-
American Journal of Cardiovascular... Mar 2022Increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are recognized as a primary risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which remains the... (Review)
Review
Increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are recognized as a primary risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Lowering LDL-C levels clearly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events, with benefits related to both absolute reduction and duration of treatment; however, a threshold below which low LDL-C levels can be dangerous has never been established. Since the discovery of statins, cardiovascular research has focused on developing new lipid-lowering agents. Ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors have been found to further reduce LDL-C values and subsequent cardiovascular risk. Novel recently approved inclisiran and bempedoic acid, currently being tested in cardiovascular outcomes studies, are further expanding our pharmacological armamentarium, enabling the clinician to diminish residual risk related to LDL-C. Moreover, new agents are paving the way to successful treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. This review summarizes the main characteristics of current and emerging lipid-lowering therapies to assist with comprehensive evidence-based decision making.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Cholesterol, LDL; Ezetimibe; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypolipidemic Agents; Proprotein Convertase 9
PubMed: 34514551
DOI: 10.1007/s40256-021-00497-3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2016The results from controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the treatment of active Crohn's disease have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The results from controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the treatment of active Crohn's disease have been conflicting and controversial. An updated meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of these drugs for the induction of remission in active Crohn's disease.
OBJECTIVES
The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for induction of remission in active Crohn's disease.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to 30 October 2015. Review articles and conference proceedings were also searched to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine compared to placebo or active therapy involving adult patients with active Crohn's disease were selected for inclusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were extracted by two independent observers based on the intention-to-treat principle. Outcomes of interest included: clinical remission, clinical improvement, fistula improvement or healing, steroid sparing, adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each outcome. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The overall quality of the evidence supporting each outcome was assessed using the GRADE criteria.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirteen RCTs (n = 1211 patients) of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine therapy in adult patients were identified: nine included placebo comparators and six included active comparators. The majority of included studies were rated as low risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical remission rates between azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and placebo. Forty-eight per cent (95/197) of patients receiving antimetabolites achieved remission compared to 37% (68/183) of placebo patients (5 studies, 380 patients; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.55). There was no statistically significant difference in clinical improvement rates between azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and placebo. Forty-eight per cent (107/225) of patients receiving antimetabolites achieved clinical improvement or remission compared to 36% (75/209) of placebo patients (8 studies, 434 patients; RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.62). There was a statistically significant difference in steroid sparing (defined as prednisone dose < 10 mg/day while maintaining remission) between azathioprine and placebo. Sixty-four per cent (47/163) of azathioprine patients were able to reduce their prednisone dose to < 10 mg/day compared to 46% (32/70) of placebo patients (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.77). GRADE analyses rated the overall quality of the evidence for the outcomes clinical remission, clinical improvement and steroid sparing as moderate due to sparse data. There was no statistically significant difference in withdrawals due to adverse events or serious adverse events between antimetabolites and placebo. Ten percent of patients in the antimetabolite group withdrew due to adverse events compared to 5% of placebo patients (8 studies, 510 patients; RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.08). Serious adverse events were reported in 14% of patients receiving azathioprine compared to 4% of placebo patients (2 studies, 216 patients; RR 2.57, 95% CI 0.92 to 7.13). Common adverse events reported in the placebo controlled studies included: allergic reactions. leukopenia, pancreatitis and nausea. Azathioprine was significantly inferior to infliximab for induction of steroid-free clinical remission. Thirty per cent (51/170) of azathioprine patients achieved steroid-free remission compared to 44% (75/169) of infliximab patients (1 study, 339 patients; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90). The combination of azathioprine and infliximab was significantly superior to infliximab alone for induction of steroid-free clinical remission. Sixty per cent (116/194) of patients in the combined azathioprine and infliximab group achieved steroid-free remission compared to 48% (91/189) of infliximab patients (2 studies, 383 patients; RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.47). Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine therapy was found to be no better at inducing steroid free clinical remission compared to methotrexate (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.49) and 5-aminosalicylate or sulfasalazine (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.91). There were no statistically significant differences in withdrawals due to adverse events between azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.71); between azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and 5-aminosalicylate or sulfasalazine (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.54); between azathioprine and infliximab (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.23); or between the combination of azathioprine and infliximab and infliximab (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.80). Common adverse events in the active comparator trials included nausea, abdominal pain, pyrexia and headache.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine offer no advantage over placebo for induction of remission or clinical improvement in active Crohn's disease. Antimetaboilte therapy may allow patients to reduce steroid consumption. Adverse events were more common in patients receiving antimetabolites although differences with placebo were not statistically significant. Azathioprine therapy is inferior to infliximab for induction of steroid-free remission. However, the combination of azathioprine and infliximab was superior to infliximab alone for induction of steroid-free remission.
