-
Annals of Palliative Medicine Oct 2021Since December 2019, there have been cases of infectious pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. On January 12, 2020, the World Health Organization... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Since December 2019, there have been cases of infectious pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. On January 12, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) named it COVID-19. There are few studies on the clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19, and results vary widely in sample sizes.
METHODS
Chinese and English databases were searched with "Infectious pneumonia", "COVID-19", "CT", "SARS-COV-2", and "Diagnose" as keywords. Rev Man 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane system was used to assess the quality of the included literature.
RESULTS
Of the 18 included studies, ground-glass shadow was the most common computed tomography (CT) sign [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.97], followed by thickening of the blood vessels (95% CI: 0.63-0.78), and pleural thickening (95% CI: 0.02-0.15). Of the 18 studies, 12 reported that the lesions were externally subpleural (95% CI: 0.132-0.173), and 6 reported that the lesions were distributed in a single lobe (95% CI: 0.598-0.841). The heterogeneity test results showed that the morphology of the lesions was cord-like (95% CI: 0.092-0.172), grid-like (95% CI: 0.152-0.193), patchy (95% CI: 0.192-0.313), and nodular (95% CI: 0.591-0.745).
DISCUSSION
Ground-glass opacity was a typical CT manifestation for patients with infectious pneumonia, and CT signs were instrumental in diagnosing this disease.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Retrospective Studies; SARS-CoV-2; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; World Health Organization
PubMed: 34763487
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2101 -
The European Respiratory Journal Aug 2014Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is endorsed for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is endorsed for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of Xpert for the detection of extrapulmonary TB. We searched multiple databases to October 15, 2013. We determined the accuracy of Xpert compared with culture and a composite reference standard (CRS). We grouped data by sample type and performed meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model. We assessed sources of heterogeneity using meta-regression for predefined covariates. We identified 18 studies involving 4461 samples. Sample processing varied greatly among the studies. Xpert sensitivity differed substantially between sample types. In lymph node tissues or aspirates, Xpert pooled sensitivity was 83.1% (95% CI 71.4-90.7%) versus culture and 81.2% (95% CI 72.4-87.7%) versus CRS. In cerebrospinal fluid, Xpert pooled sensitivity was 80.5% (95% CI 59.0-92.2%) against culture and 62.8% (95% CI 47.7-75.8%) against CRS. In pleural fluid, pooled sensitivity was 46.4% (95% CI 26.3-67.8%) against culture and 21.4% (95% CI 8.8-33.9%) against CRS. Xpert pooled specificity was consistently >98.7% against CRS across different sample types. Based on this systematic review, the World Health Organization now recommends Xpert over conventional tests for diagnosis of TB in lymph nodes and other tissues, and as the preferred initial test for diagnosis of TB meningitis.
Topics: Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Databases, Factual; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; HIV Infections; Humans; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Prevalence; Reference Standards; Regression Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Rifampin; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis; World Health Organization
PubMed: 24696113
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00007814 -
Clinical Imaging Feb 2021We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of chest CT findings in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of chest CT findings in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection.
METHODS
Systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar to retrieve original studies on chest CT findings of patients with confirmed COVID-19, available up to 10 May 2020. Data on frequency and distribution of chest CT findings were extracted from eligible studies, pooled and meta-analyzed using random-effects model to calculate the prevalence of chest CT findings.
RESULTS
Overall, 103 studies (pooled population: 9907 confirmed COVID-19 patients) were meta-analyzed. The most common CT findings were ground-glass opacities (GGOs) (77.18%, 95%CI = 72.23-81.47), reticulations (46.24%, 95%CI = 38.51-54.14), and air bronchogram (41.61%, 95%CI = 32.78-51.01). Pleural thickening (33.35%, 95%CI = 21.89-47.18) and bronchial wall thickening (15.48%, 95%CI = 8.54-26.43) were major atypical and airway findings. Lesions were predominantly distributed bilaterally (75.72%, 95%CI = 70.79-80.06) and peripherally (65.64%, 95%CI = 58.21-72.36), while 8.20% (95%CI = 6.30-10.61) of patients had no abnormal findings and pre-existing lung diseases were present in 6.01% (95%CI = 4.37-8.23).
