-
PloS One 2021The incidence of stillbirth has decreased marginally or remained stable during the past decades in high income countries. A recent report has shown Stockholm to have a...
INTRODUCTION
The incidence of stillbirth has decreased marginally or remained stable during the past decades in high income countries. A recent report has shown Stockholm to have a lower incidence of stillbirth at term than other parts of Sweden. The risk of antepartum stillbirth increases in late term and postterm pregnancies which is one of the factors contributing to the current discussion regarding the optimal time of induction of labor due to postterm pregnancy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This is a cohort study based on the Stockholm Stillbirth Database which contains all cases of stillbirth from 1998-2018 in Stockholm County. All cases were reviewed systematically and the cause of death was evaluated according to the Stockholm Stillbirth Classification. Stillbirths diagnosed between gestational week (GW) 37+0 and 40+6 n = 605 were compared to stillbirths diagnosed from GW 41+0 and onwards n = 157, according to the cause of stillbirth and pregnancy and maternal characteristics. The aim was to evaluate the incidence of stillbirth over time and the incidence of stillbirth diagnosed from GW 41+0.
RESULTS
In Stockholm County the overall incidence of stillbirth has decreased from 4.6/1000 births during the period 1998-2004 to 3.4/1000 births during the period 2014-2018, p-value <0.001. When comparing the same time periods, the incidence of stillbirth diagnosed from GW 41+0 and onwards has decreased from 0.5/1000 births to 0.15/1000 births, p-value <0.001. Among women still pregnant at GW 41+0 the incidence of stillbirth has decreased from 1.8/ 1000 to 0.5/ 1000. When comparing stillbirths diagnosed at GW 37+0-40+6 with stillbirths diagnosed from GW 41+0 and onwards infection was a more common cause of stillbirth in the latter group.
CONCLUSION
In Stockholm County there was a decreasing incidence of stillbirth overall and in stillbirths diagnosed from 41+0 weeks of gestation and onwards during the period 1998-2018. In stillbirths diagnosed from GW 41+0 and onwards infection was a more common cause of death compared to stillbirths diagnosed between GW 37+0 and 40+6.
Topics: Adult; Cause of Death; Cohort Studies; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Labor, Obstetric; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy, Prolonged; Stillbirth; Sweden; Young Adult
PubMed: 34033674
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251965 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Nov 2022There is a renewed call to address preventable foetal deaths in high-income countries, especially where progress has been slow. The Centers for Disease Control and...
BACKGROUND
There is a renewed call to address preventable foetal deaths in high-income countries, especially where progress has been slow. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released publicly, for the first time, the initiating cause and estimated timing of foetal deaths in 2014. The objective of this study is to describe risk and characteristics of antepartum versus intrapartum stillbirths in the U.S., and frequency of pathological examination to determine cause.
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional study of singleton births (24-43 weeks) using 2014 U.S. Fetal Death and Natality data available from the National Center for Health Statistics. The primary outcome was timing of death (antepartum (n = 6200), intrapartum (n = 453), and unknown (n = 5403)). Risk factors of interest included maternal sociodemographic, behavioural, medical and obstetric factors, along with foetal sex. We estimated gestational week-specific stillbirth hazard, risk factors for intrapartum versus antepartum stillbirth using multivariable log-binomial regression models, conditional probabilities of intrapartum and antepartum stillbirth at each gestational week, and frequency of pathological examination by timing of death.
RESULTS
The gestational age-specific stillbirth hazard was approximately 2 per 10,000 foetus-weeks among preterm gestations and > 3 per 10,000 foetus-weeks among term gestations. Both antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth risk increased in late-term and post-term gestations. The risk of intrapartum versus antepartum stillbirth was higher among those without a prior live birth, relative to those with at least one prior live birth (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.61) and those with gestational hypertension, relative to those with no report of gestational hypertension (RR 1.47; 95% CI 1.09-1.96), and lower among Black, relative to white, individuals (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55-0.89). Pathological examination was not performed/planned in 25% of known antepartum stillbirths and 29% of known intrapartum stillbirths.
CONCLUSION
These findings suggest greater stillbirth risk in the late-term and post-term periods. Primiparous mothers had greater risk of intrapartum than antepartum still birth, suggesting the need for intrapartum interventions for primiparous mothers in this phase of pregnancy to prevent some intrapartum foetal deaths. Efforts are needed to improve understanding, prevention and investigation of foetal deaths as well as improve stillbirth data quality and completeness in the United States.
