-
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice Dec 2023Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDN) is common, affecting around a quarter of patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and can lead to significant...
Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDN) is common, affecting around a quarter of patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and can lead to significant curtailment of functionality and quality of life. Patients may present with unremitting burning, aching or "electric-shock" type pains in their feet, legs and later, in the hands. Conventional management approaches must focus not only on pain relief, but also on concurrent sleep problems, mood disorders and functionality. The mainstay of treatment is pharmacotherapy. Most current international guidelines recommend a choice of four drugs: amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin or gabapentin, as initial treatment for PDN. Recent evidence from the OPTION-DM trial demonstrated that these drugs and their combinations have equivalent efficacy. Moreover, combination treatment provided significant pain relief to patients with inadequate response to the maximum tolerated dose of monotherapy. PDN refractory to pharmacotherapy can be treated with capsaicin 8% or high frequency spinal cord stimulation.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Quality of Life; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Pain
PubMed: 38245323
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110765 -
Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira... Mar 2022This study aimed to investigate the effects of duloxetine and pregabalin primarily on pain and functional status in patients with knee osteoarthritis and secondarily on... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to investigate the effects of duloxetine and pregabalin primarily on pain and functional status in patients with knee osteoarthritis and secondarily on quality of life, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance.
METHODS
A total of 66 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to use duloxetine or pregabalin. Patients were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale, Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, Short Form-36, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index before the treatment and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment.
RESULTS
Improvements occurred in Visual Analog Scale, Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, Short Form-36 (with an exception of the mental health subgroup scores in duloxetine-treated group), Beck Depression Inventory, and Beck Anxiety Inventory scores in both groups from 4 weeks after baseline. Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index total scores and SF-36 mental health subgroup scores started to improve on the 4th and 12th weeks in pregabalin- and duloxetine-treated groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Osteoarthritis pain, a complex outcome with nociceptive and neuropathic components, leads to central sensitization in a chronic phase. Using centrally acting drugs in the control of pain and associated symptoms would increase the probability of treatment success.
Topics: Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Humans; Neuralgia; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pregabalin; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35442367
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20211047 -
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science Apr 2022Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal disease where most tumors are too advanced at diagnosis for resection, leaving chemotherapy as the mainstay of treatment. Although the... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal disease where most tumors are too advanced at diagnosis for resection, leaving chemotherapy as the mainstay of treatment. Although the prognosis of unresectable PC is poor, it has been dramatically improved by new chemotherapy treatments, such as the combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. However, as oxaliplatin and paclitaxel are common neurotoxic drugs, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and severe adverse effect of both treatments. As there are no agents recommended in the ASCO guidelines, we review the methods used to treat CIPN caused by PC treatment. The efficacy of duloxetine was observed in a large randomized controlled trial (RCT). In addition, pregabalin was more effective than duloxetine for CIPN in two RCTs. Although duloxetine and pregabalin can be effective for CIPN, they have several side effects. Therefore, the choice between the two drugs should be determined according to effect and tolerability. Mirogabalin is also used in patients with PC and there is hope it will yield positive outcomes when treating CIPN in the future.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Humans; Oxaliplatin; Paclitaxel; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Pregabalin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35197393
DOI: 10.5387/fms.2021-32 -
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Aug 2015Cognitive functioning is a symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) that deserves particular attention by clinicians and researchers. Despite the fact that cognitive... (Review)
Review
Cognitive functioning is a symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) that deserves particular attention by clinicians and researchers. Despite the fact that cognitive dysfunction represents a symptom of MDD as well as a functional outcome measure, cognition has been insufficiently investigated in antidepressant trials. While, until recently, few placebo-controlled trials have measured cognition in MDD, those examples which did have consisted of older adults. Of agents tested thus far in placebo-controlled trials (citalopram, duloxetine, vortioxetine), only the latter has been studied in patients aged 18-65, and only the latter has been shown to be superior to placebo in improving measures of executive functioning and to do so across adult age groups. Both duloxetine and vortioxetine appear to result in greater improvements than placebo in immediate and delayed memory. Clinicians who wish to improve the psychosocial recovery of patients with MDD should be familiar with studies of new options for treatment.
