-
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Feb 2023: Metformin has been found to potentially reduce the risk and improve the prognosis of a variety of tumors, but these findings remain controversial in biliary tract... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
: Metformin has been found to potentially reduce the risk and improve the prognosis of a variety of tumors, but these findings remain controversial in biliary tract cancer (BTC). Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between metformin and BTC. : Two independent researchers comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for eligible studies published from their inception to 31 March 2022. Comparisons of risk, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with BTC were selected as the endpoints of interest and pooled by random or fixed-effects models. : Eleven studies with a total of 24,788,738 participants were eligible for this analysis. The overall pooled effects showed no significant differences in biliary tract cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-1.35, = 0.436), OS (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.74-1.04, = 0.135), or DFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.79-1.34, = 0.829) between metformin users and non-users. When restricting participants to those with diabetes, a similar negative result was found, demonstrating that metformin use was not significantly associated with a lower risk of developing BTC compared with a lack of metformin use (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.39-1.07, = 0.089); notably, the included studies exhibited significant heterogeneity in the selection of participants and the definition of metformin users. : Metformin may not be able to reduce the risk of BTC and improve prognosis in certain populations. Based on the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the present results should be interpreted within their limitations, and further studies are warranted to determine the optimal timing, dose, duration, and scenario of metformin administration.
Topics: Humans; Metformin; Hypoglycemic Agents; Prognosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Biliary Tract Neoplasms
PubMed: 36837499
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020298 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Apr 2022Metastatic spread to the rectum is a rare finding, and management of rectal metastases (RM) is not standardized. The aim of the present study was to review the evidence... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Metastatic spread to the rectum is a rare finding, and management of rectal metastases (RM) is not standardized. The aim of the present study was to review the evidence on diagnosis, management and outcomes of RM.
METHODS
A computerized literature search through MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane databases was performed, applying a combination of terms related to RM. Articles and abstracts were screened and final selection was done after cross-referencing and by use of predefined eligibility criteria.
RESULTS
Final analysis was based on 99 publications totaling 162 patients with RM from 16 different primary tumors. Most common origins of RM were breast (42 patients), stomach (38 patients), and prostate (16 patients). RM occurred metachronously in the majority of patients (77%). The main treatment was surgical resection (n = 32), followed by chemotherapy (n = 16). Median overall survival for breast RM, stomach RM, and prostate RM were 24 months (95% CI 9-39 months), 7 months (95% CI 0-14 months), and 24 months (95% CI 7-41 months), respectively.
CONCLUSION
RM is a rare and highly heterogeneous condition. Surgical treatment appears to be a valuable treatment option in selected patients, while overall prognosis depends mainly on the primary tumor.
Topics: Humans; Male; Melanoma; Prognosis; Prostate; Rectum; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 34656391
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.004 -
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Jun 2022Prognostic disclosure is essential to informed decision making in oncology, yet many oncologists are unsure how to successfully facilitate this discussion. This scoping... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Prognostic disclosure is essential to informed decision making in oncology, yet many oncologists are unsure how to successfully facilitate this discussion. This scoping review determines what prognostic communication models exist, compares and contrasts these models, and explores the supporting evidence.
METHOD
A protocol was created for this study using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols extension for Scoping Reviews. Comprehensive literature searches of electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL were executed to identify relevant publications between 1971 and 2020.
RESULTS
In total, 1532 articles were identified, of which 78 met inclusion criteria and contained 5 communication models. Three of these have been validated in randomised controlled trials (the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, the Four Habits Model and the ADAPT acronym) and have demonstrated improved objective communication measures and patient reported outcomes. All three models emphasise the importance of exploring patients' illness understanding and treatment preferences, communicating prognosis and responding to emotion.
CONCLUSION
Communicating prognostic estimates is a core competency skill in advanced cancer care. This scoping review highlights available communication models and identifies areas in need of further assessment. Such areas include how to maintain learnt communication skills for lifelong practice, how to assess patient and caregiver understanding during and after these conversations, and how to best scale these protocols at the institutional and national levels.
Topics: Caregivers; Communication; Disclosure; Humans; Medical Oncology; Prognosis
PubMed: 35144938
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003313 -
Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry :... 2015Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels proved to be associated with prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer or breast cancer, but its prognostic role in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels proved to be associated with prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer or breast cancer, but its prognostic role in hematological malignancies was still unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the association between serum 25(OH)D levels and prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies.