Topics: United States; Female; Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Stillbirth; Cross-Sectional Studies; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Sex Factors; Parturition
PubMed: 36447143
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05185-x -
Population Health Metrics Feb 2021Household surveys remain important sources of stillbirth data, but omission and misclassification are common. Classifying adverse pregnancy outcomes as stillbirths...
BACKGROUND
Household surveys remain important sources of stillbirth data, but omission and misclassification are common. Classifying adverse pregnancy outcomes as stillbirths requires accurate reporting of vital status at birth and gestational age or birthweight for every pregnancy. Further categorisation, e.g. by sex, or timing (intrapartum/antepartum) improves data to understand and prevent stillbirth.
METHODS
We undertook a cross-sectional population-based survey of women of reproductive age in five health and demographic surveillance system sites in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau and Uganda (2017-2018). All women answered a full birth history with pregnancy loss questions (FBH+) or a full pregnancy history (FPH). A sub-sample across both groups were asked additional stillbirth questions. Questions were evaluated using descriptive measures. Using an interpretative paradigm and phenomenology methodology, focus group discussions with women exploring barriers to reporting birthweight for stillbirths were conducted. Thematic analysis was guided by an a priori codebook.
RESULTS
Overall 69,176 women reported 98,483 livebirths (FBH+) and 102,873 pregnancies (FPH). Additional questions were asked for 1453 stillbirths, 1528 neonatal deaths and 12,620 surviving children born in the 5 years prior to the survey. Completeness was high (> 99%) for existing FBH+/FPH questions on signs of life at birth and gestational age (months). Discordant responses in signs of life at birth between different questions were common; nearly one-quarter classified as stillbirths on FBH+/FPH were reported born alive on additional questions. Availability of information on gestational age (weeks) (58.1%) and birthweight (13.2%) was low amongst stillbirths, and heaping was common. Most women (93.9%) were able to report the sex of their stillborn baby. Response completeness for stillbirth timing (18.3-95.1%) and estimated proportion intrapartum (15.6-90.0%) varied by question and site. Congenital malformations were reported in 3.1% stillbirths. Perceived value in weighing a stillborn baby varied and barriers to weighing at birth a nd knowing birthweight were common.
CONCLUSIONS
Improving stillbirth data in surveys will require investment in improving the measurement of vital status, gestational age and birthweight by healthcare providers, communication of these with women, and overcoming reporting barriers. Given the large burden and effect on families, improved data must be made available to end preventable stillbirths.
Topics: Birth Weight; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Perinatal Death; Pregnancy; Stillbirth
PubMed: 33557841
DOI: 10.1186/s12963-020-00239-8 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Sep 2022Almost two million stillbirths occur annually, most occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Nigeria is reported to have one of the highest stillbirth rates on the... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND
Almost two million stillbirths occur annually, most occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Nigeria is reported to have one of the highest stillbirth rates on the African continent. The aim was to identify sociodemographic, living environment, and health status factors associated with stillbirth and determine the associations between pregnancy and birth factors and stillbirth in the Murtala Mohammed Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
METHODS
A three-month single-site prospective observational feasibility study. Demographic and clinical data were collected. We fitted bivariable and multivariable models for stillbirth (yes/no) and three-category livebirth/macerated stillbirth/non-macerated stillbirth outcomes to explore their association with demographic and clinical factors.
FINDINGS
1,998 neonates and 1,926 mothers were enrolled. Higher odds of stillbirth were associated with low-levels of maternal education, a further distance to travel to the hospital, living in a shack, maternal hypertension, previous stillbirth, birthing complications, increased duration of labour, antepartum haemorrhage, prolonged or obstructed labour, vaginal breech delivery, emergency caesarean-section, and signs of trauma to the neonate following birth.
INTERPRETATION
This work has obtained data on some factors influencing stillbirth. This in turn will facilitate the development of improved public health interventions to reduce preventable deaths and to progress maternal health within this site.
Topics: Female; Humans; Incidence; Infant, Newborn; Maternal Health; Nigeria; Pregnancy; Stillbirth; Tertiary Healthcare
PubMed: 36076161
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04971-x -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Jul 2021Antepartum stillbirth, i.e., intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) above 24 weeks of gestation, occurs with a prevalence of 2.4-3.1 per 1000 live births in Central Europe. In...
