-
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Jun 2021Constipation is commonly treated with over-the-counter (OTC) products whose efficacy and safety remain unclear. We performed a systematic review of OTC therapies for...
INTRODUCTION
Constipation is commonly treated with over-the-counter (OTC) products whose efficacy and safety remain unclear. We performed a systematic review of OTC therapies for chronic constipation and provide evidence-based recommendations.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials of ≥4-week duration that evaluated OTC preparations between 2004 and 2020. Studies were scored using the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria (0-5 scale) including randomization, blinding, and withdrawals. The strengths of evidence were adjudicated within each therapeutic category, and recommendations were graded (A, B, C, D, and I) based on the level of evidence (level I, good; II, fair; or III, poor).
RESULTS
Of 1,297 studies identified, 41 met the inclusion criteria. There was good evidence (grade A recommendation) for the use of the osmotic laxative polyethylene glycol (PEG) and the stimulant senna; moderate evidence (grade B) for psyllium, SupraFiber, magnesium salts, stimulants (bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate), fruit-based laxatives (kiwi, mango, prunes, and ficus), and yogurt with galacto-oligosaccharide/prunes/linseed oil; and insufficient evidence (grade I) for polydextrose, inulin, and fructo-oligosaccharide. Diarrhea, nausea, bloating, and abdominal pain were common adverse events, but no serious adverse events were reported.
DISCUSSION
The spectrum of OTC products has increased and quality of evidence has improved, but methodological issues including variability in study design, primary outcome measures, trial duration, and small sample sizes remain. We found good evidence to recommend polyethylene glycol or senna as first-line laxatives and moderate evidence supporting fiber supplements, fruits, stimulant laxatives, and magnesium-based products. For others, further validation with more rigorously designed studies is warranted.
Topics: Bisacodyl; Cathartics; Chronic Disease; Citrates; Constipation; Defecation; Fruit; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucans; Humans; Inulin; Laxatives; Magnesium; Nonprescription Drugs; Oligosaccharides; Organometallic Compounds; Picolines; Polyethylene Glycols; Psyllium; Senna Extract; Yogurt
PubMed: 33767108
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001222 -
Phytotherapy Research : PTR Aug 2016Emodin is a natural anthraquinone derivative that occurs in many widely used Chinese medicinal herbs, such as Rheum palmatum, Polygonum cuspidatum and Polygonum... (Review)
Review
Emodin is a natural anthraquinone derivative that occurs in many widely used Chinese medicinal herbs, such as Rheum palmatum, Polygonum cuspidatum and Polygonum multiflorum. Emodin has been used as a traditional Chinese medicine for over 2000 years and is still present in various herbal preparations. Emerging evidence indicates that emodin possesses a wide spectrum of pharmacological properties, including anticancer, hepatoprotective, antiinflammatory, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. However, emodin could also lead to hepatotoxicity, kidney toxicity and reproductive toxicity, particularly in high doses and with long-term use. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that emodin has poor oral bioavailability in rats because of its extensive glucuronidation. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the pharmacology, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of emodin reported to date with an emphasis on its biological properties and mechanisms of action. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Topics: Emodin; Humans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Plant Extracts
PubMed: 27188216
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5631 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jul 2018Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Colonoscopy is widely preferred for CRC... (Review)
Review
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Colonoscopy is widely preferred for CRC screening and is the most commonly used method in the United States. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful colonoscopy CRC screening. However, up to one-quarter of colonoscopies are associated with inadequate bowel preparation, which may result in reduced polyp and adenoma detection rates, unsuccessful screens, and an increased likelihood of repeat procedure. In addition, standardized criteria and assessment scales for bowel preparation quality are lacking. While several bowel preparation quality scales are referred to in the literature, these differ greatly in grading methodology and categorization criteria. Published reliability and validity data are available for five bowel preparation quality assessment scales, which vary in several key attributes. However, clinicians and researchers continue to use a variety of bowel preparation quality measures, including nonvalidated scales, leading to potential confusion and difficulty when comparing quality results among clinicians and across clinical trials. Optimal clinical criteria for bowel preparation quality remain controversial. The use of validated bowel preparation quality scales with stringent but simple scoring criteria would help clarify clinical trial data as well as the performance of colonoscopy in clinical practice related to quality measurements.
Topics: Cathartics; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Early Detection of Cancer; False Negative Reactions; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality Assurance, Health Care
PubMed: 30018478
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2833 -
Endoscopy Aug 2019ESGE recommends a low fiber diet on the day preceding colonoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends the use of enhanced instructions for...
ESGE recommends a low fiber diet on the day preceding colonoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends the use of enhanced instructions for bowel preparation.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE suggests adding oral simethicone to bowel preparation.Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends split-dose bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends, for patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy, a same-day bowel preparation as an acceptable alternative to split dosing.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends to start the last dose of bowel preparation within 5 hours of colonoscopy, and to complete it at least 2 hours before the beginning of the procedure.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends the use of high volume or low volume PEG-based regimens as well as that of non-PEG-based agents that have been clinically validated for routine bowel preparation. In patients at risk for hydroelectrolyte disturbances, the choice of laxative should be individualized.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antifoaming Agents; Cathartics; Colonoscopy; Dietary Fiber; Humans; Patient Education as Topic; Simethicone
PubMed: 31295746
DOI: 10.1055/a-0959-0505 -
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015Constipation is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder, with prevalence in the general population of approximately 20%. In the elderly population the incidence of... (Review)
Review
Constipation is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder, with prevalence in the general population of approximately 20%. In the elderly population the incidence of constipation is higher compared to the younger population, with elderly females suffering more often from severe constipation. Treatment options for chronic constipation (CC) include stool softeners, fiber supplements, osmotic and stimulant laxatives, and the secretagogues lubiprostone and linaclotide. Understanding the underlying etiology of CC is necessary to determine the most appropriate therapeutic option. Therefore, it is important to distinguish from pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), slow and normal transit constipation. Evaluation of a patient with CC includes basic blood work, rectal examination, and appropriate testing to evaluate for PFD and slow transit constipation when indicated. Pelvic floor rehabilitation or biofeedback is the treatment of choice for PFD, and its efficacy has been proven in clinical trials. Surgery is rarely indicated in CC and can only be considered in cases of slow transit constipation when PFD has been properly excluded. Other treatment options such as sacral nerve stimulation seem to be helpful in patients with urinary dysfunction. Botulinum toxin injection for PFD cannot be recommended at this time with the available evidence. CC in the elderly is common, and it has a significant impact on quality of life and the use of health care resources. In the elderly, it is imperative to identify the etiology of CC, and treatment should be based on the patient's overall clinical status and capabilities.
