-
European Heart Journal Open Mar 2023People living with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are likely to have worse clinical outcomes and greater impairment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than other... (Review)
Review
People living with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are likely to have worse clinical outcomes and greater impairment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than other sarcoidosis manifestations. CS can result in a constellation of intrusive symptoms (such as palpitations, dizziness, syncope/pre-syncope, chest pain, dyspnoea, orthopnoea, or peripheral oedema) and/or life-threatening episodes, requiring consideration of invasive cardiac procedures for diagnosis and for the management of acute events. Additionally, the presence of multisystemic involvement and persistent non-specific sarcoidosis symptoms negatively affect HRQoL. A systematic review was undertaken to explore the impact of CS on HRQoL in adults with CS. Multiple bibliographic databases were searched for studies with HRQoL as primary or secondary outcomes in CS (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019119752). Data extraction and quality assessments were undertaken independently by two authors. From the initial 1609 identified records, only 11 studies included CS patients but none specifically reported HRQoL scores for CS patients. The average representation of CS patients was 14.5% within these cohorts (range 2-22%). The majority (73%) was conducted in single-centre tertiary care settings, and only one study (9%) included longitudinal HRQoL data. CS patients were among those sarcoidosis patients with impaired HRQoL and worse outcomes, requiring higher doses of sarcoidosis-specific therapy which contribute to further deterioration of HRQoL. Sarcoidosis studies do not incorporate stratified HRQoL scores for CS patients. While there is a need for longitudinal and multicentre studies assessing HRQoL outcomes in CS cohorts, the development of CS-specific tools is also needed.
PubMed: 36974155
DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead009 -
JAMA Network Open May 2022Clinical prediction models, or risk scores, can be used to risk stratify patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), although the most discriminative score is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Clinical prediction models, or risk scores, can be used to risk stratify patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), although the most discriminative score is unknown.
OBJECTIVE
To identify all LGIB risk scores available and compare their prognostic performance.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1990, through August 31, 2021, was conducted. Non-English-language articles were excluded.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational and interventional studies deriving or validating an LGIB risk score for the prediction of a clinical outcome were included. Studies including patients younger than 16 years or limited to a specific patient population or a specific cause of bleeding were excluded. Two investigators independently screened the studies, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data were abstracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline independently by 2 investigators and pooled using random-effects models.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Summary diagnostic performance measures (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]) determined a priori were calculated for each risk score and outcome combination.
RESULTS
A total of 3268 citations were identified, of which 9 studies encompassing 12 independent cohorts and 4 risk scores (Oakland, Strate, NOBLADS [nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, no diarrhea, no abdominal tenderness, blood pressure ≤100 mm Hg, antiplatelet drug use (nonaspirin), albumin <3.0 g/dL, disease score ≥2 (according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index), and syncope], and BLEED [ongoing bleeding, low systolic blood pressure, elevated prothrombin time, erratic mental status, and unstable comorbid disease]) were included in the meta-analysis. For the prediction of safe discharge, the AUROC for the Oakland score was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88). For major bleeding, the AUROC was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95) for the Oakland score, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77) for the Strate score, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.53-0.62) for the NOBLADS score, and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.61-0.69) for the BLEED score. For transfusion, the AUROC was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00) for the Oakland score and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.90) for the NOBLADS score. For hemostasis, the AUROC was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.32-0.40) for the Oakland score, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79-0.85) for the Strate score, and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.20-0.28) for the NOBLADS score.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The Oakland score was the most discriminative LGIB risk score for predicting safe discharge, major bleeding, and need for transfusion, whereas the Strate score was best for predicting need for hemostasis. This study suggests that these scores can be used to predict outcomes from LGIB and guide clinical care accordingly.
Topics: Area Under Curve; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; ROC Curve; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35622365
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14253 -
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) Jul 2023Traditionally, mechanical thrombectomy performed for pulmonary embolism (PE) necessitates the utilization of iodinated contrast. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Traditionally, mechanical thrombectomy performed for pulmonary embolism (PE) necessitates the utilization of iodinated contrast. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been used as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in the management of acute high and intermediate-risk PE. Recently, with the shortage of contrast supplies and the considerable incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), other safer and more feasible IVUS methods have become desirable. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the importance of IVUS in patients with PE undergoing thrombectomy.
METHODS
Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for review studies, case reports, and case series. Clinical characteristics, outcomes and the usage of IVUS-guided mechanical thrombectomy during the treatment of acute high and intermediate-risk PE were examined in a descriptive analysis.