CONCLUSIONS
The most common CT findings in COVID-19 are GGOs with/without consolidation, reticulations, and air bronchogram, which often involve both lungs with peripheral distribution. However, COVID-19 might present with atypical manifestations or no abnormal findings in chest CT, which deserve clinicians' notice.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Lung; Retrospective Studies; SARS-CoV-2; Thorax; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33142125
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.035 -
Clinical Imaging Jul 2021Our purpose was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of all existing literature regarding imaging findings on chest CT and associated clinical features in... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Our purpose was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of all existing literature regarding imaging findings on chest CT and associated clinical features in pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19.
MATERIALS & METHODS
A literature search was conducted on April 21, 2020 and updated on July 24, 2020 using PubMed, Embase, World Health Organization, and Google Scholar databases. Only studies which described chest CT findings of COVID-19 in pregnant patients were included for analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 67 articles and 427 pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were analyzed. The most frequently encountered pulmonary findings on chest CT were ground-glass opacities (77.2%, 250/324), posterior lung involvement (72.5%, 50/69), multilobar involvement (71.8%, 239/333), bilateral lung involvement (69.4%, 231/333), peripheral distribution (68.1%, 98/144), and consolidation (40.9%, 94/230). Pregnant patients were also found to present more frequently with consolidation (40.9% vs. 21.0-31.8%) and pleural effusion (30.0% vs. 5.0%) in comparison to the general population. Associated clinical features included antepartum fever (198 cases), lymphopenia (128 cases), and neutrophilia (97 cases). Of the 251 neonates delivered, 96.8% had negative RT-PCR and/or IgG antibody testing for COVID-19. In the eight cases (3.2%) of reported neonatal infection, tests were either conducted on samples collected up to 72 h after birth or were found negative on all subsequent RT-PCR tests.
CONCLUSION
Pregnant patients appear to present more commonly with more advanced COVID-19 CT findings compared to the general adult population. Furthermore, characteristic laboratory abnormalities found in pregnant patients tended to mirror those found in the general patient population. Lastly, results from neonatal testing suggest a low risk of vertical transmission.
Topics: Adult; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lung; Lung Diseases; Pregnancy; SARS-CoV-2; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33508754
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.01.004 -
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology Nov 2021Chest computed tomography has been frequently used to evaluate patients with potential coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. However, this may be particularly...
Diagnostic Imaging in Newborns, Children and Adolescents Infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Is There a Realistic Alternative to Lung High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) and Chest X-Rays? A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Chest computed tomography has been frequently used to evaluate patients with potential coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. However, this may be particularly risky for pediatric patients owing to high doses of ionizing radiation. We sought to evaluate COVID-19 imaging options in pediatric patients based on the published literature. We performed an exhaustive literature review focusing on COVID-19 imaging in pediatric patients. We used the search terms "COVID-19," "SARS-CoV2," "coronavirus," "2019-nCoV," "Wuhan virus," "lung ultrasound (LUS)," "sonography," "lung HRCT," "children," "childhood" and "newborn" to query the online databases PubMed, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), Embase, LitCovid, the World Health Organization COVID-19 database and Medline Bireme. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis and review. We identified only seven studies using lung ultrasound (LUS) to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in newborns and children. The studies evaluated small numbers of patients, and only 6% had severe or critical illness associated with COVID-19. LUS showed the presence of B-lines in 50% of patients, sub-pleural consolidation in 43.18%, pleural irregularities in 34.09%, coalescent B-lines and white lung in 25%, pleural effusion in 6.82% and thickening of the pleural line in 4.55%. We found 117 studies describing the use of chest X-ray or chest computed tomography in pediatric patients with COVID-19. The proportion of those who were severely or critically ill was similar to that in the LUS study population. Our review indicates that use of LUS should be encouraged in pediatric patients, who are at highest risk of complications from medical ionizing radiation. Increased use of LUS may be of particularly high impact in under-resourced areas, where access to chest computed tomography may be limited.
Topics: Adolescent; COVID-19; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lung; Radiography; SARS-CoV-2; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 34429231
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.07.015 -
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Oct 2022Anthrax is a toxin-mediated zoonotic disease caused by Bacillus anthracis, with a worldwide distribution recognized for millennia. Bacillus anthracis is considered a...
BACKGROUND
Anthrax is a toxin-mediated zoonotic disease caused by Bacillus anthracis, with a worldwide distribution recognized for millennia. Bacillus anthracis is considered a potential biowarfare agent.
