-
Journal of Cardiac Surgery Nov 2022Although concomitant pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is used more frequently than the Cox-Maze procedure, which is currently the gold standard treatment for atrial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Although concomitant pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is used more frequently than the Cox-Maze procedure, which is currently the gold standard treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), data on the comparative effectiveness of the two procedures after concomitant mitral valve (MV) surgery are still limited.
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the mid-term mortality and recurrence of AF after concomitant Cox-Maze and PVI in patients with AF undergoing MV surgery based on 12-month follow-up.
METHODS
Medline, EMBASE databases, and the Cochrane Library were searched from 1987 up to March 2022 for studies comparing concomitant Cox-Maze and PVI. Additionally, a meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes between these two surgical ablation techniques.
RESULTS
Three RCTs and three observational studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this systematic review with 790 patients in total (532 concomitant Cox-Maze and 258 PVI during MV surgery). Most studies reported that the concomitant Cox-Maze procedure was associated with higher freedom from AF at 12-month follow-up than PVI. Regarding AF recurrence, estimates pooled across the three RCTs indicated large heterogeneity and high uncertainty. In the largest and highest quality RCT, 12-month AF recurrence was higher in the PVI arm (risk ratio = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.91-2.73). In two out of three higher-quality observational studies, 12-month AF recurrence was higher in PVI than in the Cox-Maze arm (estimated adjusted probabilities 11% vs. 8% and 35% vs. 17%, respectively). RCTs demonstrated comparable 12-month mortality between concomitant Cox-Maze and PVI, while observational studies demonstrated the survival benefit of Cox-Maze.
CONCLUSIONS
Concomitant Cox-Maze in AF patients undergoing MV surgery is associated with better mid-term freedom from AF when compared to PVI with comparable mid-term survival. Large observational studies suggest that there might be a mid-term survival benefit among patients after concomitant Cox-Maze. Further large RCTs with longer standardized follow-up are required to clarify the benefits of concomitant Cox-Maze in AF patients during MV surgery.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Humans; Maze Procedure; Mitral Valve; Pulmonary Veins; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36040710
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16888 -
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease 2019Pulmonary valve replacement is required for patients with right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) dysfunction. Surgical and percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement are...
BACKGROUND
Pulmonary valve replacement is required for patients with right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) dysfunction. Surgical and percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement are the treatment options. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) provides a less-invasive therapy for patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PPVI and the optimal time for implantation.
METHODS
We searched , and databases covering the period until May 2018. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the mean RVOT gradient; the secondary endpoints were the pulmonary regurgitation fraction, left and right ventricular end-diastolic and systolic volume indexes, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The safety endpoints were the complication rates.
RESULTS
A total of 20 studies with 1246 participants enrolled were conducted. The RVOT gradient decreased significantly [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -19.63 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -21.15, -18.11; < 0.001]. The right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVi) was improved (WMD = -17.59 ml/m²; 95% CI: -20.93, -14.24; < 0.001), but patients with a preoperative RVEDVi >140 ml/m² did not reach the normal size. Pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) was notably decreased (WMD = -26.27%, 95% CI: -34.29, -18.25; < 0.001). The procedure success rate was 99% (95% CI: 98-99), with a stent fracture rate of 5% (95% CI: 4-6), the pooled infective endocarditis rate was 2% (95% CI: 1-4), and the incidence of reintervention was 5% (95% CI: 4-6).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with RVOT dysfunction, PPVI can relieve right ventricular remodeling, improving hemodynamic and clinical outcomes.
