-
World Journal of Surgery Jul 2023Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common surgical presentations in Australia and increases with age. Guidelines recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within...
OBJECTIVES
Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common surgical presentations in Australia and increases with age. Guidelines recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 7 days), as it results in shorter length of stay, reduced costs and readmission rates. Despite this, there is a perception that early cholecystectomy may result in higher morbidity and conversion to open surgery in older patients. Our objective is to report the proportion of early versus delayed cholecystectomy in older patients in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and to compare health outcomes and factors influencing variation.
DESIGN
This is a retrospective population-based cohort study of all cholecystectomies for primary acute cholecystitis in NSW residents aged >50, between 2009 and 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of early versus delayed cholecystectomy. We used multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, insurance status, socio-economic status and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS
A high rate (85%) of the 47,478 cholecystectomies in older patients were performed within 7 days of admission. Delayed surgery was associated with increasing age and comorbidity, male sex, Medicare-only insurance and surgery in low- or medium-volume centres. Early surgery was associated with shorter overall length of stay, fewer readmissions, less conversion to open surgery and lower bile duct injury rates.
CONCLUSION
A high proportion of adults with cholecystitis are undergoing early cholecystectomy in NSW. Our results support the efficacy of early cholecystectomy in older patients and identify potentially modifiable factors relevant to health care professionals and policymakers.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Cohort Studies; National Health Programs; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Cholecystitis, Acute; Length of Stay; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37133808
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06968-9 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Mar 2021Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a potentially fatal complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT); however, only limited information is...
Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a potentially fatal complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT); however, only limited information is available on its clinical features, outcomes, and risk management strategies. This retrospective, nested, case-control study included 6701 patients undergoing allo-HSCT at our center from January 2004 to June 2019. In total, 72 patients (1.1%) were diagnosed with AC; among these, acute acalculous cholecystitis had a slightly higher prevalence (42 patients, 58.3%). Patients with moderate and severe AC exhibited remarkably worse overall survival (P = .001) and non-relapse mortality (P = .011) than others. Survival of haploidentical HSCT recipients with AC was comparable to that for patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical donors. Age ≥ 18 years, antecedent stage II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease, and total parenteral nutrition were identified as potential risk factors for AC following allo-HSCT, while haploidentical transplantations were not more susceptible to AC than HLA-identical HSCT. Based on these criteria, a risk score model was developed and validated to estimate the probability of AC following allo-HSCT. The model separates all patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups and thereby provides a basis for early detection of this complication in the management of allo-HSCT.
Topics: Adolescent; Case-Control Studies; Cholecystitis, Acute; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 33781524
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2020.12.016 -
Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi =... Mar 2020Cholecystectomy is the well-accepted management method for acute cholecystitis in patients suitable for surgery. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is planned and used in...
BACKGROUND
Cholecystectomy is the well-accepted management method for acute cholecystitis in patients suitable for surgery. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is planned and used in patients at high surgical risk due to acute symptomatic cholecystitis and/or acute or chronic comorbidity. Percutaneous cholecystostomy can provide permanent treatment, or it may act as a bridge for elective cholecystectomy.
METHODS
We presented the outcomes of 50 patients who initially underwent ultrasound-guided transhepatic percutaneous cholecystostomy and 4-6 weeks later, an interval cholecystectomy. All patients had either impaired gallbladder wall integrity on contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography performed during admission or had grade II acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo Guidelines 13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis or exhibited clinical signs of acute cholecystitis on the fifth day of non-operative treatment.
RESULTS
Our results suggest that although percutaneous cholecystostomy is a useful method for alleviation of the emergency clinical condition in acute cholecystitis, it makes the interval cholecystectomy more difficult to perform due to the dense fibrosis developing during the healing process, eventually complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
CONCLUSION
Cholecystostomy may cause fibrosis during the healing process, eventually complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thus, there is a need for better evaluation during the identification of indications for cholecystostomy.
Topics: Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Cholecystitis, Acute; Cholecystostomy; Gallbladder; Humans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32185772
DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.73557 -
BMC Gastroenterology Sep 2023Impact of advanced age on disease characteristics of acute cholecystitis (AC), and surgical outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has not been established.
BACKGROUND
Impact of advanced age on disease characteristics of acute cholecystitis (AC), and surgical outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has not been established.
