-
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders May 2023Individual risk estimation is an essential part of cardiovascular (CV) disease prevention. Several imaging parameters have been studied for this purpose. Based on...
BACKGROUND
Individual risk estimation is an essential part of cardiovascular (CV) disease prevention. Several imaging parameters have been studied for this purpose. Based on mounting evidence, international guidelines recommend the ultrasound assessment of carotid artery plaques to refine individual risk estimation. Previous studies have not compared carotid artery and abdominal aorta plaques in CV risk estimation. Our aim was to explore this matter in a prospective study setting.
METHODS
Participants were part of the Oulu Project Elucidating Risk of Atherosclerosis (OPERA) project. All participants (n = 1007, 50% males, aged 51.3 ± 6.0 years) were clinically examined in the beginning of 1990's and followed until the end 2014 for fatal and non-fatal CV events.
RESULTS
During a median follow-up of 22.5 (17.5-23.2) years, 246 (24%) participants suffered a CV event and 79 (32%) of those CV events were fatal. When compared to those without plaques, both carotid (hazard ratio, HR 2.854 [95% confidence interval, CI, 2.188-3.721, p < 0.001) and abdominal aorta plaques (HR 2.534 [1.503-4.274], p < 0.001) were major risk factors for CV events as an aggregate endpoint. These associations remained even after adjusting the multivariable models with age, sex, systolic blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, LDL cholesterol, and with previous CV events (coronary artery disease and stroke/transient ischemic attack). However, only carotid plaques were significant risk factors for fatal CV events: multivariable adjusted HR 2.563 (1.452-4.524), p = 0.001. Furthermore, reclassification and discrimination parameters were improved only when carotid plaques were added to a baseline risk model. Adding abdominal aorta plaques to the baseline risk model improved C-statistic from 0.718 (0.684-0.751) to 0.721 (0.688-0.754) whereas carotid plaques improved it to 0.743 (0.710-0.776).
CONCLUSIONS
Both carotid and abdominal aorta plaques are significant risk factors for CV events, but only carotid plaques provide prognostic information beyond traditional CV risk factors on fatal CV events. If one ultrasound parameter for plaque detection and CV risk estimation had to be chosen, carotid plaques may be preferred over abdominal aorta.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Aorta, Abdominal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Prospective Studies; Atherosclerosis; Carotid Artery, Common
PubMed: 37161438
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03264-1 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Sep 2016Endovascular repair has evolved to become a viable mainstream treatment for aortic pathology in both acute and elective settings. As technology advanced, traditional... (Review)
Review
Endovascular repair has evolved to become a viable mainstream treatment for aortic pathology in both acute and elective settings. As technology advanced, traditional anatomical barriers were progressively tackled using new devices and novel procedures, and there are now multiple options available to the vascular surgeon. In the abdominal aorta, advances in endovascular aneurysm repair have been in the treatment of hostile aortic necks using new sealing concepts and ancillary procedures, and in branch preservation using fenestrations and snorkels. Access challenges have been met with a percutaneous approach and low-profile devices, and standard protocols have improved mortality for ruptured aneurysms. In the thoracic aorta, more invasive hybrid procedures have given way gradually to branched endografts. Particular challenges to the anaesthetist include blood pressure control and the prevention of stroke and paraplegia. Current focus in the thoracic aorta is in treating aortic arch pathology and in optimal management of acute and chronic dissections. This review describes the latest trends in the endovascular treatment of aortic diseases and examines the current evidence for different modalities of management.
Topics: Aorta, Abdominal; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Iliac Artery; Stents
PubMed: 27566806
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew222 -
Medicine Aug 2022To investigate the normal diameter of the abdominal aorta and common iliac arteries of the middle-aged and elderly people in China and the relationship of the diameters...
