-
Frontiers in Oncology 2022Cellular immunotherapy has become a new and promising treatment for patients with liver tumor. However, as most immune cells are delivered by intravenous injection, the...
BACKGROUND
Cellular immunotherapy has become a new and promising treatment for patients with liver tumor. However, as most immune cells are delivered by intravenous injection, the effect is limited and is likely to produce systemic toxicity. Here, the objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of cellular immunotherapy by local infusion, which seems to be a promising approach and has not been well-studied.
METHODS
The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to obtain literature. The overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) rates, and adverse events were investigated to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of locoregional therapy. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) score. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0.
RESULTS
The eligible 17 studies involved a total of 318 patients. The random-effects model demonstrated that the ORR of local cell infusion therapy was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26%-70%). The pooled OS rate was 94% (95% CI: 83%-100%) at 6 months, 87% (95% CI: 74%-96%) at 12 months, and 42% (95% CI: 16%-70%) at 24 months. Subgroup analyses suggested that minimally invasive treatment and absence of metastasis were significantly associated with better ORR. Fourteen studies reported a variety of adverse events related to cell therapy by local perfusion. The most common complications after regional infusion of immune cells were myelosuppression (66%), fever (50%), gastrointestinal toxicity (22%), hepatic dysfunction (15%), and pleural effusion and/or ascites (14%).
CONCLUSIONS
Immune cell therapy through local perfusion is effective for patients with liver cancer, with manageable toxicity. It demonstrates better prognosis when combined with minimally invasive therapy. Considering the potential limitations, more randomized controlled trials are needed to provide solid evidence for our findings.
PubMed: 35296019
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.772509 -
Journal of Visceral Surgery Dec 2018Patients with esophageal carcinoma and concomitant liver cirrhosis carry a high operative risk and may be denied esophagectomy. We performed a systematic review of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Patients with esophageal carcinoma and concomitant liver cirrhosis carry a high operative risk and may be denied esophagectomy. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to investigate postoperative outcomes in these patients.
METHODS
Studies reporting outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis were searched in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus until June 2017, matching the terms "liver cirrhosis", "esophageal neoplasm" and/or "esophageal surgery". Extracted data included study characteristics, demographic and clinical patient characteristics, type of surgical procedure, and postoperative outcomes. A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis were performed.
RESULTS
Five observational, retrospective and single-arm studies with a total of 157 patients were included. The main cause of death was liver failure followed by pneumonia/sepsis and anastomotic leak. Ascites and pleural effusion were the most frequent postoperative complications (pooled rates 36% and 34%, respectively). The pooled morbidity rate was 74% (95% HPD=46-81%) while the pooled mortality was 18% (95% HPD=17-27%). Study heterogeneity (τ2) was low, ranging from 0.046 to 0.080. An incidental diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was reported in 15.6% of patients in one series. Five-year survival was similar between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients but was statistically significantly higher in patients with MELD score<10.
CONCLUSIONS
Sound scientific evidence with regard to efficacy and outcomes of esophagectomy in patients with concomitant liver cirrhosis is lacking. There is a need to properly select these frail patients to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Carcinoma; Cause of Death; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Monte Carlo Method; Observational Studies as Topic; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29653854
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.03.014 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Nov 2014Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an almost universally fatal malignancy primarily related to asbestos exposure. Based on the differences in immunologic markers and gene... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
RATIONALE
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an almost universally fatal malignancy primarily related to asbestos exposure. Based on the differences in immunologic markers and gene expression between histologic subtypes of mesothelioma, and our clinical impression that response rates vary by histology, we decided to examine the reported response rates of mesothelioma subtypes.
OBJECTIVES
Our objective was to compare the response rates of sarcomatoid mesotheliomas to the overall response rates in published clinical trials.
