-
PloS One 2017We report information about an unpublished 1970s study ("8-way" Bendectin Study) that aimed to evaluate the relative therapeutic efficacy of doxylamine, pyridoxine, and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
We report information about an unpublished 1970s study ("8-way" Bendectin Study) that aimed to evaluate the relative therapeutic efficacy of doxylamine, pyridoxine, and dicyclomine in the management of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. We are publishing the trial's findings according to the restoring invisible and abandoned trials (RIAT) initiative because the trial was never published.
DESIGN
Double blinded, multi-centred, randomized placebo-controlled study.
SETTING
14 clinics in the United States.
PARTICIPANTS
2308 patients in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy with complaints of nausea or vomiting were enrolled.
INTERVENTIONS
Each patient was randomized to one of eight arms: placebo, doxylamine/pyridoxine/dicylcomine, doxylamine/pyridoxine, dicylomine/pyridoxine, doxylamine, dicyclomine/pyridoxine, pyridoxine and dicyclomine. Each patient was instructed to take 2 tablets at bedtime and 1 additional tablet in the afternoon or morning if needed, for 7 nights.
OUTCOMES
Reported outcomes included the number of hours of nausea reported by patients, the frequency of vomiting reported by patients and the overall efficacy of medication as judged by physicians.
RESULTS
Data from 1599 (69% of those randomized) participants were analyzed. Based on the available summary data of physician evaluation of symptoms and ignoring missing data and data integrity issues, the proportion of participants who were "evaluated moderate or excellent" was greater in each of the seven active treatment groups when compared with placebo (57%): doxylamine/pyridoxine/dicylcomine (14% absolute difference versus placebo; 95% CI: 4 to 24), doxylamine/pyridoxine (21; 95% CI 11 to 30), dicylomine/pyridoxine (21; 95% CI 11 to 30), doxylamine (20; 95% CI 10 to 29), dicyclomine/pyridoxine (4; 95% CI -6 to 14), pyridoxine (9; 95% CI -1 to 19) and dicyclomine (4; 95% CI -6 to 14). Based on incomplete information, the most common adverse events were apparently drowsiness and fatigue. There is a high risk of bias in these previously unpublished results given the high attrition rate in a 7 day trial, the lack of prespecified outcomes or analyses, and the exclusion of some data because of questionable data integrity.
CONCLUSION
The available information about this "8-way Bendectin" trial indicates it should not be used to support the efficacy of doxylamine, pyridoxine or dicyclomine for the treatment of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy because of a high risk of bias.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Not registered.
Topics: Cooperative Behavior; Dicyclomine; Doxylamine; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Nausea; Physicians; Placebos; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Publication Bias; Publications; Pyridoxine; Research Report; Risk; Vomiting
PubMed: 28052111
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167609 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Dec 2014Approximately 10 - 15% of women reportedly take an antihistamine during pregnancy for the relief of nausea and vomiting, allergy and asthma symptoms, or indigestion.... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Approximately 10 - 15% of women reportedly take an antihistamine during pregnancy for the relief of nausea and vomiting, allergy and asthma symptoms, or indigestion. Antihistamines include histamine H1-receptor and H2-receptor antagonists.
AREAS COVERED
This is a systematic evaluation of the peer-reviewed epidemiologic literature published through February 2014 on the association between prenatal exposure to antihistamines and birth defects. Papers addressing histamine H1- or H2-receptor antagonists are included. Papers addressing pyridoxine plus doxylamine (Bendectin in the United States, Debendox in the United Kingdom, Diclectin in Canada, Lenotan and Merbental in other countries) prior to the year 2001 were excluded post hoc because of several previously published meta-analyses and commentaries on this medication.
EXPERT OPINION
The literature on the safety of antihistamine use during pregnancy with respect to birth defects is generally reassuring though the positive findings from a few large studies warrant corroboration in other populations. The findings in the literature are considered in light of three critical methodological issues: i) selection of appropriate study population; ii) ascertainment of antihistamine exposures; and iii) ascertainment of birth defect outcomes. Selected antihistamines have been very well studied (e.g., loratadine); others, especially H2-receptor antagonists, require additional study before an assessment of safety with respect to birth defect risk could be made.
