-
Endocrine Journal Feb 2023Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a type of rare tumor that can occur at multiple organs. Rectal NETs are the most common NETs in gastrointestinal tract. Due to the...
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a type of rare tumor that can occur at multiple organs. Rectal NETs are the most common NETs in gastrointestinal tract. Due to the rarity of rectal NETs in rectal cancer, the molecular features and the correlation with patient therapeutic response and prognosis have not been investigated in detail. In this review, we focused on the molecular features, potential therapeutic targets and prognosis of rectal NETs. By summarizing the relevant studies, we established the mutational landscape of rectal NETs and identified a series of large fragment variations. Driver genes including TP53, APC, KRAS, BRAF, RB1, CDKN2A and PTEN were found as the top mutated genes. Large fragment alterations mainly involved known driver genes, including APC, TP53, CCNE1, MYC, TERT, RB1 and ATM. Germline mutations of APC, MUTYH, MSH6, MLH1 and MSH2 associated with Lynch syndrome or FAP were also found in rectal NETs. The BRAF-V600E mutation was reported as an actionable target in rectal NETs, and the combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors were found to be effective targeting BRAF-V600E in advanced or metastatic NETs. The known prognostic risk factors of rectal adenocarcinoma, including a series of demographic and clinicopathological factors were also prognostic factors for rectal NETs. Furthermore, three types of markers, including genetic alterations, protein expression levels and methylation, were also suggested as prognostic factors for rectal NETs. In summary, we established the landscape of mutations and large-fragment alterations of rectal NETs, and identified potential therapeutic targets and a series of prognostic factors. Future studies may focus on the optimization of therapeutic strategies based on potential actionable biomarkers.
Topics: Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Rectal Neoplasms; Mutation; Prognosis; Biomarkers, Tumor
PubMed: 36403965
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ22-0262 -
Scientific Reports Sep 2015Many types of KIT mutations have been observed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but their prognostic and predictive significance are still unclear. A... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Many types of KIT mutations have been observed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but their prognostic and predictive significance are still unclear. A meta-analysis and literature review were conducted to estimate the contribution of KIT mutations in prognostic parameters and clinic-pathological significance of GISTs. A total of 18 relevant articles from PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were included in this study. The frequency of KIT mutation was significantly increased in the GIST patients with higher mitosis (≥5/50 high-power fields (HPFs) and larger size (≥5 cm) of tumors than in those with lower MI (≤5/50HPFs) and smaller size (≤5 cm) of GISTs respectively. The rate of KIT mutation was not significantly changed between GISTs in stomachs and in small intestines. KIT mutational status has prognostic significance for patients' outcome. GIST patients with KIT exon 9 mutations have higher risk of progression than those with exon 11 mutations. 5 year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly higher in patients with KIT exon 11 deletion than in those with other type of KIT exon 11 mutations. The deletion involving KIT exon 11, particularly codons 557-558, is a valuable predictor of prognosis for patients with GISTs.
Topics: Exons; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors; Genetic Association Studies; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Mutation; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit; Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha; Risk
PubMed: 26349547
DOI: 10.1038/srep13718 -
Virologica Sinica Feb 2021Tyro3, Axl, and Mertk (TAM) receptors play multiple roles in a myriad of physiological and pathological processes, varying from promoting the phagocytic clearance of...