PubMed: 31236202
DOI: 10.1177/2040622319857635 -
Journal of the American Heart... Dec 2021Background Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common finding in adults with congenital heart disease referred for pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). However, indications... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Background Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common finding in adults with congenital heart disease referred for pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). However, indications for combined valve surgery remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate early results of concomitant tricuspid valve intervention (TVI) at the time of PVR. Methods and Results Observational studies comparing TVI+PVR and isolated PVR were identified by a systematic search of published research. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, comparing outcomes between the 2 groups. Six studies involving 749 patients (TVI+PVR, 278 patients; PVR, 471 patients) met the eligibility criteria. In the pooled analysis, both TVI+PVR and PVR reduced TR grade, pulmonary regurgitation grade, right ventricular end-diastolic volume, and right ventricular end-systolic volumes. TVI+PVR, but not PVR, was associated with a decrease in tricuspid valve annulus size (mean difference, -6.43 mm, 95% CI, -10.59 to -2.27; =0.010). Furthermore, TVI+PVR was associated with a larger reduction in TR grade compared with PVR (mean difference, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.75 to -0.05; =0.031). No evidence could be established for an effect of either treatment on right ventricular ejection fraction or echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction. There was no evidence for a difference in hospital mortality or reoperation for TR. Conclusions While both strategies are effective in reducing TR and right ventricular volumes, routine TVI+PVR can reduce TR grade to a larger extent than isolated PVR. Further studies are needed to identify the subgroups of patients who might benefit most from combined valve surgery.
Topics: Adult; Heart Defects, Congenital; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Pulmonary Valve; Tricuspid Valve
PubMed: 34873914
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022909 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2017Aortic valve disease is a common condition that is easily treatable with cardiac surgery. This is conventionally performed by opening the sternum longitudinally down the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Aortic valve disease is a common condition that is easily treatable with cardiac surgery. This is conventionally performed by opening the sternum longitudinally down the centre ("median sternotomy") and replacing the valve under cardiopulmonary bypass. Median sternotomy is generally well tolerated, but as less invasive options have become available, the efficacy of limited incisions has been called into question. In particular, the effects of reducing the visibility and surgical access has raised safety concerns with regards to the placement of cannulae, venting of the heart, epicardial wire placement, and de-airing of the heart at the end of the procedure. These difficulties may increase operating times, affecting outcome. The benefits of smaller incisions are thought to include decreased pain; improved respiratory mechanics; reductions in wound infections, bleeding, and need for transfusion; shorter intensive care stay; better cosmesis; and a quicker return to normal activity.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via a limited sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement via median sternotomy in people with aortic valve disease requiring surgical replacement.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, clinical trials registries, and manufacturers' websites from inception to July 2016, with no language limitations. We reviewed references of identified papers to identify any further studies of relevance.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials comparing aortic valve replacement via a median sternotomy versus aortic valve replacement via a limited sternotomy. We excluded trials that performed other minimally invasive incisions such as mini-thoracotomies, port access, trans-apical, trans-femoral or robotic procedures. Although some well-conducted prospective and retrospective case-control and cohort studies exist, these were not included in this review.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trial papers to extract data, assess quality, and identify risk of bias. A third review author provided arbitration where required. The quality of evidence was determined using the GRADE methodology and results of patient-relevant outcomes were summarised in a 'Summary of findings' table.
MAIN RESULTS
The review included seven trials with 511 participants. These included adults from centres in Austria, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, and Egypt. We performed 12 comparisons investigating the effects of minimally invasive limited upper hemi-sternotomy on aortic valve replacement as compared to surgery performed via full median sternotomy.There was no evidence of any effect of upper hemi-sternotomy on mortality versus full median sternotomy (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 2.82; participants = 511; studies = 7; moderate quality). There was no evidence of an increase in cardiopulmonary bypass time with aortic valve replacement performed via an upper hemi-sternotomy (mean difference (MD) 3.02 minutes, 95% CI -4.10 to 10.14; participants = 311; studies = 5; low quality). There was no evidence of an increase in aortic cross-clamp time (MD 0.95 minutes, 95% CI -3.45 to 5.35; participants = 391; studies = 6; low quality). None of the included studies reported major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events as a composite end point.There was no evidence of an effect on length of hospital stay through limited hemi-sternotomy (MD -1.31 days, 95% CI -2.63 to 0.01; participants = 297; studies = 5; I = 89%; very low quality). Postoperative blood loss was lower in the upper hemi-sternotomy group (MD -158.00 mL, 95% CI -303.24 to -12.76; participants = 297; studies = 5; moderate quality). The evidence did not support a reduction in deep sternal wound infections (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.30; participants = 511; studies = 7; moderate quality) or re-exploration (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.13; participants = 511; studies = 7; moderate quality). There was no change in pain scores by upper hemi-sternotomy (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.33, 95% CI -0.85 to 0.20; participants = 197; studies = 3; I = 70%; very low quality), but there was a small increase in postoperative pulmonary function tests with minimally invasive limited sternotomy (MD 1.98 % predicted FEV1, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.33; participants = 257; studies = 4; I = 28%; low quality). There was a small reduction in length of intensive care unit stays as a result of the minimally invasive upper hemi-sternotomy (MD -0.57 days, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.20; participants = 297; studies = 5; low quality). Postoperative atrial fibrillation was not reduced with minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through limited compared to full sternotomy (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.07 to 4.89; participants = 240; studies = 3; moderate quality), neither were postoperative ventilation times (MD -1.12 hours, 95% CI -3.43 to 1.19; participants = 297; studies = 5; low quality). None of the included studies reported cost analyses.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence in this review was assessed as generally low to moderate quality. The study sample sizes were small and underpowered to demonstrate differences in outcomes with low event rates. Clinical heterogeneity both between and within studies is a relatively fixed feature of surgical trials, and this also contributed to the need for caution in interpreting results.Considering these limitations, there was uncertainty of the effect on mortality or extracorporeal support times with upper hemi-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement compared to full median sternotomy. The evidence to support a reduction in total hospital length of stay or intensive care stay was low in quality. There was also uncertainty of any difference in the rates of other, secondary outcome measures or adverse events with minimally invasive limited sternotomy approaches to aortic valve replacement.There appears to be uncertainty between minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via upper hemi-sternotomy and conventional aortic valve replacement via a full median sternotomy. Before widespread adoption of the minimally invasive approach can be recommended, there is a need for a well-designed and adequately powered prospective randomised controlled trial. Such a study would benefit from performing a robust cost analysis. Growing patient preference for minimally invasive techniques merits thorough quality-of-life analyses to be included as end points, as well as quantitative measures of physiological reserve.
Topics: Aged; Aortic Valve; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Loss, Surgical; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Length of Stay; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reoperation; Sternotomy; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 28394022
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2 -
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions Jul 2017The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) in right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits and valves, comparing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) in right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits and valves, comparing bovine jugular vein (BJV) valves with all others.
BACKGROUND
Recent evidence suggests that the incidence of IE is higher in patients with congenital heart disease who have undergone implantation of BJV valves in the pulmonary position compared with other valves.
METHODS
Systematic searches of published research were conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL) and citations cross-referenced current to April 2016. Included studies met the following criteria: patients had undergone right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit or percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation, and investigators reported on the type of conduit or valve implanted, method of intervention (surgery or catheter based), IE incidence, and follow-up time.
RESULTS
Fifty studies (Levels of Evidence: 2 to 4) were identified involving 7,063 patients. The median cumulative incidence of IE was higher for BJV compared with other valves (5.4% vs. 1.2%; p < 0.0001) during a median follow-up period of 24.0 and 35.5 months, respectively (p = 0.03). For patients with BJV valves, the incidence of IE was not different between surgical and catheter-based valve implantation (p = 0.83).
CONCLUSIONS
There was a higher incidence of endocarditis with BJV valves than other types of right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits. There was no difference in the incidence of endocarditis between catheter-based bovine valves and surgically implanted bovine valves, suggesting that the substrate for future infection is related to the tissue rather than the method of implantation.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allografts; Animals; Bioprosthesis; Cattle; Child; Child, Preschool; Endocarditis; Female; Heart Defects, Congenital; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Heterografts; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Jugular Veins; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Pulmonary Valve; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Valves; Young Adult
PubMed: 28728659
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.025 -
International Journal of Infectious... Apr 2021In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the association between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) measured by echocardiography and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the association between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) measured by echocardiography and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases with the keywords "COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "2019-nCoV" AND "Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion" OR "TAPSE" until January 20, 2021. The main outcome was mortality. The effect estimate was reported as the hazard ratio (HR), which was pooled from the unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates retrieved from the studies included. Mean differences in TAPSE (in mm) between non-survivors and survivors were pooled.
