-
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Apr 2023Ruxolitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways. Ruxolitinib is used to...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Ruxolitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways. Ruxolitinib is used to treat myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera and steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease in the setting of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. This review describes the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ruxolitinib.
METHODS
Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and web of Science were searched from the time of database inception to march 15, 2021 and was repeated on November 16, 2021. Articles not written in English, animal or in vitro studies, letters to the editor, case reports, where ruxolitinib was not used for hematological diseases or not available as full text were excluded.
RESULTS
Ruxolitinib is well absorbed, has 95% bio-availability, and is bound to albumin for 97%. Ruxolitinib pharmacokinetics can be described with a two-compartment model and linear elimination. Volume of distribution differs between men and women, likely related to bodyweight differences. Metabolism is mainly hepatic via CYP3A4 and can be altered by CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors. The major metabolites of ruxolitinib are pharmacologically active. The main route of elimination of ruxolitinib metabolites is renal. Liver and renal dysfunction affect some of the pharmacokinetic variables and require dose reductions. Model-informed precision dosing might be a way to further optimize and individualize ruxolitinib treatment, but is not yet advised for routine care due to lack of information on target concentrations.
CONCLUSION
Further research is needed to explain the interindividual variability of the ruxolitinib pharmacokinetic variables and to optimize individual treatment.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Female; Janus Kinases; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Nitriles
PubMed: 37000342
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01225-7 -
Leukemia Jun 2021Data on the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN)-α for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are inconsistent. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Data on the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN)-α for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid, Scopus, COCHRANE registry of clinical trials, and Web of Science from inception through 03/2019 for studies of pegylated IFN (peg-IFN) and non-pegylated IFN (non-peg-IFN) in PV and ET patients. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the primary outcome of overall response rate (ORR) defined as a composite of complete response, partial response, complete hematologic response (CHR) and partial hematologic response. Peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN were compared by meta-regression analyses. In total, 44 studies with 1359 patients (730 ET, 629 PV) were included. ORR were 80.6% (95% confidence interval: 76.6-84.1%, CHR: 59.0% [51.5%-66.1%]) and 76.7% (67.4-84.0%; CHR: 48.5% [37.8-59.4%]) for ET and PV patients, respectively. In meta-regression analyses results did not differ significantly for non-peg-IFN vs. peg-IFN. Annualized rates of thromboembolic complications and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were low at 1.2% and 8.8% for ET and 0.5% and 6.5% for PV patients, respectively. Both peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN can be effective and safe long-term treatments for ET and PV.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Polycythemia Vera; Thrombocythemia, Essential
PubMed: 32868875
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01020-4 -
Haematologica Dec 2019Hydroxyurea is the standard treatment in high-risk patients with polycythemia vera. However, estimates of its effect in terms of clinical outcomes (thrombosis, bleeding,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Hydroxyurea is the standard treatment in high-risk patients with polycythemia vera. However, estimates of its effect in terms of clinical outcomes (thrombosis, bleeding, hematologic transformations and mortality) are lacking. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the absolute risk of events in recent cases of patients under hydroxyurea treatment. We searched for relevant articles or abstracts in the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry, LILACS. Sixteen studies published from 2008 to 2018 reporting number of events using World Health Organization diagnosis for polycythemia vera were selected. Through a random effect logistic model, incidences, study heterogeneity and confounder effects were estimated for each outcome at different follow ups. Overall, 3,236 patients were analyzed. While incidences of thrombosis and acute myeloid leukemia were stable over time, mortality and myelofibrosis varied depending on follow-up duration. Thrombosis rates were 1.9%, 3.6% and 6.8% persons/year at median ages 60, 70 and 80 years, respectively. Higher incidence of arterial events was predicted by previous cardiovascular complication. Leukemic transformation incidence was 0.4% persons/year. Incidence of transformation to myelofibrosis and mortality were significantly dependent on age and follow-up duration. For myelofibrosis, rates were 5.0 at five years and 33.7% at ten years; overall mortality was 12.6% and 56.2% at five and ten years, respectively. In conclusion, we provide reliable risk estimates for the main outcomes in polycythemia vera patients under hydroxyurea treatment. These findings can help design comparative clinical trials with new cytoreductive drugs and prove the feasibility of using critical end points for efficacy, such as major thrombosis.
Topics: Hemorrhage; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Thrombosis
PubMed: 31123026
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2019.221234 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Jan 2023Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are most prevalent in the older population (median age at the diagnosis is above 60 years) and rarely diagnosed... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are most prevalent in the older population (median age at the diagnosis is above 60 years) and rarely diagnosed in pediatrics. Thus, our knowledge about the clinical presentation, mutational status, and complications of MPNs in pediatrics is limited.
METHODS
The literature in English (PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar) was searched for studies, reviews, case series, and case reports of patients with Philadelphia-negative MPNs (including essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, and profibrotic myelofibrosis) in the pediatrics age group (less than 18 years). Only studies that fulfilled WHO 2008 or 2016 criteria for MPNs were included. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, vascular and long-term complications, types of driver mutations, and treatment approaches in pediatric patients with MPNs.
