-
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aug 2021Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequently seen in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Long-standing GERD may cause esophagitis, long-segment strictures,...
INTRODUCTION
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequently seen in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Long-standing GERD may cause esophagitis, long-segment strictures, and Barrett's esophagus and may worsen pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis with an increased risk of end-stage lung disease. Surgical treatment of recalcitrant GERD remains controversial. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the current data on surgical treatment of recalcitrant GERD in SSc patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were consulted.
RESULTS
A total of 101 patients were included from 7 studies. The age ranged from 34 to 61 years and the majority were females (73.5%). Commonly reported symptoms were heartburn (92%), regurgitation (77%), and dysphagia (74%). Concurrent pulmonary disease was diagnosed in 58% of patients. Overall, 63 patients (62.4%) underwent open fundoplication, 17 (16.8%) laparoscopic fundoplication, 15 (14.9%) Roux en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and 6 (5.9%) esophagectomy. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 12 to 65 months. Recurrent symptoms were described in up to 70% and 30% of patients undergoing fundoplication and RYGB, respectively. Various symptoms were reported postoperatively depending on the type of surgical procedures, anatomy of the valve, need for esophageal lengthening, and follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
The treatment of recalcitrant GERD in SSc patients is challenging. Esophagectomy should be reserved to selected patients. Minimally invasive RYGB appears feasible and safe with promising preliminary short-term results. Current evidence is scarce while a definitive indication about the most appropriate surgical treatment is lacking.
Topics: Barrett Esophagus; Female; Fundoplication; Gastric Bypass; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Laparoscopy; Scleroderma, Systemic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33611653
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02118-8 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2017In the recent years, a variety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) procedures have emerged that may provide a treatment option to participants suffering from... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In the recent years, a variety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) procedures have emerged that may provide a treatment option to participants suffering from moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of BLVR on the short- and long-term health outcomes in participants with moderate to severe COPD and determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of each individual technique.
SEARCH METHODS
Studies were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (CAGR) and by handsearching of respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. All searches are current until 07 December 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included studies reported as full text, those published as abstract only and unpublished data, if available.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two independent review authors assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. Where possible, data from more than one study were combined in a meta-analysis using RevMan 5 software.
MAIN RESULTS
AeriSealOne RCT of 95 participants found that AeriSeal compared to control led to a significant median improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV) (18.9%, interquartile range (IQR) -0.7% to 41.9% versus 1.3%, IQR -8.2% to 12.9%), and higher quality of life, as measured by the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (-12 units, IQR -22 units to -5 units, versus -3 units, IQR -5 units to 1 units), P = 0.043 and P = 0.0072 respectively. Although there was no significant difference in mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.90, 95% CI 0.14 to 62.15), adverse events were more common for participants treated with AeriSeal (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.34 to 10.24). The quality of evidence found in this prematurely terminated study was rated low to moderate. Airway bypass stentsTreatment with airway bypass stents compared to control did not lead to significant between-group changes in FEV (0.95%, 95% CI -0.16% to 2.06%) or SGRQ scores (-2.00 units, 95% CI -5.58 units to 1.58 units), as found by one study comprising 315 participants. There was no significant difference in mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.77), nor were there significant differences in adverse events (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.73) between the two groups. The quality of evidence was rated moderate to high. Endobronchial coilsThree studies comprising 461 participants showed that treatment with endobronchial coils compared to control led to a significant between-group mean difference in FEV (10.88%, 95% CI 5.20% to 16.55%) and SGRQ (-9.14 units, 95% CI -11.59 units to -6.70 units). There were no significant differences in mortality (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.29), but adverse events were significantly more common for participants treated with coils (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.23). The quality of evidence ranged from low to high. Endobronchial valvesFive studies comprising 703 participants found that endobronchial valves versus control led to significant improvements in FEV (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.48, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.64) and scores on the SGRQ (-7.29 units, 95% CI -11.12 units to -3.45 units). There were no significant differences in mortality between the two groups (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.43) but adverse events were more common in the endobronchial valve group (OR 5.85, 95% CI 2.16 to 15.84). Participant selection plays an important role as absence of collateral ventilation was associated with superior clinically significant improvements in health outcomes. The quality of evidence ranged from low to high. Intrabronchial valvesIn the comparison of partial bilateral placement of intrabronchial valves to control, one trial favoured control in FEV (-2.11% versus 0.04%, P = 0.001) and one trial found no difference between the groups (0.9 L versus 0.87 L, P = 0.065). There were no significant differences in SGRQ scores (MD 2.64 units, 95% CI -0.28 units to 5.56 units) or mortality rates (OR 4.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 28.94), but adverse events were more frequent (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.48 to 7.84) in participants treated with intrabronchial valves. The lack of functional benefits may be explained by the procedural strategy used, as another study (22 participants) compared unilateral versus partial bilateral placement, finding significant improvements in FEV and SGRQ when using the unilateral approach. The quality of evidence ranged between moderate to high. Vapour ablationOne study of 69 participants found significant mean between-group differences in FEV (14.70%, 95% CI 7.98% to 21.42%) and SGRQ (-9.70 units, 95% CI -15.62 units to -3.78 units), favouring vapour ablation over control. There was no significant between-group difference in mortality (OR 2.82, 95% CI 0.13 to 61.06), but vapour ablation led to significantly more adverse events (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.00 to 14.97). The quality of evidence ranged from low to moderate.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Results for selected BLVR procedures indicate they can provide significant and clinically meaningful short-term (up to one year) improvements in health outcomes, but this was at the expense of increased adverse events. The currently available evidence is not sufficient to assess the effect of BLVR procedures on mortality. These findings are limited by the lack of long-term follow-up data, limited availability of cost-effectiveness data, significant heterogeneity in results, presence of skew and high CIs, and the open-label character of a number of the studies.