METHODS
We searched PubMed for "mesothelioma" with the clinical trials filter selected. We included articles published between January 1, 2000 and March 20, 2014 in which subjects received first or second line systemic therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Studies investigating multi-modality therapy including surgery were excluded. Response rates [including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)] were estimated for the entire patient cohort and then separately for subjects with sarcomatoid tumors.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
We reviewed 544 publications of which 41 trials met our inclusion criteria. Eleven of these trials did not include patients with sarcomatoid mesothelioma (27% of eligible studies). The remaining 30 publications included 1475 subjects, 1011 with epithelioid tumors (68.5%), 203 with biphasic tumors (13.8%), 137 with sarcomatoid tumors (9.3%) and 124 with unknown subtypes (8.4%). In total, there were 323 responses (21.9%, complete and partial responses, 95% CI: 16.3, 28.8) to systemic therapy across all histological subtypes. In patients with sarcomatoid tumors (n=137) 19 responses were observed. This accounted for 5.9% of all responses and yields a 13.9% (95% CI: 8.6, 21.6) response rate for patients with sarcomatoid tumors. Multiple biases likely affected this systematic review.
CONCLUSION
Response rates for different histological subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma are infrequently reported. Partial and complete responses to systemic therapies appear to be less common among patients with sarcomatoid tumors.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Pleural Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25217189
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.017 -
Cancer Medicine Feb 2022Ionizing radiation and mesothelioma have been examined among personnel employed in nuclear power plant and patients treated by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Ionizing radiation and mesothelioma have been examined among personnel employed in nuclear power plant and patients treated by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The association is still controversial; the purpose of this review is to summarize the scientific evidence published in the literature regarding the relationship between ionizing radiation and incidence of mesothelioma and, if possible, estimating strongness of the association by meta-analysis of extracted data.
METHODS
Articles included in the systematic review were retrieved by searching among the three main scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The literature search was conducted in June 2021. A meta-analysis of random effects was conducted, stratified by exposure (EBRT, occupational exposure). The heterogeneity of the summary relative risks (RRs) was assessed using I statistics. Publication bias was evaluated graphically through the funnel plot.
FINDINGS
The exposure to ionizing radiation could be a risk factor for mesothelioma: both for exposure to high doses for short periods (EBRT) (RR of 3.34 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.24-8.99]) and for exposure to low doses for a prolonged duration (exposure working) (RR of 3.57 [95% CI 2.16-5.89]).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the low number of mesotheliomas in the general population, the steadily increased risk among individuals exposed to radiation is still worth considering.
Topics: Humans; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Occupational Exposure; Radiation, Ionizing; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35029060
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4436 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Aug 2018Intra-pleural bacteria are effective pleurodesis agents in malignant pleural effusions. However, their relationship with survival is unclear.
BACKGROUND
Intra-pleural bacteria are effective pleurodesis agents in malignant pleural effusions. However, their relationship with survival is unclear.
OBJECTIVES
We undertook a comprehensive, structured evaluation of survival outcomes in adults with malignant pleural effusions treated with intra-pleural bacterial products.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Clinical Trials Registers and Open Grey.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS
Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised comparative studies were included, if the population included adults with malignant pleural effusions. Interventions of interest were any intra-pleural bacterial product, compared with placebo, alternative intra-pleural drug, or no treatment. Survival outcomes were collected.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, assessed papers for risk of bias and extracted data. Narrative synthesis was performed as high heterogeneity between studies precluded meta-analysis.
RESULTS
631 studies were identified, of which 14 were included. All were at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Six studies reported a survival benefit associated with intra-pleural bacterial products, whilst 8 reported no difference. Non-randomised studies and studies published prior to 2000 were more likely to report survival benefits.
LIMITATIONS
There was high heterogeneity between studies, which limited the generalisability of findings. Publication bias may have affected the review as five full-text papers were unobtainable, and survival outcomes were missing in a further five.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a lack of high quality evidence regarding the relationship between intra-pleural bacterial products and survival. Implications of key findings: Well-designed, prospective randomised trials are needed, to determine whether intra-pleural bacterial products can improve survival in pleural malignancy.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42017058067.
Topics: Adult; Antigens, Bacterial; Humans; Pleura; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Pleurodesis; Publication Bias; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 30032840
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.06.002 -
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory... Apr 2020Pleural mesothelioma is a rare cancer with an often-challenging diagnosis because of its potential to be a great mimicker of many other tumors. Among them, primary lung...