RESULTS
In total, 641 patients from seven studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. TAPSE was lower in non-survivors compared with survivors (mean difference = -3.74 [-5.22, -2.26], p < 0.001; I: 85.5%, p < 0.001). Each 1 mm decrease in TAPSE was associated with increased mortality (HR = 1.24 [1.18, 1.31], p < 0.001; I: 0.0%, p = 0.491). In the pooled adjusted model, each 1 mm decrease in TAPSE was associated with increased mortality (HR = 1.21 [1.11, 1.33], p < 0.001; I: 45.1%, p = 0.156). Meta-regression indicated that the difference in TAPSE between non-survivors and survivors was affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (-0.183, p < 0.001) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (-0.344, p = 0.039), but not by age (p = 0.668), male gender (p = 0.821), hypertension (p = 0.101), diabetes (p = 0.603), coronary artery disease (p = 0.564), smoking (p = 0.140), and left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.452).
CONCLUSION
Every 1 mm decrease in TAPSE was associated with an increase in mortality of approximately 20%.
PROSPERO ID
CRD42021232194.
Topics: Aged; Blood Pressure; COVID-19; Echocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; SARS-CoV-2; Stroke Volume; Tricuspid Valve; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Function, Right
PubMed: 33582370
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.029 -
Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery May 2015Discordance between studies drives continued debate regarding the best management of asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of the present study was to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Discordance between studies drives continued debate regarding the best management of asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of management plans for asymptomatic severe MR, and compare the effectiveness of a strategy of early surgery to watchful waiting.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were excluded if they: (I) lacked a watchful waiting cohort; (II) included symptomatic patients; or (III) included etiologies other than degenerative mitral valve disease. The primary outcome of the study was all-cause mortality at 10 years. Secondary outcomes included operative mortality, repair rate, repeat mitral valve surgery, and development of new atrial fibrillation.
RESULTS
Five observational studies were eligible for review and three were included in the pooled analysis. In asymptomatic patients without class I triggers (symptoms or ventricular dysfunction), pooled analysis revealed a significant reduction in long-term mortality with an early surgery approach [hazard ratio (HR) =0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21-0.71]. This survival benefit persisted in a sub-group analysis limited to patients without class II triggers (atrial fibrillation or pulmonary hypertension) [relative risk (RR) =0.85; 95% CI: 0.75-0.98]. Aggregate rates of operative mortality did not differ between treatment arms (0.7% vs. 0.7% for early surgery vs. watchful waiting). However, significantly higher repair rates were achieved in the early surgery cohorts (RR =1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite disagreement between individual studies, the present meta-analysis demonstrates that a strategy of early surgery may improve survival and increase the likelihood of mitral valve repair compared with watchful waiting. Early surgery may also benefit patients when instituted prior to the development of class II triggers.
PubMed: 26309823
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.04.01 -
Sleep Mar 2017The presence of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is known to impact long-term cardiovascular morbidity in adults; however, the long-term effects in children are poorly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The presence of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is known to impact long-term cardiovascular morbidity in adults; however, the long-term effects in children are poorly understood. We aimed to systematically review and synthesize studies published to date on the long-term effects of SDB in children.
STUDY DESIGN
Meta-analysis and systematic review using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus (all indexed years).
METHODS
We searched for English-language articles containing original human data from prospective studies, with ≥7 participants, in children ≤18 years of age. Data regarding study design, demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes, level of evidence, and risk of bias were obtained. Articles were independently reviewed by three investigators. Retrospective and cross-sectional studies were excluded.
RESULTS
Of 1701 identified abstracts, 25 articles (combined n = 1418) were ultimately included. All studies reported longitudinal outcomes following treatment of SDB, 21 studies exclusively reporting outcomes after adenotonsillectomy. Therefore, studies were combined to objectively assess the effect of SDB treatment on cardiovascular outcomes. Although all cardiovascular parameters were within the normal range at baseline, at follow-up there was a significant decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricular end diastolic diameter, heart rate, mitral Em/Am ratio, and C-reactive protein. There was no significant change in interventricular septum thickness, left ventricular parameters (shortening fraction, systolic and end diastolic diameters, ejection fraction, posterior wall thickness, isovolumetric relaxation time), left atrial diameter, and aortic and pulmonary valve peak velocities.
