-
International Journal of Molecular... Jun 2018
Topics: Animals; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Humans; Mutagenesis; Neoplasms
PubMed: 29899224
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19061767 -
Chemical Research in Toxicology Jul 2023Aldehydes are widespread in the environment, with multiple sources such as food and beverages, industrial effluents, cigarette smoke, and additives. The toxic effects of... (Review)
Review
Aldehydes are widespread in the environment, with multiple sources such as food and beverages, industrial effluents, cigarette smoke, and additives. The toxic effects of exposure to several aldehydes have been observed in numerous studies. At the molecular level, aldehydes damage DNA, cross-link DNA and proteins, lead to lipid peroxidation, and are associated with increased disease risk including cancer. People genetically predisposed to aldehyde sensitivity exhibit severe health outcomes. In various diseases such as Fanconi's anemia and Cockayne syndrome, loss of aldehyde-metabolizing pathways in conjunction with defects in DNA repair leads to widespread DNA damage. Importantly, aldehyde-associated mutagenicity is being explored in a growing number of studies, which could offer key insights into how they potentially contribute to tumorigenesis. Here, we review the genotoxic effects of various aldehydes, focusing particularly on the DNA adducts underlying the mutagenicity of environmentally derived aldehydes. We summarize the chemical structures of the aldehydes and their predominant DNA adducts, discuss various methodologies, and , commonly used in measuring aldehyde-associated mutagenesis, and highlight some recent studies looking at aldehyde-associated mutation signatures and spectra. We conclude the Review with a discussion on the challenges and future perspectives of investigating aldehyde-associated mutagenesis.
Topics: Humans; Aldehydes; DNA Adducts; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Mutagens; DNA
PubMed: 37363863
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00045 -
Seminars in Cancer Biology Oct 2022The acquisition of DNA damage is an early driving event in tumorigenesis. Premalignant lesions show activated DNA damage responses and inactivation of DNA damage... (Review)
Review
The acquisition of DNA damage is an early driving event in tumorigenesis. Premalignant lesions show activated DNA damage responses and inactivation of DNA damage checkpoints promotes malignant transformation. However, DNA damage is also a targetable vulnerability in cancer cells. This requires a detailed understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms governing DNA integrity. Here, we review current work on DNA damage in tumorigenesis. We discuss DNA double strand break repair, how repair pathways contribute to tumorigenesis, and how double strand breaks are linked to the tumor microenvironment. Next, we discuss the role of oncogenes in promoting DNA damage through replication stress. Finally, we discuss our current understanding on DNA damage in micronuclei and discuss therapies targeting these DNA damage pathways.
Topics: Humans; DNA Repair; DNA Damage; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; DNA; Genomic Instability; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 33905873
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.04.012 -
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology Mar 2019Inactivation of the p53 gene is a key driver of tumorigenesis in various cancer cohorts and types. The quest for a successful p53-based therapy that holds the promise of... (Review)
Review
Inactivation of the p53 gene is a key driver of tumorigenesis in various cancer cohorts and types. The quest for a successful p53-based therapy that holds the promise of treating more than half of the cancer population has culminated in extensive knowledge about the role and function of p53 and led to new proposed innovative strategies against p53-defective cancers. We will discuss some of these latest studies with a focus on metabolic regulation and DNA damage response and also highlight novel functions of p53 in these pathways that may provide a contemporary rationale for targeting p53 loss in tumors.
Topics: Animals; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; DNA Damage; Humans; Neoplasms; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 30865230
DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz012 -
Genes Jun 2023Cells are constantly assaulted by endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage that threaten genome stability [...].
Cells are constantly assaulted by endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage that threaten genome stability [...].
Topics: Humans; DNA Repair; DNA Damage; Genomic Instability
PubMed: 37510290
DOI: 10.3390/genes14071385 -
DNA Repair Jul 2014The concept of the Exposome is a compilation of diseases and one's lifetime exposure to chemicals, whether the exposure comes from environmental, dietary, or... (Review)
Review
The concept of the Exposome is a compilation of diseases and one's lifetime exposure to chemicals, whether the exposure comes from environmental, dietary, or occupational exposures; or endogenous chemicals that are formed from normal metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, infections, and other natural metabolic processes such as alteration of the gut microbiome. In this review, we have focused on the endogenous exposome, the DNA damage that arises from the production of endogenous electrophilic molecules in our cells. It provides quantitative data on endogenous DNA damage and its relationship to mutagenesis, with emphasis on when exogenous chemical exposures that produce identical DNA adducts to those arising from normal metabolism cause significant increases in total identical DNA adducts. We have utilized stable isotope labeled chemical exposures of animals and cells, so that accurate relationships between endogenous and exogenous exposures can be determined. Advances in mass spectrometry have vastly increased both the sensitivity and accuracy of such studies. Furthermore, we have clear evidence of which sources of exposure drive low dose biology that results in mutations and disease. These data provide much needed information to impact quantitative risk assessments, in the hope of moving towards the use of science, rather than default assumptions.