METHODS
We completed a systematic review for clinical and demographic characteristics of adults and children hospitalized with anthrax (cutaneous, inhalation, ingestion, injection [from contaminated heroin], primary meningitis) abstracted from published case reports, case series, and line lists in English from 1880 through 2018, assessing treatment impact by type and severity of disease. We analyzed geographic distribution, route of infection, exposure to anthrax, and incubation period.
RESULTS
Data on 764 adults and 167 children were reviewed. Most cases reported for 1880 through 1915 were from Europe; those for 1916 through 1950 were from North America; and from 1951 on, cases were from Asia. Cutaneous was the most common form of anthrax for all populations. Since 1960, adult anthrax mortality has ranged from 31% for cutaneous to 90% for primary meningitis. Median incubation periods ranged from 1 day (interquartile range [IQR], 0-4) for injection to 7 days (IQR, 4-9) for inhalation anthrax. Most patients with inhalation anthrax developed pleural effusions and more than half with ingestion anthrax developed ascites. Treatment and critical care advances have improved survival for those with systemic symptoms, from approximately 30% in those untreated to approximately 70% in those receiving antimicrobials or antiserum/antitoxin.
CONCLUSIONS
This review provides an improved evidence base for both clinical care of individual anthrax patients and public health planning for wide-area aerosol releases of B. anthracis spores.
Topics: Adult; Aerosols; Anthrax; Antitoxins; Bacillus anthracis; Biological Warfare Agents; Child; Heroin; Humans; Respiratory Tract Infections
PubMed: 36251560
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac534 -
PloS One 2022Since multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a significant public health problem worldwide, identifying associated risk factors is critical for developing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Since multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a significant public health problem worldwide, identifying associated risk factors is critical for developing appropriate control strategies.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted for identifying factors independently predicting MDR-TB. The random-effects model was used to determine pooled odds ratios (ORs) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the related factors.
RESULTS
Of the 2301 retrieved reports, 28 studies were analyzed, assessing 3152 MDR-TB and 52715 DS-TB cases. Totally 22 related factors were analyzed. The pooled ORs were 1.478 (95%CI 1.077-2.028) for positive sputum AFB smear, 1.716 (95%CI 1.149-2.564) for lung cavity, 6.078 (95%CI 2.903-12.725) for previous TB disease and 5.427 (95%CI 3.469-8.490) for a history of anti-TB therapy. All Z test p values were below 0.05, indicating these parameters were significantly associated with MDR-TB.
CONCLUSIONS
Positive sputum AFB smear, lung cavity, previously diagnosed TB and a history of anti-TB therapy are significant risk factors for MDR-TB, which are independent of the clinical setting worldwide. Increased attention should be paid to cases with such parameters to achieve more effective TB control and avoid MDR-TB through the development of a global policy.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Odds Ratio; Risk Factors; Sputum; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Tuberculosis, Pleural; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 35709161
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270003 -
Journal of the American College of... Jun 2020To date, considerable knowledge gaps remain regarding the chest CT imaging features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To date, considerable knowledge gaps remain regarding the chest CT imaging features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of results from published studies to date to provide a summary of evidence on detection of COVID-19 by chest CT and the expected CT imaging manifestations.
METHODS
Studies were identified by searching PubMed database for articles published between December 2019 and February 2020. Pooled CT positive rate of COVID-19 and pooled incidence of CT imaging findings were estimated using a random-effect model.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled positive rate of the CT imaging was 89.76% and 90.35% when only including thin-section chest CT. Typical CT signs were ground glass opacities (83.31%), ground glass opacities with mixed consolidation (58.42%), adjacent pleura thickening (52.46%), interlobular septal thickening (48.46%), and air bronchograms (46.46%). Other CT signs included crazy paving pattern (14.81%), pleural effusion (5.88%), bronchiectasis (5.42%), pericardial effusion (4.55%), and lymphadenopathy (3.38%). The most anatomic distributions were bilateral lung infection (78.2%) and peripheral distribution (76.95%). The incidences were highest in the right lower lobe (87.21%), left lower lobe (81.41%), and bilateral lower lobes (65.22%). The right upper lobe (65.22%), right middle lobe (54.95%), and left upper lobe (69.43%) were also commonly involved. The incidence of bilateral upper lobes was 60.87%. A considerable proportion of patients had three or more lobes involved (70.81%).
CONCLUSIONS
The detection of COVID-19 chest CT imaging is very high among symptomatic individuals at high risk, especially using thin-section chest CT. The most common CT features in patients affected by COVID-19 included ground glass opacities and consolidation involving the bilateral lungs in a peripheral distribution.