CONCLUSIONS
Studies assessing the long-term cardiovascular effects of SDB in children are limited. The available literature indicates effects on autonomic function, right, and left heart function following treatment for SDB. However, well-designed, large-scale, prospective cohort studies (using standardized outcomes) are needed to better understand the relationship of cardiovascular morbidity in the context of pediatric SDB.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Cardiovascular Diseases; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Heart Rate; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Tonsillectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28329042
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsx015 -
Journal of Thoracic Disease Nov 2022Functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) appears frequently in the presence of left-sided heart valve diseases, combined with symptoms of heart failure, worsens if left... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) appears frequently in the presence of left-sided heart valve diseases, combined with symptoms of heart failure, worsens if left untreated, and is associated with poor patient survival. Correct indications for surgery and the choice of suitable technique, which should be based on pathophysiology of disease are of utmost importance to ensure longevity and durability of repair; particularly given the risky nature of reoperations due to residual/recurrent TR.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google to deepen knowledge of major and controversial aspects of the subject.
RESULTS
A total of 1,579 studies were reviewed, and 32 of these were enclosed in the final review: 13 studies were primarily focused on pathophysiology and preoperative assessment of functional TR; 19 studies on surgical treatment of functional TR. A total of 15,509 patients were included.
CONCLUSIONS
Indications for treatment of TR are based on the severity of regurgitation (grading), as well as on the presence of signs and symtoms of right-sided heart failure and on the extent of tricuspid annular dilation, leaflet tethering, and pulmonary hypertension (staging of disease). Despite improved knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology of TR, issues regarding indications for treatment and options of repair remain present. There is no consensus within the scientific community, for the preferred method to quantify the severity of TR; the recently introduced 5-grade TR classification based on objective quantitative parameters has not yet become common practice. The assessment of TR during stress exercise is rarely performed, though it takes into account the changes in severity of regurgitation that occur under different physiological conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging, which is the gold standard for the right heart evaluation is occasionally carried out before surgery. The threshold beyond which the tricuspid annular dilation should be repaired is unclear and recent studies put forward the idea that it may be lower than current recommendations. Tricuspid valve annuloplasty is the most adopted surgical option today. However, the ideal annuloplasty device remains elusive. In addition, as severe leaflet tethering cannot be addressed by annuloplasty alone, the addition of new techniques further increasing leaflet coaptation might optimize long-term valve continence. Further investigations are needed to address all these issues, alongside the potential of percutaneous options.
PubMed: 36524061
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-661 -
Cardiology Research Dec 2019Pulmonary hypertension is a usual complication of long-standing mitral valve disease. Perioperative pulmonary hypertension is a risk factor for right ventricular failure...
BACKGROUND
Pulmonary hypertension is a usual complication of long-standing mitral valve disease. Perioperative pulmonary hypertension is a risk factor for right ventricular failure and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve surgery. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors particularly sildenafil citrate have proven clinical benefit for pulmonary arterial hypertension but have shown discordant results in group 2 pulmonary hypertension patients. We sought to determine the effect of pre-operative sildenafil on the intra-operative hemodynamic parameters of these patients.
METHODS
Studies were included if they satisfied the following criteria: 1) Randomized controlled trials; 2) Adult patients with pulmonary hypertension scheduled for elective mitral valve surgery; and 3) Reported data on changes in pre-, intra-, and post-operative hemodynamic parameters. Using PUBMED, Clinical Key, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases, a search for eligible studies was conducted from September 1 to December 31, 2018. The quality of each study was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The primary outcome of interest is on the effect of pre-operative sildenafil on the improvement of intra-operative hemodynamic parameters such as systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances. We also investigated its effect on the post-operative mortality, length of cardiopulmonary bypass time, ventilation time, and inotrope support requirement. Review Manager 5.3 was utilized to perform analysis of random effects for continuous outcomes.
RESULTS
We identified three studies involving 153 patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve surgery, showing that among those who received pre-operative sildenafil there is a significant decrease in intra-operative systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (mean difference -11.19 (95% confidence interval (CI), -20.23 to -2.15), P < 0.05) and post-operative sPAP (mean difference -13.67 (95% CI, - 19.56 to - 7.78), P < 0.05) without significantly affecting the mean arterial pressure (mean difference 1.94 (95% CI, -5.49 to 9.37), P < 0.05). The systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances were not affected as well.
CONCLUSIONS
Administration of pre-operative sildenafil to patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve surgery decreases intra-operative and post-operative systolic pulmonary arterial pressure without significantly affecting other systemic hemodynamic parameters.
PubMed: 31803335
DOI: 10.14740/cr962