BACKGROUND
Antepartum stillbirth, i.e., intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) above 24 weeks of gestation, occurs with a prevalence of 2.4-3.1 per 1000 live births in Central Europe. In order to ensure highest standards of treatment and identify causative and associated (risk) factors for fetal death, evidence-based guidelines on clinical practice in such events are recommended. Owing to a lack of a national guideline on maternal care and investigations following stillbirth, we, hereby, sought to assess the use of institutional guidelines and clinical practice after IUFD in Austrian maternity units.
METHODS
A national survey with a paper-based 12-item questionnaire covering demographic variables, local facilities and practice, obstetrical care and routine post-mortem work-up following IUFD was performed among all Austrian secondary and tertiary referral hospitals with maternity units (n = 75) between January and July 2019. Statistical tests were conducted using Chi and Fisher's Exact test, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
46 (61.3%) obstetrical departments [37 (80.4%) secondary; 9 (19.6%) tertiary referral hospitals] participated in this survey, of which 17 (37.0%) have implemented an institutional guideline. The three most common investigations always conducted following stillbirth are placental histology (20.9%), fetal autopsy (13.1%) and maternal antibody screen (11.5%). Availability of an institutional guideline was not significantly associated with type of hospital, on-site pathology department, or institutional annual live and stillbirth rates. Post-mortem consultations only in cases of abnormal investigations following stillbirth were associated with lower odds for presence of such guideline [OR 0.133 (95% CI 0.018-0.978); p = 0.047]. 26 (56.5%) departments consider a national guideline necessary.
CONCLUSIONS
Less than half of the surveyed maternity units have implemented an institutional guideline on maternal care and investigations following antepartum stillbirth, independent of annual live and stillbirth rate or type of referral centre.
Topics: Austria; Autopsy; Female; Gestational Age; Guidelines as Topic; Health Facilities; Humans; Maternal Age; Maternal Health Services; Placenta; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Stillbirth; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 34303351
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03995-z -
The Journal of Head Trauma...There have been no systematic studies of pregnancy outcomes among women with traumatic brain injury (TBI), potentially limiting informed clinical care for women with...
OBJECTIVE
There have been no systematic studies of pregnancy outcomes among women with traumatic brain injury (TBI), potentially limiting informed clinical care for women with such injuries. The purpose of this exploratory study was to evaluate pregnancy and fetal/neonatal outcomes among women with a TBI diagnosis recorded during their delivery hospitalization compared with women without TBI.
SETTING
In this cross-sectional study, we identified women with delivery hospitalizations using 2004-2014 data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Health Care and Cost Utilization Project.
PARTICIPANTS
We identified deliveries to women with a TBI diagnosis on hospital discharge records, which included all diagnoses recorded during the delivery, and compared them with deliveries of women without a TBI diagnosis.
MAIN MEASURES
Pregnancy outcomes included gestational diabetes; preeclampsia/eclampsia; placental abruption; cesarean delivery; and others. Fetal/neonatal outcomes included preterm birth; stillbirth; and small or large gestational age.
DESIGN
We modeled risk for each outcome among deliveries to women with TBI compared with women without TBI, using multivariate Poisson regression. Models included sociodemographic and hospital characteristics; secondary models added clinical characteristics (eg, psychiatric disorders) that may be influenced by TBI.
RESULTS
We identified 3 597 deliveries to women with a TBI diagnosis and 9 106 312 deliveries to women without TBI. Women with TBI were at an increased risk for placental abruption (relative risk [RR] = 2.73; 95% CI, 2.26-3.30) and associated sequelae (ie, antepartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery). Women with TBI were at an increased risk for stillbirth (RR = 2.55; 95% CI, 1.97-3.29) and having a baby large for gestational age (RR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09-1.56). Findings persisted after controlling for clinical characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS
Risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, including placental abruption and stillbirth, were increased among women with TBI. Future research is needed to examine the association between TBI and pregnancy outcomes using longitudinal and prospective data and to investigate potential mechanisms that may heighten risk for adverse outcomes.
Topics: Infant; Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Stillbirth; Abruptio Placentae; Premature Birth; Prospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Placenta; Brain Injuries, Traumatic
PubMed: 36731040
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000807 -
BJOG : An International Journal of... Aug 2018To identify risk factors for antepartum stillbirth, including fetal growth restriction, among women with well-dated pregnancies and access to antenatal care. (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVES
To identify risk factors for antepartum stillbirth, including fetal growth restriction, among women with well-dated pregnancies and access to antenatal care.
