-
OncoTargets and Therapy 2019To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab-based combination therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), we conducted this meta-analysis by pooling the rates...
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab-based combination therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), we conducted this meta-analysis by pooling the rates of overall response, major response, complete response, and grade ≥3 hematological adverse events.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
We searched for relevant studies in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The qualitative assessment of all the included articles was conducted with reference to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was selected to perform all pooled analyses.
RESULTS
We identified altogether 22 studies with a total of 806 symptomatic WM patients enrolled. The pooled analysis indicated that the rituximab-based combination therapy achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 84% (95% CI: 81%-87%), a major response rate (MRR) of 71% (95% CI: 66%-75%), and a complete response rate (CRR) of 7% (95% CI: 5%-10%). Rituximab plus conventional alkylating agents-containing chemotherapy (subgroup A) yielded an ORR of 86% (95% CI: 81%-89%), an MRR of 74% (95% CI: 69%-79%), and a CRR of 8% (95% CI: 4%-14%). Rituximab plus purine analog (subgroup B) resulted in an ORR of 85% (95% CI: 79%-89%), an MRR of 74% (95% CI: 66%-81%), and a CRR of 9% (95% CI: 4%-15%). Rituximab plus proteasome inhibitor (subgroup C) resulted in an ORR of 86% (95% CI: 81%-90%), an MRR of 68% (95% CI: 58%-77%), and a CRR of 7% (95% CI: 3%-11%). Rituximab plus immunomodulatory drug (subgroup D) attained relatively lower response rates, with an ORR of 67% (95% CI: 51%-81%), an MRR of 56% (95% CI: 27%-83%), and a CRR of 5% (95% CI: 1%-12%). Common grade ≥3 hematological adverse events consisted of neutropenia (33%, 95% CI: 17%-52%), thrombocytopenia (7%, 95% CI: 3%-11%), and anemia (5%, 95% CI: 3%-9%).
CONCLUSION
Rituximab in combination with an alkylating agent, purine analog, or proteasome inhibitor is highly effective with tolerable hematological toxicities for WM.
PubMed: 31043792
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S191179 -
British Journal of Haematology Jul 2020
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Aged; Humans; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Oligopeptides; Proteasome Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32400886
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16735 -
Cancer Apr 2020Thromboprophylaxis is routinely used with lenalidomide-based regimens in multiple myeloma because of a substantial risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, little... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Thromboprophylaxis is routinely used with lenalidomide-based regimens in multiple myeloma because of a substantial risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, little is known about the incidence of VTE with contemporary lenalidomide-based regimens. The objective of the current study was to estimate the incidence of VTE despite thromboprophylaxis with currently used lenalidomide-based regimens in patients with myeloma.
METHODS
The Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried from study inception to January 2019 for keywords to cover the following concepts: "lenalidomide," "venous thromboembolism," and "multiple myeloma." Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials evaluating lenalidomide-based regimens with thromboprophylaxis were included. The pooled incidence rate of VTE was estimated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
The search generated 1372 citations, with 51 clinical trials and 9069 patients included for analysis. The most common thromboprophylaxis agents were aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin, administered either per risk-stratification or at investigators' discretion. The pooled incidence of VTE in trials of patients who had newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory myeloma was 6.2% (95% CI, 5.4%-7.1%) over median treatment durations ranging from 2 to 34 cycles, which translated into 1.2 VTE events per 100 patient-cycles (95% CI, 0.9-1.7 VTE events per 100 patient-cycles). Among contemporary regimens, the risk of VTE was low with combined lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (0.2 [95% CI, 0.1-0.6] events/100 patient-cycles) and lenalidomide maintenance (0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.7] events per 100 patient-cycles). VTE risk was higher with combined lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone plus proteasome inhibitors (1.3 [95% CI, 0.7-2.3] events per 100 patient-cycles).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite adequate thromboprophylaxis, lenalidomide-based regimens have a substantial risk of VTE in controlled clinical trial settings. Further studies are needed on new thromboprophylaxis strategies with regimens that have a high VTE risk.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anticoagulants; Dexamethasone; Humans; Incidence; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 31913498
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32682 -
Chinese Journal of Traumatology =... Apr 2019The clinical treatment of joint contracture due to immobilization remains difficult. The pathological changes of muscle tissue caused by immobilization-induced joint...
The clinical treatment of joint contracture due to immobilization remains difficult. The pathological changes of muscle tissue caused by immobilization-induced joint contracture include disuse skeletal muscle atrophy and skeletal muscle tissue fibrosis. The proteolytic pathways involved in disuse muscle atrophy include the ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent pathway, caspase system pathway, matrix metalloproteinase pathway, Ca-dependent pathway and autophagy-lysosomal pathway. The important biological processes involved in skeletal muscle fibrosis include intermuscular connective tissue thickening caused by transforming growth factor-β1 and an anaerobic environment within the skeletal muscle leading to the induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. This article reviews the progress made in understanding the pathological processes involved in immobilization-induced muscle contracture and the currently available treatments. Understanding the mechanisms involved in immobilization-induced contracture of muscle tissue should facilitate the development of more effective treatment measures for the different mechanisms in the future.
Topics: Atrophy; Autophagy; Calcium; Caspases; Connective Tissue; Contracture; Fibrosis; Humans; Immobilization; Joints; Lysosomes; Matrix Metalloproteinases; Muscle, Skeletal; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Proteolysis; Signal Transduction; Transforming Growth Factor beta1; Ubiquitin
PubMed: 30928194
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.02.001 -
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Aug 2021Daratumumab was approved in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who previously received proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulatory drugs. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Daratumumab was approved in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who previously received proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulatory drugs. However, the efficacy and safety of the addition of daratumumab in subpopulations of patients with relapsed or refractory MM is still unknown. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (inception to September 2020). All phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which were conducted in patients with relapsed or refractory MM and compared the efficacy or safety with the addition of daratumumab versus control were adopted. Three studies including 1497 patients met our criteria. The addition of daratumumab increased the rates of overall response (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.15-1.28, p < .001), complete response or better (RR 2.43, 95% CI 2.00-2.96, p < .001), very good partial response or better (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.48-1.80, p < .001) compared with those with control. No clear evidence of heterogeneity was found in comparisons of progression-free survival obtained from subsets of studies grouped by the age of participant, ISS disease stage, type of measurable MM, the level of baseline renal function, cytogenetic profile. The results showed progression-free survival benefit was consistent between the treatment groups regarding previous clinical therapy information. Patients receiving daratumumab had higher risks of lymphopenia and infusion-related reactions of any grade and grade 3 or 4. In conclusions, this study provides a clear proof of beneficial effects of daratumumab-based therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MM with an acceptable safety profile. The progression-free survival benefit was consistent regardless of patient's baseline characteristics or previous therapy agents.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence
PubMed: 34128350
DOI: 10.1002/prp2.797