-
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2023Prone cross-table lateral x-ray (CTLxR) and colostogram aid surgical planning for anorectal malformations (ARMs) without perineal fistulas. We suggest objective imaging...
PURPOSE
Prone cross-table lateral x-ray (CTLxR) and colostogram aid surgical planning for anorectal malformations (ARMs) without perineal fistulas. We suggest objective imaging tools to classify ARMs.
METHODS
Three observers prospectively evaluated CTLxR and colostograms of male ARM patients (2012-2022) without perineal fistulas. The level of the rectal pouch was estimated with pubococcygeal (PC) and ischiatic (I) lines. On CTLxR, we described the "pigeon sign", defined as the rectal pouch ending with a beak-like image, suspicious for a rectourinary fistula. ARM was defined as rectobulbar when the rectal pouch was below the I line, rectoprostatic when between PC and I lines, and rectovesical when above the PC line. Concordance was assessed with Fleiss' kappa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the "pigeon sign" were calculated.
RESULTS
Thirteen patients were included in this study. The interobserver agreement on CTLxR was 69.2% ( = 0.54) on pouch ending, 84.6% ( = 0.69) on the "pigeon sign", and 76.9% ( = 0.69) on diagnosis; concordance between observers and intraoperative diagnosis was 66.6% ( = 0.56). The "pigeon sign" had 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, and 50% NPV. The interobserver agreement on colostograms was 84.6% ( = 0.77) on pouch ending and 89.7% ( = 0.86) on diagnosis; concordance between observers and intraoperative diagnosis was 92.3% ( = 0.90).
CONCLUSION
PC and I lines and the "pigeon sign" are useful tools in examining CTLxR and colostograms. Adequate CTLxR interpretation may modify surgical strategy.
PubMed: 37609362
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1224620 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Mar 2023Rectoperineal congenital anorectal malformations (CARMs) are diagnosed by examining the perineum, combined with electric stimulation (ES) of the anal sphincter performed...
INTRODUCTION
Rectoperineal congenital anorectal malformations (CARMs) are diagnosed by examining the perineum, combined with electric stimulation (ES) of the anal sphincter performed under anesthesia. This procedure may be troublesome because it is based on the observed contractibility of the sphincter. We aimed to add 3-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D-HRAM) to the procedure and to assess its value for diagnosing rectoperineal forms of CARM.
METHODS
We prospectively included 66 patients younger than 24 months who presented with constipation and were suspected of CARM, idiopathic constipation, or Hirschsprung disease. The patients were assessed between 2015 and 2021 at University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands. All patients underwent 3D-HRAM, followed by the standard diagnostic procedure for either CARM or Hirschsprung disease.
RESULTS
Of the 51 patients who underwent both 3D-HRAM and ES, we observed that patients with rectoperineal CARM revealed a pressure gap along the anterior part of the anal sphincter. Based on this observation, we diagnosed 35 patients with CARM. Subsequently, all 35 diagnoses were confirmed with ES. Sixteen patients were diagnosed as not having CARM, 100% of whom were in agreement with the gold standard-ES. Both the specificity and sensitivity of 3D-HRAM for diagnosing rectoperineal CARM were 100%.
DISCUSSION
We consider 3D-HRAM a reliable tool for diagnosing and excluding rectoperineal CARM. Using this method in patients suspected of CARM might keep infants from undergoing unnecessary interventions requiring anesthetics, such as ES. By providing objective insight into the functional capabilities of the anal sphincter, anorectal manometry adds to the diagnosis.
Topics: Infant; Humans; Anorectal Malformations; Prospective Studies; Hirschsprung Disease; Manometry; Retrospective Studies; Anal Canal; Constipation; Rectum
PubMed: 36573421
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002121 -
Cureus Mar 2022Background Anorectal malformations are congenital defects wherein there is defective development of the anus and rectum. For babies born with congenital anorectal...