To investigate the normal diameter of the abdominal aorta and common iliac arteries of the middle-aged and elderly people in China and the relationship of the diameters with age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and body surface area (BSA). This retrospective study enrolled 625 patients including 380 males and 245 females aged 60.00 years (interquartile range 13.00 years). All clinical data and the diameters of the abdominal aorta and common iliac arteries were analyzed. The diameter of the abdominal aorta was 21.49 ± 2.49 mm at the proximal, 16.94 (interquartile range 2.39) mm at the middle, and 15.65 (interquartile range 2.90) mm at the distal segment. The diameter of the common iliac artery was 10.76 (interquartile range 1.99) mm at the right proximal, 10.41 (interquartile range 2.05) mm at the left proximal, 10.74 (interquartile range 2.25) mm at the right distal, and 10.67 (interquartile range 2.22) mm at the left distal segment. The height, weight, BSA, BMI, diameters of the proximal, middle and distal abdominal aorta as well as the proximal and distal left and right common iliac arteries were significantly higher in males than those in females (P < .001). Height, weight, BSA, and BMI were significantly (P < .001) positively correlated with the diameter of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery at the proximal, middle, and distal segments. The middle and distal diameters of the abdominal aorta were significantly higher in males than those in females (P < .05). The diameter of the abdominal aorta at the proximal, middle, and distal segment as well as the diameter of the left and right common iliac artery at the distal segment were significantly (P < .05) increased with age. The normal values of the diameter of the abdominal aorta and common iliac arteries are suggested for the middle-aged and elderly Chinese people for clinical reference. The diameters are gender related and significantly positively correlated with BSA, height, weight, and BMI, which is beneficial for the diagnosis and treatment planning of relevant vascular diseases.
Topics: Aged; Aorta, Abdominal; Body Surface Area; China; Female; Humans; Iliac Artery; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35945710
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030026 -
Biomolecules Mar 2022Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), defined as a focal dilation of the abdominal aorta beyond 50% of its normal diameter, is a common and potentially life-threatening... (Review)
Review
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), defined as a focal dilation of the abdominal aorta beyond 50% of its normal diameter, is a common and potentially life-threatening vascular disease. The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying AAA pathogenesis remain unclear. Healthy endothelial cells (ECs) play a critical role in maintaining vascular homeostasis by regulating vascular tone and maintaining an anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic local environment. Increasing evidence indicates that endothelial dysfunction is an early pathologic event in AAA formation, contributing to both oxidative stress and inflammation in the degenerating arterial wall. Recent studies utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing revealed heterogeneous EC sub-populations, as determined by their transcriptional profiles, in aortic aneurysm tissue. This review summarizes recent findings, including clinical evidence of endothelial dysfunction in AAA, the impact of biomechanical stress on EC in AAA, the role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) uncoupling in AAA, and EC heterogeneity in AAA. These studies help to improve our understanding of AAA pathogenesis and ultimately may lead to the generation of EC-targeted therapeutics to treat or prevent this deadly disease.
Topics: Aorta, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Dilatation, Pathologic; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Oxidative Stress
PubMed: 35454098
DOI: 10.3390/biom12040509 -
Journal of the Royal Society, Interface Feb 2019The paper provides a deepened insight into the role of anisotropy in the analysis of residual stresses in arteries. Residual deformations are modelled following...
The paper provides a deepened insight into the role of anisotropy in the analysis of residual stresses in arteries. Residual deformations are modelled following Holzapfel and Ogden (Holzapfel and Ogden 2010, J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 787-799. ( doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0357 )), which is based on extensive experimental data on human abdominal aortas (Holzapfel et al. 2007, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35, 530-545. ( doi:10.1007/s10439-006-9252-z )) and accounts for both circumferential and axial residual deformations of the individual layers of arteries-intima, media and adventitia. Each layer exhibits distinctive nonlinear and anisotropic mechanical behaviour originating from its unique microstructure; therefore, we use the most general form of strain-energy function (Holzapfel et al. 2015, J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150188. ( doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0188 )) to derive residual stresses for each layer individually. Finally, the systematic experimental data (Niestrawska et al. 2016, J. R. Soc. Interface 13, 20160620. ( doi:10.1098/rsif.2016.0620 )) on both mechanical and structural properties of the different layers of the human abdominal aorta facilitate our discussion on (i) the importance of anisotropy in modelling residual stresses; (ii) the variability of residual stresses within the same class of tissue, the abdominal aorta; (iii) the limitations of conventional opening angle method to account for complex residual deformations; and (iv) the effect of residual stresses on the loaded configuration of the aorta mimicking in vivo conditions.
Topics: Anisotropy; Aorta, Abdominal; Humans; Models, Cardiovascular; Stress, Mechanical
PubMed: 30958201
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0029 -
European Journal of Vascular and... May 2022Brucellosis is the most common zoonosis worldwide. Although cardiovascular complications in human brucellosis comprise only 3% of morbidity, they are the principal cause... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Brucellosis is the most common zoonosis worldwide. Although cardiovascular complications in human brucellosis comprise only 3% of morbidity, they are the principal cause of death. Endocarditis covers the majority of these cases. Infected aneurysms and ulcerative processes of the aorta are rare but can be life threatening as well. Currently, limited information is available about aortic and iliac involvement in brucellosis.
METHODS
A PubMed, Web of Science, and AccessMedicine search (without restriction on language or year of publication) was performed to identify relevant articles on aortic and iliac involvement in brucellosis. Case reports were eligible for inclusion if they reported on thoracic, abdominal, or iliac aortic pathology caused by Brucella.
RESULTS
Seventy-one cases were identified over the last 70 years, with an overall mortality rate of 22%. Most of the patients were male (86%) and had a history of Brucella exposure (66%). Approximately one quarter (23%) contracted Brucella while travelling in a (hyper)endemic region. Almost half of the infections were located in the abdominal aorta (49%), followed by the ascending (37%) and descending (13%) thoracic aorta. Infected aneurysms (61%) and ulcerative processes (16%) were seen most frequently. Aortic rupture was present in 31% of cases and occurred mainly in the abdominal (49%) and descending thoracic aorta (44%). The majority of all patients (59%) underwent open surgery combined with long term antibiotics. Over the past 15 years, a trend towards endovascular treatment was observed.
CONCLUSION
Although aortic and iliac involvement in brucellosis is rare, it can be a life threatening manifestation. Due to low awareness, this infection may represent an under reported disease. The therapeutic cornerstone in these cases remains open surgery combined with antibiotics. The role of endovascular treatment is yet to be decided, in which the condition of the patient and the risks of long term complications need to be considered.
Topics: Aneurysm, Infected; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aorta, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Brucellosis; Female; Humans; Male
PubMed: 35282998
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.02.004 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Apr 2019
Topics: Aorta, Abdominal; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30711382
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.01.004 -
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and... Dec 2019
Review
Topics: Animals; Aorta, Abdominal; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; MicroRNAs; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Nuclear Proteins; Phenotype; Signal Transduction; Trans-Activators; Transcription, Genetic; Vascular Diseases; Vascular Remodeling
PubMed: 31770033
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312581 -
The Journal of Thoracic and... Oct 2019
Topics: Aortic Dissection; Aorta, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Humans
PubMed: 31537254
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.07.052 -
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of... Jul 2021Mechanical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms using personalized biomechanical models is being widely investigated as an alternative criterion to assess risk...
Mechanical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms using personalized biomechanical models is being widely investigated as an alternative criterion to assess risk of rupture. These methods rely on accurate wall motion detection and appropriate model boundary conditions. In this study, multi-perspective ultrasound is combined with finite element models to perform mechanical characterization of abdominal aortas in volunteers. Multi-perspective biplane radio frequency ultrasound recordings were made under seven angles (-45° to 45°) in one phantom set-up and eight volunteers, which were merged using automatic image registration. 2-D displacement fields were estimated in the seven longitudinal ultrasound views, creating a sparse, high resolution 3-D map of the wall motion at relatively high frame rates (20-27 Hz). The displacements were used to personalize the subject-specific finite element model of which the geometry of the aorta, spine, and surrounding tissue were determined from a single 3-D ultrasound acquisition. Automatic registration of the multi-perspective images was successful in six out of eight cases with an average error of 5.4° compared to the ground truth. Displacements of the aortic wall were measured and cyclic strain of the aortic diameter was found ranging from 4.2% to 8.6%. The subject-specific mesh and inverse FE analysis was performed yielding shear moduli estimates for the wall between 104 and 215 kPa. Comparative results from a single-perspective workflow revealed very low aortic wall motion signal, which resulted in relatively high modulus estimates, between 230 and 754 kPa. Multi-perspective biplane ultrasound imaging was used to personalize finite element models of the abdominal aorta and its surroundings, and performing mechanical characterization of the aortic shear modulus. The method was found to be a more robust method compared to a single-perspective 3-D ultrasound approach. Future research will focus on investigating the use of multiple 3-D ultrasound acquisitions, the feasibility of free-hand scanning, the creation of a full 3-D automatic registration process, and with that, enable a clinical continuation of this study.
Topics: Aorta, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Finite Element Analysis; Humans; Models, Cardiovascular; Motion; Stress, Mechanical; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 33865067
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104509