-
International Journal of Gynaecology... Nov 2019To classify cause-of-death (COD) for stillbirths occurring in a major referral hospital in Kumasi, Ghana.
OBJECTIVE
To classify cause-of-death (COD) for stillbirths occurring in a major referral hospital in Kumasi, Ghana.
METHODS
In a retrospective review conducted between June 8, 2011, and June 12, 2012, detailed information was collected on all stillbirths delivered at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. Patient records were independently reviewed by investigators using the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand's Perinatal Death Classification system to determine COD for each case.
RESULTS
COD was analyzed in 465 stillbirth cases. The leading causes of death were hypoxic interpartum death (105, 22.6%), antepartum hemorrhage (67, 14.4%), hypertension (52, 11.2%), and perinatal infection (32, 6.9%). One hundred and fifty seven (33.8%) stillbirths were classified as unexplained antepartum deaths.
CONCLUSIONS
This evaluation of stillbirth in a busy, tertiary care hospital in Kumasi, Ghana provides crucial insight into the high volume of stillbirth in Ghana as well as its medical causes. The study demonstrated the high rate of stillbirth attributed to hypoxic intrapartum events, placental abruption, pre-eclampsia, and unspecified bacterial infections. Yet, our rate of unexplained stillbirths underscores the need for a stillbirth classification system that thoughtfully integrates the needs and limitations of low-resource settings as unexplained stillbirth rates are a common indicator of the effectiveness of a classification system.
Topics: Adult; Cause of Death; Female; Ghana; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Obstetric Labor Complications; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Stillbirth
PubMed: 31353461
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12930 -
JAMA Network Open Apr 2021Women and families constitute the fastest-growing segments of the homeless population. However, there is limited evidence on whether women experiencing homelessness have... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
IMPORTANCE
Women and families constitute the fastest-growing segments of the homeless population. However, there is limited evidence on whether women experiencing homelessness have poorer childbirth delivery outcomes and higher costs of care compared with women not experiencing homelessness.
OBJECTIVE
To compare childbirth delivery outcomes and costs of care between pregnant women experiencing homelessness vs those not experiencing homelessness.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This cross-sectional study included 15 029 pregnant women experiencing homelessness and 308 242 pregnant women not experiencing homelessness who had a delivery hospitalization in 2014. The study used statewide databases that included all hospital admissions in 3 states (ie, Florida, Massachusetts, and New York). Delivery outcomes and delivery-associated costs were compared between pregnant women experiencing homelessness and those not experiencing homelessness cared for at the same hospital (analyzed using the overlap propensity-score weighting method and multivariable regression models with hospital fixed effects). The Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate procedure was used to account for multiple comparisons. Data were analyzed from January 2020 through May 2020.
EXPOSURE
Housing status at delivery hospitalization.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Outcome variables included obstetric complications (ie, antepartum hemorrhage, placental abnormalities, premature rupture of the membranes, preterm labor, and postpartum hemorrhage), neonatal complications (ie, fetal distress, fetal growth restriction, and stillbirth), delivery method (ie, cesarean delivery), and delivery-associated costs.
RESULTS
Among 15 029 pregnant women experiencing homelessness (mean [SD] age, 28.5 [5.9] years) compared with 308 242 pregnant women not experiencing homelessness (mean [SD] age, 29.4 [5.8] years) within the same hospital, those experiencing homelessness were more likely to experience preterm labor (adjusted probability, 10.5% vs 6.7%; adjusted risk difference [aRD], 3.8%; 95% CI, 1.2%-6.5%; adjusted P = .03) and had higher delivery-associated costs (adjusted costs, $6306 vs $5888; aRD, $417; 95% CI, $156-$680; adjusted P = .02) compared with women not experiencing homelessness. Those experiencing homelessness also had a higher probability of placental abnormalities (adjusted probability, 4.0% vs 2.0%; aRD, 1.9%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.5%; adjusted P = .053), although this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This study found that women experiencing homelessness, compared with those not experiencing homelessness, who had a delivery and were admitted to the same hospital were more likely to experience preterm labor and incurred higher delivery-associated costs. These findings suggest wide disparities in delivery-associated outcomes between women experiencing homelessness and those not experiencing homelessness in the US. The findings highlight the importance for health care professionals to actively screen pregnant women for homelessness during prenatal care visits and coordinate their care with community health programs and social housing programs to make sure their health care needs are met.
