-
Global Spine Journal Mar 2022Systematic review and meta-analysis.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are minimally invasive techniques widely used for the treatment of neurologically intact osteoporotic Kümmell's disease (KD), but which treatment is preferable remains controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to shed light on this issue.
METHODS
Six databases were searched for all relevant studies based on the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently conducted a quality assessment, extracted the data and performed all statistical analyses.
RESULTS
Eight studies encompassing 438 neurologically intact osteoporotic KD patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to PVP, PKP was associated with greater improvement in the short- and long-term Cobb angle [SMD = -0.37, P = 0.007; SMD = -0.34, P = 0.012], short-term anterior vertebral height [SMD = 0.43, P = 0.003] and long-term middle vertebral height [SMD = 0.57, P = 0.012] and a lower cement leakage rate [SMD = 0.50, P = 0.003] but produced more consumption (cement injection volume, operative time, fluoroscopy times, intraoperative blood loss and operation cost). However, there were no differences between the 2 procedures in the short- and long-term VAS and ODI scores, long-term anterior vertebral height, overall complications or new vertebral fractures.
CONCLUSIONS
Both procedures are equally effective for neurologically intact KD in terms of the clinical outcomes, with the exception of a lower cement leakage risk and better radiographic improvement for PKP but greater resource consumption. Based on the evidence available, good clinical judgment should be exercised in the selection of patients for these procedures.
PubMed: 33541141
DOI: 10.1177/2192568220984129 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2023Vertebral body metastases (VBM) are one of the most frequent sites of bone metastasis, and their adequate therapeutic management still represents an insidious challenge... (Review)
Review
Radiofrequency Ablation in Vertebral Body Metastasis with and without Percutaneous Cement Augmentation: A Systematic Review Addressing the Need for SPINE Stability Evaluation.
Vertebral body metastases (VBM) are one of the most frequent sites of bone metastasis, and their adequate therapeutic management still represents an insidious challenge for both oncologists and surgeons. A possible alternative treatment for VBM is radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a percutaneous technique in which an alternating current is delivered to the tumor lesion producing local heating and consequent necrosis. However, RFA alone could alter the biomechanics and microanatomy of the vertebral body, thus increasing the risk of post-procedure vertebral fractures and spine instability, and indeed the aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of RFA on spine stability. A systematic review according to PRISMA-P guidelines was performed, and 17 papers were selected for the systematic review. The results show how RFA is an effective, safe, and feasible alternative to conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of VBM without indication for surgery, but spine stability is a major issue in this context. Although exerting undeniable benefits on pain control and local tumor recurrence, RFA alone increases the risk of spine instability and consequent vertebral body fractures and collapses. Concomitant safe and feasible therapeutic strategies such as percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have shown synergic positive effects on back pain and improvement in spine stability.
PubMed: 36980472
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061164 -
Medicine Mar 2018High-viscosity cement (HVC) has been gradually applied in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). Although HVC has been reported to reduce... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
High-viscosity cement (HVC) has been gradually applied in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). Although HVC has been reported to reduce cement leakage, different opinions exist. To assess the complications of HVC in cement leakage in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures and to evaluate the clinical effect of HVC compared with low-viscosity cement (LVC).
METHODS
EMBASE, PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched from their inception to August 2017. Two researchers independently searched for articles and reviewed all retrieved studies. Forest plots were used to illustrate the results. The Q-test and I statistic were employed to evaluate between-study heterogeneity. Potential publication bias was assessed by funnel plot.
RESULTS
HVC reduced the occurrence of cement leakage (risk ratio (RR) = 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.29 to 0.51, P < 0.00001), especially in the disc space (RR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.80, P = 0.007) and the vein (RR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.85, P = 0.008) but not in the intraspinal space (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.23, P = 0.13) or the paravertebral area (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.32 to 1.22, P = 0.17). No significant differences in the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), injected cement volume or adjacent vertebral fracture were noted between HVC and LVC (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Compared with LVC, HVC results in a reduced incidence of cement leakage for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, especially in the disc space and vein but not in the intraspinal space or the paravertebral area. In addition, HVC yields the same satisfactory clinical effect as LVC.
Topics: Bone Cements; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Spinal Fractures; Viscosity
PubMed: 29561435
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010184 -
Medicine Aug 2018Unilateral and bilateral percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (PKP) are 2 main approaches for the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Unilateral and bilateral percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (PKP) are 2 main approaches for the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Numerous published systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of 2 approaches remain inconclusive. In order to propose a significant principle to make decisions for comparing clinical safety and efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral PKP for treating OVCFs patients based on the currently best available evidence, a systematic review of overlapping meta-analysis was conducted.