Differential Diagnosis of Epithelioid Malignant Mesothelioma With Lung and Breast Pleural Metastasis: A Systematic Review Compared With a Standardized Panel of Antibodies-A New Proposal That May Influence Pathologic Practice.
CONTEXT.—
Pleural mesothelioma is a rare cancer with an often-challenging diagnosis because of its potential to be a great mimicker of many other tumors. Among them, primary lung and breast cancers are the 2 main causes of pleural metastasis. The development and application of targeted therapeutic agents have made it even more important to achieve an accurate diagnosis. In this setting, international guidelines have recommended the use of 2 positive and 2 negative immunohistochemical biomarkers.
OBJECTIVES.—
To define the most highly specific and sensitive minimum set of antibodies for routine practice to use for the separation of epithelioid malignant mesothelioma from lung and breast metastasis and to determine the most relevant expression cutoff.
DESIGN.—
To provide information at different levels of expression of 16 mesothelial and epithelial biomarkers, we performed a systematic review of articles published between 1979 and 2017, and we compared those data to results from the Mesothelioma Telepathology Network (MESOPATH) of the standardized panel used in routine practice database since 1998.
RESULTS.—
Our results indicate that the following panel of markers-calretinin (poly)/thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1; clone 8G7G3/1) and calretinin (poly)/estrogen receptor-α (ER-α; clone EP1)-should be recommended; ultimately, based on the MESOPATH database, we highlight their relevance which are the most sensitive and specific panel useful to the differential diagnosis at 10% cutoff.
CONCLUSIONS.—
Highlighted by their relevance in the large cohort reported, we recommend 2 useful panels to the differential diagnosis at 10% cutoff.
Topics: Female; Humans; Adenocarcinoma; Antibodies; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Diagnosis, Differential; Immunohistochemistry; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Pleural Neoplasms; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 31389715
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0457-OA -
European Respiratory Review : An... Sep 2019Debulking surgery and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) has been successfully used in the treatment of thoracic tumours. Few authors report on the...
INTRODUCTION
Debulking surgery and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) has been successfully used in the treatment of thoracic tumours. Few authors report on the feasibility of its use in patients with lung cancer and malignant pleural effusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and results of debulking surgery and HITHOC in the treatment of selected patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant pleural effusion.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The word search included: "hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy and/or HITHOC or hyperthermic intrapleural". Inclusion criteria were only those studies reporting a sufficient amount of data on HITHOC and surgery for lung cancer. Single case reports and review articles were excluded.
RESULTS
20 articles were selected as they related to the topic of HITHOC and lung cancer. Most were from China (n=8) and Japan (n=6). Only four out of the 20 articles had sufficient data for this review. In total, data for 21 patients were collected. Debulking surgery ranged from wedge resection to pneumonectomy and pleurectomy. Mean survival was 27 months and median survival was 18 months (range 1-74 months). 13 patients out of 21 (62%) were alive at 1 year and six (28.5%) were alive at 2 years. 10 patients were still alive at the time of the respective publication in the 21 patients included. Systemic toxicity and treatment-related mortality were nil. There were insufficient data to perform a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Although reported survival in this systematic review is encouraging, available evidence concerning debulking surgery and HITHOC in N0-N1 NSCLC with malignant pleural effusion is weak. Better evidence in the form of a randomised controlled trial is mandatory.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Hyperthermia, Induced; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Pneumonectomy; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31366459
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0018-2019 -
Clinical and Translational Science Jan 2023Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is widely used in patients with pleural effusion (PE). This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively summarize the clinical complication... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is widely used in patients with pleural effusion (PE). This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively summarize the clinical complication from IPC. We searched four large electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library) for potentially relevant studies and assessed the included studies' quality using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies' criteria. Extracted data were used to pool rates, and to conduct subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Forty-one studies involving a cumulative 4983 patients with 5650 IPCs were included in this meta-analysis. The overall incidence of IPC complications was 20.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.0-26.3). The top four complications were: overall infection incidence 5.7% (95% CI: 0.7-2.4); overall catheter abnormality incidence 4.4% (95% CI: 2.8-6.3); pain incidence 1.2% (95% CI: 0.4-2.4); and overall loculation incidence 0.9% (95% CI: 0.1-2.1). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses for overall complications and infections by country, PE site, and PE type demonstrated these factors did not contribute significantly to heterogeneity. Further subgroup analyses for infection of benign PE showed that the overall infection incidence (12.6% [95% CI: 8.1-17.8] vs 0.7% [95% CI: 0.0-4.5]) and empyema incidence (9.1% [95% CI: 5.3-13.8] vs 0.0% [95% CI: 0.0-2.3]) of patients with liver-related PE were significantly higher than that of patients with heart-related PE. Our meta-analysis showed reliable pooled incidences of IPC-related complications, with infection being the most common. These results serve to remind clinicians about the incidence of IPC-related complications and emphasize the importance of taking corresponding preventive and therapeutic steps.
