-
Microorganisms Jul 2022is an emerging, Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen that is transmitted by a tick vector. Human infection ranges from asymptomatic to severe disease that can... (Review)
Review
is an emerging, Gram-negative, obligate intracellular pathogen that is transmitted by a tick vector. Human infection ranges from asymptomatic to severe disease that can present with pancytopenia, multiorgan failure, and death. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze case reports and case series reported over the last two decades in peer-reviewed journals indexed in the Medline/PubMed database according to the PRISMA guidelines. We found 110 unique patients from 88 case reports and series. The most common mode of transmission was tick bite (60.9%), followed by blood transfusion (8.2%). Infection was acquired by blood transfusion in nearly half (42%) of the immunocompromised patients. Most patients reported fever (90%), followed by constitutional (59%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (56%). Rash was present in 17% of patients, much higher than in previous studies. Thrombocytopenia was the most common laboratory abnormality (76%) followed by elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (46%). The diagnosis was most commonly established using whole-blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 76% of patients. Coinfection rate was 9.1% and was most commonly isolated in seven patients (6.4%). Doxycycline was used to treat 70% of patients but was only used as an empiric treatment in one-third of patients (33.6%). The overall mortality rate was 5.7%, and one patient died from trauma unrelated to HGA. The mortality rates among immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients were 4.2% ( = 4/95) and 18.2% ( = 2/11), respectively. Four of the six patients who died (66.6%) received appropriate antibiotic therapy. Among these, doxycycline was delayed by more than 48 h in two patients.
PubMed: 35889152
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10071433 -
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 2021Analyze available evidence related to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vertical transmission. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Analyze available evidence related to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vertical transmission.
METHODS
Scoping review, according to the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR. Searches were conducted in five electronic databases to find publications about coronavirus infection and vertical transmission. Data were extracted, analyzed and synthesized by three independent researchers using a descriptive approach.
RESULTS
The search resulted in 76 publications. After selective steps, 15 articles - retrospective descriptive or case studies - were analyzed, all in English. In order to track the infection, specimens were collected from neonates through nasal swabs and C-reactive protein from breast milk, cord blood, amniotic fluid, placenta and vaginal secretion was analyzed. A small percentage of neonates tested positive for COVID-19, but these cases were not attributed to vertical transmission.
CONCLUSION
Vertical transmission could not be demonstrated. Research protocol registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fawmv).
Topics: C-Reactive Protein; COVID-19; DNA, Viral; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Pandemics; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34037165
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0849 -
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 2023Southeast Asia is attractive for tourism. Unfortunately, travelers to this region are at risk of becoming infected with Shigella. We conducted a meta-analysis to provide... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Southeast Asia is attractive for tourism. Unfortunately, travelers to this region are at risk of becoming infected with Shigella. We conducted a meta-analysis to provide updates on Shigella prevalence in Southeast Asia, along with their serogroups and serotypes.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies from 2000 to November 2022. We selected studies that detected Shigella in stools by culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Two reviewers extracted the data using a standardized form and performed quality assessments using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. The random effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of Shigella.
RESULTS
During our search, we identified 4376 studies. 29 studies (from six Southeast Asian countries) were included in the systematic review, 21 each in the meta-analysis of the prevalence of Shigella (Sample size: 109545) and the prevalence of Shigella serogroups. The pooled prevalence of Shigella was 4% (95% CI: 4-5%) among diarrhea cases. Shigella sonnei was the most abundant serogroup in Thailand (74%) and Vietnam (57%), whereas Shigella flexneri was dominant in Indonesia (72%) and Cambodia (71%). Shigella dysenteriae and Shigella boydii were uncommon (pooled prevalence of 1% each). The pooled prevalence of Shigella was 5% (95% CI: 4-6%) in children aged <5 years. The pooled prevalence showed a decreasing trend comparing data collected between 2000-2013 (5%; 95% CI: 4-6%) and between 2014-2022 (3%; 95% CI: 2-4%). Shigella prevalence was 6% in studies that included participants with mixed pathogens versus 3% in those without. Shigella flexneri serotype 2a was the most frequently isolated (33%), followed by 3a (21%), 1b (10%), 2b (3%), and 6 (3%).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides compelling evidence for the development of effective Shigella vaccines for residents of endemic regions and travellers to these areas.
Topics: Child; Humans; Dysentery, Bacillary; Shigella; Shigella dysenteriae; Shigella flexneri; Indonesia
PubMed: 36792021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102554 -
Oncotarget Nov 2015Despite continuously improving therapies, gastric cancer still shows poor survival in locally advanced stages with local recurrence rates of up to 50% and peritoneal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Despite continuously improving therapies, gastric cancer still shows poor survival in locally advanced stages with local recurrence rates of up to 50% and peritoneal recurrence rates of 17% after curative surgery. We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses to clarify whether positive intraperitoneal cytology (IPC) indicates a high risk of disease recurrence and poor overall survival in gastric cancer.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched in December 2014 to identify studies on the prognostic significance of positive intraperitoneal cytology in gastric cancer, including: Medline, Biosis, Science Citation Index, Embase, CCMed and publisher databases. Hazard ratios (HR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted from the identified studies. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model on overall survival, disease-free survival and peritoneal recurrence free survival.
