-
Cancer Biology & Medicine Feb 2021Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) is a highly invasive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, typically positive for cytoplasmic CD3, CD56, cytotoxic markers, including... (Review)
Review
Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) is a highly invasive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, typically positive for cytoplasmic CD3, CD56, cytotoxic markers, including granzyme B and TIA1, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The current treatment methods for NKTCL are associated with several drawbacks. For example, chemotherapy can lead to drug resistance, while treatment with radiotherapy alone is inadequate and results in frequent relapses. Moreover, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation exhibits limited efficacy and is not well recognized by domestic and foreign experts. In recent years, immunotherapy has shown good clinical results and has become a hot spot in cancer research. Clinical activity of targeted antibodies, such as daratumumab (anti-CD38 antibody) and brentuximab vedotin (anti-CD30 antibody), have been reported in NKTCL. Additionally, dacetuzumab and Campath-1H have demonstrated promising results. Further encouraging data have been obtained using checkpoint inhibitors. The success of these immunotherapy agents is attributed to high expression levels of programmed death-ligand 1 in NKTCL. Furthermore, anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) exert cytotoxic actions on both CCR4+ tumor cells and regulatory T cells. Depletion of these cells and the long half-life of anti-CCR4 mAbs result in enhanced induction of antitumor effector T cells. The role of IL10 in NKTCL has also been investigated. It has been proposed that exploitation of this cytokine might provide potential novel therapeutic strategies. Cellular immunotherapy with engineered cytotoxic T lymphocytes targeted against LMP1 and LMP2 has shown promising results and sustained remission. Cellular immunotherapy may be used either as maintenance therapy following initial induction chemotherapy or in cases of relapsed/refractory disease. The present review outlines the known immunotherapy targets for the treatment of NKTCL.
Topics: Alemtuzumab; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; B7-H1 Antigen; Brentuximab Vedotin; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Humans; Immunotherapy; Lymphoma, Extranodal NK-T-Cell; Natural Killer T-Cells; T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic
PubMed: 33628584
DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0400 -
BMC Cancer Dec 2020The purpose of this network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to compare rank targeted therapies for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to compare rank targeted therapies for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
METHODS
The PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane library electronic databases were systematically searched throughout December 2019. Direct and indirect evidence from relevant RCTs was identified for network meta-analysis. The pooled results for grade 3 or greater adverse events between targeted therapies and chemotherapy were calculated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 18 RCTs enrolling 8207 DLBCL patients were selected for the final meta-analysis. The results of the network analysis indicated that the addition of dacetuzumab (74.8%) to rituximab-based regimens or lenalidomide (77.1%) was associated with better therapeutic effects on overall survival, whereas dacetuzumab (80.4%) or bortezomib (70.8%) added to rituximab was most likely to improve events-free survival. Moreover, lenalidomide (93.8%) and I-tositumomab (77.2%) were associated with higher overall response rates. Finally, patients receiving targeted therapies were associated with an increased risk of diarrhea (RR: 2.63; 95%CI: 1.18-5.86; P = 0.019), and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.41; 95%CI: 1.05-1.90; P = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides the best treatment strategy for DLBCL patients in terms of overall survival, events-free survival, and overall response rate. The findings of this study require validation with further large-scale RCTs.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Prognosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 33308179
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07715-2 -
Immunotherapy Feb 2018We reviewed emerging immune strategies for multiple myeloma (MM) therapy excluding US FDA approved drugs. In relapsed refractory MM, isatuximab (anti-CD38) monotherapy...