METHODS
We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies evaluating the association between serum 25(OH)D levels and prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies. The hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) were pooled using meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Seven studies with a total of 2,643 patients with hematological cancer were finally included into the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with normal serum 25(OH)D levels, low serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly associated with both poorer OS (HR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.54-2.23, P <0.001) and poorer RFS (HR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.70, P <0.001) in hematological malignancies. Subgroup analysis further showed that low serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly associated with poorer OS and RFS in both lymphoma and leukemia.
CONCLUSION
Low serum 25(OH)D levels are significantly associated with poorer prognosis in patients with hematological malignancies including lymphoma and leukemia.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Disease-Free Survival; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Prognosis; Survival Rate; Vitamin D
PubMed: 25871640
DOI: 10.1159/000374007 -
Journal of the European Academy of... May 2020Nail apparatus melanoma (NAM) is a rare dermatologic malignancy. Its prognosis is poor because it is often diagnosed late. However, progression and survival of NAM... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Nail apparatus melanoma (NAM) is a rare dermatologic malignancy. Its prognosis is poor because it is often diagnosed late. However, progression and survival of NAM patients have only been studied among small populations. Early biopsy could help to identify suspicious lesions at a less invasive stage. While surgery is generally seen as the treatment of choice, the extent of excision margins and the use of sentinel biopsy remain debated. This systematic review aims to summarize the treatment procedures and observed prognosis in the literature during the last two decades and present pooled survival and progression rates of NAM by using meta-analysis. A systematic review on studies assessing pathology, treatment and prognosis of NAM was carried out up to end of 2018. After evaluation of eligible studies, the main emerging topics were outlined and pooled survival outcomes estimated. A total of 30 articles out of 624 identified records were included for systematic review. Finally, meta-analysis of pooled mortality rates including 18 studies was 4.6 × 100 patient-years (95% CI: 2.7, 6.8) equivalent to 5-year cumulative survival of 77.0%. Additionally, the pooled progression rate based on 17 studies was 6.3 × 100 patient-years (95% CI: 4.1, 8.9) with estimated 5-year cumulative progression-free survival of 68.5%. While the optimal extent of surgical treatment remains debated, prompt biopsy could help to identify early lesions. This is the first study to present pooled survival and progression rates by meta-analysis.
Topics: Biopsy; Humans; Melanoma; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 31788861
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16121 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) is a critical effector molecule in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), a leading renal disease without noninvasive assessment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) is a critical effector molecule in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), a leading renal disease without noninvasive assessment options. This updated systematic review aimed to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of Gd-IgA1 assessment in biological fluids in patients with IgAN.
METHODS
PRISMA guidelines were followed in this review. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine disc, VIP Information/China Science and Technology Journal Database, and WANFANG for studies published between database inception and January 31, 2023. Eligible studies that evaluated aberrant IgA1 glycosylation in IgAN patients relative to controls were identified, and random effects meta-analyses were used to compare Gd-IgA1 levels in different groups. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022375246).
FINDINGS
Of the 2727 records identified, 50 were eligible and had available data. The mean Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was 7.1 (range, 6-8). Data synthesis suggested that IgAN patients had higher levels of blood and/or urine Gd-IgA1 compared with healthy controls (standard mean difference [SMD]=1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.19-1.68, P<0.00001), IgA vasculitis patients (SMD=0.58, 95% CI=0.22-0.94, P=0.002), and other kidney disease patients (SMD=1.06, 95% CI=0.79-1.33, P<0.00001). Moreover, patients with IgAN had similar levels of serum Gd-IgA1 compared to first-degree relatives (SMD=0.38, 95% CI= -0.04-0.81, P=0.08) and IgA vasculitis with nephritis patients (SMD=0.12, 95% CI= -0.04-0.29, P=0.14). In addition, ten studies demonstrated significant differences in serum Gd-IgA1 levels in patients with mild and severe IgAN (SMD= -0.37, 95% CI= -0.64--0.09, P=0.009).
CONCLUSIONS
High serum and urine Gd-IgA1 levels suggest a diagnosis of IgAN and a poor prognosis for patients with this immunological disorder. Future studies should use more reliable and reproducible methods to determine Gd-IgA1 levels.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022375246, identifier CRD42022375246.
Topics: Humans; Glomerulonephritis, IGA; Prognosis; IgA Vasculitis; Immunoglobulin A
PubMed: 37671165
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1209394 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Nov 2021The optimal management of localized gallbladder perforation (Neimeier type II) has yet to be defined. The aim of this systematic review was to identify factors... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The optimal management of localized gallbladder perforation (Neimeier type II) has yet to be defined. The aim of this systematic review was to identify factors associated with improved patient outcomes.