Topics: Congenital Abnormalities; Female; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Pregnancy; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects
PubMed: 25307228
DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2014.970164 -
International Journal of Clinical... Aug 2017Background The unintentional misuse of over-the-counter sleep aids among older adults is an important public health problem and a focus of Healthy People 2020....
Background The unintentional misuse of over-the-counter sleep aids among older adults is an important public health problem and a focus of Healthy People 2020. Accordingly, the 2015 Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults recommends that individuals 65 years or older avoid use of diphenhydramine and doxylamine; however, many over-the-counter sleep products contain these active ingredients. Objective To identify the proportion of older adults using an over-the-counter medication containing diphenhydramine or doxylamine, and compare their characteristics with older adults using an over-the-counter medication that does not contain these ingredients. Setting Study participants were recruited from the Community Registry of the Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center. Method The study sample was taken from a larger survey of 1025 participants on sleep health and over-the-counter sleep medication use conducted from February to April 2015. A subset of 169 participants aged 65 and older reporting taking at least one over-the-counter product to improve sleep within the past 30 days (16.5%) were selected for our analysis on associations between participant characteristics and potentially inappropriate use of over-the-counter sleep medications. Main outcome measure The proportion and characteristics of older adults taking at least one over-the-counter medication containing diphenhydramine or doxylamine. Results Of the 223 over-the-counter sleep medications listed by participants, 115 (52%) contained diphenhydramine or doxylamine. Using the Beers Criteria, we found that more than half of participants (59%) had used a potentially inappropriate over-the-counter medication containing diphenhydramine or doxylamine to improve sleep within the past 30 days. Participants taking at least one diphenhydramine or doxylamine containing medication were less likely to be aware of any safety risks in taking over-the-counter sleep medications than participants not taking these products (38 vs 49%, p = 0.016). Conclusion A majority of older adults in a limited sample from the United States taking an over-the-counter medication to improve sleep are taking a product containing diphenhydramine or doxylamine, both of which are classified as potentially inappropriate for older adults. Awareness of the safety risks of over-the-counter medications and addressing conditions that impact sleep quality could be facilitated through consultation with pharmacists and other healthcare providers.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diphenhydramine; Doxylamine; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Nonprescription Drugs; Sleep Aids, Pharmaceutical; Sleep Wake Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 28466395
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0467-x -
Cureus Aug 2023A 52-year-old male with acute onset right-sided weakness, numbness, and buttock pain after consuming 30 tablets of doxylamine antihistamine the night prior. Laboratory...
A 52-year-old male with acute onset right-sided weakness, numbness, and buttock pain after consuming 30 tablets of doxylamine antihistamine the night prior. Laboratory tests showed elevated creatinine kinase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, troponins, liver transaminases, and phosphate. The patient was admitted to the medical intensive care unit for severe rhabdomyolysis, acute liver failure, and acute kidney injury secondary to doxylamine intoxication. Studies describe symptoms of severe doxylamine intoxication, such as impaired consciousness (coma), grand mal seizures, and cardiopulmonary arrest. Circulating myoglobin causes oxidative injury to the kidney through the formation of F2-isoprostanes leading to renal vasoconstriction. One study explained drug-induced rhabdomyolysis via two mechanisms: direct drug injury to the striated muscle and local muscle compression in seizure, coma, and metabolic abnormality. Treatment involves aggressive hydration with monitoring of serum electrolytes and renal function. Aggressive volume expansion via intravenous fluids remains critical in preventing rhabdomyolysis-associated nephrotoxicity and myoglobin-induced acute renal failure. Alkalinization of urine may prevent renal vasoconstriction resulting in enhanced excretion of the toxic metabolites of doxylamine and myoglobin via renal tubules, thereby reducing peak serum concentration time and preventing direct renal tissue damage.
PubMed: 37581198
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43395 -
European Review For Medical and... Jun 2022Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy is a common disease that affects many women suffering from mild to severe symptoms. Amongst the different treatments, a fixed dose...
