-
Annals of Palliative Medicine Oct 2021In clinical general thoracic surgery, the prevalence of atelectasis is relatively high. Perioperative interventions can affect the probability of patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In clinical general thoracic surgery, the prevalence of atelectasis is relatively high. Perioperative interventions can affect the probability of patients with atelectasis after surgery. Therefore, the incidence of perioperative intervention to prevent atelectasis after thoracic surgery was discussed using meta-analysis in this study.
METHODS
The articles were searched in the English database PubMed and Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD). The duration for publication time of the articles was from the database inception to March 2021, and the articles were required to be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using interventions [such as changing the dose of general anesthesia, continuous positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), non-invasive pressure support ventilation, and physical therapy] after thoracic surgery (such as pulmonary lobectomy, sternum surgery, and lung cancer surgery) for the treatment of atelectasis. The software RevMan 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 5 articles were obtained, including 375 cases in the control group and 268 cases in the intervention treatment group. A meta-analysis was performed on the included articles, combined effect model analysis results showed that compared with the control group, the use of PEEP during mechanical ventilation can significantly reduce the incidence of atelectasis [odds ratio (OR) =0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31-0.67; Z=3.94; P<0.0001].
DISCUSSION
Perioperative intervention was more effective for postoperative atelectasis and other complications.
Topics: Humans; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Thoracic Surgery; Thoracic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 34763434
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2441 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2014Oesophagectomy followed by oesophagogastrostomy is the preferred treatment for early-stage oesophageal cancer. It carries the risk of anastomotic leakage after... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Oesophagectomy followed by oesophagogastrostomy is the preferred treatment for early-stage oesophageal cancer. It carries the risk of anastomotic leakage after oesophagogastric anastomosis, which causes considerable morbidity and mortality and is one of the most dangerous complications. Omentoplasty has been recommended by some researchers to prevent anastomotic leaks associated with oesophagogastrostomy. However, the value of omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy has not been systematically reviewed.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer.
SEARCH METHODS
A comprehensive search to identify eligible studies for inclusion was conducted using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and other reliable resources.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials comparing omentoplasty versus no omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer were eligible for inclusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors (Yong Yuan and Xiaoxi Zeng) independently assessed the quality of included studies and extracted data; disagreements were resolved through arbitration by another review author. Results of dichotomous outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Meta-analysis was performed when available data were sufficiently similar. Subgroup analysis was carried out on the basis of different approaches to surgery.
MAIN RESULTS
Three randomised controlled trials (633 participants) were included in this updated review. No significant differences in hospital mortality were noted between the study group (with omentoplasty) and the control group (without omentoplasty) (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.39). None of the included studies reported differences in long-term survival between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage was significantly less among study participants treated with omentoplasty than among those treated without (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.55), but the additional benefit was seen in the subgroup analysis only for participants undergoing a transhiatal oesophagogastrectomy (THE) procedure (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.79); transthoracic oesophagogastrectomy (TTE) (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.03); or three-field oesophagectomy (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.19 ). Omentoplasty did not significantly improve other surgery-related complications, such as anastomotic stricture (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.57). However, participants treated with omentoplasty could reduce the duration of hospitalisation compared with that seen in the control group (MD -2.13, 95% CI -3.57 to -0.69).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Omentoplasty may provide additional benefit in decreasing the incidence of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy and oesophagogastrostomy for patients with oesophageal cancer without increasing or decreasing other complications, especially among those treated with THE. It also has the potential to reduce the duration of hospital stay after operation. Further randomised controlled trials are needed to investigate the influences of omentoplasty on the incidence of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stricture, long-term survival, duration of hospital stay and quality of life after oesophagectomy and oesophagogastrostomy when different surgical approaches are used.
Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Esophagostomy; Esophagus; Gastrostomy; Humans; Length of Stay; Omentum; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stomach
PubMed: 25274134
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008446.pub3 -
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Oct 2016Pancreas surgery has developed into a fairly safe procedure in terms of mortality, but is still hampered by considerable morbidity. Among the most frequent and dreaded... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pancreas surgery has developed into a fairly safe procedure in terms of mortality, but is still hampered by considerable morbidity. Among the most frequent and dreaded complications are the development of a post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The prediction and prevention of POPF remains an area of debate with several questions yet to be firmly addressed with solid answers.
METHODS
A systematic review of systematic reviews/meta-analyses and randomized trials in the English literature (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library, EMBASE) covering January 2005 to December 2015 on risk factors and preventive strategies for POPF.