Topics: Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Coronavirus Infections; Female; Humans; Male; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Radiography, Thoracic; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32283052
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.006 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Nov 2021Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common cause of atypical community acquired pneumonia (CAP). The diagnostic approach of chlamydial infections remains a challenge. Diagnosis of...
BACKGROUND
Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common cause of atypical community acquired pneumonia (CAP). The diagnostic approach of chlamydial infections remains a challenge. Diagnosis of delayed chlamydial-associated complications, involving complex autoimmune pathophysiological mechanisms, is still more challenging. C. pneumoniae-related cardiac complications have been rarely reported, including cases of endocarditis, myocarditis and pericarditis.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 40-year old female was hospitalized for pleuropericarditis following lower respiratory tract infection. The patient had been hospitalized for CAP (fever, dyspnea, chest X-ray positive for consolidation on the left upper lobe) 5 weeks ago and had received ceftriaxone and moxifloxacin. Four weeks after her discharge, the patient presented with fever, shortness of breath and pleuritic chest pain and was readmitted because of pericardial and bilateral pleural effusions (mainly left). The patient did not improve on antibiotics and sequential introduction of colchicine and methylprednisolone was performed. The patient presented impressive clinical and laboratory response. Several laboratory and clinical assessments failed to demonstrate any etiological factor for serositis. Chlamydial IgM and IgG antibodies were positive and serial measurements showed increasing kinetics for IgG. Gold standard polymerase chain reaction of respiratory tract samples was not feasible but possibly would not have provided any additional information since CAP occurred 5 weeks ago. The patient was discharged under colchicine and tapered methylprednisolone course. During regular clinic visits, she remained in good clinical condition without pericardial and pleural effusions relapse.
CONCLUSIONS
C. pneumoniae should be considered as possible pathogen in case of pleuritis and/or pericarditis during or after a lower respiratory tract infection. In a systematic review of the literature only five cases of C. pneumoniae associated pericarditis were identified. Exact mechanisms of cardiovascular damage have not yet been defined, yet autoimmune pathways might be implicated.
Topics: Adult; Chlamydophila Infections; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Female; Humans; Pericarditis
PubMed: 34809625
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01743-9 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Dec 2014Although the evidence base regarding the use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) when testing respiratory samples is well... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Although the evidence base regarding the use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) when testing respiratory samples is well established, the evidence base for its diagnostic accuracy for extrapulmonary and sputum-scarce pulmonary TB when testing non-respiratory samples is less clearly defined.
METHODS
A systematic literature search of 7 electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, BIOSIS, Global Health Database, Scopus and Cochrane Database) was conducted to identify studies of the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert assay when testing non-respiratory samples compared with a culture-based reference standard. Data were extracted and study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated on a per-sample basis, stratified by sample type and smear microscopy status and summarised using forest plots. Pooled estimates were calculated for groups with sufficient data.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies with a total of 6,026 non-respiratory samples were included. Among the 23 studies comparing Xpert and culture done on the same samples, sensitivity was very heterogeneous with a median sensitivity of 0.83 (IQR, 0.68-0.94) whereas specificities were typically very high (median, 0.98; IQR, 0.89-1.00). The pooled summary estimates of sensitivity when testing smear-positive and smear-negative samples were 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-1.00) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.60-0.80), respectively. Pooled summary estimates of sensitivity varied substantially between sample types: lymph node tissue, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.72-0.99); tissue samples of all types, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.76-0.94); pleural fluid, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.24-0.44); gastric aspirates for diagnosis of sputum-scarce pulmonary TB, 0.78 (IQR, 0.68 - 0.85). Median sensitivities when testing cerebrospinal fluid and non-pleural serous fluid samples were 0.85 (IQR, 0.75-1.00) and 0.67 (IQR, 0.00-1.00), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Xpert detects with high specificity the vast majority of EPTB cases with smear-positive non-respiratory samples and approximately two-thirds of those with smear-negative samples. Xpert is a useful rule-in diagnostic test for EPTB, especially when testing cerebrospinal fluid and tissue samples. In addition, it has a high sensitivity for detecting pulmonary TB when using gastric aspirate samples. These findings support recent WHO guidelines regarding the use of Xpert for TB diagnosis from non-respiratory samples.
Topics: Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Exudates and Transudates; Feces; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Rifampin; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 25599808
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-014-0709-7