RESULTS
We reviewed 33 articles of available published literature from 2008 to 2022 and collected data from a total of 196 patients of the pediatric population. Among the cohort of patients, 139 had essential thrombocythemia (ET), 20 had polycythemia vera (PV), and 37 had primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The median age at the time of diagnosis for each disease varied, with 8.8 years for ET, 10 years for PV, and 3.6 years for MF. There was a slight difference in gender prevalence between both gender groups and all three diseases. The presenting symptoms were not mentioned in more than 50% of studies. We found that JAK2 was the most prevalent among all mutations. Both bleeding and thrombosis were present equally in ET, with 9% of cases complicated by bleeding and 9% complicated by thrombosis. Hemorrhagic events did not occur in patients with PV; thrombosis in children with MF was also not found. The progression into AML occurred in two patients with PV and one with ET.
CONCLUSION
Given the rarity of MPNs in pediatrics and their different characteristics compared with adults, we believe there is a need for unique diagnostic criteria to match the different molecular statuses in pediatrics. Based on our review, the incidence of MPN complications in pediatrics, including thrombotic events, hemorrhage, and leukemic transformation, differs from that in adults.
PubMed: 36766480
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030377 -
Biomedicines Jan 2023The impact of primary arterial hypertension (HTN) in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) remains unclear, with scant literature available, mostly focusing on... (Review)
Review
The impact of primary arterial hypertension (HTN) in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) remains unclear, with scant literature available, mostly focusing on cardiovascular risk factors as a singular entity or on organ-specific HTN. Furthermore, available studies reporting findings on drug-induced HTN in MPNs report varying and contradictory findings. In consideration of the above, this study set out to systematically review the available literature and shed light on the occurrence of HTN in MPNs, its association with thrombosis, as well as the drugs used in MPN management that could increase blood pressure. The literature search yielded 598 potentially relevant records of which 315 remained after the duplicates ( = 283) were removed. After we screened the titles and the abstracts of these publications, we removed irrelevant papers ( = 228) and evaluated the full texts of 87 papers. Furthermore, 13 records did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded from the systematic review. Finally, a total of 74 manuscripts were entered into the qualitative synthesis and included in the present systematic review. Our systematic review highlights that HTN is the most common comorbidity encountered in MPNs, with an impact on both the occurrence of thrombosis and survival. Moreover, drug-induced HTN remains a challenge in the management of MPNs. Further research should investigate the characteristics of patients with MPNs and HTN, as well as clarify the contribution of HTN to the development of thrombotic complications, survival and management in MPNs. In addition, the relationship between clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, HTN, cardiovascular disease and MPNs requires examination in upcoming assessments.
PubMed: 36830925
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020388 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Jul 2021Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare, clonal disorders of the hematopoietic stem cell in which an uncontrolled proliferation of terminally differentiated myeloid... (Review)
Review
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare, clonal disorders of the hematopoietic stem cell in which an uncontrolled proliferation of terminally differentiated myeloid cells is noted. Polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are included in the category of Philadelphia-negative, so-called classical MPNs. The potential applications of liquid biopsy and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers have not been explored in MPNs until now. Thus, a systematic search was computed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library and, in total, 198 potentially relevant papers were detected. Following the removal of duplicates ( = 85), 113 records were screened. After the exclusion of irrelevant manuscripts based on the screening of their titles and abstracts ( = 81), we examined the full texts of 33 manuscripts. Finally, after we applied the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 27 original articles were included in this review. Overall, the data analyzed in this review point out that liquid biopsy and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers (cell-free DNA, extracellular vesicles, microparticles, circulating endothelial cells) could be used in MPNs for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Future research is needed to clarify whether this technique can be employed to differentiate between MPN subtypes and secondary causes of erythrocytosis, thrombocytosis and myelofibrosis, as well as to predict the development of thrombosis.
PubMed: 34357048
DOI: 10.3390/life11070677 -
BMC Cancer Feb 2019Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell clonal diseases. Most patients with MPN... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell clonal diseases. Most patients with MPN are asymptomatic at diagnosis although some of them suffer from constitutional symptoms. Thrombosis and bleeding can also be one of the initial manifestations although the reported prevalence varied considerably across the studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aims to better understand the prevalence and characteristics of thrombosis and bleeding among patients with newly-diagnosed MPN.
METHODS
Using a search strategy that included the terms for myeloproliferative neoplasms, thrombosis, and bleeding, two investigators independently searched for published articles indexed in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to August 2018. The pooled prevalence was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model with a double arcsine transformation.
RESULTS
A total of 29 cohort studies (8 prospective and 21 retrospective) with 13,436 patients with MPN were included into this meta-analysis. At diagnosis, the pooled prevalence of overall thrombosis among patients with MPN was 20.0% (95% CI, 16.6-23.8%; I 96%), with the pooled prevalence of arterial thrombosis of 16.2% (95% CI, 13.0-20.0%; I 95%) and the pooled prevalence of venous thrombosis of 6.2% (95% CI, 4.9-7.8%; I 89%). Common thrombotic events included cerebrovascular disease/transient ischemic attack, coronary heart disease, and deep venous thrombosis. The pooled prevalence of hemorrhagic complications among patients who were newly diagnosed with MPN patients was 6.2% (95% CI, 5.0-7.8%; I 85%). Common sites of bleeding included gastrointestinal, mucosal, and cutaneous bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS
Thrombosis and bleeding are common initial manifestations of MPN. Investigations for MPN should be considered for patients who present with unexplained thrombosis or abnormal bleeding.
