 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the blood, the following categories of immune cells were elevated: leukocyte count (31 studies, standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.46), granulocyte count (4 studies, SMD = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.12 to 1.01), neutrophil granulocyte count (21 studies, SMD = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.54), monocyte count (23 studies, SMD = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.56), and B lymphocyte count (10 studies, SMD = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48). Additionally, the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (23 studies, SMD = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.60), the monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (9 studies, SMD = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.57), and the platelet/lymphocyte ratio (10 studies, SMD = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.43) were elevated. The CSF cell count showed a similar tendency but was not significantly elevated (3 studies, SMD = 0.14; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.32).
CONCLUSIONS
The results indicate a broad activation of the immune system in psychotic disorders, with cells from both the myeloid and the lymphoid line being elevated. However, CSF analyses were lacking in most of the studies, and many studies were hampered by insufficient adjustment for confounding factors such as body mass index and smoking.
PubMed: 38185237
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.11.029 -
Advances in Rheumatology (London,... Jun 2020Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, also known as antimalarial drugs, are widely used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases and have recently become the focus of...
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, also known as antimalarial drugs, are widely used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases and have recently become the focus of attention because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Rheumatologists have been using antimalarials to manage patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases for decades. It is an appropriate time to review their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms impact on disease activity and survival of systemic lupus erythematosus patient, including antiplatelet effect, metabolic and lipid benefits. We also discuss possible adverse effects, adding a practical and comprehensive approach to monitoring rheumatic patients during treatment with these drugs.
Topics: Antimalarials; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; COVID-19; Chloroquine; Coronavirus Infections; Drug Eruptions; Drug Interactions; Female; Glucose; Heart Diseases; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Lipids; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Pandemics; Platelet Aggregation; Pneumonia, Viral; Pregnancy; Renal Insufficiency; Retinal Diseases; Sjogren's Syndrome
PubMed: 32517786
DOI: 10.1186/s42358-020-00134-8 -
Molekuliarnaia Biologiia 2018The heritable component of susceptibility to myocardial infraction (MI) remains unexplained, possibly due to the minor effects of genes, which are not obviously...
The heritable component of susceptibility to myocardial infraction (MI) remains unexplained, possibly due to the minor effects of genes, which are not obviously associated with the disease. These genes may be integrated in miRNA regulated networks associated with myocardial infarction. A systematic review of the literature led us to selecting rs2910164 (MIR146A), rs11614913 (MIR196A2), and rs3746444 (MIR499А) variants to study the association with the MI phenotype. In ethnic Russians, variant rs11614913*C (MIR196A2) was found to be associated with the risk of myocardial infraction (p = 0.023, OR = 1.74) for the first time; this association was validated in an independent cohort. The gene-gene interaction network for experimentally validated miR-196a2 target genes was built and analyzed. One of its four topological clusters contained the majority of miR-196a2 target genes associated with atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction and was enriched with the genes regulating the TGFβ and class I MHC signaling pathways, platelet activation/aggregation, and the cell cycle control. This analysis points towards the role of miR-196a2 in the pathological coronary phenotypes and opens up an avenue for further investigations.
Topics: Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; MicroRNAs; Myocardial Infarction; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 30633243
DOI: 10.1134/S0026898418060149