Topics: Adult; Citalopram; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, Major; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Executive Function; Humans; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors; Sulfides; Vortioxetine
PubMed: 26335095
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.13086tx5c -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2017Major depressive disorder is a common mental disorder affecting a person's mind, behaviour and body. It is expressed as a variety of symptoms and is associated with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder is a common mental disorder affecting a person's mind, behaviour and body. It is expressed as a variety of symptoms and is associated with substantial impairment. Despite a range of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options, there is still room for improvement of the pharmacological treatment of depression in terms of efficacy and tolerability. The latest available antidepressant is vortioxetine. It is assumed that vortioxetine's antidepressant action is related to a direct modulation of serotonergic receptor activity and inhibition of the serotonin transporter. The mechanism of action is not fully understood, but it is claimed to be novel. Vortioxetine was placed in the category of "Other" antidepressants and may therefore provide an alternative to existing antidepressant drugs.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and acceptability of vortioxetine compared with placebo and other antidepressant drugs in the treatment of acute depression in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane's Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's Specialised Register to May 2016 without applying any restrictions to date, language or publication status. We checked reference lists of relevant studies and reviews, regulatory agency reports and trial databases.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy, tolerability, or both of vortioxetine versus placebo or any other antidepressant agent in the treatment of acute depression in adults.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently selected the studies and extracted data. We extracted data on study characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention details and outcome measures in terms of efficacy, acceptability and tolerability. We analysed intention-to-treat (ITT) data only and used risk ratios (RR) as effect sizes for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analyses used random-effects models.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 15 studies (7746 participants) in this review. Seven studies were placebo controlled; eight studies compared vortioxetine to serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). We were unable to identify any study that compared vortioxetine to antidepressant drugs from other classes, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).Vortioxetine may be more effective than placebo across the three efficacy outcomes: response (Mantel-Haenszel RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.49; 14 studies, 6220 participants), remission (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.53; 14 studies, 6220 participants) and depressive symptoms measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS) (score range: 0 to 34; higher score means worse outcome: MD -2.94, 95% CI -4.07 to -1.80; 14 studies, 5566 participants). The quality of the evidence was low for response and remission and very low for depressive symptoms. We found no evidence of a difference in total dropout rates (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.19; 14 studies, 6220 participants). More participants discontinued vortioxetine than placebo because of adverse effects (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.81; 14 studies, 6220 participants) but fewer discontinued due to inefficacy (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.90, P = 0.02; 14 studies, 6220 participants). The quality of the evidence for dropouts was moderate.The subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not reveal factors that significantly influenced the results.In comparison with other antidepressants, very low-quality evidence from eight studies showed no clinically significant difference between vortioxetine and SNRIs as a class for response (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.00; 3159 participants) or remission (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03; 3155 participants). There was a small difference favouring SNRIs for depressive symptom scores on the MADRS (MD 1.52, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.53; 8 studies, 2807 participants). Very low quality evidence from eight studies (3159 participants) showed no significant differences between vortioxetine and the SNRIs as a class for total dropout rates (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.08), dropouts due to adverse events (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.08) and dropouts due to inefficacy (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.30).Against individual antidepressants, analyses suggested that vortioxetine may be less effective than duloxetine in terms of response rates (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 6 studies, 2392 participants) and depressive symptoms scores on the MADRS scale (MD 1.99, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.83; 6 studies; 2106 participants). Against venlafaxine, meta-analysis of two studies found no statistically significant differences (response: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.25; 767 participants; depressive symptom scores: MD 0.02, 95% CI -2.49 to 2.54; 701 participants). In terms of number of participants reporting at least one adverse effect (tolerability), vortioxetine was better than the SNRIs as a class (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.94; 8 studies, 3134 participants) and duloxetine (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95; 6 studies; 2376 participants). However, the sensitivity analysis casts some doubts on this result, as only two studies used comparable dosing.We judged none of the studies to have a high risk of bias for any domain, but we rated all studies to have an unclear risk of bias of selective reporting and other biases.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The place of vortioxetine in the treatment of acute depression is unclear. Our analyses showed vortioxetine may be more effective than placebo in terms of response, remission and depressive symptoms, but the clinical relevance of these effects is uncertain. Furthermore, the quality of evidence to support these findings was generally low. In comparison to SNRIs, we found no advantage for vortioxetine. Vortioxetine was less effective than duloxetine, but fewer people reported adverse effects when treated with vortioxetine compared to duloxetine. However, these findings are uncertain and not well supported by evidence. A major limitation of the current evidence is the lack of comparisons with the SSRIs, which are usually recommended as first-line treatments for acute depression. Studies with direct comparisons to SSRIs are needed to address this gap and may be supplemented by network meta-analyses to define the role of vortioxetine in the treatment of depression.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Humans; Patient Dropouts; Piperazines; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors; Sulfides; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Vortioxetine
PubMed: 28677828
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2 -
Anesthesia, Essays and Researches 2022Recently, opoids are linked with cancer recurrence. Duloxetine hydrochloride (DH), an anxiolytic may reduce total opoid requirement after cancer surgery.