Topics: Bronchi; Bronchoscopy; Humans; Pneumonectomy; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28230230
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012158.pub2 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Jul 2021Partnership between anesthesia providers and proceduralists is essential to ensure patient safety and optimize outcomes. A renewed importance of this axiom has emerged...
Partnership between anesthesia providers and proceduralists is essential to ensure patient safety and optimize outcomes. A renewed importance of this axiom has emerged in advanced bronchoscopy and interventional pulmonology. While anesthesia-induced atelectasis is common, it is not typically clinically significant. Advanced guided bronchoscopic biopsy is an exception in which anesthesia protocols substantially impact outcomes. Procedure success depends on careful ventilation to avoid excessive motion, reduce distortion causing computed tomography (CT)-to-body-divergence, stabilize dependent areas, and optimize breath-hold maneuvers to prevent atelectasis. Herein are anesthesia recommendations during guided bronchoscopy. An FiO of 0.6 to 0.8 is recommended for pre-oxygenation, maintained at the lowest tolerable level for the entire the procedure. Expeditious intubation (not rapid-sequence) with a larger endotracheal tube and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants are preferred. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of up to 10-12 cm HO and increased tidal volumes help to maintain optimal lung inflation, if tolerated by the patient as determined during recruitment. A breath-hold is required to reduce motion artifact during intraprocedural imaging (e.g., cone-beam CT, digital tomosynthesis), timed at the end of a normal tidal breath (peak inspiration) and held until pressures equilibrate and the imaging cycle is complete. Use of the adjustable pressure-limiting valve is critical to maintain the desired PEEP and reduce movement during breath-hold maneuvers. These measures will reduce atelectasis and CT-to-body divergence, minimize motion artifact, and provide clearer, more accurate images during guided bronchoscopy. Following these recommendations will facilitate a successful lung biopsy, potentially accelerating the time to treatment by avoiding additional biopsies. Application of these methods should be at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and the proceduralist; best medical judgement should be used in all cases to ensure the safety of the patient.
Topics: Anesthesia, General; Breath Holding; Bronchoscopy; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Lung; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 34273966
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01584-6 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024Neoaortic root dilatation (NeoARD) and neoaortic regurgitation (NeoAR) are common sequelae following the arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great...
BACKGROUND
Neoaortic root dilatation (NeoARD) and neoaortic regurgitation (NeoAR) are common sequelae following the arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries.
OBJECTIVES
The authors aimed to estimate the cumulative incidence of NeoAR, assess whether larger neoaortic root dimensions were associated with NeoAR, and evaluate factors associated with the development of NeoAR during long-term follow-up.
METHODS
Electronic databases were systematically searched for articles that assessed NeoAR and NeoARD after ASO, published before November 2022. The primary outcome was NeoAR, classified based on severity categories (trace, mild, moderate, and severe). Cumulative incidence was estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves, neoaortic root dimensions using Z-scores, and risk factors were evaluated using random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Thirty publications, comprising a total of 6,169 patients, were included in this review. Pooled estimated cumulative incidence of ≥mild NeoAR and ≥moderate NeoAR at 30-year follow-up were 67.5% and 21.4%, respectively. At last follow-up, neoaortic Z-scores were larger at the annulus (mean difference [MD]: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.52-1.82, < 0.001; MD: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.46-2.30, = 0.003) and root (MD: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.16-2.49, < 0.001; MD: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.07-2.60, < 0.001) in patients with ≥mild and ≥moderate NeoAR, respectively, compared to those without NeoAR. Risk factors for the development of any NeoAR included prior pulmonary artery banding, presence of a ventricular septal defect, aorto-pulmonary mismatch, a bicuspid pulmonary valve, and NeoAR at discharge.
CONCLUSIONS
The risks of NeoARD and NeoAR increase over time following ASO surgery. Identified risk factors for NeoAR may alert the clinician that closer follow-up is needed. (Risk factors for neoaortic valve regurgitation after arterial switch operation: a meta-analysis; CRD42022373214).
PubMed: 38939665
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100878 -
Minerva Anestesiologica Jun 2019Many studies have found that volatile anesthetics are associated with improved clinical outcomes for adults undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Many studies have found that volatile anesthetics are associated with improved clinical outcomes for adults undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the effect of volatile anesthetics for adults after heart valve surgery has been unclear. So we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore whether the choice of an anesthetic regimen might influence patients' outcomes after valve surgery.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2018. We included eligible research comparing inhalation anesthesia with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in adult patients undergoing valve surgery. The major endpoints involved mortality, postoperative arrhythmia, acute kidney injury, pulmonary complications, neurological events, myocardial infarction, reoperation for bleeding. The postoperative peak troponin release, hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and ventilation time were also analyzed.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
After screening through 243 potentially relevant articles, we included 13 RCTs with 962 patients. The inhalation anesthesia group revealed comparable mortality (inhalation group 12/249 [4.8%] vs. TIVA group 13/247 [5.3%], RR=0.97; 95% CI: 0.45 to 2.09; P=0.93; P for heterogeneity=0.66, I2=0%) and other postoperative complications with no heterogeneity. The postoperative peak troponin release, hospital/ICU stay and ventilation time were comparable between two groups with considerable heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients undergoing heart valve surgery, the use of inhalation anesthesia compared with TIVA failed to demonstrate superiority for survival and major postoperative complications, and the evidence was insufficient to draw firm conclusions due to the limited sample size. A determination of equivalence or superiority between these two anesthetic regimens requires further researches.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Heart Valves; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30762324
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13377-9 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Sep 2020Valve replacement surgery is the definitive management strategy for patients with severe valvular disease. However, valvular conduits currently in clinical use are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Valve replacement surgery is the definitive management strategy for patients with severe valvular disease. However, valvular conduits currently in clinical use are associated with significant limitations. Tissue-engineered (decellularized) heart valves are alternative prostheses that have demonstrated promising early results. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to perform robust evaluation of the clinical performance of decellularized heart valves implanted in either outflow tract position, in comparison with standard tissue conduits.
METHODS
Systematic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for articles in which outcomes between decellularized heart valves surgically implanted within either outflow tract position of human subjects and standard tissue conduits were compared. Primary endpoints included postoperative mortality and reoperation rates. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model via the Mantel-Haenszel method.
RESULTS
Seventeen articles were identified, of which 16 were included in the meta-analysis. In total, 1418 patients underwent outflow tract reconstructions with decellularized heart valves and 2725 patients received standard tissue conduits. Decellularized heart valves were produced from human pulmonary valves and implanted within the right ventricular outflow tract in all cases. Lower postoperative mortality (4.7% vs. 6.1%; RR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.60-1.47; P = 0.77) and reoperation rates (4.8% vs. 7.4%; RR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.84; P = 0.0057) were observed in patients with decellularized heart valves, although only reoperation rates were statistically significant. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between the analyzed articles (I = 31%, P = 0.13 and I = 33%, P = 0.10 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Decellularized heart valves implanted within the right ventricular outflow tract have demonstrated significantly lower reoperation rates when compared to standard tissue conduits. However, in order to allow for more accurate conclusions about the clinical performance of decellularized heart valves to be made, there need to be more high-quality studies with greater consistency in the reporting of clinical outcomes.
Topics: Bioprosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Prosthesis Design; Pulmonary Valve; Pulmonary Valve Stenosis; Reference Standards; Tissue Engineering
PubMed: 32948234
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01292-y -
Circulation Journal : Official Journal... Oct 2018The aim of this study was to investigate long-term survival, clinical status, and echocardiographic findings of patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to investigate long-term survival, clinical status, and echocardiographic findings of patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) undergoing MitraClip (MC) treatment and to explore the role of baseline features on outcome. Methods and Results: Randomized and observational studies of FMR patients undergoing MC treatment were collected to evaluate the overall survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and echocardiographic changes after MC treatment. Baseline parameters associated with mortality and echocardiographic changes were also investigated. Across 23 studies enrolling 3,253 patients, the inhospital death rate was 2.31%, whereas the mortality rate was 5.37% at 1 month, 11.87% at 6 months, 18.47% at 1 year and 31.08% at 2 years. Mitral regurgitation Grade <3+ was observed in 92.76% patients at discharge and in 83.36% patients at follow-up. At follow-up, 76.63% of patients NYHA Class I-II and there were significant improvements in left ventricular (LV) volume, ejection fraction, and pulmonary pressure. Atrial fibrillation (AF) had a significant negative effect on 1-year survival (β=0.18±0.06; P=0.0047) and on the reduction in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (β=-1.05±0.47 [P=0.0248] and β=-2.60±0.53 [P=0.0024], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
MC results in durable reductions in mitral regurgitation associated with significant clinical and echocardiographic improvements in heart failure patients. AF negatively affects LV reverse remodeling and 1-year survival after MC treatment.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Disease-Free Survival; Echocardiography; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Survival Rate
PubMed: 30210070
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0571 -
PloS One 2017Frailty is a common condition in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Frailty is a common condition in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this systematic review was to assess the impact of frailty status on acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality after TAVR.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from the inception through November 2016. The protocol for this study is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42016052350). Studies that reported odds ratios, relative risks or hazard ratios comparing the risk of AKI after TAVR in frail vs. non-frail patients were included. Mortality risk was evaluated among the studies that reported AKI-related outcomes. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Eight cohort studies with a total of 10,498 patients were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RR of AKI after TAVR among the frail patients was 1.19 (95% CI 0.97-1.46, I2 = 0), compared with non-frail patients. When the meta-analysis was restricted only to studies with standardized AKI diagnosis according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria, the pooled RRs of AKI in frail patients was 1.16 (95% CI 0.91-1.47, I2 = 0). Within the selected studies, frailty status was significantly associated with increased mortality (RR 2.01; 95% CI 1.44-2.80, I2 = 58).