DESIGN
Population-based, prospective, observational study.
SETTING
Eight international urban populations.
POPULATION
Pregnant women and their babies enrolled in the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21 Project.
METHODS
Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare risks among antepartum stillborn and liveborn babies.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Antepartum stillbirth was defined as any fetal death after 16 weeks' gestation before the onset of labour.
RESULTS
Of 60 121 babies, 553 were stillborn (9.2 per 1000 births), of which 445 were antepartum deaths (7.4 per 1000 births). After adjustment for site, risk factors were low socio-economic status, hazard ratio (HR): 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2-2.1); single marital status, HR 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-2.8); age ≥40 years, HR 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4-3.7); essential hypertension, HR 4.0 (95% CI, 2.7-5.9); HIV/AIDS, HR 4.3 (95% CI, 2.0-9.1); pre-eclampsia, HR 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-3.8); multiple pregnancy, HR 3.3 (95% CI, 2.0-5.6); and antepartum haemorrhage, HR 3.3 (95% CI, 2.5-4.5). Birth weight <3rd centile was associated with antepartum stillbirth [HR, 4.6 (95% CI, 3.4-6.2)]. The greatest risk was seen in babies not suspected to have been growth restricted antenatally, with an HR of 5.0 (95% CI, 3.6-7.0). The population-attributable risk of antepartum death associated with small-for-gestational-age neonates diagnosed at birth was 11%.
CONCLUSIONS
Antepartum stillbirth is a complex syndrome associated with several risk factors. Although small babies are at higher risk, current growth restriction detection strategies only modestly reduced the rate of stillbirth.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
International stillbirth study finds individual risks poor predictors of death but combinations promising.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Fetal Weight; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stillbirth; Syndrome
PubMed: 28029221
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14463 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Jun 2021To determine whether decreased fetal growth velocity precedes antepartum fetal death and to evaluate whether fetal growth velocity is a better predictor of antepartum...
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether decreased fetal growth velocity precedes antepartum fetal death and to evaluate whether fetal growth velocity is a better predictor of antepartum fetal death compared to a single fetal biometric measurement at the last available ultrasound scan prior to diagnosis of demise.
METHODS
This was a retrospective, longitudinal study of 4285 singleton pregnancies in African-American women who underwent at least two fetal ultrasound examinations between 14 and 32 weeks of gestation and delivered a liveborn neonate (controls; n = 4262) or experienced antepartum fetal death (cases; n = 23). Fetal death was defined as death diagnosed at ≥ 20 weeks of gestation and confirmed by ultrasound examination. Exclusion criteria included congenital anomaly, birth at < 20 weeks of gestation, multiple gestation and intrapartum fetal death. The ultrasound examination performed at the time of fetal demise was not included in the analysis. Percentiles for estimated fetal weight (EFW) and individual biometric parameters were determined according to the Hadlock and Perinatology Research Branch/Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (PRB/NICHD) fetal growth standards. Fetal growth velocity was defined as the slope of the regression line of the measurement percentiles as a function of gestational age based on two or more measurements in each pregnancy.
RESULTS
Cases had significantly lower growth velocities of EFW (P < 0.001) and of fetal head circumference, biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length (all P < 0.05) compared to controls, according to the PRB/NICHD and Hadlock growth standards. Fetuses with EFW growth velocity < 10 percentile of the controls had a 9.4-fold and an 11.2-fold increased risk of antepartum death, based on the Hadlock and customized PRB/NICHD standards, respectively. At a 10% false-positive rate, the sensitivity of EFW growth velocity for predicting antepartum fetal death was 56.5%, compared to 26.1% for a single EFW percentile evaluation at the last available ultrasound examination, according to the customized PRB/NICHD standard.
CONCLUSIONS
Given that 74% of antepartum fetal death cases were not diagnosed as small-for-gestational age (EFW < 10 percentile) at the last ultrasound examination when the fetuses were alive, alternative approaches are needed to improve detection of fetuses at risk of fetal death. Longitudinal sonographic evaluation to determine growth velocity doubles the sensitivity for prediction of antepartum fetal death compared to a single EFW measurement at the last available ultrasound examination, yet the performance is still suboptimal. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Adult; Biometry; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Fetal Weight; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Perinatal Death; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Young Adult
PubMed: 32936481
DOI: 10.1002/uog.23111 -
Cureus May 2023Background Fetal death is the delivery of a fetus with no sign of life, as indicated by the absence of breathing, heartbeat, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite...