Topics: Adult; Antimetabolites; Azathioprine; Crohn Disease; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Induction Chemotherapy; Infliximab; Mercaptopurine; Mesalamine; Prednisone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfasalazine; Withholding Treatment
PubMed: 27783843
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000545.pub5 -
Journal of Cardiology Jul 2024Statin-intolerance (SI) has prevalence between 8.0 % and 10 %, and muscular complaints are the most common reason for discontinuation. Bempedoic acid (BA), an ATP... (Review)
Review
Statin-intolerance (SI) has prevalence between 8.0 % and 10 %, and muscular complaints are the most common reason for discontinuation. Bempedoic acid (BA), an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor, decreases hepatic generation of cholesterol, upregulates low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor expression in the liver, and eventually clears circulating LDL-cholesterol from the blood. Multiple randomized clinical trials studying BA demonstrate a reduction in LDL levels by 17-28 % in SI. The CLEAR OUTCOME trial established significant cardiovascular benefits with BA. A dose of 180 mg/day of BA showed promising results. BA alone or in combination with ezetimibe is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and/or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. BA reduced HbA1c by 0.12 % (p < 0.0001) in patients with diabetes. Adverse events of BA include myalgia (4.7 %), anemia (3.4 %), and increased aminotransferases (0.3 %). BA can cause up to four times higher risk of gout in those with a previous gout diagnosis or high serum uric acid levels. Reports of increased blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were noted. Current evidence does not demonstrate a reduction in deaths from cardiovascular causes. More studies that include a diverse population and patients with both high and low LDL levels should be conducted. We recommend that providers consider BA as an adjunct to statin therapy in patients with a maximally tolerated dosage to specifically target LDL levels.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Dicarboxylic Acids; Fatty Acids; Cholesterol, LDL; Ezetimibe; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Anticholesteremic Agents; Hypercholesterolemia
PubMed: 38521120
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.03.006 -
Revue Medicale de Liege Apr 2020LDL cholesterol targets are increasingly strict in recent international guidelines, especially in patients at very high or high cardiovascular risk. To reach these...
LDL cholesterol targets are increasingly strict in recent international guidelines, especially in patients at very high or high cardiovascular risk. To reach these targets, it is recommended to use a potent statin, with a titration up to the maximal tolerated dose and, if not sufficient, to combine ezetimibe, a medication that blocks the intestinal absorption of cholesterol. This association allows reduce the dose of statin, while keeping an excellent cholesterol-lowering efficacy and favouring a good tolerance profile. This article describes the characteristics of a fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin, the most potent statin, and ezetimibe, commercialized in Belgium under the trade name Myrosor®.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Belgium; Cholesterol, LDL; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ezetimibe; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypercholesterolemia; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32267116
DOI: No ID Found -
Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 2016Microemulsions combine the advantages of emulsions with those of nanocarriers, overcoming the stability problems of the former and providing facile scalable systems with... (Review)
Review
Microemulsions combine the advantages of emulsions with those of nanocarriers, overcoming the stability problems of the former and providing facile scalable systems with compartments adequate for high drug loadings. Recently, microemulsions are gaining attention in the formulation of anticancer drugs not only for topical treatment, but also for systemic delivery as well as for the development of theranostic systems. The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, an updated review about general features, preparation, characterization and pharmaceutical applications, with a special focus on colorectal cancer, is provided. Second, a case study of formulation of methotrexate in microemulsions is presented. Various essential oils (menthol, trans-anethole, α-tocopherol) and surfactants (TPGS-1000, Maxemul 6112, Noigen RN-20) were investigated for the preparation of o/w microemulsions for the delivery of methotrexate, and the ability of methotrexate-loaded microemulsions to inhibit cancer cell growth was then evaluated. Disregarding the surfactants used, menthol and trans-anethole led to cytotoxic microemulsions, whereas α-tocopherol based-formulations induced cell proliferation. These findings highlight the role that the oily component may play in the efficacy and safety of the microemulsions.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Colon; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Delivery Systems; Emulsions; Humans; Methotrexate; Oils, Volatile; Pharmaceutical Vehicles; Surface-Active Agents
PubMed: 26349496
DOI: 10.2174/1389557515666150909142920 -
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Oct 2021For many years, the lipid-lowering armamentarium consisted of statins and/or ezetimibe and/or bile acid sequestrants and/or fibrates. Now, with the availability of new... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
For many years, the lipid-lowering armamentarium consisted of statins and/or ezetimibe and/or bile acid sequestrants and/or fibrates. Now, with the availability of new drugs mostly injectables, the field has changed and the role of oral non-statin drugs (including bempedoic acid) must be reevaluated.