METHODS
Systematic review of studies that described the management of Neimeier type II perforation, reported complications of the first intervention, necessity of added interventions, resolution of the pathology, and days of hospital stay were included. The search strategy was conducted in EMBASE, Mayo Journals, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science (December 2020) RESULTS: A total of 122 patients (53% male) from case reports, series, and cohorts were included for analysis. In total 56 (46%) and 44 (36%)patients were treated with open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy respectively. Overall risk of bias was moderate. The need for another intervention was higher in the laparoscopic group (5 vs 17, p=<0.001) as well as prevalence of complications (4 vs 16, p=<0.001), but lower for days of hospital stay (median days 5. vs 15, p = 0.008) against open cholecystectomy. Preoperative percutaneous catheter drainage did not influence outcome.
CONCLUSION
Open cholecystectomy has a lower need for further surgical procedures and postoperative complications, but a longer hospital stay. These outcomes did not vary with preoperative percutaneous drainage. The effect of timing of cholecystectomy did not influence the outcomes.
Topics: Cholecystectomy; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Cholecystitis, Acute; Drainage; Female; Gallbladder; Gallbladder Diseases; Humans; Male; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34246546
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.003 -
PloS One 2021GPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
GPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A.
METHODS
We first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random-effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I2>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
In total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20-2.38 I2 = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02-1.95 I2 = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33-2.86, I2 = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15-2.92, I2 = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis.
CONCLUSION
GPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Neoplasms; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Publication Bias; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
PubMed: 33788883
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249040 -
Medicine Oct 2017The predictive roles of diabetes in the prognosis of many types of cancer have been well studied, but its role in predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer is still... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The predictive roles of diabetes in the prognosis of many types of cancer have been well studied, but its role in predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer is still controversial. The aim of the study is to evaluate the association between diabetes/hyperglycemia and the prognosis of cervical cancer.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review for peer-reviewed studies indexed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Wanfang published before December 2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
This systematic review identified 13 studies with a total of 11,091 cervical cancer patients, of which 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The study indicated that diabetes was related to poorer overall survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.35-1.87, P < .001) and poorer recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.47-2.66, P < .001) in cervical cancer patients. The meta-analysis of adjusted HRs also indicated that diabetes was independently associated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.38-2.05, P < .001) and poor recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.47-2.66, P < .001) in cervical cancer patients. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses showed similar results. No significant heterogeneity was observed for the included studies.
CONCLUSIONS
The meta-analysis suggests that diabetes is an important predictive factor for cervical cancer prognosis, and it is linked to poorer survival of cervical cancer patients. Diabetes can serve as a useful index in the prognostic evaluation for patients with cervical cancer.
Topics: Diabetes Complications; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 28984757
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007981 -
Medicine Jul 2018BCL-2 Associated X (BAX) is an important modulator of apoptosis. The associations between BAX gene polymorphism and cancer susceptibility and prognosis in different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
BCL-2 Associated X (BAX) is an important modulator of apoptosis. The associations between BAX gene polymorphism and cancer susceptibility and prognosis in different ethnic groups and types of cancer have yielded controversial results. To reconcile the results, a systematic review followed by meta-analysis was performed to assess the associations.
METHODS
A systematic search of Medline database (PubMed), EMBASE, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases for publications on BAX polymorphisms, and susceptibility and prognosis was carried out until July 2017. Retrieved 14 articles met the inclusions. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were harnessed to determine the strength of correlation between BAX polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility and prognosis, which were combined using fixed- or random-effects models as appropriate.
RESULTS
A total of 12 trials involving 3321 cases and 3209 controls were included in our pooled analysis regarding the polymorphisms and the susceptibility of cancers. Overall, results of the present meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no significant association between BAX polymorphisms and susceptibility of cancers (OR = 1.052, 95% CI: 0.827-1.339, P = .679, A vs G). Even in a stratified analysis by ethnicity and the sources of control groups, the results were consistent. Four retrospective studies of 549 cases qualified for meta-analysis were identified to set forth the associations of the polymorphisms with cancer prognosis. Our results suggested that BAX gene polymorphisms were significantly associated with unfavorable prognosis (HR = 1.735, 95% CI: 1.368-2.202, P = .000, GG vs GA/AA).
CONCLUSION
There is no significant association between BAX gene polymorphism and cancer susceptibility, but it probably contributes to increased adverse prognosis to cancer.
Topics: Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Neoplasms; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prognosis; bcl-2-Associated X Protein
PubMed: 30024563
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011591