RESULTS
A total of 64 studies with a cumulative sample size of 12,883 patients were included. Cytology, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or both were performed in 35; 21 and 8 studies, respectively. Meta analyses revealed free intraperitoneal tumor cells (FITC) to be associated with poor overall survival in univariate (HR 3.27; 95% CI 2.82 - 3.78]) and multivariate (HR 2.45; 95% CI 2.04 - 2.94) analysis and poor peritoneal recurrence free survival in univariate (4.15; 95% CI 3.10 - 5.57) and multivariate (3.09; 95% CI 2.02 - 4.71) analysis. Subgroup analysis showed this effect to be independent of the detection method, Western or Asian origin or the time of publication.
CONCLUSIONS
FITC oder positive peritoneal cytology is associated with poor survival and increased peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer.
Topics: Animals; Histological Techniques; Humans; Peritoneum; Prognosis; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26384352
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5595 -
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Feb 2017Noroviruses are increasingly recognized as a major cause of sporadic and epidemic acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Although there have been multiple studies published on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Noroviruses are increasingly recognized as a major cause of sporadic and epidemic acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Although there have been multiple studies published on norovirus epidemiology in Latin America, no comprehensive assessment of the role of norovirus has been conducted in the region. We aim to estimate the role of norovirus in the Latin American region through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature.
METHODS
We carried out a literature search in MEDLINE, SciELO and LILACS. We included papers that provided information on the prevalence or incidence of norovirus (including seroprevalence studies and outbreaks), with a recruitment and/or follow-up period of at least 12 months and where the diagnosis of norovirus was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The data were pooled for meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of norovirus AGE and norovirus asymptomatic infection with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Thirty-eight studies were included in the review. Overall, the prevalence of norovirus among AGE cases was 15% (95% CI: 13-18). By location, it was 15% in the community (95% CI: 11%-21%), 14% in outpatient settings (95% CI: 10%-19%) and 16% in hospital locations (95% CI: 12%-21%). The prevalence of norovirus among asymptomatic subjects was 8% (95% CI: 4-13). Norovirus GII.4 strains were associated with 37%-100% of norovirus AGE cases, but only 7% of norovirus asymptomatic detections.
CONCLUSIONS
Noroviruses are associated with almost 1 out of every 6 hospitalizations because of acute diarrhea in children younger than 5 years of age in Latin America.
Topics: Caliciviridae Infections; Child; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Disease Outbreaks; Gastroenteritis; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Latin America; Norovirus; Seroepidemiologic Studies
PubMed: 27755462
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001369 -
Memorias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz Apr 2015The diagnosis of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) is hampered by the absence of a gold standard. An accurate diagnosis is essential because of the high toxicity of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The diagnosis of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) is hampered by the absence of a gold standard. An accurate diagnosis is essential because of the high toxicity of the medications for the disease. This study aimed to assess the ability of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to identify MCL and to compare these results with clinical research recently published by the authors. A systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement was performed using comprehensive search criteria and communication with the authors. A meta-analysis considering the estimates of the univariate and bivariate models was performed. Specificity near 100% was common among the papers. The primary reason for accuracy differences was sensitivity. The meta-analysis, which was only possible for PCR samples of lesion fragments, revealed a sensitivity of 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.59; 0.81] and a specificity of 93% (95% CI = 0.83; 0.98) in the bivariate model. The search for measures that could increase the sensitivity of PCR should be encouraged. The quality of the collected material and the optimisation of the amplification of genetic material should be prioritised.
Topics: Biopsy; Clinical Trials as Topic; Confidence Intervals; DNA, Protozoan; Humans; Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Qualitative Research; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 25946238
DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760140280 -
Maedica Sep 2021Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is due to severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which belongs to beta-coronaviruses of the...
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is due to severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which belongs to beta-coronaviruses of the Coronaviridae family. SARS-coV-2 causes acute respiratory infection with varying severity in different age groups, wherein adults can develop severe disease, while children are relatively spared until now, with COVID-19 in children accounting for only 1-5% of diagnosed cases. Although COVID-19 incidence rate in children is relatively low, their protection from COVID-19 is still a matter of increasing concern as children constitute a large vulnerable population. In order to develop effective therapeutic management and preventive measures against COVID-19 in children, there is an urgent need for a better understanding of its pathophysiology at the molecular level and clinical presentation as well as possible protective mechanisms in the pediatric population. There is limited data regarding the incidence and clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. Our goal was to understand the clinical picture and presentation of pediatric patients with confirmed COVID-19. A systematic literature search of popular medical databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials and Scopus), restricted to English language publications only, was conducted by us. We chose published peer-reviewed and cross-sectional articles as well as case series providing clinical signs, imaging findings and laboratory results of pediatric patients, using the following inclusion criteria: children aged up to 18 years who tested positive for COVID-19 and in whom SARS-Co-V-2 was detected in the nasal/throat swab by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Our review revealed that, in children, COVID-19 was milder in terms of disease severity and clinical presentation, and it had a better prognosis and a lower mortality rate than adults.