Topics: Hemorrhage; Humans; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Philadelphia Chromosome; Prevalence; Thrombosis
PubMed: 30819138
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5387-9 -
American Journal of Hematology Mar 2018Ruxolitinib exerts immunosuppressive activity that may increase the risk of infectious complications. We performed a systematic review of the literature with the aim of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Ruxolitinib exerts immunosuppressive activity that may increase the risk of infectious complications. We performed a systematic review of the literature with the aim of estimating the risk of infections in patients treated with ruxolitinib. Studies were identified by electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE database. Differences in the incidence of infectious events between ruxolitinib and comparison groups were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Five phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (3 phase IIIa with their extended phase and 2 phase IIIb), 6 phase IV studies and 28 case reports were included in this systematic review. Ruxolitinib was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of herpes zoster infection compared to control group in 3 RCTs including patients with polycythemia vera (OR 7.39 [1.33, 41.07]) and in a pooled analysis of the extended phase IIIa RCTs (OR 5.20 [95%CI 1.27, 21.18]). In the larger phase IV post-marketing study, the incidence of the most frequent infections was 8% for herpes zoster, 6.1% for bronchitis and 6% for urinary tract infections. In the published case reports, the most frequent infections were tuberculosis (N = 10), hepatitis B reactivation (N = 5) and pneumocystis jeroveci infection (N = 2). Evidence is not solid enough to accurately estimate the risk of infection in ruxolitinib-treated patients. However, published data clearly suggest that the infection risk may be clinically relevant. Well-designed studies are warranted to evaluate the risk of ruxolitinib-associated infection, in order to identify the most appropriate antimicrobial prophylactic strategy.
Topics: Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Bacterial Infections; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Confidence Intervals; Disease Susceptibility; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Infections; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 2; Mycoses; Nitriles; Odds Ratio; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk
PubMed: 29150886
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24976 -
Blood Advances Jun 2019In the last years, a growing amount of evidence has been produced regarding the role of leukocytosis as a risk factor for thrombosis in patients with myeloproliferative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
In the last years, a growing amount of evidence has been produced regarding the role of leukocytosis as a risk factor for thrombosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, predominantly in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). Results from epidemiologic studies on this issue, however, are inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published in the last 12 years addressing the issue, according to a predefined protocol. Forty-one articles analyzing >30 000 patients met our inclusion criteria and were deemed of acceptable methodologic quality. In addition to data on thrombosis, data were collected on bleeding, hematologic evolution, secondary cancer, and death. The relative risk (RR) of thrombosis in the presence of leukocytosis was 1.59 (95% CI, 1.40-1.80), mainly accounted for by ET (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.43-1.91) and arterial thrombosis (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.86) subgroups; the effect was not significant in venous thrombosis alone. Sensitivity analyses considering recurrent events as well as white blood cell estimates adjusted or unadjusted for confounding factors confirmed the primary results. In addition, the pooled RR of studies that tested white blood cell counts in time-dependent models suggested a causative effect of leukocytes in the mechanism that triggers thrombosis. The effect of leukocytosis on bleeding (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.26-2.77) and death (RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.59-2.23) was confirmed, whereas conclusions on hematologic evolutions and solid tumors were uncertain. To confirm the accuracy of these results, an investigation on individual patient data in a large collective archive of homogeneous patients is warranted.
Topics: Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Leukocytosis; Male; Polycythemia Vera; Risk Factors; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Thrombosis
PubMed: 31175128
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000211 -
Blood Advances Jan 2020Ruxolitinib is a recommended second-line treatment for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera who become resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea;... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Ruxolitinib is a recommended second-line treatment for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera who become resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea; however, evidence regarding its efficacy in terms of thrombosis reduction is uncertain. We searched Medline, Embase, and archives of abstracts from the European Hematology Association and the American Society of Hematology annual congresses from 2014 onward for randomized controlled trials comparing the treatment vs best available therapy (BAT). Our search retrieved 80 records; after screening of abstracts and full text, the total was reduced to 16. Evidence came from 4 randomized controlled trials, including 663 patients (1057 patients per year). We estimated a thrombosis risk ratio of 0.56 for ruxolitinib BAT, corresponding to an incidence of 3.09% and 5.51% patients per year, respectively. The number of thrombotic events reported with ruxolitinib was consistently lower than that with BAT in our sample, but, globally, the difference did not reach significance (P = .098). Hard evidence in favor of ruxolitinib is lacking; a clinical trial on selected patients at high risk of thrombosis would be warranted, but its feasibility is questionable.
Topics: Humans; Nitriles; Odds Ratio; Polycythemia Vera; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31985808
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001158