-
Medicine Aug 2022Current research has found contradictory results on the treatment of magnesium valproate (VPM) in patients with dementia (PwD). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Current research has found contradictory results on the treatment of magnesium valproate (VPM) in patients with dementia (PwD).
OBJECTIVES
Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VPM in the adjuvant treatment of PwD.
PURPOSE
Current research has found contradictory results on the treatment of VPM in PwD. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VPM in the adjuvant treatment of PwD.
METHODS
MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Embase, China National Knowledge (CNKI), and Wan Fang databases were researched to gather relevant data on magnesium valproate assistant therapy for patients with dementia (PwD) by using medical subject headings and term words.
RESULTS
After the final screening, 22 RCT studies (a total of 1899 participants) were included in this meta-analysis, which compared VPM adjuvant treatment with antidementia or psychotropic drug monotherapy. Significant differences were found in the scores on mini-mental state examination (P = .028), Alzheimer disease assessment scale cognitive subscale (P < .05), Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale (P < .05), behavioral pathology in Alzheimer disease rating scale (P = .001), activities of daily living (P < .05), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (P < .05). Besides, the levels of inflammatory factors including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were significantly lower than those in the monotherapy group (P < .05). While there was no increase in the incidence of adverse events (P = .383), VPM as an assistant therapy is generally well tolerated in PwD.
CONCLUSION
By meta-analysis, evidence was found to support VPM additional used for the treatment of cognitive function, psychiatric symptoms, or disease improvement in PwD. VPM may be a potential drug to aid in the treatment of dementia patients. However, there was lack of enough evidence to classification of dementia severity in our inclusion study. More research is still needed, including clinical trials evaluating VPM as a complementary therapy.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Alzheimer Disease; Cognition; Humans; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 35945786
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029642 -
European Journal of Clinical... Jan 2024This study intends to assess the reference range of lamotrigine concentration for treating childhood epilepsy. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This study intends to assess the reference range of lamotrigine concentration for treating childhood epilepsy.
METHODS
PubMed, Ovid-Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang data and VIP databases were searched from database inception to January 2022. RCT, cohort study, case-control study, cross-sectional study that estimated the reference range of lamotrigine for children epilepsy treatment were included. The data extracted included basic information, statistical methods, data type, and results of reference range. Descriptive analysis was performed for them.
RESULTS
8 studies were included and estimated the reference range, and all of them were calculated based on efficacy data and/or concentration data. Statistical methods including ROC curve, concentration-effect curve, mean ± standard deviation, 95% confidence interval and percentile interval were utilized. For lamotrigine monotherapy, the lower limits ranged from 2.06 mg/L to 3.99 mg/L, and the upper limits ranged from 8.43 mg/L to 9.08 mg/L, showing basic consistency. However, for lamotrigine concomitant with valproate, the lower limits ranged from 2.00 mg/L to 8.00 mg/L, and the upper limit was 11.50 mg/L, for lamotrigine concomitant with other antiepileptics, the lower limits ranged from 1.00 mg/L to 3.09 mg/L, and the upper limits varied from 5.90 mg/L to 16.24 mg/L, indicating inconsistency.
CONCLUSION
Several studies have estimated the reference range of lamotrigine for childhood epilepsy, while controversy exist and no studies have determined the upper limit of the range based on safety data. To establish the optimal reference range, further high-quality studies are necessary that consider both efficacy and safety data.
Topics: Child; Humans; Anticonvulsants; Lamotrigine; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Reference Values; Triazines; Epilepsy; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 37906300
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-023-03562-9 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2019Aggression is a commonly reported problem following traumatic brain injury (TBI). It may present as verbal insults or outbursts, physical assaults, and/or property...
Aggression is a commonly reported problem following traumatic brain injury (TBI). It may present as verbal insults or outbursts, physical assaults, and/or property destruction. Aggressive behavior can fracture relationships and impede participation in treatment as well as a broad range of vocational and social activities, thereby reducing the individual's quality of life. Pharmacological intervention is frequently used to control aggression following TBI. The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the evidence regarding efficacy of pharmacological interventions for aggression following TBI in adults. We reviewed studies in English, available before December 2018. MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL databases were searched, with additional searching of key journals, clinical trials registries, and international drug regulators. The primary outcomes of interest were reduction in the severity of aggression and occurrence of harms. The secondary outcomes of interest were changes in quality of life, participation, psychological health (e.g., depression, anxiety), and cognitive function. Evidence quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Instruments. Ten studies were identified, including five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five case series. There were positive, albeit mixed, findings for the RCTs examining the use of amantadine in reducing irritability ( = 2) and aggression ( = 2). There were some positive findings favoring methylphenidate in reducing anger ( = 1). The evidence for propranolol was weak ( = 1). Individual analysis revealed differential drug response across individuals for both methylphenidate and propranolol. The less rigorous studies administered carbamazepine ( = 2), valproic acid ( = 1), quetiapine ( = 1), and sertraline ( = 1), and all reported reductions in aggression. However, given the lack of a control group, it is difficult to discern treatment effects from natural change over time. This review concludes that a recommendation for use of amantadine to treat aggression and irritability in adults following TBI is appropriate. However, there is a need for further well-designed, adequately powered and controlled studies of pharmacological interventions for aggression following TBI.