Topics: Aged; Aging; Cathartics; Chronic Disease; Constipation; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Gastrointestinal Agents; Gastrointestinal Transit; Humans; Laxatives; Pelvic Floor Disorders; Physical Examination; Physical Therapy Modalities; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors
PubMed: 26082622
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S54304 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Sep 2019Anastomotic leak (AL) constitutes a significant issue in colorectal surgery, and its incidence has remained stable over the last years. The use of intra-abdominal drain... (Review)
Review
Anastomotic leak (AL) constitutes a significant issue in colorectal surgery, and its incidence has remained stable over the last years. The use of intra-abdominal drain or the use of mechanical bowel preparation alone have been proven to be useless in preventing AL and should be abandoned. The role or oral antibiotics preparation regimens should be clarified and compared to other routes of administration, such as the intravenous route or enema. In parallel, preoperative antibiotherapy should aim at targeting collagenase-inducing pathogens, as identified by the microbiome analysis. AL can be further reduced by fluorescence angiography, which leads to significant intraoperative changes in surgical strategies. Implementation of fluorescence angiography should be encouraged. Progress made in AL comprehension and prevention might probably allow reducing the rate of diverting stoma and conduct to a revision of its indications.
Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cathartics; Colon; Enema; Fluorescein Angiography; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Incidence; Preoperative Care; Rectum; Surgical Wound Infection; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31558854
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i34.5017 -
Redox Biology Feb 2023Obeticholic acid (OCA) has been examined to treat non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), but has unsatisfactory antifibrotic effect and deficient responsive rate in...
Obeticholic acid (OCA) has been examined to treat non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), but has unsatisfactory antifibrotic effect and deficient responsive rate in recent phase III clinical trial. Using a prolonged western diet-feeding murine NASH model, we show that OCA-shaped gut microbiota induces lipid peroxidation and impairs its anti-fibrotic effect. Mechanically, Bacteroides enriched by OCA deconjugates tauro-conjugated bile acids to generate excessive chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), resulting in liver ROS accumulation. We further elucidate that OCA reduces triglycerides containing polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA-TGs) levels, whereas elevates free PUFAs and phosphatidylethanolamines containing PUFA (PUFA-PEs), which are susceptible to be oxidized to lipid peroxides (notably arachidonic acid (ARA)-derived 12-HHTrE), inducing hepatocyte ferroptosis and activating hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Inhibiting lipid peroxidation with pentoxifylline (PTX) rescues anti-fibrotic effect of OCA, suggesting combination of OCA and lipid peroxidation inhibitor could be a potential antifibrotic pharmacological approach in clinical NASH-fibrosis.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Lipid Peroxidation; Liver; Chenodeoxycholic Acid; Microbiota
PubMed: 36584600
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102582 -
Gut Sep 2017To compare efficacy of pharmacotherapies for chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) based on comparisons to placebo using Bayesian network meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare efficacy of pharmacotherapies for chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) based on comparisons to placebo using Bayesian network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
We conducted searches (inception to May 2015) of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Central, as well as original data from authors or drug companies for the medications used for CIC.
STUDY SELECTION
Phase IIB and phase III randomised, placebo-controlled trials (RCT) of ≥4 weeks' treatment for CIC in adults with Rome II or III criteria for functional constipation; trials included at least one of four end points.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two investigators independently evaluated all full-text articles that met inclusion criteria and extracted data for primary and secondary end points, risk of bias and quality of evidence.
OUTCOMES
Primary end points were ≥3 complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM)/week and increase over baseline by ≥1 CSBM/week. Secondary end points were change from baseline (Δ) in the number of SBM/week and Δ CSBM/week.
RESULTS
Twenty-one RCTs (9189 patients) met inclusion and end point criteria: 9 prucalopride, 3 lubiprostone, 3 linaclotide, 2 tegaserod, 1 each velusetrag, elobixibat, bisacodyl and sodium picosulphate (NaP). All prespecified end points were unavailable in four polyethylene glycol studies. Bisacodyl, NaP, prucalopride and velusetrag were superior to placebo for the ≥3 CSBM/week end point. No drug was superior at improving the primary end points on network meta-analysis. Bisacodyl appeared superior to the other drugs for the secondary end point, Δ in number of SBM/week.
CONCLUSIONS
Current drugs for CIC show similar efficacy. Bisacodyl may be superior to prescription medications for Δ in the number of SBM/week in CIC.
Topics: Azabicyclo Compounds; Benzofurans; Bisacodyl; Chronic Disease; Citrates; Constipation; Defecation; Drug Monitoring; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Organometallic Compounds; Picolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27287486
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311835