PubMed: 34925609
DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2020.16.3.499 -
Placenta Aug 2022Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has been implicated in the clinical pathology of... (Review)
Review
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has been implicated in the clinical pathology of multiple organs and organ systems. Due to the novelty of the disease, there is a need to review emerging literature to understand the profile of SARS-CoV-2 in the placenta. This review sought to evaluate the literature on the mediators, mechanism of entry, pathogenesis, detection, and pathology of SARS-CoV-2 in the placenta. Systematic literature searches found 96 eligible studies. Our review revealed that SARS-CoV-2 canonical mediators, angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), and transmembrane serine protease-2 (TMPRSS2) are variably expressed in various placenta compartments, including the villous cytotrophoblasts, syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs), and extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs) throughout pregnancy. Placental SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus-associated receptors and factors (SCARFs), including basigin (BSG/CD147), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4/CD26), cathepsin B/L (CTL B/L), furin, interferon-induced transmembrane protein (IFITM1-3), and lymphocyte antigen 6E (LY6E) may increase or reduce the permissiveness of the placenta to SARS-CoV-2. EVTs express genes that code for proteins that may drive viral pathogenesis in the placenta. Viral RNA, proteins, and particles were detected primarily in the STBs by in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and polymerase chain reaction. Placental pathology in SARS-CoV-2-infected placentas included maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion and a generally nonspecific inflammatory-immune response. The localization of SARS-CoV-2 receptors, proteases, and genes involved in coding proteins that drive viral pathogenesis in the placenta predisposes the placenta to SARS-CoV-2 infection variably in all pregnancy trimesters, with antecedent placental pathology. There is a need for further studies to explicate the mechanism of entry and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in the placenta.
Topics: COVID-19; Female; Humans; Placenta; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; SARS-CoV-2; Trophoblasts
PubMed: 35872511
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.07.007 -
Viruses Mar 2021Repeated positivity and reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) is a significant concern. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Repeated positivity and reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) is a significant concern. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of repeatedly positive testing after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) recovery. We performed a systematic literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. With available individual patient data reporting on repeatedly SARS-CoV-2 positive (RSP) patients, case reports, and case series were included in this analysis. We performed a descriptive analysis of baseline characteristics of repeatedly positive cases. We assessed the cases according to the length of their polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative interval between the two episodes. Risk factors for the severity of second episodes were evaluated. Overall, we included 123 patients with repeated positivity from 56 publications, with a mean repeated positivity length of 47.8 ± 29.9 days. Younger patients were predominant in the delayed (>90 days) recurrent positive group. Furthermore, comparing patients with RSP intervals of below 60 and above 60 days, we found that a more severe disease course can be expected if the repeated positivity interval is shorter. Severe and critical disease courses might predict future repeatedly positive severe and critical COVID-19 episodes. In conclusion, our results show that the second episode of SARS-CoV-2 positivity is more severe if it happens within 60 days after the first positive PCR. On the other hand, the second episode's severity correlates with the first.
Topics: Adult; Aged; COVID-19; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reinfection; SARS-CoV-2; Young Adult
PubMed: 33808867
DOI: 10.3390/v13030512 -
Journal of Clinical Virology : the... Mar 2022Active SARS-CoV-2 infection is confirmed mainly through the detection of viral nucleic acid via the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Active SARS-CoV-2 infection is confirmed mainly through the detection of viral nucleic acid via the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique. Methods to assess humoral responses contribute to the monitoring of the disease and confirmation of exposure to the virus.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the accuracy of tests for IgM and IgG antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-PCR and utility as complementary data for immunosurveillance.
METHODS
Literature research was performed by searching the terms "COVID-19", "COVID-19 diagnostic testing" and "test" in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to search for potentially eligible observational studies without language restrictions published up to September 2020.
RESULTS
The pooled sensitivity and specificity, regardless of collection moment, was 80.0% (CI 95% 72.0-86.0) and 97.0% (CI 95% 94.0-98.0) for "IgM and/or IgG", respectively. Serology considering immunoglobulins M and G together had a high accuracy performance on "fifteenth day and after": sensitivity and specificity was 91.0% (CI 95% 85.0-94.0) and 98.0% (CI 95% 95.0-99.0) respectively, DOR 461 and AUC 0.98.
CONCLUSION
This study shows that serology is a group of tests with high accuracy, mainly following the second week after infection.
Topics: Antibodies, Viral; COVID-19; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulin M; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35245882
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105121