We reviewed emerging immune strategies for multiple myeloma (MM) therapy excluding US FDA approved drugs. In relapsed refractory MM, isatuximab (anti-CD38) monotherapy achieved overall response (OR) of 24%. Other monoclonal antibodies that have shown efficacy in combination therapy include siltuximab (OR: 66%), indatuximab (OR: 78%), isatuximab (OR: 64.5%), pembrolizumab (OR: 60%), bevacizumab (OR: 70%), dacetuzumab (OR: 39%) and lorvotuzumab (OR: 56.4%). No OR was observed with monotherapy using BI-505, siltuximab, bevacizumab, AVE-1642, figitumumab, atacicept, milatuzumab, dacetuzumab, lucatumumab, IPH2101, lorvotuzumab, BT062 and nivolumab. We included seven clinical trials on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. CAR T-cell targets include BCMA, CD19, KLC and CD138. A recent experience of CAR T-cell (B-cell maturation antigen) therapy in advanced MM has shown global response of 100%. The future of monoclonal antibodies and adoptive T cells for MM treatment seems promising.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy; Multiple Myeloma
PubMed: 29421983
DOI: 10.2217/imt-2017-0136 -
Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) May 2019Immunotherapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has been the focus in recent years due to its myeloma-specific immune responses. We reviewed the literature on non-Food and Drug... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Immunotherapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has been the focus in recent years due to its myeloma-specific immune responses. We reviewed the literature on non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to highlight future perspectives. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov to include phase I/II clinical trials. Data from 39 studies (1906 patients) were included. Of all the agents, Isatuximab (Isa, anti-CD38) and F50067 (anti-CXCR4) were the only mAbs to produce encouraging results as monotherapy with overall response rates (ORRs) of 66.7% and 32% respectively. Isa showed activity when used in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (Dex), producing a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 83%. Additionally, Isa used in combination with pomalidomide (Pom) and Dex resulted in a CBR of 73%. Indatuximab Ravtansine (anti-CD138 antibody-drug conjugate) produced an ORR of 78% and 79% when used in combination with Len-Dex and Pom-Dex, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Combination therapy using mAbs such as indatuximab, pembrolizumab, lorvotuzumab, siltuximab or dacetuzumab with chemotherapy agents produced better outcomes as compared to monotherapies. Further clinical trials investigating mAbs targeting CD38 used in combination therapy are warranted.
PubMed: 31544840
DOI: 10.3390/antib8020034 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2020Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (pCBCL) include an infrequent group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that are limited to skin sites at the time of diagnosis. They comprise... (Review)
Review
Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (pCBCL) include an infrequent group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that are limited to skin sites at the time of diagnosis. They comprise roughly 20-25% of all cutaneous lymphomas and are subdivided into primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL), primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL), and primary cutaneous diffuse large cell B cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLCBCL, LT). The first two show a rather indolent course while PCDLCBCL, LT carries a worse prognosis. Intravascular large cell B-cell lymphoma is the most infrequent subtype, and its therapy is not covered in this review. For solitary, single-site PCMZL and PCFCL, several topical treatment options exist. They include, but are not limited to, excision, radiotherapy, and intralesional therapies, discussed in this review. However, in selected cases, even "watchful waiting" is reasonable. Indolent types of pCBCL rarely require systemic treatment. However, in extended cases and more importantly DLCBCL, LT, systemic treatment is the first choice. Monoclonal anti-CD20-antibody rituximab is often used as monotherapy in PCMZL and PCFCL or combined with chemotherapy in PCDLBCL, LT. Newer options are monoclonal anti-CD40 antibody dacetuzumab, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Indolent pCBCL are treated with a risk-adapted strategy using intralesional steroids, RT, and interferon-α as first-line treatments. Relapsing cases may profit from rituximab. In aggressive PCDLCBCL, LT, rituximab with polychemotherapy is recommended. Innovative therapies include intralesional oncolytic virotherapy, systemic monoclonal antibodies, and small molecules.
PubMed: 32850331
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01163 -
Journal of Hematology & Oncology Jun 2014Patients with DLBCL who are ineligible for or have relapsed after aggressive salvage chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. CD40 is expressed on multiple B-cell neoplasms...