Background Anorectal malformations are congenital defects wherein there is defective development of the anus and rectum. For babies born with congenital anorectal malformations, prompt treatment is crucial which requires detection of the anomalies at the earliest. This study aimed to determine the epidemiology ofanorectal malformations in the Pediatric Unit of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan over a period of 19 months. Methodology An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted retrospectively from January 2020 to September 2021 using a non-randomized consecutive sampling technique. Patients aged less than eight years were included, whereas burnt, torn, and incomplete records from the Hospital Management Information System (HMIS) were excluded. SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. Binomial and multinomial logistic regression were applied for analyzing the association between explanatory and dependent variables. Results Of the 1,108 patients, 72 (6.5%) patients had anorectal malformations. Gastrointestinal diseases made up about 64.3% of all diseases. Among gastrointestinal causes, the prevalence of anorectal malformation was up to 10.1%. The mortality of anorectal malformation patients was low (2.85%) compared to mortalities due to other gastrointestinal abnormalities (8.25%). Anorectal malformation had significantly lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.19, p < 0.05) compared to other gastrointestinal abnormalities. Conclusions This study has provided data about the prevalence of anorectal malformation and its mortality which were calculated as 6.5% and 2.58%, respectively. Female gender, neonates, and delayed presentation were seen to have higher mortality, highlighting the need to screen all neonates pre- and post-natally to avoid any misdiagnosis.
PubMed: 35425683
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23136 -
Cell and Tissue Banking Sep 2022Many congenital malformations often require a multidisciplinary and multistep surgical treatment, including the use of biological membranes. Aims of the study were to...
Many congenital malformations often require a multidisciplinary and multistep surgical treatment, including the use of biological membranes. Aims of the study were to describe the use of these membranes for the correction of malformations, their clinical performance at follow-up, and patient's tolerance to them. The study included patients treated between 2009 and November 2020 in two referral centers. They were affected by abdominal wall defects (AWD), esophageal atresia/tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF), diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), spinal defects (SD), and anorectal malformations (ARM). The human origin membranes used during surgery were amniotic membrane, fascia lata, and pericardium provided by the local tissue bank and the porcine-derived membrane available on the market. Thirty-one patients were retrieved. The sample included 10 AWD, 7 EA/TEF, 5 CDH, 4 SD, 2 ARM, and 3 miscellaneous defects. The median age at repair was 139 days (range: 10,5-1494). The median follow-up was 1021 days (range: 485,5-1535). Two patients were lost at follow-up. The defects were successfully repaired and the membranes perfectly tolerated in 28/29 cases. In 1 case of CDH the fascia lata was replaced with a Goretex patch due to recurrence of the defect. This is the largest series on the use of biological membranes in congenital malformations. The variety of tissues allows to choose the best material for each malformation. The excellent tolerance and performance of this first series of patients encourage the use of these membranes to correct different type of malformations at any age.
Topics: Animals; Esophageal Atresia; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Swine; Tracheoesophageal Fistula
PubMed: 35381893
DOI: 10.1007/s10561-022-10003-x -
Cureus Dec 2023The present study aimed to review the treatment experience and outcomes of Currarino syndrome (CS) complicated with anorectal stenosis to evaluate the current treatment...
PURPOSE
The present study aimed to review the treatment experience and outcomes of Currarino syndrome (CS) complicated with anorectal stenosis to evaluate the current treatment strategies.
METHODS
Seven cases of CS complicated with anorectal stenosis, treated at our hospital between 1998 and 2021, were retrospectively investigated. This is a case series article from a single institution.
RESULTS
In six and three cases and one case, the presacral mass was a mature teratoma, meningocele, and lipoma, respectively. Resection of the lesion was performed in all six cases of mature teratoma, and duraplasty was performed before resection in all three cases of meningocele. Moreover, surgery for anorectal stenosis was performed simultaneously in four patients. Surgery was performed for six cases of anorectal stenosis, with the remaining case relieved by dilation using a metal bougie. The surgical methods used were a partial resection with end-to-end anastomosis, anorectal strictureplasty, pull-through, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, and cutback after mass resection. Pathological analysis of the anorectal stenoses revealed disorganized and rough smooth muscle fibers and the replacement of the stroma by an increased quantity of collagen fibers.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical outcomes of CS can be improved by establishing a treatment flow chart and understanding the complicated pathophysiology of the disease.
PubMed: 38226073
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50512 -
Scientific Reports Jan 2021The anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula is a rare anomaly in the spectrum of anorectal malformations. Aim of the study is to describe the series of...
The anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula is a rare anomaly in the spectrum of anorectal malformations. Aim of the study is to describe the series of patients with anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula and compare the outcome with patient with standard perineal fistula. From March 2012 to January 2019, 7 patients who suffered from anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula were retrospectively reviewed. Three were operated on primarily by our department, and 4 cases were re-operated after a perineal anoplasty repair performed elsewhere. Four were operated by laparoscopy assisted anorectoplasty, and 3 cases were repaired by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. The follow-up outcomes were compared with 71 cases of normal perineal fistula (NPF) in the same period. 7 cases have been followed up for 0.5-4 years (M = 2.57 ± 1.26) after definitive surgery. Their bowel function score was lower than normal perineal fistula (SPF = 12, range: 5-18; NPF = 18.5, range: 18-20). Four cases underwent anorectomanometry. The incidence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex was lower in the special type group. (p = 0.14). Three cases of contrast enema using barium: 2 cases of colorectal dilatation and thickening changes, 1 case showed no obvious abnormalities. Anorectal perineal fistula should be examined by distal colostogram at preoperation. This should be altered in: When suspecting a case of anorectal malformation type long perineal fistula a preoperative contrast enema could give insight of the anatomy befor performing a anoplasty.
Topics: Anal Canal; Anorectal Malformations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Laparoscopy; Male; Rectal Fistula; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33462249
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81056-3 -
Journal of Indian Association of... 2022Posterior cloacal malformations (PCMs) are distinguished from classical cloacal malformations by the posterior location of the common opening in the perineum. We aim to...
AIM
Posterior cloacal malformations (PCMs) are distinguished from classical cloacal malformations by the posterior location of the common opening in the perineum. We aim to describe our experience of management of these rare and complex malformations.
METHODS
This study was a retrospective chart review of all patients with PCM who underwent treatment at Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital (KSCH), New Delhi, and Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, between 2013 and 2021. Individual anatomical variations and their impact on the clinical presentation, management, and final outcome (cosmesis and function) were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS
During the study period, four girls with a median age of 2 (range: 0-5) years presented to us with PCM. Three patients were referred to KSCH as ambiguous genitalia whereas one patient was born at SGPGIMS with an antenatal diagnosis of "urorectal septal defect." On examination, three patients had the urogenital sinus (UGS) opening immediately anterior to the normally located anal opening (2 orifices), whereas one had a single orifice at the normal location of the anus with the UGS opening in the anterior rectal wall. Associated anomalies included: (a) hydrocolpos ( = 3), which was managed by a tube vaginostomy; (b) urethral duplication with dorsal atretic urethra ( = 3); (c) uterine didelphys ( = 1); (d) bilateral grade 5 vesicoureteric reflux ( = 1); and (e) vaginal calculus ( = 1). Total urogenital mobilization (anterior sagittal approach) with feminizing genitoplasty was performed for patients with UGS and normal anus ( = 3). In the patient with a single opening at the normal location of the anus, posterior sagittal ano-recto-urethro-vaginoplasty was performed. At a median follow-up of 24 months, three patients are continent for urine and stool, whereas one patient is yet to be toilet trained.
CONCLUSIONS
PCMs are unusual complex malformations that necessitate meticulous clinical examination, detailed diagnostic workup, and multistaged surgical management. Management should be tailored as per each individual patient's anatomy and clinical presentation for an optimal outcome.
PubMed: 36714474
DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_39_22 -
PloS One 2017Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the commonest anomalies in neonates. Both laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) and posterior sagittal... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the commonest anomalies in neonates. Both laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) can be used for the treatment of ARMs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare these two approaches in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched from 2000 to August 2016. Both randomized and non-randomized studies, assessing LAARP and PSARP in pediatric patients with high/intermediate ARMs, were included. The primary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay and total postoperative complications. The second outcome measures were rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, wound infection/dehiscence, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score, and Krickenbeck classification. The quality of the randomized and non-randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) respectively. The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADEpro.
RESULTS
From 332 retrieved articles, 1, 1, and 8 of randomized control, prospective and retrospective studies, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The randomized clinical trial was judged to be of low risk of bias, and the nine cohort studies were of moderate to high quality. 191 and 169 pediatric participants had undergone LAARP and PSARP, respectively. Shorter hospital stays, less wound infection/dehiscence, higher anal canal resting pressure, and a lower incidence of grade 2 or 3 constipation were obtained after LAARP compared with PSARP group values. Besides, the LAARP group had marginally less total postoperative complications. However, the result of operative time was inconclusive; meanwhile, there was no significant difference in rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score and Krickenbeck classification.
CONCLUSION
For pediatric patients with high/intermediate anorectal malformations, LAARP is a better option compared with PSARP. However, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.