RESULTS
In this systematic review, we included one prospective study, two case series, and two case reports from July 2019 to May 2023. A total of 39 patients were evaluated; most were female (53.8%). The main presenting symptoms were dyspnea and chest pain (79.5%); three patients (7.9%) presented with syncope, one with shock and one with cardiac arrest. Biomarkers (troponin and BNP) were elevated in 94.6% of patients. Most patients (87.2%) had intermediate-risk PE, and 12.8% had high-risk PE. All patients presented with right-heart strain (RV/LV ratio ≥ 0.9, = 39). Most patients (56.4%) had bilateral PE. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed using IVUS without contrast utilization in 39.4% of the patients. After the initial learning curve, contrast usage decreased gradually over time. There was a significant decrease in the composite mean arterial pressure immediately following IVUS-guided thrombectomy from 35.1 ± 7.2 to 25.2 ± 8.3 mmHg ( < 0.001). Post-procedure, there was no reported (0%) CI-AKI, no all-cause mortality, no major bleeding, or other adverse events. There was a significant improvement in symptoms and RV function at the mean follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
New evidence suggests that IVUS-guided mechanical thrombectomy is safe, with visualization of the thrombus for optimal intervention, and reduces contrast exposure.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Thrombolytic Therapy; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Pulmonary Embolism; Thrombectomy; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 37489479
DOI: 10.3390/tomography9040111 -
The American Journal of Medicine Dec 2020Guidelines recommend increased salt intake as a first-line recommendation in the management of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension and recurrent syncope. There have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Guidelines recommend increased salt intake as a first-line recommendation in the management of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension and recurrent syncope. There have been no systematic reviews of this intervention. We sought to summarize the evidence for increased salt intake in patients with orthostatic intolerance syndromes.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Interventional studies that increased salt intake in individuals with orthostatic intolerance syndromes were included. Primary outcome measures included incidence of falls and injuries, and rates of syncope and presyncope. Secondary outcome measures included other orthostatic intolerance symptoms, blood pressure, and heart rate.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were eligible, including participants with orthostatic hypotension, syncope, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, and idiopathic orthostatic tachycardia (n = 391). Mean age was 35.6 (± 15) years. All studies were small and short-term (<60 mins-90 days). No study reported on the effect of increased salt intake on falls or injuries. Meta-analysis demonstrated that during head-up tilt, mean time to presyncope with salt intake increased by 1.57 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.88), mean systolic blood pressure increased by 12.27 mm Hg (95% CI, 10.86-13.68), and mean heart rate decreased by -3.97 beats per minute (95% CI, -4.08 to -3.86), compared with control. Increased salt increased supine blood pressure by 1.03 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.25). Increased salt intake resulted in an improvement or resolution of symptoms in 62.3% (95% CI, 51.6 to 72.6) of participants in short-term follow-up studies (mean follow-up of 44.3 days, 6 studies; n=91). Methodological quality of studies were low with high statistical heterogeneity in all meta-analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis provides low-quality evidence of a short-term improvement in orthostatic intolerance with increased salt intake. There were no clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of increased salt intake on long-term clinical outcomes. Overall, there is a paucity of clinical trial evidence to support a cornerstone recommendation in the management of orthostatic intolerance syndromes.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Middle Aged; Orthostatic Intolerance; Sodium Chloride, Dietary; Young Adult
PubMed: 32603788
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.028 -
Journal of the American College of... Aug 2017To determine, using systematic review of the biomedical literature, whether pacing reduces risk of recurrent syncope and relevant clinical outcomes among adult patients... (Review)
Review
Pacing as a Treatment for Reflex-Mediated (Vasovagal, Situational, or Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity) Syncope: A Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association...
OBJECTIVES
To determine, using systematic review of the biomedical literature, whether pacing reduces risk of recurrent syncope and relevant clinical outcomes among adult patients with reflex-mediated syncope.
METHODS
MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through October 7, 2015) were searched for randomized trials and observational studies examining pacing and syncope, and the bibliographies of known systematic reviews were also examined. Studies were rejected for poor-quality study methods and for the lack of the population, intervention, comparator, or outcome(s) of interest.
RESULTS
Of 3,188 citations reviewed, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review, including a total of 676 patients. These included 9 randomized trials and 1 observational study. Of the 10 studies, 4 addressed patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity, and the remaining 6 addressed vasovagal syncope. Among the 6 open-label (unblinded) studies, we found that pacing was associated with a 70% reduction in recurrent syncope (relative risk [RR]: 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.60). When the 2 analyzable studies with double-blinded methodology were considered separately, there was no clear benefit (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.25-2.1), but confidence intervals were wide. The strongest evidence was from the randomized, double-blinded ISSUE-3 (Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology) trial, which demonstrated a benefit of pacing among patients with recurrent syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.