OBJECTIVE
Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy is a common disease that affects many women suffering from mild to severe symptoms. Amongst the different treatments, a fixed dose combination of doxylamine and pyridoxine has been proven safe and effective although the mechanism of action is not well established. There are different pharmaceutical dosage forms in the European market. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of a capsule formulation, Cariban® and a tablet formulation, Xonvea® to evaluate the potential impact of their release profiles on their onset of action.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
10 mg/10 mg of doxylamine succinate/pyridoxine hydrochloride capsules (Cariban®) and tablets (Xonvea®) were used as reference materials. Appearance, mass, composition, and in vitro dissolution profiles were compared. Bibliographic data from 4 pharmacokinetic studies of Xonvea® and 1 pharmacokinetic study of Cariban® was reviewed.
RESULTS
In vitro dissolution studies showed significant differences in dissolution profiles of tablets and capsules. The later exhibiting some release of both drug substances in acid conditions followed by a non-complete release after a total of 3 hours while the tablets demonstrated gastro-resistant properties and rapid API release in about 20-30 minutes after the acid stage. Comparison of PK data showed greater Cmax for pyridoxine.
CONCLUSIONS
At pH 6.8, complete and faster release of the fixed dose combination for Xonvea® gastro-resistant tablets compared to Cariban® capsules could possibly explain the greater Cmax observed in vivo for the tablet's formulation. This could translate into faster onset of action and relief of nausea for pregnant women taking the tablets vs. the capsules.
Topics: Antiemetics; Doxylamine; Female; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Nausea; Pregnancy; Pyridoxine; Solubility; Tablets
PubMed: 35776043
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202206_29081 -
Neurology. Clinical Practice Oct 2021
PubMed: 34840894
DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000956 -
The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 2018Derinöz-Güleryüz O. Doxylamine succinate overdose: Slurred speech and visual hallucination. Turk J Pediatr 2018; 60: 439-442. Doxylamine succinate is a commonly used...
Derinöz-Güleryüz O. Doxylamine succinate overdose: Slurred speech and visual hallucination. Turk J Pediatr 2018; 60: 439-442. Doxylamine succinate is a commonly used antihistamine for respiratory allergies including allergic rhinitis as well as for the management of insomnia. As it is available over-the-counter like other nonprescription antihistamines and sleep aids, there is a risk of overdose. It is believed that doxylamine succinate has both peripheral and central activity with its anticholinergic properties. Delirium, seizures, and coma are among the central adverse effects that are rare. This case was presented since it is the first case in the literature who developed slurred speech and visual hallucination after high dose doxylamine succinate use and received antidotal therapy for anticholinergic side effects.
Topics: Adolescent; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Doxylamine; Drug Overdose; Female; Hallucinations; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Physostigmine; Speech; Speech Disorders
PubMed: 30859772
DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2018.04.015 -
Drugs in R&D Jun 2018Doxylamine tablets are approved as an over-the-counter sleep aid. We developed a doxylamine succinate intranasal metered-dose delivery system with the expectation of a... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION
Doxylamine tablets are approved as an over-the-counter sleep aid. We developed a doxylamine succinate intranasal metered-dose delivery system with the expectation of a more rapid onset of action with reduced side-effect potential compared with the oral tablet.
METHODS
This phase I study randomized 24 adults with chronic intermittent sleep impairment to receive either single doses of intranasal doxylamine succinate 3.2, 6.3, or 12.7 mg or doxylamine succinate 25-mg oral tablet. Doxylamine pharmacokinetics were assessed using noncompartmental methods; pharmacodynamics were evaluated using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) and numerous psychomotor tests. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored.
RESULTS
None of the intranasal dose levels produced a mean maximum plasma concentration (C) above the 50 ng/mL target level or a time to maximum concentration shorter than that of the oral tablet. At the highest intranasal dose, C and area under the doxylamine concentration-time curve were approximately 25% of the values achieved with the oral dose. Variation in most pharmacokinetic parameters was higher with intranasal compared with oral dosing. A relationship between plasma doxylamine concentration and KSS change from baseline was evident for the 25-mg tablet and, to a lesser extent, for the 12.7-mg intranasal dose. Changes from baseline in psychomotor parameters did not show a relationship to intranasal dose, and did not distinguish between intranasal versus oral dosing. The most common AEs with intranasal dosing were nasal congestion, nasal dryness, and frontal headache.
CONCLUSION
The nasal spray did not increase doxylamine absorption or systemic bioavailability compared with the oral tablet.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Biological Availability; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doxylamine; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Middle Aged; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Young Adult
PubMed: 29671128
DOI: 10.1007/s40268-018-0232-1 -
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology Jan 2021Although nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is common, the secular and demographic trends of NVP and its treatments are not well-studied.
BACKGROUND
Although nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is common, the secular and demographic trends of NVP and its treatments are not well-studied.
OBJECTIVES
To describe the prevalence and patterns of first-trimester NVP and selected treatments among controls in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS).
METHODS
National Birth Defects Prevention Study is a population-based case-control study of birth defects in the United States (1997-2011). We collected self-reported data about NVP and use of commonly reported pharmacological and herbal/natural treatments (ondansetron, promethazine, pyridoxine, metoclopramide, doxylamine succinate, ginger, phosphorated carbohydrate solution, and prochlorperazine) from mothers of non-malformed control infants. We estimated the prevalence of NVP and selected treatments and examined secular and demographic trends (education, race/ethnicity, and maternal age) for such use, adjusting for study centre.
RESULTS
Among 10 540 mothers of controls, 7393 women (70.1%) reported first-trimester NVP, and 12.2% of those used one or more of the commonly reported treatments. Specific treatment use varied after adjustment for study centre (ondansetron: 3.4%; promethazine: 4.2%; pyridoxine: 3.2%; metoclopramide: 0.7%; doxylamine succinate: 1.7%; ginger: 1.0%; phosphorated carbohydrate solution: 0.4%; and prochlorperazine: 0.3%). Treatment use increased for each agent over the study period. Women with more years of education reported more NVP and treatment use. White (72%), Hispanic (71%), and other race (73%) women reported more NVP than Black women (67%); White women used selected NVP treatments most frequently, and Black women used them more than Hispanic women. Though women aged 25-34 years reported more NVP (72%) than younger (69%) or older (67%) women, the frequency of medication use was similar among women aged 25-34 and ≥35, and lower among women aged <25 years.
CONCLUSIONS
National Birth Defects Prevention Study controls reported NVP at frequencies similar to those previously reported. Of note, we observed an increase in use of selected treatments over time, and variations in NVP and treatments by study site and demographic factors.
Topics: Antiemetics; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Infant; Nausea; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Vomiting
PubMed: 32623767
DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12705 -
Bioengineered Dec 2021Recent findings have identified microbiota as crucial participants in many disease conditions, including cancers. Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) is regarded as a...
Recent findings have identified microbiota as crucial participants in many disease conditions, including cancers. Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) is regarded as a candidate mechanism involving relevant biological processes. We therefore constructed a ceRNA network using the TCGA and GEO database, to determine the potential mechanisms of microbiota-mediated colorectal carcinogenesis and progression. We found a total of 75 lncRNAs, 8 miRNAs, and 9 mRNAs in the probiotics-mediated ceRNA network and a total of 49 lncRNAs, 4 miRNAs, and 3 mRNA in the pathobiont-mediated ceRNA network, which could induce the microbiota-mediated carcinogenesis and progression. The GO and KEGG analysis indicated that the ceRNA network is mainly enriched in the metabolic process, and two unique pathways (the p53 signaling pathway and microRNA in cancer), respectively. A four-gene signature (FRMD6-AS2, DIRC3, LIFR-AS1, and MRPL23-AS1) was suggested as an independent prognostic factor. Four lncRNAs (LINC00355, KCNQ1OT1, LINC00491, and HOTAIR) were associated with poor survival. Three small molecule candidate anticancer drugs (Pentoxyverine, Rimexolone, and Doxylamine) were identified. A four-gene signature (FAM129A, BCL2, PMAIP1, and RPS6) is significantly correlated with immune infiltration level. This study provides a promising biomarker reservoir to explore the mechanism by which microbiota regulate the ceRNA network involving the immune response, and further participate in colorectal carcinogenesis and progression.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Computational Biology; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Regulatory Networks; Humans; Prognosis; Protein Interaction Maps; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Untranslated
PubMed: 34227920
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1940614