METHODS
This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent LC for AC between April 2010 and December 2020. We analyzed the disease characteristics and surgical outcomes according to age: Group 1 (age < 60 years), Group 2 (60 ≤ age < 80 years), and Group 3 (age ≥ 80 years). Risk factors for complications were assessed using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS
Of the 1,876 patients (809 [43.1%] women), 723 were in Group 1, 867 in Group 2, and 286 in Group 3. With increasing age, the severity of AC and combined common bile duct stones increased. Group 3 demonstrated significantly worse surgical outcomes when compared to Group 1 and 2 for overall (4.0 vs. 9.1 vs. 18.9%, p < 0.001) and serious complications (1.2 vs. 4.2 vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (2.78 vs. 3.72 vs. 5.87 days, p < 0.001), and open conversion (0.1 vs. 1.0 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.007). Incidental gallbladder cancer was also the most common in Group 3 (0.3 vs. 1.5 vs. 3.1%, p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, body mass index < 18.5, moderate/severe AC, and albumin < 2.5 g/dL were significant risk factors for serious complications in Group 3.
CONCLUSION
Advanced age was associated with severe AC, worse surgical outcomes, and a higher rate of incidental gallbladder cancer following LC. Therefore, in patients over 80 years of age with AC, especially those with poor nutritional status and high severity grading, urgent surgery should be avoided, and surgery should be performed after sufficient supportive care to restore nutritional status before LC.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Female; Aged, 80 and over; Middle Aged; Male; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Gallbladder Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Cholecystitis, Acute; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37749524
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02954-6 -
World Journal of Emergency Surgery :... Feb 2023Hematologic patients requiring abdominal emergency surgery are considered to be a high-risk population based on disease- and treatment-related immunosuppression....
BACKGROUND
Hematologic patients requiring abdominal emergency surgery are considered to be a high-risk population based on disease- and treatment-related immunosuppression. However, the optimal surgical therapy and perioperative management of patients with abdominal emergency surgery in patients with coexisting hematological malignancies remain unclear.
METHODS
We here report a single-center retrospective analysis aimed to investigate the impact of abdominal emergency surgery due to clinically suspected gastrointestinal perforation (group A), intestinal obstruction (group B), or acute cholecystitis (group C) on mortality and morbidity of patients with coexisting hematological malignancies. All patients included in this retrospective single-center study were identified by screening for the ICD 10 diagnostic codes for gastrointestinal perforation, intestinal obstruction, and ischemia and acute cholecystitis. In addition, a keyword search was performed in the database of all pathology reports in the given time frame.
RESULTS
A total of 56 patients were included in this study. Gastrointestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction occurred in 26 and 13 patients, respectively. Of those, 21 patients received a primary gastrointestinal anastomosis, and anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in 33.3% and resulted in an AL-related 30-day mortality rate of 80%. The only factor associated with higher rates of AL was sepsis before surgery. In patients with suspected acute cholecystitis, postoperative bleeding events requiring abdominal packing occurred in three patients and lead to overall perioperative morbidity of 17.6% and surgery-related 30-day mortality of 5.9%.
CONCLUSION
In patients with known or suspected hematologic malignancies who require emergency abdominal surgery due to gastrointestinal perforation or intestinal obstruction, a temporary or permanent stoma might be preferred to a primary intestinal anastomosis.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Intestinal Obstruction; Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak; Cholecystitis, Acute
PubMed: 36747231
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00481-z -
World Journal of Surgery Jan 2023Acute cholecystectomy is standard treatment for acute cholecystitis. However, many patients are still treated conservatively and undergo delayed elective surgery. The...
BACKGROUND
Acute cholecystectomy is standard treatment for acute cholecystitis. However, many patients are still treated conservatively and undergo delayed elective surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the ideal time to perform an elective cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis.
METHODS
All patients treated for acute cholecystitis in Sweden between 2006 and 2013 were identified through the Swedish Patient Register. This cohort was cross-linked with the Swedish Register for Gallstone Surgery, GallRiks, where information on surgical outcome was retrieved. The impact of the time interval after discharge from hospital to elective surgery was analysed by multivariate logistic regression adjusting for gender and age.
RESULTS
After exclusion of patients not subjected to surgery, not registered in GallRiks and patients treated with acute cholecystectomy, 8532 remained. This cohort was divided into six-time categories. Using the first time interval < 11 days from discharge to elective surgery as the reference category the chance of completing surgery with a minimally invasive technique was increased for all categories (p < 0.05). The risk for perioperative complication and cystic duct leakage was reduced if surgery was undertaken > 30 days after discharge (both p < 0.05). The risk for bile duct injury was significantly increased if the procedure was undertaken > 365 days after discharge (p = 0.030). The chance of completing the procedure within 100 min was not affected by time.