Tyro3, Axl, and Mertk (TAM) receptors play multiple roles in a myriad of physiological and pathological processes, varying from promoting the phagocytic clearance of apoptotic cells, sustaining the immune and inflammatory homeostasis, maintaining the blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity and central nervous system (CNS) homeostasis, to mediating cancer malignancy and chemoresistance. Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (Gas6) and protein S (Pros1) are the two ligands that activate TAM receptors. Recently, TAM receptors have been reported to mediate cell entry and infection of multitudinous enveloped viruses in a manner called apoptotic mimicry. Moreover, TAM receptors are revitalized during viral entry and infection, which sequesters innate immune and inflammatory responses, facilitating viral replication and immune evasion. However, accumulating evidence have now proposed that TAM receptors are not required for the infection of these viruses in vivo. In addition, TAM receptors protect mice against the CNS infection of neuroinvasive viruses and relieve the brain lesions during encephalitis. These protective effects are achieved through maintaining BBB integrity, attenuating proinflammatory cytokine production, and promoting neural cell survival. TAM receptors also regulate the programmed cell death modes of virus-infected cells, which have profound impacts on the pathogenesis and outcome of infection. Here, we systematically review the functionalities and underlying mechanisms of TAM receptors and propose the potential application of TAM agonists to prevent severe viral encephalitis.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Signal Transduction; Virus Diseases; c-Mer Tyrosine Kinase
PubMed: 32720213
DOI: 10.1007/s12250-020-00264-9 -
Pancreas Sep 2018Pancreatic cancer requires many genetic mutations. Combinations of underlying germline variants and environmental factors may increase the risk of cancer and accelerate...
Pancreatic cancer requires many genetic mutations. Combinations of underlying germline variants and environmental factors may increase the risk of cancer and accelerate the oncogenic process. We systematically reviewed, annotated, and classified previously reported pancreatic cancer-associated germline variants in established risk genes. Variants were scored using multiple criteria and binned by evidence for pathogenicity, then annotated with published functional studies and associated biological systems/pathways. Twenty-two previously identified pancreatic cancer risk genes and 337 germline variants were identified from 97 informative studies that met our inclusion criteria. Fifteen of these genes contained 66 variants predicted to be pathogenic (APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, CFTR, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, NBN, PALB2, PALLD, PRSS1, SPINK1, TP53). Pancreatic cancer risk genes were organized into key biological mechanisms that promote pancreatic oncogenesis within an oncogenic model. Development of precision medicine approaches requires updated variant information within the framework of an oncogenic progression model. Complex risk modeling may improve interpretation of early biomarkers and guide pathway-specific treatment for pancreatic cancer in the future. Precision medicine is within reach.
Topics: Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30113427
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001136 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Jun 2024Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ROS1 gene fusion: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence.
BACKGROUND
Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies and estimated the efficacy and safety of crizotinib using meta-analyses (MA) for objective response rate (ORR), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from January 2016 to March 2023 using Ovid® for published single-arm or comparative RWE studies evaluating patients (N ≥ 20) receiving crizotinib monotherapy for aNSCLC with ROS1 gene fusion. Pooled estimates for ORR and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were derived using the metafor package in R while pooled estimates for median real-world PFS (rwPFS) and OS were derived using reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary analysis included all studies regardless of crizotinib line of therapy; a subgroup analysis (SA) was conducted using studies evaluating patients receiving first-line crizotinib.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were considered feasible for MA. For the primary analysis, the pooled ORR (N = 9 studies) was 70.6 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 57.0, 81.3), median rwPFS was 14.5 months (N = 11 studies), and OS was 40.2 months (N = 9 studies). In the SA, the pooled ORR (N = 4 studies) was 81.1 % (95 % CI: 76.1, 85.2) and the median rwPFS (N = 4 studies) and OS (N = 2 studies) were 18.1 and 60 months, respectively. All MAs were associated with significant heterogeneity (I > 25 %). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 18.7 % of patients (pooled estimate).
CONCLUSION
The results from this study are consistent with clinical trial data and, taken collectively, supports crizotinib as a safe and effective treatment across different lines of therapy in patients with ROS1 aNSCLC in the real-world setting.