Effect of Preoperative Duloxetine Hydrochloride on Reducing Postoperative Morphine Requirement after Open Radical Cholecystectomy in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.
BACKGROUND
Recently, opoids are linked with cancer recurrence. Duloxetine hydrochloride (DH), an anxiolytic may reduce total opoid requirement after cancer surgery.
AIMS
We assessed the efficacy of a single dose of DH in reducing the total morphine requirement after open radical cholecystectomy. We also calculated the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, patient satisfaction score (PSS), and time taken to the use of the first rescue analgesic.
SETTING AND DESIGNES
This is a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled study conducted in the patients aged 20-70 years (American Society of Anaesthesiologists classes I-III) undergoing open radical cholecystectomy under general anesthesia for carcinoma gall bladder.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The patients were divided into two groups of 32 patients each by computer-generated randomization. Group A received oral DH (60 mg); Group B received identical placebo capsules 2 h before surgery with a sip of water. Postoperatively, intravenous morphine was given using a patient-controlled analgesia pump. After 24 h, total morphine consumption, the VAS score, time to the first rescue analgesia, and PSS were recorded.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS version 22.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA 2013). value < 0.05 or 0.001 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The total morphine consumption and VAS score were significantly lower in Group A. No significant effects was observed on PSS.
CONCLUSION
A single 60 mg dose of DH administered 2 h before open radical cholecystectomy reduced total morphine consumption and improved VAS score postoperatively with no effect on PSS.
PubMed: 36620122
DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_75_22 -
Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark... Aug 2023This study was carried out to compare the levels of inflammatory markers in the complete blood count before and after they began receiving duloxetine in patients with...
BACKGROUND
This study was carried out to compare the levels of inflammatory markers in the complete blood count before and after they began receiving duloxetine in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
METHODS
The patient and control groups were composed of 40 patients diagnosed with FMS in accordance with the 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and 40 healthy volunteers, respectively. The data collection tools comprised the sociodemographic information form, the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ), and the sleep hygiene index (SHI), which were used to assess patients' sociodemographic characteristics, FMS disease activity, and sleep quality, respectively. The inflammatory markers of the patient group were assessed by complete blood count before and after the duloxetine treatment and compared with those of the control group.
RESULTS
The white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group ( < 0.001, = 0.036 and = 0.004, respectively). Moreover, platelet distribution width (PDW) was significantly lower, whereas mean platelet volume (MPV) was significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group ( < 0.001 for both cases). In addition to patients' platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) values, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and white blood cell (WBC) counts decreasing but not significantly ( = 0.083, = 0.068, and = 0.065, respectively), their neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), hemoglobin (Hgb), and hematocrit (Hct) values declined substantially after commencing duloxetine treatment ( = 0.001, = 0.008, and = 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
The significant reduction in NLR, Hgb, and Hct levels following duloxetine treatment may indicate that these parameters can be utilized as biomarkers in determining the efficacy of treatment and in the follow-up of the treatment in FMS patients.