Background Fetal death is the delivery of a fetus with no sign of life, as indicated by the absence of breathing, heartbeat, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles. Nearly 2.6 million stillbirths are estimated to occur worldwide every year. Almost all of these (98%) stillbirths occur in low- and middle-income countries. About one-sixth of the stillbirths globally were recorded in India in 2019, making it the most burdened country in the world. In light of this, we conducted a study to identify the placental pathologies and maternal factors associated with stillbirth. Methodology A case-control study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Veer Surendra Sai Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (VIMSAR), from June 2022 to May 2023. Cases included pregnant women with a gestational age of 28 weeks or more who delivered a stillbirth infant at VIMSAR, and controls included gestational age-matched deliveries with live birth. Consent to participate in the study was obtained before enrolment. The final sample size was 79 cases and controls. The chi-square test was performed for bivariate analysis, and logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results In our study, we found a significant association between maternal age of more than 30 years (odds ratio (OR) = 3.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.91-4.22, p = 0.012), maternal education (with up to the primary level or less: OR = 6.19, 95% CI = 2.92-7.87, p = 0.012), history of addiction (tobacco chewing: OR = 5.58, 95% CI = 3.71-7.11, p = 0.03), and the number of antenatal visits (no visit: OR = 6.87, 95% CI = 2.91-7.79, p = 0.019) with an increased risk of stillbirth. Among the obstetrical complications, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (OR = 3.87, 95% CI = 1.98-5.11, p = 0.001), premature rupture of membranes (PROM)/preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) (OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.31-3.91, p = 0.03) and antepartum hemorrhage (APH) (OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.65-3.58, p = 0.02) were found to be significantly related with stillbirth. Among placental pathologies, uteroplacental vascular pathology (OR = 7.39, 95% CI = 3.01-8.97), acute chorioamnionitis (OR = 3.35, 95% CI = 2.11-5.21), chronic inflammation (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.91 4.17), calcific changes (OR = 4.46, 95% CI = 2.56-6.01), and retroplacental clots (OR = 9.95, 95% CI = 4.39-11.71) were associated with stillbirth. Conclusions In our study, advanced maternal age, absence of antenatal visits, low level of education, tobacco addiction, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, APH, and PROM in pregnancy were the major risk factors associated with stillbirth. Uteroplacental vascular pathology, chorioamnionitis, chronic inflammation, retroplacental hematoma, and calcific changes were the most significant placental lesions associated with stillbirth.
PubMed: 37351240
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39339 -
BMJ Global Health 2019Globally, every year 1.1 million antepartum stillbirths occur with 98% of these deaths taking place in countries where the health system is poor. In this paper we...
BACKGROUND
Globally, every year 1.1 million antepartum stillbirths occur with 98% of these deaths taking place in countries where the health system is poor. In this paper we examine the burden of misclassification of antepartum stillbirth in hospitals of Nepal and factors associated with misclassification.
METHOD
A prospective observational study was conducted in 12 hospitals of Nepal for a period of 6 months. If fetal heart sounds (FHS) were detected at admission and during the intrapartum period, the antepartum stillbirth (fetal death ≥22 weeks prior labour) recorded in patient's case note was recategorised as misclassified antepartum stillbirth. We further compared sociodemographic, obstetric and neonatal characteristics of misclassified and correctly classified antepartum stillbirths using bivariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULT
A total of 41 061 women were enrolled in the study and 39 562 of the participants' FHS were taken at admission. Of the total participants whose FHS were taken at admission, 94.8% had normal FHS, 4.7% had abnormal FHS and 0.6% had no FHS at admission. Of the total 119 recorded antepartum stillbirths, 29 (24.4%) had FHS at admission and during labour and therefore categorised as misclassified antepartum stillbirths. Multivariate analysis performed to adjust the risk of association revealed that complications during pregnancy resulted in a threefold risk of misclassification (adjusted OR-3.35, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.76).
CONCLUSION
Almost 25% of the recorded antepartum stillbirths were misclassified. Improving quality of data is crucial to improving accountability and quality of care. As the interventions to reduce antepartum stillbirth differ, accurate measurement of antepartum stillbirth is critical.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
ISRCTN30829654.
PubMed: 31908870
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001936