METHODS
Three electronic databases, Pubmed/Medline, Embase2 and the Cochrance Library, were searched systematically to retrieve and identify all eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing unilateral and bilateral PKP for the treatment of patients with OVCFs. Only systematic reviews or meta-analyses with an exclusively pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the minimum eligibility criteria in this investigation. The Oxford Levels of Evidence, Jadad algorithm and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument were adopted for evaluation of the methodological quality for each included literature to select currently best available evidence.
RESULTS
Screening determined that out of 2159, 9 meta-analyses with level II or III of evidence met the inclusion criteria in the systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. The multiple systematic reviews scores ranged from 8 to 9 with a mean of 8.55 (median 8.5). According to the search process and selection strategies of the Jadad algorithm, a meta-analysis by Feng et al with the best available evidence (12 RCTs and an AMSTAR score of 9) demonstrated that unilateral and bilateral PKP are both nice choices for the treatment of patients with OVCFs, and no significant differences were revealed in clinical scores, radiological outcomes, and quality of life with long-term follow-up. However, compared with bilateral PKP, unilateral PKP produced a shorter surgery time, smaller dosage of cement, lower risk of cement leakage, and relieved a higher degree of intractable pain at short-term follow-up after surgery.
CONCLUSION
Unilateral percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty is more advantageous and superior to bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty, and should be considered an effective option for the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Topics: Aged; Bone Cements; Female; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Male; Operative Time; Osteoporotic Fractures; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30113502
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011968 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Oct 2018This meta-analysis was aimed to explore the overall safety and efficacy of balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This meta-analysis was aimed to explore the overall safety and efficacy of balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) based on qualified studies.
METHODS
By searching multiple databases and sources, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase by the index words updated to January 2018, qualified studies were identified and relevant literature sources were also searched. The qualified studies included randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective comparative studies, and cohort studies. The meta-analysis was performed including mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to analyze the main outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis to explore the safety and efficacy of kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for the treatment of OVCF. The results indicated that kyphoplasty significantly decreased the kyphotic wedge angle (SMD, 0.98; 95% CI 0.40-1.57), increased the postoperative vertebral body height (SMD, - 1.27; 95% CI - 1.86 to - 0.67), and decreased the risk of cement leakage (RR, 0.62; 95% CI 0.47-0.80) in comparison with vertebroplasty. However, there was no statistical difference in visual analog scale (VAS) scores (WMD, 0.04; 95% CI - 0.28-0.36) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (WMD, - 1.30; 95% CI - 3.34-0.74) between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Kyphoplasty contributes especially to decreasing the mean difference of kyphotic wedge angle and risk of cement leakage and increasing the vertebral body height when compared with vertebroplasty. But radiographic differences did not significantly influence the clinical results (no significant difference was observed in VAS scores and ODI scores between the two groups); thus, kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are equally effective in the clinical outcomes of OVCF. In addition, more high-quality multi-center RCTs with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are warranted to confirm the current findings.
Topics: Bone Cements; Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Postoperative Complications; Spinal Fractures; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 30348192
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0952-5 -
The Spine Journal : Official Journal of... Aug 2022Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) dramatically increase with age and are serious life altering adverse events for seniors resulting in increased rates of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) dramatically increase with age and are serious life altering adverse events for seniors resulting in increased rates of institutionalization, morbidity and mortality. Given the expanding population of the elderly and increasing prevalence of OVFs, cost-effective treatment strategies need to be considered. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (VA) procedures such as vertebroplasty (VP) or balloon kyphoplasty (BK) are increasingly employed to treat painful vertebral fractures not responding to conservative management (CM) of bedrest and analgesia. Both VA procedures have been shown to be effective treatments for OVFs in multiple systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. In this systematic review, analytical strategies, designs and results were compared for health economic studies evaluating cost-effectiveness of VA procedures, VP or BK for OVFs. Furthermore, assessments of quality (risk of bias) were conducted for the systematic review and the individual studies with peer-reviewed checklists recommended for cost-effectiveness studies.
PURPOSE
To provide an up-to-date systematic review of peer-reviewed studies evaluating cost-effectiveness of VA procedures, VP or KP for OVFs to support treatment and health care funding decisions.
STUDY DESIGN
This study is a systematic literature review and structured narrative synthesis.