Topics: Animals; Antioxidant Response Elements; DNA Adducts; DNA Damage; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Isotope Labeling; Mutagenesis
PubMed: 24767943
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.031 -
International Journal of Molecular... Dec 2017Within the nucleus, sub-nuclear domains define territories where specific functions occur. Nuclear bodies (NBs) are dynamic structures that concentrate nuclear factors... (Review)
Review
Within the nucleus, sub-nuclear domains define territories where specific functions occur. Nuclear bodies (NBs) are dynamic structures that concentrate nuclear factors and that can be observed microscopically. Recently, NBs containing the p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1), a key component of the DNA damage response, were defined. Interestingly, 53BP1 NBs are visualized during G1 phase, in daughter cells, while DNA damage was generated in mother cells and not properly processed. Unlike most NBs involved in transcriptional processes, replication has proven to be key for 53BP1 NBs, with replication stress leading to the formation of these large chromatin domains in daughter cells. In this review, we expose the composition and organization of 53BP1 NBs and focus on recent findings regarding their regulation and dynamics. We then concentrate on the importance of the replication stress, examine the relation of 53BP1 NBs with DNA damage and discuss their dysfunction.
Topics: Animals; Cell Nucleus; Chromatin; DNA Damage; DNA Replication; Humans; Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1
PubMed: 29206178
DOI: 10.3390/ijms18122611 -
DNA Repair Aug 2023Cells have evolved an arsenal of molecular mechanisms to respond to continuous alterations in the primary structure of DNA. At the cellular level, DNA damage response... (Review)
Review
Cells have evolved an arsenal of molecular mechanisms to respond to continuous alterations in the primary structure of DNA. At the cellular level, DNA damage response proteins accumulate at sites of DNA damage and organize into nuclear foci. As recounted by Errol Friedberg, pioneering work on DNA repair in the 1930Â s was stimulated by collaborations between physicists and geneticists. In recent years, the introduction of ideas from physics on self-organizing compartments has taken the field of cell biology by storm. Percolation and phase separation theories are increasingly used to model the self-assembly of compartments, called biomolecular condensates, that selectively concentrate molecules without a surrounding membrane. In this review, we discuss these concepts in the context of the DNA damage response. We discuss how studies of DNA repair foci as condensates can link molecular mechanisms with cell physiological functions, provide new insights into regulatory mechanisms, and open new perspectives for targeting DNA damage responses for therapeutic purposes.
Topics: Proteins; Cell Nucleus; DNA Damage; DNA Repair
PubMed: 37320957
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103524 -
International Journal of Molecular... Sep 2019Nickel (Ni) is known to be a major carcinogenic heavy metal. Occupational and environmental exposure to Ni has been implicated in human lung and nasal cancers.... (Review)
Review
Nickel (Ni) is known to be a major carcinogenic heavy metal. Occupational and environmental exposure to Ni has been implicated in human lung and nasal cancers. Currently, the molecular mechanisms of Ni carcinogenicity remain unclear, but studies have shown that Ni-caused DNA damage is an important carcinogenic mechanism. Therefore, we conducted a literature search of DNA damage associated with Ni exposure and summarized known Ni-caused DNA damage effects. In vitro and vivo studies demonstrated that Ni can induce DNA damage through direct DNA binding and reactive oxygen species (ROS) stimulation. Ni can also repress the DNA damage repair systems, including direct reversal, nucleotide repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous-recombination repair (HR), and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathways. The repression of DNA repair is through direct enzyme inhibition and the downregulation of DNA repair molecule expression. Up to now, the exact mechanisms of DNA damage caused by Ni and Ni compounds remain unclear. Revealing the mechanisms of DNA damage from Ni exposure may contribute to the development of preventive strategies in Ni carcinogenicity.
Topics: Animals; Carcinogenesis; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Damage; DNA Mismatch Repair; DNA Repair; Humans; Nickel; Reactive Oxygen Species
PubMed: 31546657
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20194690 -
Biochemical Pharmacology Sep 2019Mitosis ensures accurate segregation of duplicated DNA through tight regulation of chromosome condensation, bipolar spindle assembly, chromosome alignment in the... (Review)
Review
Mitosis ensures accurate segregation of duplicated DNA through tight regulation of chromosome condensation, bipolar spindle assembly, chromosome alignment in the metaphase plate, chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), in particular PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, PARP5a (TNKS1), as well as poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG), regulate different mitotic functions, including centrosome function, mitotic spindle assembly, mitotic checkpoints, telomere length and telomere cohesion. PARP depletion or inhibition give rise to various mitotic defects such as centrosome amplification, multipolar spindles, chromosome misalignment, premature loss of cohesion, metaphase arrest, anaphase DNA bridges, lagging chromosomes, and micronuclei. As the mechanisms of PARP1/2 inhibitor-mediated cell death are being progressively elucidated, it is becoming clear that mitotic defects caused by PARP1/2 inhibition arise due to replication stress and DNA damage in S phase. As it stands, entrapment of inactive PARP1/2 on DNA phenocopies replication stress through accumulation of unresolved replication intermediates, double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) and incorrectly repaired DSBs, which can be transmitted from S phase to mitosis and instigate various mitotic defects, giving rise to both numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations. Cancer cells have increased levels of replication stress, which makes them particularly susceptible to a combination of agents that compromise replication fork stability. Indeed, combining PARP1/2 inhibitors with genetic deficiencies in DNA repair pathways, DNA-damaging agents, ATR and other cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors has yielded synergistic effects in killing cancer cells. Here I provide a comprehensive overview of the mitotic functions of PARPs and PARG, mitotic phenotypes induced by their depletion or inhibition, as well as the therapeutic relevance of targeting mitotic cells by directly interfering with mitotic functions or indirectly through replication stress.
Topics: Animals; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Humans; Mitosis; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases
PubMed: 30910692
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.03.028