Topics: Adult; Case-Control Studies; Cesarean Section; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Fetal Distress; Fetal Growth Retardation; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Health Care Costs; Ill-Housed Persons; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Obstetric Labor Complications; Obstetric Labor, Premature; Parturition; Placenta Diseases; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Stillbirth; Uterine Hemorrhage; Young Adult
PubMed: 33885772
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7491 -
The Australian & New Zealand Journal of... Aug 2022The majority of perinatal deaths occur in the preterm period; however, current approaches predominantly focus on prevention in the term period. Reducing perinatal deaths...
AIM
The majority of perinatal deaths occur in the preterm period; however, current approaches predominantly focus on prevention in the term period. Reducing perinatal deaths in the preterm period is, therefore, key to reducing the rates of perinatal death overall in Australia. The aim was to understand the classifications of causes of preterm stillbirth and neonatal death in Victoria over time and by gestation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Retrospective study using state-wide, publicly available data. All births in Victoria between 2010 and 2018 included in the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection, excluding terminations of pregnancy for maternal psychosocial indications, were studied. Differences in causes of preterm perinatal mortality gestation group and over time were determined.
RESULTS
Out of 7977 perinatal deaths reported, 85.9% (n = 6849) were in the preterm period. The most common cause of preterm stillbirths was congenital anomalies (n = 1574, 29.8%), followed by unexplained antepartum deaths (n = 557, 14.2%). The most common cause of preterm neonatal death was spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB; n = 599, 38.2%), followed by congenital anomalies (n = 493, 31.4%). The rate of preterm stillbirths due to hypertension (-14.9% (95% CI -27.1% to -2.7%; P = 0.02)), maternal conditions (-24.1% (95% CI -44.2% to -4.0%; P = 0.03)) and those that were unexplained (-5.4% (95% CI -9.8% to -1.2%; P = 0.02)) decreased per annum between 2010 and 2018. All other classifications did not change significantly over time.
CONCLUSION
Prevention of congenital anomalies and sPTB is critical to reducing preterm perinatal mortality. Greater emphasis on understanding causes of preterm deaths through mortality investigations may reduce the proportion of those considered 'unexplained'.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Perinatal Death; Perinatal Mortality; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Retrospective Studies; Stillbirth; Victoria
PubMed: 35238402
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13497 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2024Antepartum fetal surveillance (AFS) is essential for pregnant women with diabetes to mitigate the risk of stillbirth. However, there is still no universal consensus on... (Review)
Review
Antepartum fetal surveillance (AFS) is essential for pregnant women with diabetes to mitigate the risk of stillbirth. However, there is still no universal consensus on the optimal testing method, testing frequency, and delivery timing. This review aims to comprehensively analyze the evidence concerning AFS and the most advantageous timing for delivery in both gestational and pregestational diabetes mellitus cases. This review's methodology involved an extensive literature search encompassing international diabetes guidelines and scientific databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The review process meticulously identified and utilized pertinent articles for analysis. Within the scope of this review, a thorough examination revealed five prominent international guidelines predominantly addressing gestational diabetes. These guidelines discuss the utility and timing of fetal well-being assessments and recommendations for optimal pregnancy resolution timing. However, the scarcity of clinical trials directly focused on this subject led to a reliance on observational studies as the basis for most recommendations. Glucose control, maternal comorbidities, and the medical management received are crucial in making decisions regarding AFS and determining the appropriate delivery timing.
PubMed: 38256447
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020313 -
PloS One 2023To determine stillbirth ratio and its association with maternal, perinatal, and delivery characteristics, as well as geographic differences in Latin American countries...
OBJECTIVE
To determine stillbirth ratio and its association with maternal, perinatal, and delivery characteristics, as well as geographic differences in Latin American countries (LAC).
METHODS
We analysed data from the Perinatal Information System of the Latin American Center for Perinatology and Human Development (CLAP) between January 2018 and June 2021 in 8 health facilities from five LAC countries (Bolivia, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic). Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics, in addition to pregnancy outcomes were reported. Estimates of association were tested using chi-square tests, and P < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Bivariate analysis was conducted to estimate stillbirth risk. Prevalence ratios (PR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each predictor were reported.