CONCLUSIONS
There are limited data with substantive evidence of outcome ascertainment bias, and only 2 studies with a double-blinded study design have been conducted. The evidence does not support the use of pacing for reflex-mediated syncope beyond patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.
Topics: Advisory Committees; American Heart Association; Biomedical Research; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Cardiology; Disease Management; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Societies, Medical; Syncope; United States
PubMed: 28286220
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.004 -
European Journal of Preventive... Jul 2017Aims To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Aims To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Methods Medline and PubMed databases were searched for original articles published in English from 1963 through to December 2015 that included patients under 18 years of age with a primary or secondary end-point of either SCD or SCD-equivalent events (aborted cardiac arrest or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge) or cardiovascular death (CVD). Results Twenty-five studies (3394 patients) met the inclusion criteria. We identified four conventional major risk factors that were evaluated in at least four studies and that we found to be statistically associated with an increased risk of death in at least two studies: previous adverse cardiac event (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.67-7.95, p < 0.001); non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (pooled HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.21-3.74, p = 0.009); unexplained syncope (pooled HR 1.89, 95% CI 0.69-5.16, p = 0.22); and extreme left ventricular hypertrophy (pooled HR 1.80, 95% CI 0.75-4.32, p = 0.19). Left atrial diameter did not meet the major risk factor criteria; however, this is likely to be an additional significant risk factor. 'Minor' risk factors included a family history of SCD, gender, age, symptoms, electrocardiogram changes, abnormal blood pressure response to exercise and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Conclusions A lack of well-designed, large, population-based studies in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy means that the evidence base for individual risk factors is not robust. We have identified four clinical parameters that are likely to be associated with increased risk of SCD, SCD-equivalent events or CVD. Multi-centre prospective studies are needed in order to further determine the relevance of these factors in predicting SCD in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and to identify novel risk markers. Condensed abstract A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical risk factors predicting sudden cardiac death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was performed, identifying four 'major' factors: previous adverse cardiac event; non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; syncope; and extreme left ventricular hypertrophy. Well-designed multi-centre studies are required in the future in order to confirm these findings.
Topics: Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Child; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Defibrillators, Implantable; Global Health; Humans; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Survival Rate
PubMed: 28482693
DOI: 10.1177/2047487317702519 -
Texas Heart Institute Journal Aug 2023The study aimed to review differences in the presentation and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) between men and women. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The study aimed to review differences in the presentation and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) between men and women.
METHODS
PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for studies comparing clinical features or outcomes of PE between men and women. Baseline comorbidities, risk factors, clinical features, and mortality rates were also compared between men and women.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included. It was noted that men presented with PE at a statistically significantly younger age than women (P < .001). Smoking history (P < .001), lung disease (P = .004), malignancy (P = .02), and unprovoked PE (P = .004) were significantly more frequent among men than among women. There was no difference between the sexes for hypertension, diabetes, and a history of recent immobilization. A significantly higher proportion of men presented with chest pain (P = .02) and hemoptysis (P < .001), whereas syncope (P = .005) was more frequent in women. Compared with men, women had a higher proportion of high-risk PE (P = .003). There was no difference in the use of thrombolytic therapy or inferior vena cava filter. Neither crude nor adjusted mortality rates were significantly different between men and women.
CONCLUSION
This review found that the age at presentation, comorbidities, and symptoms of PE differed between men and women. Limited data also suggest that women more frequently had high-risk PE compared with men, but the use of thrombolytic therapy did not differ between the 2 sexes. Importantly, both crude and adjusted data show that the mortality rate did not differ between men and women.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Comorbidity; Neoplasms; Acute Disease
PubMed: 37577766
DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-23-8113 -
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology... May 2023To summarize published case reports of patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Brugada pattern electrocardiogram (ECG). (Review)
Review
AIMS
To summarize published case reports of patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Brugada pattern electrocardiogram (ECG).
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist were followed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus up until September 2021. The incidence, clinical characteristics, and management outcomes of COVID-19 patients with a Brugada pattern ECG were identified.
RESULTS
A total of 18 cases were collected. The mean age was 47.1 years and 11.1% were women. No patients had prior confirmed diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. The most common presenting clinical symptoms were fever (83.3%), chest pain (38.8%), shortness of breath (38.8%), and syncope (16.6%). All 18 patients presented with type 1 Brugada pattern ECG. Four patients (22.2%) underwent left heart catheterization, and none demonstrated the presence of obstructive coronary disease. The most common reported therapies included antipyretics (55.5%), hydroxychloroquine (27.7%), and antibiotics (16.6%). One patient (5.5%) died during hospitalization. Three patients (16.6%) who presented with syncope received either an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or wearable cardioverter defibrillator at discharge. At follow-up, 13 patients (72.2%) had resolution of type 1 Brugada pattern ECG.