PubMed: 31849802
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01169 -
Palliative Medicine Apr 2024Seizures are an important palliative symptom, the management of which can be complicated by patients' capacity to swallow oral medications. In this setting, and the wish...
BACKGROUND
Seizures are an important palliative symptom, the management of which can be complicated by patients' capacity to swallow oral medications. In this setting, and the wish to avoid intravenous access, subcutaneous infusions may be employed. Options for antiseizure medications that can be provided subcutaneously may be limited. Subcutaneous sodium valproate may be an additional management strategy.
AIM
To evaluate the published experience of subcutaneous valproate use in palliative care, namely with respect to effectiveness and tolerability.
DESIGN
A systematic review was registered (PROSPERO CRD42023453427), conducted and reported according to PRISMA reporting guidelines.
DATA SOURCES
The databases PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus were searched for publications until August 11, 2023.
RESULTS
The searches returned 429 results, of which six fulfilled inclusion criteria. Case series were the most common study design, and most studies included <10 individuals who received subcutaneous sodium valproate. There were three studies that presented results on the utility of subcutaneous sodium valproate for seizure control, which described it to be an effective strategy. One study also described it as an effective treatment for neuropathic pain. The doses were often based on presumed 1:1 oral to subcutaneous conversion ratios. Only one study described a local site adverse reaction, which resolved with a change of administration site.
CONCLUSIONS
There are limited data on the use of subcutaneous sodium valproate in palliative care. However, palliative symptoms for which subcutaneous sodium valproate have been used successfully are seizures and neuropathic pain. The available data have described few adverse effects, supporting its use with an appropriate degree of caution.
Topics: Humans; Valproic Acid; Palliative Care; Seizures; Neuralgia
PubMed: 38444061
DOI: 10.1177/02692163241234597 -
Seizure Jan 2024Epilepsy is one of the most frequent neurological comorbidities in patients with Down Syndrome (DS). Young patients and adults are the most affected, the latter mostly... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Epilepsy is one of the most frequent neurological comorbidities in patients with Down Syndrome (DS). Young patients and adults are the most affected, the latter mostly showing a phenotype labeled as "Late-onset myoclonic epilepsy" (LOMEDS). Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening complication in patients with epilepsy. In this study, we described a non-convulsive SE (NCSE) case in a patient diagnosed with LOMEDS. We also performed a systematic review of the literature on SE diagnosis and treatment in patients with Down Syndrome.
METHODS
Clinical and demographic characteristics of a DS patient diagnosed with NCSE were described. The systematic literature search dissected the diagnostic and therapeutic management of SE in patients with DS. The following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar.
RESULTS
5 DS individuals (4 from the past literature + 1 novel case report) with SE have been identified. The median age at SE onset was 42 years (IQR: 21-60.5 years). The most common SE type was myoclonic SE (MSE), followed by NCSE. Two cases of acute symptomatic etiology were described, whereas a progressive symptomatic etiology was otherwise reported. Ictal EEG recording information was available in two patients who showed generalized spike waves and polyspike and wave discharges. In 3 cases, SE was treated with intravenous antiseizure medications that produced a complete resolution.
CONCLUSION
SE may represent a rare complication in patients with DS. Although no definitive conclusions may be achieved due to the lack of evidence, treatment with valproic acid seems effective, especially in MSE. NCSE management is more challenging. It requires low doses of anesthetics, which should be used cautiously due to the high rate of complications.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Down Syndrome; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Status Epilepticus; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 38101201
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.11.009 -
Molecular Autism 2019Autism (MIM 209850) is a multifactorial disorder with a broad clinical presentation. A number of high-confidence ASD risk genes are known; however, the contribution of...