STUDY SAMPLE
Peer reviewed health economic studies reporting cost-effectiveness for VA procedures, VP or BK for OVFs OUTCOME MEASURES: The following information extracted from the studies included: report country and year, study design, comparators, population, perspective, health valuations, costing sources and cost-effectiveness measures. For economic studies involving modeling, information was also extracted for model type, time horizon, key model drivers, and handling of uncertainty. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), the ratio of differences between comparator treatment groups in costs and health benefits, was considered the main cost-effectiveness measure.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ECONLIT, Cochrane Library and DARE databases up to the review date May 2021. Studies were reviewed for those reporting cost-effectiveness analyses on VA procedures including VP or BK for OVFs. Studies including only costs, abstracts, editorials, methodologies and reviews were not included. The selection of articles was reported in line with PRISMA guidance. A descriptive framework was developed to classify types of cost-effectiveness studies based on methodological differences and a structured narrative synthesis was used to summarize studies. Quality assessments were made with British Medical Journal checklist for individual cost-effectiveness studies and the CiCERO checklist for systematic reviews of cost-effectiveness studies.
RESULTS
In this systematic review, 520 references were identified through database searching and 501 were excluded as ineligible by titles and abstract based on prior eligibility criteria. From full-text reviews of 19 reports, ten were identified as eligible for the systematic review evaluating cost-effectiveness of VA procedures for OVFs. All references were published between 2008 and 2020. The ten cost-effectiveness studies, three for VP, three for BK and four for both VP and BK, all involved CM for OVFs as a treatment comparator. The studies involved different methods of economic analysis, modeling assumptions, cost and health valuations conducted in different health care setting over different time periods. A framework for the review outlines key features of cost-effectiveness study designs consisting of unmatched, matched, or randomized controls involving cost-effectiveness or cost-utility) analyses. Both VP and BK were cost-effective alternatives to CM for OVFs with earlier health gains and significantly shorter hospital stays. Cost-effectiveness estimates, ICERs, remained relatively stable and within willingness-to-pay thresholds under a range of sensitivity analyses. Comparisons between VP and BK were variable depending on modeling assumptions, but generally the procedures had similar health benefit gains with VP having lower acute procedural costs.
CONCLUSIONS
Both VP and BK, have been shown to be cost-effective alternatives to CM for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in diverse cost-effectiveness studies conducted in multiple health care settings. Trial-based cost-utility contributed the strongest evidence supporting cost-effectiveness determination for VP and BK for OVFs.
Topics: Aged; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Pain; Spinal Fractures; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 35257838
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.02.013 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2022Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), and bone-filling mesh containers(BFC) are three viable minimally invasive techniques that have been... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), and bone-filling mesh containers(BFC) are three viable minimally invasive techniques that have been used to treat Kümmell's disease(KD). However, there is still debate as to which is safer and more effective. This study summarized the pros and cons of the three techniques in the treatment of KD through network meta-analysis(NMA).
METHODS
All eligible published clinical control studies comparing PVP, PKP, and BFC for KD up to December 2021 were collected by online search of Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Database, and Chinese biomedical literature database. Data were extracted after screening, and Stata 16.0 software was used to perform the network meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 16 retrospective case-control studies (CCTs) with a total of 1114 patients were included. The NMA results showed no statistical difference between the 3 procedures in terms of improving patients' clinical symptoms. PKP was most likely to be the most effective in correcting kyphosis, while BFC was likely to be the most effective in managing the occurrence of cement leakage. No statistical differences were found in the incidence of new vertebral fractures in adjacent segments.
CONCLUSIONS
Ranking analysis showed that BFC has the highest likelihood of being the optimal procedure for the treatment of KD, based on a combined assessment of effectiveness in improving patients' symptoms and safety in the occurrence of adverse events.
PubMed: 35722530
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.893404 -
Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery Sep 2020Osteolytic lesions of the atlas (C1) are challenging to treat by vertebroplasty due to the vicinity of the vertebral artery and the spinal cord.
BACKGROUND
Osteolytic lesions of the atlas (C1) are challenging to treat by vertebroplasty due to the vicinity of the vertebral artery and the spinal cord.
OBJECTIVE
To present our experience with transoral vertebroplasty (TOV) for osteolytic lesions of the lateral mass of the atlas.
METHODS
Retrospective case series involving 15 consecutive patients (nine male, six female, mean age 63 years) who underwent TOV for the treatment of an osteolytic lesion of the lateral mass of the atlas. Among the osteolytic lesions, 10/15 (67%) were bone metastases from various cancers; 4/15 (27%) were lesions related to multiple myeloma; and one lesion (7%) was an aggressive hemangioma. All the TOVs were performed under general anesthesia and in most cases (10/15; 67%) in a hybrid angiosuite combining a C-arm flat panel and a CT scan. The remaining five patients were treated under biplane fluoroscopic guidance.