CONCLUSION
For patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis, the safety of the procedure increases if surgery is performed more than 30 days after discharge from the primary admission.
Topics: Humans; Research; Sweden; Cholecystitis, Acute
PubMed: 36280615
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06772-x -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Dec 2022
Topics: Humans; Intestinal Volvulus; Cholecystitis, Acute; Gallbladder Diseases; Abdomen
PubMed: 36814421
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0157 -
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine :... Jun 2023What sonographic variables are most predictive for acute cholecystitis? What variables differentiate acute and chronic cholecystitis?
OBJECTIVES
What sonographic variables are most predictive for acute cholecystitis? What variables differentiate acute and chronic cholecystitis?
METHODS
The surgical pathology database was reviewed to identify adult patients who underwent cholecystectomy for cholecystitis and had a preceding ultrasound of the right upper quadrant within 7 days. A total of 236 patients were included in the study. A comprehensive imaging review was performed to assess for gallstones, gallbladder wall thickening, gallbladder distension, pericholecystic fluid, gallstone mobility, the sonographic Murphy's sign, mural hyperemia, and the common hepatic artery peak systolic velocity.
RESULTS
Of 236 patients with a cholecystectomy, 119 had acute cholecystitis and 117 had chronic cholecystitis on surgical pathology. Statistical models were created for prediction. The simple model consists of three sonographic variables and has a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 83% in predicting acute versus chronic cholecystitis. The most predictive variables for acute cholecystitis were elevated common hepatic artery peak systolic velocity, gallbladder distension, and gallbladder mural abnormalities. If a patient had all three of these findings on their preoperative ultrasound, the patient had a 96% chance of having acute cholecystitis. Two of these variables gave a 73-93% chance of having acute cholecystitis. One of the three variables gave a 40-76% chance of having acute cholecystitis. If the patient had 0 of 3 of the predictor variables, there was a 29% chance of having acute cholecystitis.
CONCLUSIONS
Gallbladder distension, gallbladder mural abnormalities, and elevated common hepatic artery peak systolic velocity are the most important sonographic variables in predicting acute versus chronic cholecystitis.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Gallbladder; Sensitivity and Specificity; Cholecystitis; Cholecystitis, Acute; Ultrasonography; Cholelithiasis; Probability
PubMed: 36457230
DOI: 10.1002/jum.16138 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Aug 2016Besides cholecystectomy (CC), percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been recommended for the management of critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis. However,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Besides cholecystectomy (CC), percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been recommended for the management of critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis. However, solid evidence on the benefit of PC in this subgroup of patients is lacking.
METHODS
In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, we systematically searched the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus for relevant studies published between 2000 and 2014. Two investigators independently screened the studies included.
RESULTS
Six studies with a total of 337 500 patients (PC 10 045, CC 327 455) were included for meta-analysis. Significant differences in favor of CC were recorded with regard to the rate of mortality (OR 4.28, [1.72 to 10.62], p = 0.0017), length of hospital stay (OR 1.41, [1.02 to 1.95], p = 0.04), and the rate of readmission for biliary complaints (OR 2.16, [1.72 to 2.73], p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between both intervention arms with regard to complications (OR 0.74, [0.36 to 1.53], p = 0.42) and re-interventions (OR 7.69, [0.68 to 87.33], p = 0.10).
CONCLUSION
The benefit of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) over cholecystectomy (CC) in the management of critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis could not be proven in this systematic review.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystitis, Acute; Cholecystostomy; Critical Illness; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Incidence; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27598871
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0545 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Jan 2015Acute abdominal pain is a common clinical condition. Clinical signs and symptoms can be difficult to interpret, and diagnostic imaging may help to identify... (Review)
Review
Acute abdominal pain is a common clinical condition. Clinical signs and symptoms can be difficult to interpret, and diagnostic imaging may help to identify intra-abdominal disease. Conventional X-ray, ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen vary in usability between common surgical causes of acute abdominal pain. Overall, conventional X-ray cannot confidently diagnose or rule out disease. US and CT are equally trustworthy for most diseases. US with subsequent CT may enhance diagnostic precision. Magnetic resonance seems promising for future use in acute abdominal imaging.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Acute Disease; Appendicitis; Cholecystitis, Acute; Diverticulitis; Humans; Ileus; Intestinal Perforation; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Pancreatitis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 25613211
DOI: No ID Found