Autism (MIM 209850) is a multifactorial disorder with a broad clinical presentation. A number of high-confidence ASD risk genes are known; however, the contribution of non-genetic environmental factors towards ASD remains largely uncertain. Here, we present a bioinformatics resource of genetic and induced models of ASD developed using a shared annotation platform. Using this data, we depict the intricate trends in the research approaches to analyze rodent models of ASD. We identify the top 30 most frequently studied phenotypes extracted from rodent models of ASD based on 787 publications. As expected, many of these include animal model equivalents of the "core" phenotypes associated with ASD, such as impairments in social behavior and repetitive behavior, as well as several comorbid features of ASD including anxiety, seizures, and motor-control deficits. These phenotypes have also been studied in models based on a broad range of environmental inducers present in the database, of which gestational exposure to valproic acid (VPA) and maternal immune activation models comprising lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and poly I:C are the most studied. In our unique dataset of rescue models, we identify 24 pharmaceutical agents tested on established models derived from various ASD genes and CNV loci for their efficacy in mitigating symptoms relevant for ASD. As a case study, we analyze a large collection of Shank3 mouse models providing a high-resolution view of the in vivo role of this high-confidence ASD gene, which is the gateway towards understanding and dissecting the heterogeneous phenotypes seen in single-gene models of ASD. The trends described in this study could be useful for researchers to compare ASD models and to establish a complete profile for all relevant animal models in ASD research.
Topics: Animals; Autistic Disorder; Databases, Genetic; Disease Models, Animal; Mice; Phenotype; Rats; Translational Research, Biomedical
PubMed: 30911366
DOI: 10.1186/s13229-019-0263-7 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2019This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2017.Absence seizures (AS) are brief epileptic seizures which present in childhood and...
BACKGROUND
This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2017.Absence seizures (AS) are brief epileptic seizures which present in childhood and adolescence. Depending on clinical features and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings they are divided into typical, atypical absences, and absences with special features. Typical absences are characterised by sudden loss of awareness and an EEG typically shows generalised spike wave discharges at three cycles per second. Ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine are currently used to treat absence seizures. This review aims to determine the best choice of antiepileptic drug for children and adolescents with AS.
OBJECTIVES
To review the evidence for the effects of ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine as treatments for children and adolescents with absence seizures (AS), when compared with placebo or each other.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web, 29 May 2018), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 29 May 2018), ClinicalTrials.gov (29 May 2018) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP, 29 May 2018). Previously we searched Embase (1988 to March 2005) and SCOPUS (1823 to 31 March 2014), but this is no longer necessary because randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in Embase and SCOPUS are now included in CENTRAL. No language restrictions were imposed. In addition, we contacted Sanofi Winthrop, Glaxo Wellcome (now GlaxoSmithKline) and Parke Davis (now Pfizer), manufacturers of sodium valproate, lamotrigine and ethosuximide respectively.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised parallel group monotherapy or add-on trials which include a comparison of any of the following in children or adolescents with AS: ethosuximide, sodium valproate, lamotrigine, or placebo.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Outcome measures were: (1) proportion of individuals seizure free at one, three, six, 12 and 18 months post randomisation; (2) people with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; (3) normalisation of EEG and/or negative hyperventilation test; and (4) adverse effects. Data were independently extracted by two review authors. Results are presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We used GRADE quality assessment criteria to evaluate the certainty of evidence derived from all included studies.
MAIN RESULTS
On the basis of our selection criteria, we included no new studies in the present review. Eight small trials (total number of participants: 691) were included from the earlier review. Six of them were of poor methodological quality (unclear or high risk of bias) and seven recruited less than 50 participants. There are no placebo-controlled trials for ethosuximide or valproate, and hence, no evidence from RCTs to support a specific effect on AS for either of these two drugs. Due to the differing methodologies used in the trials comparing ethosuximide, lamotrigine and valproate, we thought it inappropriate to undertake a meta-analysis. One large randomised, parallel double-blind controlled trial comparing ethosuximide, lamotrigine and sodium valproate in 453 children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy found that at 12 months, the freedom-from-failure rates for ethosuximide and valproic acid were similar and were higher than the rate for lamotrigine. The frequency of treatment failures due to lack of seizure control (P < 0.001) and intolerable adverse events (P < 0.037) was significantly different among the treatment groups, with the largest proportion of lack of seizure control in the lamotrigine cohort, and the largest proportion of adverse events in the valproic acid group. Overall, this large study demonstrates the superior effectiveness of ethosuximide and valproic acid compared to lamotrigine as initial monotherapy aimed to control seizures without intolerable adverse effects in children with childhood absence epilepsy. The risk of bias for this study was low. We rated the overall certainty of the evidence available from the included studies to be moderate or high.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Since the last version of this review was published, we have found no new studies. Hence, the conclusions remain the same as the previous update. With regards to both efficacy and tolerability, ethosuximide represents the optimal initial empirical monotherapy for children and adolescents with AS. However, if absence and generalised tonic-clonic seizures coexist, valproate should be preferred, as ethosuximide is probably inefficacious on tonic-clonic seizures.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsy, Absence; Ethosuximide; Humans; Lamotrigine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 30734919
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003032.pub4 -
PloS One 2019Headaches are a common source of pain and suffering. The study's purpose was to assess beta-blockers efficacy in preventing migraine and tension-type headache. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Headaches are a common source of pain and suffering. The study's purpose was to assess beta-blockers efficacy in preventing migraine and tension-type headache.