RESULTS
A total of 49 systematic reviews and meta-analyses over the past decade discussed patient, surgeon, pancreatic disease and intraoperative related factors of POPF. Non-modifiable factors (age, BMI, comorbidity) and pathology (histotype, gland texture, duct size) that indicates surgery are associated with POPF risk. Consideration of anastomotic technique and use of somatostatin-analogs may slightly modify the risk of fistula. Sealant products appear to have no effect. Perioperative bleeding and transfusion enhance risk, but is modifiable by focus on technique and training. Drains may not prevent fistulae, but may help in early detection. Early drain-amylase may aid in detection. Predictive scores lack uniform validation, but may have a role in patient information if reliable pre-operative risk factors can be obtained.
CONCLUSIONS
Development of POPF occurs through several demonstrated risk factors. Anastomotic technique and use of somatostatin-analogs may slightly decrease risk. Drains may aid in early detection of leaks, but do not prevent POPF.
Topics: Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Drainage; Humans; Morbidity; Pancreas; Pancreatic Fistula; Postoperative Complications; Predictive Value of Tests; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27216233
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1169317 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jul 2022To evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stent placement for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stent placement for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS
PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to February 26, 2022. Studies comparing outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without pancreatic duct stents were included. The primary outcome measured was postoperative pancreatic fistula rate, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality rate, reoperation rate, delayed gastric emptying rate and wound infection rate.
RESULTS
Seven RCTs involving 847 patients met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference between the stent group and non-stent group was detected in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.57-1.26, P = 0.41), in-hospital mortality, reoperation, delayed gastric emptying rate and wound infection. Subgroup analyses revealed that use of an external stent significantly reduced the incidence of pancreatic fistula (RR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.43-0.86, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS
Our preliminary results from this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that pancreatic duct stents did not reduce the risk of POPF and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with no stents. External stents were associated with a reduced POPF rate compared with no stents. Large-scale RCTs are required to assess the effectiveness and assist in clarifying the real role of pancreatic duct stents with respect to the POPF rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Topics: Gastroparesis; Humans; Pancreatic Ducts; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Postoperative Complications; Stents; Wound Infection
PubMed: 35697324
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106707 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... Jan 2017C5 palsy is a serious complication after cervical decompression surgery in which the patient shows a deterioration in power of the deltoid or biceps brachii by at least... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
C5 palsy is a serious complication after cervical decompression surgery in which the patient shows a deterioration in power of the deltoid or biceps brachii by at least one grade in the manual muscle test without aggravation of lower extremity function. Although there are several hypotheses regarding the etiology of C5 palsy, the pathogenesis and preventive measures remain unidentified and many other controversies remain.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the clinical features, risk factors, mechanism, and preventive measures of C5 palsy after posterior cervical decompression surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed was searched to identify eligible studies that contained more than 10 cases and focused on C5 palsy. Microsoft Excel was used to analyze the data. Statistical comparisons were made when appropriate.
RESULTS
Out of 718 papers involving C5 palsy, 28 met the inclusion criteria. The average incidence rate was 7.8% (range, 1.4-23.0%). Risk factors for C5 palsy included age, male gender, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and stenosis of the C4-C5 intervertebral foramen. C5 palsy occurred from immediately to 2 months after surgery, and recovery time ranged from 48 h to 41 months. Hypotheses for the mechanism of C5 palsy included root involvement and spinal cord impairment. Foraminotomy and intraoperative neuromonitoring were the two main methods used to prevent C5 palsy.
CONCLUSION
C5 palsy is a serious complication occurring at the early stage after cervical decompression surgery. Foraminotomy and intraoperative neuromonitoring were the two main methods to prevent C5 palsy. The incidence of C5 palsy is low, but it can place a serious burden on the patients' quality of life and finances. The risk factors and mechanism of C5 palsy are still controversial. However, under conservative therapy, the prognosis is usually good. Higher quality studies are necessary for drawing more reliable and convincing conclusions about this disease.
Topics: Brachial Plexus Neuropathies; Cervical Vertebrae; Decompression, Surgical; Female; Humans; Male; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors
PubMed: 28176604
DOI: 10.1177/2309499016684502 -
Is minimally invasive orthopedic surgery safer than open? A systematic review of systematic reviews.International Journal of Surgery... May 2022To assess the safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for orthopedic spinal, upper limb and lower limb procedures, this systematic review of systematic reviews...
BACKGROUND
To assess the safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for orthopedic spinal, upper limb and lower limb procedures, this systematic review of systematic reviews compared their complications with open procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A literature search was conducted electronically (PubMed, Cochrane library and Web of Science; May 8, 2021) without language restriction in the past five years. Reviews that consulted at least two databases, compared MIS with open orthopedic surgery, and reported the following: intraoperative, post-operative or total complications, function, ambulation, pain, hospital stay, reoperation rate and operation time were included. Article selection, quality assessment using AMSTAR-2, and data extraction were conducted in duplicate on predesigned forms. In each review, a subset analysis focusing on prospective cohort and randomized studies was additionally performed.
PROSPERO
CRD42020178171.