Topics: Crizotinib; Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Treatment Outcome; Antineoplastic Agents; Gene Fusion
PubMed: 38749072
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107816 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024Microsatellite Instability (MSI-H) occurs in approximately 15% of non-metastatic colon cancers, influencing patient outcomes positively compared to microsatellite stable... (Review)
Review
Microsatellite Instability (MSI-H) occurs in approximately 15% of non-metastatic colon cancers, influencing patient outcomes positively compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers. This systematic review focuses on the prognostic significance of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations within MSI-H colon cancer. Through comprehensive searches in databases like MEDLINE, EMBASE, and others until 1 January 2024, we selected 8 pertinent studies from an initial pool of 1918. These studies, encompassing nine trials and five observational studies involving 13,273 patients, provided insights into disease-free survival (DFS), survival after recurrence, and overall survival. The pooled data suggest that while KRAS and BRAF mutations typically predict poorer outcomes in MSS colorectal cancer, their impact is less pronounced in MSI contexts, with implications varying across different stages of cancer and treatment responses. In particular, adverse effects of these mutations manifest significantly upon recurrence rather than affecting immediate DFS. Our findings confirm the complex interplay between genetic mutations and MSI status, emphasizing the nuanced role of MSI in modifying the prognostic implications of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colon cancer. This review underscores the importance of considering MSI alongside mutational status in the clinical decision-making process, aiming to tailor therapeutic strategies more effectively for colon cancer patients.
PubMed: 38786299
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101001 -
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Mar 2022Type 2 diabetes is known as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer (PC). Various genetic and environmental factors cause both these global chronic diseases. The mechanisms... (Review)
Review
Type 2 diabetes is known as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer (PC). Various genetic and environmental factors cause both these global chronic diseases. The mechanisms that define their relationships are complex and poorly understood. Recent studies have implicated that metabolic abnormalities, including hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, could lead to cell damage responses, cell transformation, and increased cancer risk. Hence, these kinds of abnormalities following molecular events could be essential to develop our understanding of this complicated link. Among different molecular events, focusing on shared signaling pathways including metabolic (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) and mitogenic (MAPK) pathways in addition to regulatory mechanisms of gene expression such as those involved in non-coding RNAs (miRNAs, circRNAs, and lncRNAs) could be considered as powerful tools to describe this association. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the development of type 2 diabetes and pancreatic cancer would help us to find a new research area for developing therapeutic and preventive strategies. For this purpose, in this review, we focused on the shared molecular events resulting in type 2 diabetes and pancreatic cancer. First, a comprehensive literature review was performed to determine similar molecular pathways and non-coding RNAs; then, the final results were discussed in more detail.
Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; MAP Kinase Signaling System; MicroRNAs; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; RNA, Long Noncoding; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
PubMed: 34859606
DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13727 -
Genetics Research 2022Accumulating evidence indicates that the expression and/or variants of several genes play an essential role in the progress of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current study... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Accumulating evidence indicates that the expression and/or variants of several genes play an essential role in the progress of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current study is a meta-analysis undertaken to estimate the prognosis and survival associated with , , , , , and genes among CRC patients.
METHODS
The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Science Direct for relevant reports published between 2000 and 2020 and analyzed them to determine any relationship between the (immunohistochemically/sequencing-detected) gene expression and variants of the selected genes and the survival of CRC patients.
RESULTS
The analysis included 34,074 patients from 64 studies. To evaluate association, hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS), with a 95% confidence interval (CIs). Pooled results showed that overexpression, mutation, or 4 loss of expression, mutations, and expression were associated with shorter OS. overexpression (HR: 0.137 (95% CI: 0.131-0.406)), loss of expression of or 4 (HR: 0.449 (95% CI: 0.146-0.753)), the mutations of (HR: 0.179 (95% CI: 0.126-0.485)), and expression (HR: 0.485 (95% CI: 0.772-0.198)) also presented risk for shorter DFS.