Topics: Humans; Catheterization; Catheters, Indwelling; Incidence; Pleural Effusion; Pleural Effusion, Malignant
PubMed: 36253892
DOI: 10.1111/cts.13430 -
Journal of B.U.ON. : Official Journal... 2015To evaluate the rates of locoregional failure (LRF) vs distant metastasis (DM), and find risk factors for recurrence in patients with completely resected N1 non-small... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the rates of locoregional failure (LRF) vs distant metastasis (DM), and find risk factors for recurrence in patients with completely resected N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
By searching Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register from 1995 through 2014, eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified. In addition, the reference lists of articles and conference abstracts were searched. The logarithm of the risk ratio (RR) and its standard error (SE) were calculated, and a fixed-effect model was used to combine the estimates.
RESULTS
3 RCTs and 9 retrospective studies, which included 889 patients, were identified and selected. All studies dealt with resected N1 NSCLC, LRF vs DM, and risk factors such as visceral pleural invasion (VPI) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). There was statistically significant benefit on 5-year overall survival (OS) for LRF (RR=0.68,95% CI=0.60-0.78, p<0.00001). Further analysis for patients with LRF also showed that VPI (RR=1.25, 95% confidence interval/CI=1.09-1.42, p=0.0009), LVI (RR=1.16, 95% CI=1.04-1.30, p=0.009), were the main risk factors for recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study indicates that in patients with resected N1 NSCLC, the incidence of LRF is lower than DM. Advanced T stage classification, VPI, and LVI were predictors of poor survival. These patients represent a subgroup with N1 disease who might benefit from additional therapy, including adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). However, large, well-designed prospective studies should be conducted to confirm this conclusion.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Chi-Square Distribution; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Odds Ratio; Pneumonectomy; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26214632
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Jul 2020To systematically evaluate the correlation between percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) and recurrence in stage I lung cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To systematically evaluate the correlation between percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) and recurrence in stage I lung cancer.
METHODS
The databases of PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and China Biology Medicine disc were retrieved to collect relevant literatures about the correlation between PTNB and recurrence in stage I lung cancer. The retrieval time was limited from the time of their database establishment to April 30/2020.Screened the literature, extracted the data and assessed the quality of studies included. Then the meta-analysis was performed by using Stata l6.0 software.
RESULTS
A total of 8 cohort studies involving 2760 lung cancer patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that PTNB did not increase the risk of total recurrence and pleural recurrence in the patients with stage I lung cancer. The result of subgroup analysis is according to the tumor location. For stage I lung cancer, PTNB will increase the risk of pleural recurrence in patients with sub-pleural lesions but not in those without sub-pleural lesions.
CONCLUSIONS
To stage I lung cancer, PTNB is not associated with the total recurrence and pleural recurrence but PTNB will increase the risk of pleural recurrence in patients with sub-pleural lesions.
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Seeding; Neoplasm Staging; Pleural Neoplasms
PubMed: 32689974
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-020-01235-2