CONCLUSION
COVID-19-associated Brugada pattern ECG seems relatively rare. Most patients had resolution of the ECG pattern once their symptoms have improved. Increased awareness and timely use of antipyretics is warranted in this population.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Antipyretics; Electrocardiography; COVID-19; Brugada Syndrome; Defibrillators, Implantable; Syncope
PubMed: 36811259
DOI: 10.1111/anec.13051 -
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A,... Jan 2020Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is associated with increased risk of falls, cognitive impairment and death, as well as a reduced quality of life. Although it is presumed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is associated with increased risk of falls, cognitive impairment and death, as well as a reduced quality of life. Although it is presumed to be common in older people, estimates of its prevalence vary widely. This study aims to address this by pooling the results of epidemiological studies.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and ProQuest were searched. Studies were included if participants were more than 60 years, were set within the community or within long-term care and diagnosis was based on a postural drop in systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥20 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥10 mmHg. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Random and quality effects models were used for pooled analysis.
RESULTS
Of 23,090 identified records, 20 studies were included for community-dwelling older people (n = 24,967) and six were included for older people in long-term settings (n = 2,694). There was substantial variation in methods used to identify OH with differing supine rest duration, frequency and timing of standing BP, measurement device, use of standing and tilt-tables and interpretation of the diagnostic drop in BP. The pooled prevalence of OH in community-dwelling older people was 22.2% (95% CI = 17, 28) and 23.9% (95% CI = 18.2, 30.1) in long-term settings. There was significant heterogeneity in both pooled results (I2 > 90%).
CONCLUSIONS
OH is very common, affecting one in five community-dwelling older people and almost one in four older people in long-term care. There is great variability in methods used to identify OH.
Topics: Aged; Blood Pressure; Global Health; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Independent Living; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30169579
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gly188 -
Seizure Nov 2022Differentiating epileptic seizures from other causes of Transient Loss of Consciousness (TLOC) remains a challenge in the Emergency Department (ED), where it may lead to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Differentiating epileptic seizures from other causes of Transient Loss of Consciousness (TLOC) remains a challenge in the Emergency Department (ED), where it may lead to erroneous administration of anti-epileptic drugs. Although video electroencephalography (EEG) is the gold standard for diagnosing epileptic seizures, it is not widely available in ED settings. Therefore, simple and quick diagnostic techniques for patients with TLOC in ED are needed. We performed a meta-analysis to review relevant literature and determine the efficacy of serum lactate in differentiating epileptic seizures from other causes of TLOC in the ED setting.
METHODS
We performed a literature search of PubMed and Scopus from inception up to April 2022. Randomized trials and observational (prospective or retrospective) studies reporting lactate levels in adults ≤ 3 h after a TLOC episode were included. The primary outcome of interest was the serum lactate level difference between patients with a generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) and those with other forms of TLOC. Other outcomes were the differences in serum lactate levels among patients with other types of TLOC, such as psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), syncope, and non-GTCS. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare the mean difference in serum lactate levels among different types of TLOC. The PROSPERO registration is CRD42022316163.
RESULTS
We included eight studies (1348 patients) in our analysis. Serum lactate levels from patients who had GTCS were significantly higher than those from patients who had TLOC from any other cause (mean difference 5.27 mmol/L, 95% CI 1.73, 8.81, P = 0.004). Similarly, there was statistically a significant difference in serum lactate between patients with GTCS and non-GTCS (2.96 mmol/L, 95% CI 1.68, 4.24, P = 0.001), and patients with GTCS and syncope (4.29 mmol/L, 95% CI 2.48, 6.10, P = 0.001). However, there was no difference in mean lactate between syncope and PNES, and between syncope and non-GTCS, demonstrating that the serum lactate levels between other forms of TLOC other than GTCS were similar. A serum lactate concentration of 2.4 mmol/L provided a good capability to differentiate between GTCS and non-GTCS, with AUROC ranging from 0.94 - 0.97.
CONCLUSION
Serum lactate can be a valuable tool to differentiate GTCS from other forms of TLOC, but it is not valuable in distinguishing non-GTCS types of TLOC from each other. However, lactate level should not be used as an absolute diagnostic tool and should be interpreted along with proper clinical context.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Diagnosis, Differential; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Seizures; Epilepsy; Electroencephalography; Syncope; Unconsciousness; Lactic Acid
PubMed: 36242832
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.10.007