RESULTS
In total, 101,852 childbirths comprised the SIP database. For this analysis, we included 99,712 childbirths. There were 762 stillbirths during the study period; the Stillbirth ratio of 7.7/1,000 live births (ranged from 3.8 to 18.2/1,000 live births across the different maternities); 586 (76.9%) were antepartum stillbirths, 150 (19.7%) were intrapartum stillbirths and 26 (3.4%) with an ignored time of death. Stillbirth was significantly associated with women with diabetes (PRadj 2.36; 95%CI [1.25-4.46]), preeclampsia (PRadj 2.01; 95%CI [1.26-3.19]), maternal age (PRadj 1.04; 95%CI [1.02-1.05]), any medical condition (PRadj 1.48; 95%CI [1.24-1.76, and severe maternal outcome (PRadj 3.27; 95%CI [3.27-11.66]).
CONCLUSIONS
Pregnancy complications and maternal morbidity were significantly associated with stillbirths. The stillbirth ratios varied across the maternity hospitals, which highlights the importance for individual surveillance. Specialized antenatal and intrapartum care remains a priority, particularly for women who are at a higher risk of stillbirth.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Stillbirth; Latin America; Resource-Limited Settings; Risk Factors; Electronics
PubMed: 38134193
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296002 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jan 2019The optimal route of delivery in early-onset preeclampsia before 34 weeks is debated because many clinicians are reluctant to proceed with induction for perceived high... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
The optimal route of delivery in early-onset preeclampsia before 34 weeks is debated because many clinicians are reluctant to proceed with induction for perceived high risk of failure.
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to investigate labor induction success rates and compare maternal and neonatal outcomes by intended mode of delivery in women with early preterm preeclampsia.
STUDY DESIGN
We identified 914 singleton pregnancies with preeclampsia in the Consortium on Safe Labor study for analysis who delivered between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks. We excluded fetal anomalies, antepartum stillbirth, or spontaneous preterm labor. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women undergoing induction of labor (n = 460) and planned cesarean delivery (n = 454) and women with successful induction of labor (n = 214) and unsuccessful induction of labor (n = 246). We calculated relative risks and 95% confidence intervals to determine outcomes by Poisson regression model with propensity score adjustment. The calculation of propensity scores considered covariates such as maternal age, gestational age, parity, body mass index, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, hospital type and site, birthweight, history of cesarean delivery, malpresentation/breech, simplified Bishop score, insurance, marital status, and steroid use.
RESULTS
Among the 460 women with induction (50%), 47% of deliveries were vaginal. By gestational age, 24 to 27 6/7, 28 to 31 6/7, and 32 to 33 6/7, the induction of labor success rates were 38% (12 of 32), 39% (70 of 180), and 54% (132 of 248), respectively. Induction of labor compared with planned cesarean delivery was less likely to be associated with placental abruption (adjusted relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.67), wound infection or separation (adjusted relative risk, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.85), and neonatal asphyxia (0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.78). Women with vaginal delivery compared with those with failed induction of labor had decreased maternal morbidity (adjusted relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.82) and no difference in neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSION
About half of women with preterm preeclampsia who attempted an induction had a successful vaginal delivery. The rate of successful vaginal delivery increases with gestational age. Successful induction has the benefit of preventing maternal and fetal comorbidities associated with previous cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies. While overall rates of a composite of serious maternal and neonatal morbidity/mortality did not differ between induction of labor and planned cesarean delivery groups, women with failed induction of labor had increased maternal morbidity highlighting the complex route of delivery counseling required in this high-risk population of women.
Topics: Adult; Cesarean Section; Clinical Decision-Making; Cohort Studies; Decision Making; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Labor, Induced; Labor, Obstetric; Maternal Mortality; Natural Childbirth; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; United States; Young Adult
PubMed: 30273585
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.027 -
Frontiers in Reproductive Health 2024International studies have reported conflicting data about the effects of COVID-19 pandemic policy measures on maternal and neonatal health. A major impact was reported...
BACKGROUND
International studies have reported conflicting data about the effects of COVID-19 pandemic policy measures on maternal and neonatal health. A major impact was reported on stillbirth and prematurity. The published literature suggests that the economic setting influenced the effects of imposed mitigation measures with a more severe effect in low-income countries.
OBJECTIVES
Our objective is to compare pregnancy outcomes at the only tertiary Maternity Hospital in Bihor County-Romania before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to observe and document differences in perinatal outcomes across these periods, without inferring direct causation related to the pandemic or its associated restrictions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We used data from the registries of Public Health Services Bihor to conduct a retrospective cohort analysis of preterm births and stillbirths during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bihor County, Romania. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between the pandemic period (March 2020-February 2022) to the corresponding historical pre-COVID-19 period (March 2018-February 2020). Maternal socio-demographic variables and neonatal characteristics of these periods were also examined.