RESULTS
The search yielded 531 articles from which 76 reviews consisting of 1104 primary studies were included. All reviews were assessed as being low quality. Compared to open surgery, MIS had fewer total, postoperative and intraoperative complications in 2/10, 2/11 and 2/5 reviews of spinal procedures respectively, 1/3, 1/4 and 1/2 reviews of upper limb procedures respectively, and 4/6, 2/7 and 0/2 reviews of lower limb procedures respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
MIS had greater overall safety compared to open surgery in spinal procedures. In upper limb and lower limb procedures, MIS was not outright superior to open procedures in terms of safety hence a general preference of MIS is not justified on the premise of a better safety profile compared to open procedures.
Topics: Humans; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Operative Time; Prospective Studies; Spinal Fusion; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35427798
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106616 -
The Bone & Joint Journal Jul 2016Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the incidence of post-operative epidural haematomas and wound infections after one-, or two-level,... (Review)
Review
AIMS
Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the incidence of post-operative epidural haematomas and wound infections after one-, or two-level, non-complex, lumbar surgery for degenerative disease in patients with, or without post-operative wound drainage.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Studies were identified from PubMed and EMBASE, up to and including 27 August 2015, for papers describing one- or two-level lumbar discectomy and/or laminectomy for degenerative disease in adults which reported any form of subcutaneous or subfascial drainage.
RESULTS
Eight papers describing 1333 patients were included. Clinically relevant post-operative epidural haematomas occurred in two (0.15%), and wound infections in ten (0.75%) patients. Epidural haematomas occurred in two (0.47%) patients who had wound drainage (n = 423) and in none of those without wound drainage (n = 910). Wound infections occurred in two (0.47%) patients with wound drainage and in eight (0.88%) patients without wound drainage.
CONCLUSION
These data suggest that the routine use of a wound drain in non-complex lumbar surgery does not prevent post-operative epidural haematomas and that the absence of a drain does not lead to a significant change in the incidence of wound infection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:984-9.
Topics: Diskectomy; Drainage; Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal; Humans; Laminectomy; Lumbar Vertebrae; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 27365478
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B7.37190 -
PLoS Medicine Aug 2023The optimal approach to prevent preterm birth (PTB) in twins has not been fully established yet. Recent evidence suggests that placement of cervical cerclage in twin... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies with short cervical length or cervical dilatation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The optimal approach to prevent preterm birth (PTB) in twins has not been fully established yet. Recent evidence suggests that placement of cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies with short cervical length at ultrasound or cervical dilatation at physical examination might be associated with a reduced risk of PTB. However, such evidence is based mainly on small studies thus questioning the robustness of these findings. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the role of cervical cerclage in preventing PTB and adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Key databases searched and date of last search: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched electronically on 20 April 2023. Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria were observational studies assessing the risk of PTB among twin pregnancies undergoing cerclage versus no cerclage and randomized trials in which twin pregnancies were allocated to cerclage for the prevention of PTB or to a control group (e.g., placebo or treatment as usual). The primary outcome was PTB <34 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were PTB <37, 32, 28, 24 weeks of gestation, gestational age at birth, the interval between diagnosis and birth, preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (pPROM), chorioamnionitis, perinatal loss, and perinatal morbidity. Subgroup analyses according to the indication for cerclage (short cervical length or cervical dilatation) were also performed. Risk of bias assessment: The risk of bias of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, while that of the observational studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Statistical analysis: Summary risk ratios (RRs) of the likelihood of detecting each categorical outcome in exposed versus unexposed women, and (b) summary mean differences (MDs) between exposed and unexposed women (for each continuous outcome), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using head-to-head meta-analyses. Synthesis of the results: Eighteen studies (1,465 twin pregnancies) were included. Placement of cervical cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy with a short cervix at ultrasound or cervical dilatation at physical examination was associated with a reduced risk of PTB <34 weeks of gestation (RR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.59, 0.91], p = 0.005 corresponding to a 16% difference in the absolute risk, AR), <32 (RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.57, 0.84], p < 0.001; AR: 16.92%), <28 (RR: 0.54, 95% [CI 0.43, 0.67], 0.001; AR: 18.29%), and <24 (RR: 0.48, 95% CI [0.23, 0.97], p = 0.04; AR: 15.57%) weeks of gestation and a prolonged gestational age at birth (MD: 2.32 weeks, 95% [CI 0.99, 3.66], p < 0.001). Cerclage in twin pregnancy with short cervical length or cervical dilatation was also associated with a reduced risk of perinatal loss (RR: 0.38, 95% CI [0.25, 0.60], p < 0.001; AR: 19.62%) and composite adverse outcome (RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.53, 0.90], p = 0.007; AR: 11.75%). Cervical cerclage was associated with a reduced risk of PTB <34 weeks both in women with cervical length <15 mm (RR: 0.74, 95% CI [0.58, 0.95], p = 0.02; AR: 29.17%) and in those with cervical dilatation (RR: 0.68, 95% CI [0.57, 0.80], p < 0.001; AR: 35.02%). The association between cerclage and prevention of PTB and adverse perinatal outcomes was exclusively due to the inclusion of observational studies. The quality of retrieved evidence at GRADE assessment was low.