RESULTS
Vertebroplasty of the lateral mass of C1 through a transoral route was feasible in all cases. Significant pain relief was obtained in most cases (1 month average decrease in Numeric Rating Scale: 4.9±4.1). No major complication was recorded. In 7/15 cases (47%), cement leakage surrounding the C1 lateral mass was seen; none of these leakages had a significant clinical consequence. No additional spine surgery was required in any of the patients.
CONCLUSION
TOV of osteolytic lesions of the lateral mass of the atlas is feasible and seems safe and effective, providing pain relief and bone stabilization.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Cements; Cervical Vertebrae; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Neoplasms; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 32354844
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015853 -
Pain Physician 2016Kyphoplasty has been proven to be an efficient method to relieve patient suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Because of its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Kyphoplasty has been proven to be an efficient method to relieve patient suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Because of its technological superiority, unilateral kyphoplasty consumes less operative time and bone cement than traditional bilateral kyphoplasty. However, there is controversy about which method is most efficient in the treatment of OVCFs. Thus, an overall analysis should be performed to shed light on the facts corroborating both procedures.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of unipedicular kyphoplasty versus bipedicular kyphoplasty in treating OVCFs.
STUDY DESIGN
Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials focusing on comparing unilateral versus bilateral balloon kyphoplasty in treatment of OVCFs. The exclusion criteria contained infection, neoplastic etiology, traumatic fracture, neural compression, neurological deficit, spinal stenosis, previous surgery at the involved vertebral body, long-term use of steroids, and kyphoplasty with other invasive or semi-invasive intervention treatment. Retrospective studies, reviews, technology introductions, and biochemical trials were also excluded.
SETTINGS
The PubMed MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematic searched. Only randomized controlled trials published up to June 2015 comparing unilateral kyphoplasty with bilateral kyphoplasty in treatment of OVCFs were identified.
METHODS
Two researchers independently screeded the works for inclusion and data extraction. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the methodological quality and evidence synthesis.
RESULTS
Six articles with 563 patients were enrolled in this study. Results showed that the unilateral approach required less surgical time (MD, -23.19; 95% CI, [-27.08, -19.31]; P < 0.00001) and cement consumption (MD, -2.07; 95% CI, [-2.23, -1.91]; P < 0.00001), as well as a reduced cement leakage ratio (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, [0.35, 0.99]; P < 0.05) and improved short-term general health (MD, 1.48; 95% CI, [0.02, 2.93], P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the visual analog scale score (short-term and long-term), Oswestry Disability Index score (mid-term and long-term) kyphotic angle reduction, restoration rate of anterior vertebral height, vertebral height loss rate, postoperative adjacent-level fractures, or in other assessments of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey parameters (short-term and long-term).
LIMITATIONS
Only 6 studies were included, so that the sample size was still relatively small and publication bias could not be revealed in this study. Observation time of some data was inconsistent. All of these problems could influence the reliability of the results.
CONCLUSION
Both unilateral kyphoplasty and bilateral kyphoplasty are safe and effective treatments for OVCFs. However, when operative time, cement volume, cement leakage, short-term general health, radiation dose, and hospitalization costs are taken into consideration, unilateral kyphoplasty may be the better choice. Yet, more high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are still required to make the final conclusion.Key words: Kyphoplasty, unilateral approach, bilateral approach, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, meta-analysis.
Topics: Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27906934
DOI: No ID Found -
Global Spine Journal Aug 2016Review of the literature. (Review)
Review
STUDY DESIGN
Review of the literature.
OBJECTIVE
Surgery and cement augmentation procedures are effective palliative treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases. Our objective is to systematically review the literature to describe the survival, prognostic factors, and clinical outcomes of surgery and cement augmentation procedures for breast cancer metastases to the spine.
METHODS
We performed a literature review using PubMed to identify articles that reported outcomes and/or prognostic factors of the breast cancer patient population with spinal metastases treated with any surgical technique since 1990.
RESULTS
The median postoperative survival for metastatic breast cancer was 21.7 months (8.2 to 36 months), the mean rate of any pain improvement was 92.9% (76 to 100%), the mean rate of neurologic improvement was 63.8% (53 to 100%), the mean rate of neurologic decline was 4.1% (0 to 8%), and the local tumor control rate was 92.6% (89 to 100%). Kyphoplasty studies reported a high rate of pain control in selected patients. Negative prognostic variables included hormonal (estrogen and progesterone) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor refractory tumor status, high degree of axillary lymph node involvement, and short disease-free interval (DFI). All other clinical or prognostic parameters were of low or insufficient strength.
CONCLUSION
With respect to clinical outcomes, surgery consistently yielded neurologic improvements in patients presenting with a deficit with a minimal risk of worsening; however, negative prognostic factors associated with shorter survival following surgery include estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity, HER2 negativity, and a short DFI.
PubMed: 27433433
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564807