CONCLUSION
The findings from our study suggest no significant association between frailty status and AKI after TAVR. However, frailty status is associated with mortality after TAVR and may aid appropriate patient selection for TAVR.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Humans; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
PubMed: 28545062
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177157 -
Open Heart Feb 2024Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the prognostic value of RV free-wall longitudinal strain (RVfwLS), compared with other RV parameters in PH.
METHODS
We searched for articles presenting the HR of two-dimensional RVfwLS in PH. HRs were standardised using the within-study SD. The ratio of HRs of a 1 SD change in RVfwLS versus systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP), systolic tricuspid annular velocities (s'-TV), RV fractional area change (FAC) or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was calculated for each study, after which we conducted a random model meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis regarding the type of outcome, aetiology of PH and software vendor was also performed.
RESULTS
Twenty articles totalling 2790 subjects were included. The pooled HR of a 1 SD decrease of RVfwLS was 1.80 (95% CI: 1.62 to 2.00, p<0.001), and there was a significant association with all-cause death (ACD) and composite endpoints (CEs). The ratio of HR analysis revealed that RVfwLS has a significant, strong association with ACD and CE per 1 SD change, compared with corresponding values of SPAP, s'-TV, RVFAC or TAPSE. RVfwLS was a significant prognostic factor regardless of the aetiology of PH. However, significant superiority of RVfwLS versus other parameters was not observed in group 1 PH.
CONCLUSIONS
The prognostic value of RVfwLS in patients with PH was confirmed, and RVfwLS is better than other RV parameters and SPAP. Further accumulation of evidence is needed to perform a detailed subgroup analysis for each type of PH.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000052679).
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Tricuspid Valve; Systole
PubMed: 38325907
DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002561 -
Pediatric Cardiology Aug 2019Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) is one of the most common cyanotic congenital heart defects. We sought to summarize all available data regarding the epidemiology and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) is one of the most common cyanotic congenital heart defects. We sought to summarize all available data regarding the epidemiology and perioperative outcomes of syndromic ToF patients. A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review of PubMed and Cochrane Library was performed. Twelve original studies were included. The incidence of syndromic ToF was 15.3% (n = 549/3597). The most prevalent genetic syndromes were 22q11.2 deletion (47.8%; 95% CI 43.4-52.2) and trisomy 21 (41.9%; 95% CI 37.7-46.3). Complete surgical repair was performed in 75.2% of the patients (n = 161/214; 95% CI 69.0-80.1) and staged repair in 24.8% (n = 53/214; 95 CI 19.4-30.9). Relief of RVOT obstruction was performed with transannular patch in 64.7% (n = 79/122; 95% CI 55.9-72.7) of the patients, pulmonary valve-sparing technique in 17.2% (n = 21/122; 95% CI 11.5-24.9), and RV-PA conduit in 18.0% (n = 22/122; 95% CI 12.1-25.9). Pleural effusions were the most common postoperative complications (n = 28/549; 5.1%; 95% CI 3.5-7.3). Reoperations were performed in 4.4% (n = 24/549; 95% CI 2.9-6.4) of the patients. All-cause mortality rate was 9.8% (n = 51/521; 95% CI 7.5-12.7). Genetic syndromes are seen in approximately 15% of ToF patients. Long-term survival exceeds 90%, suggesting that surgical management should be dictated by anatomy regardless of genetics.
Topics: Cardiac Surgical Procedures; DiGeorge Syndrome; Down Syndrome; Female; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Valve; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Tetralogy of Fallot; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31214731
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-019-02133-z