CONCLUSIONS
Emergency cerclage for cervical dilation or short cervical length <15 mm may be potentially associated with a reduction in PTB and improved perinatal outcomes. However, these findings are mainly based upon observational studies and require confirmation in large and adequately powered RCTs.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Cerclage, Cervical; Cervix Uteri; Labor Stage, First; Pregnancy, Twin; Premature Birth
PubMed: 37535682
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004266 -
Fenoldopam to prevent acute kidney injury after major surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical Care (London, England) Dec 2015Acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery is associated with increased mortality and healthcare costs. Fenoldopam is a selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery is associated with increased mortality and healthcare costs. Fenoldopam is a selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist with renoprotective properties. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing fenoldopam with placebo to prevent AKI after major surgery.
METHODS
We searched EMBASE, PubMed, meta-Register of randomised controlled trials and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for trials comparing fenoldopam with placebo in patients undergoing major surgery. The primary outcome was incidence of new AKI. Secondary outcomes were requirement for renal replacement therapy and hospital mortality.
RESULTS
Eighty-three publications were screened; 23 studies underwent full data extraction and scoring. Six trials were suitable for inclusion in the data synthesis (total of 507 subjects undergoing cardiovascular surgery, partial nephrectomy, liver transplant surgery). Five studies were rated at high risk of bias. Data on post-operative incidence of AKI were available in five of the six trials (total of 471 patients) but definitions of AKI varied between studies. Of the 238 patients receiving fenoldopam, 45 (18.9%) developed AKI compared to 62 (26.6%) of the 233 patients who received placebo (p = 0.004, I (2) = 0 %; random-effects model odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.79). In patients treated with fenoldopam, there was no difference in renal replacement therapy (n = 478; p = 0.11, I (2) = 47%; fixed-effect model odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.06-1.19) or hospital mortality (p = 0.60, I (2) = 0 %; fixed-effect model odds ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.14-7.37).
CONCLUSIONS
In this analysis, peri-operative treatment with fenoldopam was associated with a significant reduction in post-operative AKI but it had no impact on renal replacement therapy or hospital mortality. Equipoise remains for further large trials in this area since the studies were conducted in three types of surgery, the majority of studies were rated at high risk of bias and the criteria for AKI varied between trials.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Fenoldopam; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Surgical Procedures, Operative
PubMed: 26703329
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-1166-4 -
European Urology Jul 2016Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programs are multimodal care pathways that aim to decrease intra-operative blood loss, decrease postoperative complications, and... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programs are multimodal care pathways that aim to decrease intra-operative blood loss, decrease postoperative complications, and reduce recovery times.
OBJECTIVE
To overview the use and key elements of ERAS pathways, and define needs for future clinical trials.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A comprehensive systematic MEDLINE search was performed for English language reports published before May 2015 using the terms "postoperative period," "postoperative care," "enhanced recovery after surgery," "enhanced recovery," "accelerated recovery," "fast track recovery," "recovery program," "recovery pathway", "ERAS," and "urology" or "cystectomy" or "urologic surgery."
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
We identified 18 eligible articles. Patient counseling, physical conditioning, avoiding excessive alcohol and smoking, and good nutrition appeared to protect against postoperative complications. Fasting from solid food for only 6h and perioperative liquid-carbohydrate loading up to 2h prior to surgery appeared to be safe and reduced recovery times. Restricted, balanced, and goal-directed fluid replacement is effective when individualized, depending on patient morbidity and surgical procedure. Decreased intraoperative blood loss may be achieved by several measures. Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, antibiotic prophylaxis, and thermoregulation were found to help reduce postsurgical complications, as was a multimodal approach to postoperative nausea, vomiting, and analgesia. Chewing gum, prokinetic agents, oral laxatives, and an early resumption to normal diet appear to aid faster return to normal bowel function. Further studies should compare anesthetic protocols, refine analgesia, and evaluate the importance of robot-assisted surgery and the need/timing for drains and catheters.
CONCLUSIONS
ERAS regimens are multidisciplinary, multimodal pathways that optimize postoperative recovery.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This review provides an overview of the use and key elements of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programs, which are multimodal, multidisciplinary care pathways that aim to optimize postoperative recovery. Additional conclusions include identifying effective procedures within Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programs and defining needs for future clinical trials.
Topics: Diet; Early Ambulation; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Recovery of Function; Smoking Cessation; Time Factors; Urologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 26970912
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051