RESULTS
The COVID-19 pandemic period was associated with an increase in the stillbirth rate (RR: 1.53, 95% CI, 1.05-2.23). Preterm birth was significantly impacted during this period and showed changes when analyzing gestational age (RR: 0.88, 95% CI, 0.79-0.96) or birth weight (RR: 0.91, 95% CI, 0.82-1.00). The main cause of stillbirth was intrauterine asphyxia due to placental causes (67.6%) or cord pathology (12.6%), the most frequently encountered maternal pathology was cardiovascular (28.3%) or infectious (21.7%). Our study revealed no significant changes in terms of maternal and neonatal characteristics during the two-year pandemic period.
CONCLUSIONS
Lockdown restrictions in Bihor County, Romania were associated with an increase in stillbirths, whilst preterm birth rate decreased. This raises concerns about whether pandemic policy measures may have led to a failure in identifying and offering proper care for pregnant women who were more likely to experience an antepartum loss. Further studies across the globe are needed in order to integrate comparable data that will help develop adequate protocols and policies for protecting maternal and child health during the next pandemic that will follow.
PubMed: 38486846
DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1286496 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Nov 2016To develop a model for the prediction of stillbirth that is based on a combination of maternal characteristics and medical history with first-trimester biochemical and...
OBJECTIVES
To develop a model for the prediction of stillbirth that is based on a combination of maternal characteristics and medical history with first-trimester biochemical and biophysical markers and to evaluate the performance of screening with this model for all stillbirths and those due to impaired placentation and unexplained causes.
METHODS
This was a prospective screening study of 76 897 singleton pregnancies, including 76 629 live births and 268 (0.35%) antepartum stillbirths; 157 (59%) were secondary to impaired placentation and 111 (41%) were due to other or unexplained causes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine if there was a significant contribution to prediction of stillbirth from the maternal factor-derived a-priori risk, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, ductus venosus pulsatility index for veins (DV-PIV), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and maternal serum free β-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). The significant contributors were used to derive a model for first-trimester prediction of stillbirth.
RESULTS
Significant contribution to prediction of stillbirth was provided by maternal factors, PAPP-A, UtA-PI and DV-PIV. A model combining these variables predicted 40% of all stillbirths and 55% of those due to impaired placentation, at a false-positive rate of 10%. Within the impaired-placentation group, the detection rate of stillbirth < 32 weeks' gestation was higher than that of stillbirth ≥ 37 weeks (64% vs 42%).
CONCLUSIONS
A model based on maternal factors and first-trimester biomarkers can potentially predict more than half of subsequent stillbirths that occur due to impaired placentation. The extent to which such stillbirths could be prevented remains to be determined. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Topics: Biomarkers; Early Diagnosis; Female; Humans; Live Birth; Logistic Models; Models, Theoretical; Placenta; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Prospective Studies; Stillbirth
PubMed: 27561595
DOI: 10.1002/uog.17289 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Sep 2021Maternal anemia is a common pregnancy complication and often leads to a requirement for additional treatments and interventions. Identifying the frequency at which women...
BACKGROUND
Maternal anemia is a common pregnancy complication and often leads to a requirement for additional treatments and interventions. Identifying the frequency at which women with antenatally diagnosed anemia experience severe morbidity at the time of admission to the labor and delivery unit will guide future recommendations regarding screening and interventions for anemia during pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between antenatally diagnosed anemia and severe maternal morbidity as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in a large, contemporary, US cohort. Neonatal outcomes were also examined.
STUDY DESIGN
This was a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor database from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, which collected data on 228,438 deliveries in 19 United States hospitals from 2002 to 2008. This analysis included women with viable, singleton gestations and excluded stillbirths and gestations with severe congenital anomalies. Women with a diagnosis of antenatal anemia were compared with those without. Identification of diagnoses of antenatal anemia was obtained via electronic medical record abstraction and International Classification of Diseases coding according to each hospital protocol within the Consortium on Safe Labor. The primary maternal outcome consisted of a composite of severe maternal morbidity as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and included maternal death, eclampsia, thrombosis, transfusion, hysterectomy, and maternal intensive care unit admission. The primary neonatal outcome was a composite that included a 5-minute Apgar score of <7, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, seizures, intracranial hemorrhage, periventricular or intraventricular hemorrhage, neonatal sepsis, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal death. Each outcome within the composites was assessed individually along with other additional secondary outcomes, including a composite of severe maternal morbidity not including transfusion morbidity. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata version 14.2 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX) using Student's t test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression was performed with potential confounding variables entered into the regression equation if they differed between groups at a significance level of P<.05.