Topics: Anal Canal; Anorectal Malformations; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Postoperative Complications; Rectum; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28099464
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170421 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2024During the second stage surgery for anorectal malformations (ARM), patients whose distal intestine of the colostomy is particularly short underwent laparoscopic-assisted...
PURPOSE
During the second stage surgery for anorectal malformations (ARM), patients whose distal intestine of the colostomy is particularly short underwent laparoscopic-assisted distal colon excision and proximal colon pull-through anorectoplasty (PCPARP). This study aimed to discuss the outcomes of PCPARP after colostomy in patients with ARM.
METHODS
This is a single-center propensity score-matched (PSM) study which was retrospectively initiated patients with intermediate- or high-type ARM who underwent laparoscopic surgery from June 2007 to December 2018. These patients were divided into PCPARP group and conventional laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) group according to specific surgical methods. The general data, surgical data, postoperative complications, and functional results were evaluated.
RESULTS
In total, 216 patients were included in this study: 190 (88.0%) undergoing LAARP approach and 26 (12.0%) undergoing PCPARP approach. After PSM, two well-balanced groups of 26 patients were analyzed and showed the postoperative complications ( = 0.126) and bowel function ( = 0.809) were similiar between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The curative effect of PCPARP after colostomy is similar to that of classic LAARP surgery, which can be used for ARM patients with a very short and abnormal distal intestine of the stoma.
PubMed: 38798309
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1402666 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Jun 2019Fetal megacystis presents a challenge in terms of counseling and management because of its varied etiology and evolution. The aim of this study was to present a...
OBJECTIVE
Fetal megacystis presents a challenge in terms of counseling and management because of its varied etiology and evolution. The aim of this study was to present a comprehensive overview of the underlying etiologies and structural anomalies associated with fetal megacystis.
METHODS
This was a retrospective multicenter study of cases referred to the fetal medicine unit of one of the eight academic hospitals in The Netherlands with a diagnosis of fetal megacystis. For each case, data on and measurements of fetal urinary tract and associated structural anomalies were collected. All available postmortem examinations and postnatal investigations were reviewed in order to establish the final diagnosis. In the first trimester, fetal megacystis was defined as longitudinal bladder diameter (LBD) ≥ 7 mm, and in the second and third trimesters as an enlarged bladder failing to empty during an extended ultrasound examination lasting at least 40 min.
RESULTS
Of the 541 pregnancies with fetal megacystis, it was isolated (or solely accompanied by other signs of lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO)) in 360 (67%) cases and associated with other abnormal ultrasound findings in 181 (33%) cases. The most common associated ultrasound anomaly was an increased nuchal translucency thickness (22%), followed by single umbilical artery (10%) and cardiac defect (10%). A final diagnosis was established in 418 cases, including 222 (53%) cases with isolated LUTO and 60 (14%) infants with normal micturition or minor isolated urological anomalies. In the remaining 136 (33%) cases, concomitant developmental or chromosomal abnormality or genetic syndrome was diagnosed. Overall, 40 chromosomal abnormalities were diagnosed, including trisomy 18 (n = 24), trisomy 21 (n = 5), Turner syndrome (n = 5), trisomy 13 (n = 3) and 22q11 deletion (n = 3). Thirty-two cases presented with anorectal malformations involving the anus, rectum and urogenital tract. In cases with confirmed urethral and anal atresia, megacystis occurred early in pregnancy and the bladder appeared severely distended (the LBD (in mm) was equal to or greater than twice the gestational age (in weeks)). Fetal macrosomia was detected in six cases and an overgrowth syndrome was detected in four cases, comprising two infants with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and two with Sotos syndrome. Megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome was diagnosed in five (1%) cases and prenatally suspected only in one case.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the main cause of fetal megacystis is LUTO, an enlarged fetal bladder can also be present as a concomitant finding of miscellaneous genetic syndromes, developmental disturbances and chromosomal abnormalities. We provide an overview of the structural anomalies and congenital disorders associated with fetal megacystis and propose a practical guide for the differential diagnosis of genetic syndromes and chromosomal and developmental abnormalities in pregnancies presenting with fetal megacystis, focusing on the morphological examination of the fetus. © 2018 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Abnormalities, Multiple; Colon; Female; Humans; Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction; Netherlands; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Urinary Bladder
PubMed: 30043466
DOI: 10.1002/uog.19182