CONCLUSIONS
The present meta-analysis indicates that overexpression or underexpression and variants of , , 4, , and genes potentially acted as unfavorable biomarkers for the prognosis of CRC. The gene was not associated with prognosis.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Cyclin D1; Genes, bcl-1; Humans; Prognosis; Smad3 Protein; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53; beta Catenin
PubMed: 36072013
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5338956 -
PloS One 2014The survival rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients carrying wild-type KRAS is significantly increased by combining anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) with standard... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PCR-based assays versus direct sequencing for evaluating the effect of KRAS status on anti-EGFR treatment response in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The survival rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients carrying wild-type KRAS is significantly increased by combining anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) with standard chemotherapy. However, conflicting data exist in both the wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS groups, which strongly challenge CRC anti-EGFR treatment. Here we conducted a meta-analysis in an effort to provide more reliable information regarding anti-EGFR treatment in CRC patients.
METHODS
We searched full reports of randomized clinical trials using Medline, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Two investigators independently screened the published literature according to our inclusive and exclusive criteria and the relative data were extracted. We used Review Manager 5.2 software to analyze the data.
RESULTS
The addition of anti-EGFR mAb to standard chemotherapy significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (mOS) in the wild-type KRAS group; hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and mOS were 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.84] and 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75-0.91], respectively. In sub-analyses of the wild-type KRAS group, when PCR-based assays are employed, PFS and mOS notably increase: the HRs were 0.74 [95% CI, 0.62-0.88] and 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78-0.96], respectively. In sub-analyses of the mutant KRAS group, neither PCR-based assays nor direct sequencing enhance PFS or mOS.
CONCLUSION
Our data suggest that PCR-based assays with high sensitivity and specificity allow accurate identification of patients with wild-type KRAS and thus increase PFS and mOS. Furthermore, such assays liberate patients with mutant KRAS from unnecessary drug side effects, and provide them an opportunity to receive appropriate treatment. Thus, establishing a precise standard reference test will substantially optimize CRC-targeted therapies.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors; Humans; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; ras Proteins
PubMed: 25260023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107926 -
JDR Clinical and Translational Research Apr 2021The use of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF) has received Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of periodontal and...
AIM
The use of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF) has received Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of periodontal and orthopedic bone defects and dermal wound healing. Many studies have investigated its regenerative potential in a variety of other oral clinical indications. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy, safety, and clinical benefit of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF) use for alveolar bone and/or soft tissue regeneration.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Comprehensive electronic and manual literature searches according to the PRISMA guidelines were performed to identify interventional and observational studies evaluating the regenerative applications of rhPDGF-BB. The primary outcomes were the safety, efficacy, and overall clinical benefit of rhPDGF use in oral regenerative procedures.
RESULTS
Sixty-three human clinical studies (mean ± SD follow-up period of 10.7 ± 3.3 mo) were included in the qualitative analysis. No serious adverse effects were reported in any of the 63 studies, aside from the postoperative complications routinely associated with surgical therapy. Use of rhPDGF was shown to be beneficial when combined with allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts (the latter tricalcium phosphate [β-TCP]) for the treatment of periodontal defects and gingival recession. The use of rhPDGF also led to favorable clinical outcomes when combined with allografts or xenografts for guided bone regeneration (GBR) and alveolar ridge preservation. While favorable clinical results support the use of the combination of rhPDGF plus allograft or xenograft for GBR, ARP, and sinus floor augmentation, current data support the use of rhPDGF and alloplasts (e.g., β-TCP) only in periodontal defects and gingival recession.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the clinical evidence, rhPDGF is safe and provides clinical benefits when used in combination with bone allografts, xenograft, or β-TCP for the treatment of intrabony and furcation periodontal defects and gingival recession or when used with allografts or xenograft for GBR and ARP (PROSPERO CRD42020142446).
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT
Clinicians should be aware that rhPDGF is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of intrabony and furcation periodontal defects and gingival recession or when used with allografts or xenograft for bone regeneration and alveolar ridge preservation. With consideration of cost and patient preference, this result could lead to more appropriate therapeutic decisions.
Topics: Alveolar Bone Loss; Becaplermin; Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sis; Recombinant Proteins; Sinus Floor Augmentation; United States
PubMed: 32392438
DOI: 10.1177/2380084420921353