RESULTS
A total of 166,566 women met the inclusion criteria. From the original cohort, 56,734 women could not be included because of an unknown diagnosis of anemia. Of those included, 10,217 (6.1%) were diagnosed with anemia during the pregnancy. Women with anemia were more likely to be younger, non-Hispanic Black, single, multiparous, and have a higher prepregnancy body mass index than those without anemia. The frequency of the primary maternal composite outcome, the neonatal composite outcome, and other secondary outcomes including the severe maternal morbidity composite not including transfusion, maternal death, transfusion during labor and the postpartum period, hysterectomy, postpartum hemorrhage, infectious morbidity, cesarean delivery, and preterm delivery were more common in women with anemia (P<.05). After multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for confounders, higher rates of severe maternal morbidity remained persistently associated with anemia (adjusted odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-2.23) in addition to the association of anemia with the severe maternal morbidity composite not including transfusion, maternal death, thrombosis, transfusion, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, postpartum hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, and infectious morbidity. The composite neonatal outcome also remained associated with anemia after adjusting for confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.23).
CONCLUSION
Women with antepartum anemia experienced increased rates of severe maternal morbidity and other serious adverse outcomes. Diagnosis and treatment of anemia during the antepartum period may lead to the identification and treatment of women at higher risk for maternal morbidity and mortality.
Topics: Anemia; Cesarean Section; Child; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Obstetric Labor Complications; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; United States
PubMed: 33992832
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100395 -
Reproductive Health Nov 2020Stillbirth rates are high and represent a substantial proportion of the under-5 mortality in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). In LMIC, where nearly 98% of...
BACKGROUND
Stillbirth rates are high and represent a substantial proportion of the under-5 mortality in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). In LMIC, where nearly 98% of stillbirths worldwide occur, few population-based studies have documented cause of stillbirths or the trends in rate of stillbirth over time.
METHODS
We undertook a prospective, population-based multi-country research study of all pregnant women in defined geographic areas across 7 sites in low-resource settings (Kenya, Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala). Staff collected demographic and health care characteristics with outcomes obtained at delivery. Cause of stillbirth was assigned by algorithm.
RESULTS
From 2010 through 2018, 573,148 women were enrolled with delivery data obtained. Of the 552,547 births that reached 500 g or 20 weeks gestation, 15,604 were stillbirths; a rate of 28.2 stillbirths per 1000 births. The stillbirth rates were 19.3 in the Guatemala site, 23.8 in the African sites, and 33.3 in the Asian sites. Specifically, stillbirth rates were highest in the Pakistan site, which also documented a substantial decrease in stillbirth rates over the study period, from 56.0 per 1000 (95% CI 51.0, 61.0) in 2010 to 44.4 per 1000 (95% CI 39.1, 49.7) in 2018. The Nagpur, India site also documented a substantial decrease in stillbirths from 32.5 (95% CI 29.0, 36.1) to 16.9 (95% CI 13.9, 19.9) per 1000 in 2018; however, other sites had only small declines in stillbirth over the same period. Women who were less educated and older as well as those with less access to antenatal care and with vaginal assisted delivery were at increased risk of stillbirth. The major fetal causes of stillbirth were birth asphyxia (44.0% of stillbirths) and infectious causes (22.2%). The maternal conditions that were observed among those with stillbirth were obstructed or prolonged labor, antepartum hemorrhage and maternal infections.
CONCLUSIONS
Over the study period, stillbirth rates have remained relatively high across all sites. With the exceptions of the Pakistan and Nagpur sites, Global Network sites did not observe substantial changes in their stillbirth rates. Women who were less educated and had less access to antenatal and obstetric care remained at the highest burden of stillbirth.
STUDY REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.gov (ID# NCT01073475).
Topics: Delivery, Obstetric; Developing Countries; Female; Guatemala; Humans; India; Infant, Newborn; Kenya; Male; Obstetric Labor Complications; Pakistan; Population Surveillance; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Stillbirth; Zambia
PubMed: 33256783
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-00991-y