METHODS
Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; ISI Web of Science, clinical trial registries, CNKI, Wanfang and CQVIP were searched through 21 August 2018, for randomized trials in which at least one comparison was a beta-blocker for the prevention of migraine or tension-type headache in adults. The primary outcome, headache frequency per month, was extracted in duplicate and pooled using random effects models.
DATA SYNTHESIS
This study included 108 randomized controlled trials, 50 placebo-controlled and 58 comparative effectiveness trials. Compared to placebo, propranolol reduced episodic migraine headaches by 1.5 headaches/month at 8 weeks (95% CI: -2.3 to -0.65) and was more likely to reduce headaches by 50% (RR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7). Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) found that these outcomes were unlikely to be due to a Type I error. A network analysis suggested that beta-blocker's benefit for episodic migraines may be a class effect. Trials comparing beta-blockers to other interventions were largely single, underpowered trials. Propranolol was comparable to other medications known to be effective including flunarizine, topiramate and valproate. For chronic migraine, propranolol was more likely to reduce headaches by at least 50% (RR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-4.3). There was only one trial of beta-blockers for tension-type headache.
CONCLUSIONS
There is high quality evidence that propranolol is better than placebo for episodic migraine headache. Other comparisons were underpowered, rated as low-quality based on only including single trials, making definitive conclusions about comparative effectiveness impossible. There were few trials examining beta-blocker effectiveness for chronic migraine or tension-type headache though there was limited evidence of benefit.
REGISTRATION
Prospero (ID: CRD42017050335).
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Male; Migraine Disorders; Propranolol; Tension-Type Headache; Topiramate; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 30893319
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212785 -
Jornal de Pediatria 2017This systematic review of national or regional guidelines published in English aimed to better understand variance in pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of...
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review of national or regional guidelines published in English aimed to better understand variance in pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of status epilepticus.
SOURCES
Systematic search of national or regional guidelines (January 2000 to February 2017) contained within PubMed and Google Scholar databases, and article reference lists. The search keywords were status epilepticus, prolonged seizure, treatment, and guideline.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
356 articles were retrieved and 13 were selected according to the inclusion criteria. In all six pre-hospital guidelines, the preferred route of medication administration was to use alternatives to the intravenous route: all recommended buccal and intranasal midazolam; three also recommended intramuscular midazolam, and five recommended using rectal diazepam. All 11 emergency department guidelines described three phases in therapy. Intravenous medication, by phase, was indicated as such: initial phase - ten/11 guidelines recommended lorazepam, and eight/11 recommended diazepam; second phase - most (ten/11) guidelines recommended phenytoin, but other options were phenobarbital (nine/11), valproic acid (six/11), and either fosphenytoin or levetiracetam (each four/11); third phase - four/11 guidelines included the choice of repeating second phase therapy, whereas the other guidelines recommended using a variety of intravenous anesthetic agents (thiopental, midazolam, propofol, and pentobarbital).
CONCLUSIONS
All of the guidelines share a similar framework for management of status epilepticus. The choice in route of administration and drug type varied across guidelines. Hence, the adoption of a particular guideline should take account of local practice options in health service delivery.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Clinical Protocols; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Status Epilepticus
PubMed: 28941387
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.08.004 -
Neuro-oncology Nov 2021To update the 2000 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice parameter on anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors.
OBJECTIVE
To update the 2000 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice parameter on anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors.
METHODS
Following the 2017 AAN methodologies, a systematic literature review utilizing PubMed, EMBASE Library, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was performed. The studies were rated based on the AAN therapeutic or causation classification of evidence (class I-IV).
RESULTS
Thirty-seven articles were selected for final analysis. There were limited high-level, class I studies and mostly class II and III studies. The AAN affirmed the value of these guidelines.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors who have not had a seizure, clinicians should not prescribe antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to reduce the risk of seizures (level A). In brain tumor patients undergoing surgery, there is insufficient evidence to recommend prescribing AEDs to reduce the risk of seizures in the peri- or postoperative period (level C). There is insufficient evidence to support prescribing valproic acid or levetiracetam with the intent to prolong progression-free or overall survival (level C). Physicians may consider the use of levetiracetam over older AEDs to reduce side effects (level C). There is insufficient evidence to support using tumor location, histology, grade, molecular/imaging features when deciding whether or not to prescribe prophylactic AEDs (level U).
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Humans; Postoperative Period; Seizures; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 34174071
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab152