-
Drugs & Aging Jul 2020Evidence regarding safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AFib) in older adults has been assessed regarding the age... (Review)
Review
A Structured Literature Review and International Consensus Validation of FORTA Labels of Oral Anticoagulants for Long-Term Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients (OAC-FORTA 2019).
INTRODUCTION
Evidence regarding safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AFib) in older adults has been assessed regarding the age appropriateness of oral anticoagulants (OAC) according to the FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) classification (OAC-FORTA). Three years after its first version (OAC-FORTA 2016), an update was initiated to create OAC-FORTA 2019.
METHODS
A structured review of randomized controlled clinical trials and summaries of individual product characteristics was performed to detect newly emerged evidence on oral anticoagulants in older patients with AFib. This review was used by an interdisciplinary panel of European experts (N = 10) in a Delphi process to label OACs according to FORTA.
RESULTS
A total of 202 records were identified and 11 studies finally included. We found four new trials providing relevant data on efficacy and safety of warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban in older patients with AFib. In the majority of studies comparing the non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin, NOACs were superior to warfarin regarding at least one relevant clinical endpoint. The mean consensus coefficient significantly increased from 0.867 (OAC-FORTA 2016) to 0.931 (p < 0.05) and the proposed FORTA classes were confirmed in all cases during the first round (consensus coefficient > 0.8). Warfarin, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were assigned to the FORTA B label, acenocoumarol, fluindione and phenprocoumon were labeled FORTA C and only apixaban was rated as FORTA A.
CONCLUSION
OAC-FORTA 2019 confirms that AFib can be successfully treated with positively labeled antithrombotics at advanced age.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Consensus Development Conferences as Topic; Dabigatran; Europe; Female; Humans; Long-Term Care; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K; Warfarin
PubMed: 32500503
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-020-00771-0 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases May 2021Vitamin K is hypothesised to play a role in osteoarthritis (OA) pathogenesis through effects on vitamin K-dependent bone and cartilage proteins, and therefore may...
OBJECTIVES
Vitamin K is hypothesised to play a role in osteoarthritis (OA) pathogenesis through effects on vitamin K-dependent bone and cartilage proteins, and therefore may represent a modifiable risk factor. A genetic variant in a vitamin K-dependent protein that is an essential inhibitor for cartilage calcification, matrix Gla protein (MGP), was associated with an increased risk for OA. Vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (VKAs), such as warfarin and acenocoumarol, act as anticoagulants through inhibition of vitamin K-dependent blood coagulation proteins. VKAs likely also affect the functioning of other vitamin K-dependent proteins such as MGP.
METHODS
We investigated the effect of acenocoumarol usage on progression and incidence of radiographic OA in 3494 participants of the Rotterdam Study cohort. We also examined the effect of and single nucleotide variants on this association.
RESULTS
Acenocoumarol usage was associated with an increased risk of OA incidence and progression (OR=2.50, 95% CI=1.94-3.20), both for knee (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.67-3.22) and hip OA (OR=2.74, 95% CI=1.82-4.11). Among acenocoumarol users, carriers of the high ) expression haplotype together with the OA risk allele (rs1800801-T) had an increased risk of OA incidence and progression (OR=4.18, 95% CI=2.69-6.50), while this relationship was not present in non-users of that group (OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.78-1.33).
CONCLUSIONS
These findings support the importance of vitamin K and vitamin K-dependent proteins, as MGP, in the pathogenesis of OA. Additionally, these results may have direct implications for the clinical prevention of OA, supporting the consideration of direct oral anticoagulants in favour of VKAs.
Topics: 4-Hydroxycoumarins; Acenocoumarol; Aged; Alleles; Anticoagulants; Calcium-Binding Proteins; Disease Progression; Extracellular Matrix Proteins; Female; Humans; Incidence; Indenes; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prospective Studies; Vitamin K; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Matrix Gla Protein
PubMed: 34412027
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219483 -
Biomedica : Revista Del Instituto... Sep 2021We present the clinical case of a 10-year-old patient diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy who registered INR values above 10 upon receiving standard doses of...
We present the clinical case of a 10-year-old patient diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy who registered INR values above 10 upon receiving standard doses of acenocoumarol, as well as other values reported as uncoagulable, forcing the discontinuation and restart of treatment more than once. Expected and stable INR levels were achieved after more than 30 days of treatment, surprisingly with half the recommended dose for a patient of her age and weight. We decided to conduct a retrospective pharmacogenomic analysis including nucleotide genetic polymorphisms (SNPs) with different degrees of association with the dose/response to antivitamin K (AVK) drugs: rs2108622 (gene CYP4F2), rs9923231, rs7294 (gene VKORC1), rs1799853, and rs1057910 (CYP2C9 gene) using TaqMan® RT-PCR. The patient was homozygous for rs9923231 (VKORC1) and heterozygous for rs2108622 (CYP4F2),a genetic profile strongly associated with a requirement of lower AVK doses as shown by national and international evidence. In conclusion, the pharmacogenetic analysis confirmed that this patient’s genetic conditions, involving low expression of the VKA therapeutic target, required a lower dose than that established in clinical protocols as recommended by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the PharmGKB® for coumarin drugs. A previous genotypic analysis of the patient would have allowed reaching the therapeutic range sooner, thus avoiding potential bleeding risks. This shows the importance of pharmacogenetic analyses for highly variable treatments with a narrow therapeutic range.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Child; Female; Genotype; Humans; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Retrospective Studies; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases
PubMed: 34559488
DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.5840 -
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis :... Mar 2017Essentials Prospective studies of pharmacogenetic-guided (PG) coumarin dosing produced varying results. EU-PACT acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon trials compared PG and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
UNLABELLED
Essentials Prospective studies of pharmacogenetic-guided (PG) coumarin dosing produced varying results. EU-PACT acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon trials compared PG and non-PG dosing algorithms. Sub-analysis of EU-PACT identified differences between trial arms across VKORC1-CYP2C9 groups. Adjustment of the PG algorithm might lead to a higher benefit of genotyping.
SUMMARY
Background The multicenter, single-blind, randomized EU-PACT trial compared the safety and efficacy of genotype-guided and non-genetic dosing algorithms for acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon in patients with atrial fibrillation or deep vein thrombosis. The trial showed no differences in the primary outcome between the two dosing strategies. Objectives To explore possible reasons for the lack of differences between trial arms by performing a secondary analysis of EU-PACT data in order to evaluate the performance of both dosing algorithms across VKORC1-CYP2C9 genetic subgroups. Patients/Methods Anticoagulation control measured according to an International Normalized Ratio (INR) below (INR of < 2), within (INR of 2-3) and above (INR of > 3) the therapeutic range was compared across VKORC1-CYP2C9 subgroups. Owing to a low number of patients in each subgroup, trials for acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon were combined for analysis. Results Four weeks after therapy initiation, genotype-guided dosing increased the mean percentage of time in the therapeutic INR range (PTIR) in the VKORC1 GG-CYP2C9*1*1 subgroup as compared with the non-genetic dosing (difference of 14.68%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.38-23.98). For the VKORC1 AA-CYP2C9*1*1 subgroup, there was a higher risk of under-anticoagulation with the genotype-guided algorithm (difference of 19.9%; 95% CI 11.6-28.2). Twelve weeks after therapy initiation, no statistically significant differences in anticoagulation control between trial arms were noted across the VKORC1-CYP2C9 genetic subgroups. Conclusions EU-PACT genetic-guided dose initiation algorithms for acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon could have predicted the dose overcautiously in the VKORC1 AA-CYP2C9*1*1 subgroup. Adjustment of the genotype-guided algorithm could lead to a higher benefit of genotyping.
Topics: Acenocoumarol; Aged; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Female; Genotype; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Phenprocoumon; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases
PubMed: 28063245
DOI: 10.1111/jth.13615 -
Journal of Clinical and Experimental... Dec 2017According to the Spanish Society of Cardiology, 700,000 patients receive oral anticoagulants, and in these cases bleeding on probing (BOP) could be altered. However, no...
BACKGROUND
According to the Spanish Society of Cardiology, 700,000 patients receive oral anticoagulants, and in these cases bleeding on probing (BOP) could be altered. However, no studies have analyzed the periodontal status of these patients and the effects anticoagulants may have upon BOP. A study was made of the possible relationship between plaque index, probing depth, INR (International Normalized Ratio) and acenocoumarol dose versus the clinical signs of BOP in a sample of anticoagulated patients. Likewise, an analysis was made of oral hygiene habits and attitude towards bleeding in these patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A controlled observational clinical study was made in La Ribera Hospital (Valencia, Spain) involving 44 anticoagulated patients treated with Sintrom® (acenocoumarol) and a homogeneous control group of 44 non-anticoagulated patients. A survey on oral hygiene habits and attitude towards bleeding was carried out, and the main periodontal parameters were recorded.
RESULTS
Probing depth was the parameter with the strongest correlation to BOP (<0.001), followed by the plaque index (<0.002). In contrast, no relationship was observed between acenocoumarol dose or INR and BOP. Mean BOP was greater in the control group than in the anticoagulated group (<0.001). Oral hygiene habits and attitude towards bleeding differed significantly between groups.
CONCLUSIONS
We have found no explanation why BOP was greater in the control group. What seems clear is that in the presence of the same plaque index and probing depth, anticoagulated patients did not bleed more than non-anticoagulated patients. A lack of knowledge of health and oral hygiene habits was observed in these subjects. Anticoagulant therapy, bleeding on probing, periodontal health.
PubMed: 29410759
DOI: 10.4317/jced.54331 -
Drugs & Aging Jul 2017Age appropriateness of anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is uncertain. (Review)
Review
Appropriateness of Oral Anticoagulants for the Long-Term Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Older People: Results of an Evidence-Based Review and International Consensus Validation Process (OAC-FORTA 2016).
BACKGROUND
Age appropriateness of anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
To review oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in older (age >65 years) people and to classify appropriate and inappropriate drugs based on efficacy, safety and tolerability using the Fit-fOR-The-Aged (FORTA) classification.
METHODS
We performed a structured comprehensive review of controlled clinical trials and summaries of individual product characteristics to assess study and total patient numbers, quality of major outcome data and data of geriatric relevance. The resulting evidence was discussed in a round table with an interdisciplinary panel of ten European experts. Decisions on age appropriateness were made using a Delphi process.
RESULTS
For the eight drugs included, 380 citations were identified. The primary outcome results were reported in 32 clinical trials with explicit and relevant data on older people. Though over 24,000 patients aged >75/80 years were studied for warfarin, data on geriatric syndromes were rare (two studies reporting on frailty/falls/mental status) and missing for all other compounds. Apixaban was rated FORTA-A (highly beneficial). Other non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (including low/high-intensity dabigatran and high-intensity edoxaban) and warfarin were assigned to FORTA-B (beneficial). Phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol and fluindione were rated FORTA-C (questionable), mainly reflecting the absence of data.
CONCLUSIONS
All non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin were classified as beneficial or very beneficial in older persons (FORTA-A or -B), underlining the overall positive assessment of the risk/benefit ratio for these drugs. For other vitamin-K antagonists regionally used in Europe, the lack of evidence should challenge current practice.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Consensus; Dabigatran; Delphi Technique; Europe; Evidence-Based Practice; Female; Humans; Long-Term Care; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin
PubMed: 28493216
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-017-0466-6 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2020Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are used as prophylaxis for thromboembolic events in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The most common VKA are warfarin and...
BACKGROUND
Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are used as prophylaxis for thromboembolic events in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The most common VKA are warfarin and acenocoumarol. These drugs have a narrow therapeutic margin and high inter-individual response variability due to clinical and pharmacogenetic variables.
OBJECTIVE
The authors aim to develop an algorithm comprised of clinical and genetic factors to explain the variability in the therapeutic dose of acenocoumarol among Chilean patients.
METHODOLOGY
DNA was obtained from 304 patients as a discovery cohort with an international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2.0-3.0. The non-genetic (demographic and clinical) variables were also recorded. Genotype analyses were performed using real-time PCR for (), (), () () () (), (), and ().
RESULTS
The clinical variables that significantly influenced the weekly therapeutic dose of VKA were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and initial INR, collectively accounting for 19% of the variability, and the genetic variables with a significant impact were (), (), and (), explaining for another 37% of the variability.
CONCLUSION
We developed an algorithm that explains 49.99% of the variability in therapeutic VKA dosage in the Chilean population studied. Factors that significantly affected the dosage included , , and polymorphisms, as well as age, sex, BMI, and initial INR.
PubMed: 32327994
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00325 -
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis :... May 2016The periprocedural management of patients receiving chronic therapy with oral anticoagulants (OACs), including vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin and direct... (Review)
Review
The periprocedural management of patients receiving chronic therapy with oral anticoagulants (OACs), including vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin and direct OACs (DOACs), is a common clinical problem. The optimal perioperative management of patients receiving chronic OAC therapy is anchored on four key principles: (i) risk stratification of patient-related and procedure-related risks of thrombosis and bleeding; (ii) the clinical consequences of a thrombotic or bleeding event; (iii) discontinuation and reinitiation of OAC therapy on the basis of the pharmacokinetic properties of each agent; and (iv) whether aggressive management such as the use of periprocedural heparin bridging has advantages for the prevention of postoperative thromboembolism at the cost of a possible increase in bleeding risk. Recent data from randomized trials in patients receiving VKAs undergoing pacemaker/defibrillator implantation or using heparin bridging therapy for elective procedures or surgeries can now inform best practice. There are also emerging data on periprocedural outcomes in the DOAC trials for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This review summarizes the evidence for the periprocedural management of patients receiving chronic OAC therapy, focusing on recent randomized trials and large outcome studies, to address three key clinical scenarios: (i) can OAC therapy be safely continued for minor procedures or surgeries; (ii) if therapy with VKAs (especially warfarin) needs to be temporarily interrupted for an elective procedure/surgery, is heparin bridging necessary; and (iii) what is the optimal periprocedural management of the DOACs? In answering these questions, we aim to provide updated clinical guidance for the periprocedural management of patients receiving VKA or DOAC therapy, including the use of heparin bridging.
Topics: Acenocoumarol; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve; Atrial Fibrillation; Elective Surgical Procedures; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Perioperative Care; Phenprocoumon; Prothrombin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Societies, Medical; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin
PubMed: 26988871
DOI: 10.1111/jth.13305 -
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology : HJC =... 2015Administration of anticoagulation is mandatory in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Vitamin K antagonists require regular monitoring and dosage...
INTRODUCTION
Administration of anticoagulation is mandatory in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Vitamin K antagonists require regular monitoring and dosage adjustment. Dabigatran administered in a standard dose twice daily is more convenient and achieves a stable anticoagulant effect, but its effectiveness and safety in patients with LVADs has not been investigated. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether dabigatran can be used safely as a second-line anticoagulation option in patients with a HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD.
METHODS
The study population consisted of 7 consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure who underwent HMII implantation and sequentially received acenocoumarol and dabigatran. Occurrence of stroke, systematic embolism, device thrombosis and major or life-threatening bleeding were included in the analysis. An acute decrease in plasma hemoglobin >2 g/dL or a need for transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) was defined as major bleeding, while an acute decrease in plasma hemoglobin >5 g/dL, fatal, symptomatic intracranial bleed, need for transfusion of at least 4 units PRBC, or association with hypotension requiring the use of intravenous inotropic agents or surgical intervention was defined as life-threatening bleeding.
RESULTS
The duration of follow up was 1564 ± 292 days. Patients received acenocoumarol for 855 ± 246 days, followed by dabigatran for 708 ± 368 days. The rates of thromboembolic events were similar under dabigatran and acenocoumarol treatment: strokes, 0.094 vs. 0 /patient-year, p=0.36; systemic embolism, no event in either group; and device thrombosis, 0.053 vs. 0.258 events/patient-year, p=0.19, respectively. Compared to an adjusted acenocoumarol dose, the standard dabigatran dose resulted in similar rates of life-threatening bleeding, but significantly lower rates of major bleeding (0.18 vs. 0.27 bleeds/patient-years, p=0.76, and 0.047 vs. 0.547, p<0.001, for dabigatran and acenocoumarol, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
The safe and effective use of dabigatran as a second-line anticoagulation therapy in patients with HMII seems feasible. However, these data must be confirmed in a randomized study.
Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Greece; Heart Failure; Heart-Assist Devices; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Postoperative Complications; Severity of Illness Index; Thromboembolism; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 25701968
DOI: No ID Found -
European Review For Medical and... Jul 2021The embolization of thrombi formed within the atria can occur in any form of atrial fibrillation (AF), i.e., paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent. Although ischemic... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
The embolization of thrombi formed within the atria can occur in any form of atrial fibrillation (AF), i.e., paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent. Although ischemic stroke is the most frequent embolic event associated with AF, embolization to other sites in the pulmonary and systemic circulations may occasionally occur. To avert the risk of embolization, long-term oral anticoagulation therapy is recommended for all AF patients if the CHA2DS2-VASC score is at least 1 for men and at least 2 for women. Since anticoagulant therapy is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, the choice of oral anticoagulant agent should be made by careful consideration of the benefit-to-risk ratio. The use of a newer class of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to the anti-vitamin K (AVK) anticoagulants (warfarin, acenocumarol, etc.) can help mitigate the need for periodic monitoring of International Normalized Ratio (INR) and adverse bleeding events that are commonly associated with the use of AVK anticoagulants. Though the use of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, apixaban, etc.) is gaining ground due to their relative safety profile and the low overall cost, quite a few clinicians remain skeptical about their use.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Our objective was to evaluate the risk of thromboembolism, stroke, neuropsychiatric illness, depression, and dementia, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who have been treated with either acenocumarol or apixaban, as well as to see the inflammatory status (ESR) and levels of fibrinogen. Our team at Municipal Emergency University Hospital, Timisoara, Romania, conducted a retrospective study using the medical records of AF patients who were treated with either apixaban or acenocumarol between 2016-2019. We divided the patients into two groups and compared the groups for the aforementioned outcomes.
RESULTS
AF patients who were prescribed apixaban had a lower rate of stroke and psychiatric illness compared to those on acenocumarol. No significant correlation was found in terms of risk of developing depression or dementia between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Non-valvular AF patients on apixaban had lower rates of thromboembolic events than the patients on acenocumarol. This article will serve as a reminder of the positive health and financial outcomes of apixaban use, especially to those healthcare systems that are still oblivious to the decrease in economic burden and gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) by the long-term use of NOACS/ DOACS instead of the AVK anticoagulants.
Topics: Acenocoumarol; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Decision-Making; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Romania; Stroke
PubMed: 34286492
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202107_26241