BACKGROUND
Patients with DLBCL who are ineligible for or have relapsed after aggressive salvage chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. CD40 is expressed on multiple B-cell neoplasms including DLBCL and is a potential target for immunotherapy. Dacetuzumab (SGN-40), a non-blocking, partial agonist, humanized IgG1, anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, has previously demonstrated anti-lymphoma activity in a phase I study.
METHODS
A phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the rate and duration of objective responses and safety of single-agent dacetuzumab in relapsed DLBCL. Forty-six adult patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL received up to 12 cycles of intravenous dacetuzumab using intrapatient dose-escalation to a target dose of 8 mg/kg/week in an initial 5-week cycle, followed by 4-week cycles of 8 mg/kg/week. Study endpoints included rate and duration of objective responses, safety, survival, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and exploratory correlative studies.
RESULTS
Overall response rate was 9% and disease control rate (complete remission + partial remission + stable disease) was 37%. Common non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) included fatigue, headache, chills, fever, and nausea. The most frequent Grade 3-4 non-hematologic AE was deep venous thrombosis (3 patients). Grade 3-4 lymphopenia (41%), neutropenia (13%), or thrombocytopenia (19%) occurred without associated infection or bleeding. Reversible ocular events, including conjunctivitis and ocular hyperemia, occurred in 8 patients (17%). Patient-specific factors, including Fc-gamma-RIIIa polymorphism, did not appear to correlate with antitumor activity.
CONCLUSIONS
Single-agent dacetuzumab has modest activity and manageable toxicity in unselected patients with relapsed DLBCL. Combination regimens and robust methods of patient selection may be necessary for further development.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00435916.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; CD40 Antigens; Chills; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Fatigue; Female; Headache; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Lymphopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptors, IgG; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 24919462
DOI: 10.1186/1756-8722-7-44 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Jun 2018The present review is part of the ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document on the safety of targeted and biological therapies. (Review)
Review
ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document on the safety of targeted and biological therapies: an infectious diseases perspective (Agents targeting lymphoid or myeloid cells surface antigens [II]: CD22, CD30, CD33, CD38, CD40, SLAMF-7 and CCR4).
BACKGROUND
The present review is part of the ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document on the safety of targeted and biological therapies.
AIMS
To review, from an Infectious Diseases perspective, the safety profile of agents targeting CD22, CD30, CD33, CD38, CD40, SLAMF-7 and CCR4 and to suggest preventive recommendations.
SOURCES
Computer-based MEDLINE searches with MeSH terms pertaining to each agent or therapeutic family.
CONTENT
The risk and spectrum of infections in patients receiving CD22-targeted agents (i.e. inotuzumab ozogamicin) are similar to those observed with anti-CD20 antibodies. Anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis and monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is recommended for patients receiving CD30-targeted agents (brentuximab vedotin). Due to the scarcity of data, the risk posed by CD33-targeted agents (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) cannot be assessed. Patients receiving CD38-targeted agents (i.e. daratumumab) face an increased risk of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection. Therapy with CD40-targeted agents (lucatumumab or dacetuzumab) is associated with opportunistic infections similar to those observed in hyper-IgM syndrome, and prevention strategies (including anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection) are warranted. SLAMF-7 (CD319)-targeted agents (elotuzumab) induce lymphopenia and increase the risk of infection (particularly due to VZV). The impact of CCR4-targeted agents (mogamulizumab) on infection susceptibility is difficult to distinguish from the effect of underlying diseases and concomitant therapies. However, anti-Pneumocystis and anti-herpesvirus prophylaxis and screening for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are recommended.
IMPLICATIONS
Specific management strategies should be put in place to reduce the risk and/or the severity of infectious complications associated to the reviewed agents.
Topics: ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1; Antigens, Surface; Biological Therapy; CD40 Antigens; Clinical Trials as Topic; Communicable Diseases; Consensus; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Ki-1 Antigen; Lymphocytes; Membrane Glycoproteins; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Myeloid Cells; Receptors, CCR4; Sialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 2; Sialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 3; Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule Family
PubMed: 29572070
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.022