RECENT FINDINGS
Ezetimibe remains a very important combination partner for statins with continuously increasing treatment numbers. Bempedoic acid is another interesting combination partner for statin/ezetimibe or ezetimibe alone but lacks in contrast to ezetimibe evidence from outcome trials. The role of fibrates is less clear as they have shown disappointing results in outcome trials but may still be used in selected, high-risk patients with combined dyslipidemia. Bile acid sequestrants are now rarely used as there are stronger, better tolerable ways to lower LDL-cholesterol. With the introduction of new injectable lipid-lowering drugs, some oral drugs such as ezetimibe and bempedoic acid still have an important spot in our treatment algorithm others such as fibrates have a less clear role while again others are now rarely used.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Cholesterol, LDL; Ezetimibe; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lipids
PubMed: 34648074
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-021-00971-y -
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology : HJC =... 2019
Topics: Atorvastatin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 30414456
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2018.10.006 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... May 2017
Topics: Double-Blind Method; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Pravastatin; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
PubMed: 28475851
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0870 -
International Journal of Environmental... Dec 2022In the United States, a significant amount of the population is affected by hyperlipidemia, which is associated with increased levels of serum low-density lipoprotein... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
In the United States, a significant amount of the population is affected by hyperlipidemia, which is associated with increased levels of serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and risk of cardiovascular disease. As of 2019, the guidelines set by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association advocate for the use of statins as the major contributor to lowering serum LDL-C. While proven to be effective, side effects, including muscle-related symptoms and new-onset diabetes mellitus, can make patients unable to tolerate statin therapy. Additionally, there is a subset of the population which does not approach a recommended LDL-C goal on statin treatment. Due to these findings, it was deemed necessary to review the literature of current statin-alternative lipid-lowering therapies.
METHODS
A systematic review of preclinical and clinical papers, and a current meta-analysis, was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Following the literature review, a meta-analysis was conducted using ProMeta 3.
RESULTS
Through systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature, it is suggested that newer lipid-lowering therapies such as proprotein convertase subtilsin-kixen type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a safe and effective statin alternative for the population with statin intolerance. PCSK9 inhibitors were shown to have no significant effect in causing myalgia in patients and showed no increase in adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to a control of a current antilipemic medication regimen.
DISCUSSION
There are many statin-alternative therapies that should be investigated further as a potential replacement for patients with statin intolerance or as an addition for patients with statin resistance.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Proprotein Convertase 9; PCSK9 Inhibitors; Cholesterol, LDL; Cardiovascular Diseases; Anticholesteremic Agents
PubMed: 36554779
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416899 -
Revue Medicale de Liege May 2020Over the past 10 years, meta-analyzes of statins, randomized clinical trials using ezetimibe and anti-PCSK9 antibodies, and Mendelian randomization studies have... (Review)
Review
Over the past 10 years, meta-analyzes of statins, randomized clinical trials using ezetimibe and anti-PCSK9 antibodies, and Mendelian randomization studies have strengthened the central and causal role of LDL-c in the development of cardiovascular disease. The LDL-c target has been gradually lowered and to date there is no LDL-c threshold below which the benefit of the reduction disappears. The decrease in cardiovascular risk is proportional to the absolute reduction in the concentration of LDL-c regardless of the means by which this reduction is obtained. These data led to the formulation of new guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias relating in particular to a lowering of the LDL-c target and to the complementary use of ezetimibe and anti-PCSK9 antibodies after statins.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, LDL; Dyslipidemias; Ezetimibe; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Proprotein Convertase 9
PubMed: 32496685
DOI: No ID Found