Topics: Humans; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Fibromyalgia; Leukocytes; Blood Platelets; Neutrophils
PubMed: 37664936
DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2808161 -
Cancer Research Communications Nov 2022Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OIPN) is a debilitating side effect that afflicts ~90% of patients that is initiated by OCT2-dependent uptake of...
UNLABELLED
Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OIPN) is a debilitating side effect that afflicts ~90% of patients that is initiated by OCT2-dependent uptake of oxaliplatin in DRG neurons. The antidepressant drug duloxetine has been used to treat OIPN, although its usefulness in preventing this side effect remains unclear. We hypothesized that duloxetine has OCT2-inhibitory properties and can be used as an adjunct to oxaliplatin-based regimens to prevent OIPN. Transport studies were performed in cells stably transfected with mouse or human OCT2 and in isolated mouse DRG neurons . Wild-type and OCT2-deficient mice were used to assess effects of duloxetine on hallmarks of OIPN, endogenous OCT2 biomarkers, and the pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin, and the translational feasibility of a duloxetine-oxaliplatin combination was evaluated in various models of colorectal cancer. We found that duloxetine potently inhibited the OCT2-mediated transport of several xenobiotic substrates, including oxaliplatin, in a reversible, concentration-dependent manner, and independent of species and cell context. Furthermore, duloxetine restricted access of these substrates to DRG neurons and prevented OIPN in wild-type mice to a degree similar to the complete protection observed in OCT2-deficient mice, without affecting the plasma levels of oxaliplatin. Importantly, the uptake and cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin in tumor cell lines and were not negatively influenced by duloxetine. The observed OCT2-targeting properties of duloxetine, combined with the potential for clinical translation, provide support for its further exploration as a therapeutic candidate for studies aimed at preventing OIPN in cancer patients requiring treatment with oxaliplatin.
SIGNIFICANCE
We found that duloxetine has potent OCT2-inhibitory properties and can diminish excessive accumulation of oxaliplatin into DRG neurons. In addition, pre-treatment of mice with duloxetine prevented OIPN without significantly altering the plasma pharmacokinetics and antitumor properties of oxaliplatin. These results suggest that intentional inhibition of OCT2-mediated transport by duloxetine can be employed as a prevention strategy to ameliorate OIPN without compromising the effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based treatment.
Topics: Humans; Mice; Animals; Oxaliplatin; Antineoplastic Agents; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Neurotoxicity Syndromes
PubMed: 36506732
DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0172 -
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences May 2017The main purpose of the present study was to prepare duloxetine hydrochloride (DXH) enteric-coated pellets using different enteric polymers. Three layers (drug-loaded...
The main purpose of the present study was to prepare duloxetine hydrochloride (DXH) enteric-coated pellets using different enteric polymers. Three layers (drug-loaded layer, barrier layer, and enteric-coated layer) were applied to the inert core pellets, successively. The optimal formulation was manufactured by employing suspension layering method in fluidized bed processor (FBP) with varieties of enteric polymers like Aqoat AS-LF, Eudragit L30D55 and HPMCP-HP55. The prepared pellets were measured for physical characterization and the dissolution profile. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted to observe the morphology of pellets, and different kinetic models were applied to analyze the release mechanism of Cymbalta and home-made pellets. The coating weight gain of enteric-coated layer containing Eudragit L30D55, Aqoat AS-LF and HP-55 were determined to be 35%, 26% and 24%, respectively. The similarity factors ( ) of self-made capsules with above polymers and commercially available capsules (Cymbalta) were above 50 in the dissolution medium of pH 6.8 phosphate buffer solution (PBS). SEM figures showed the smooth surfaces of self-prepared pellets using Eudragit L30D55 and Aqoat AS-LF, whereas rough surface was found in the HP-55 pellets at day 0, and an impurity was appearing in the condition of 40 °C/75% relative humidity for 1 month. In conclusion, the pellets prepared by utilizing Eudragit L30D55 and Aqoat AS-LF were the optimal preparations based on the dissolution profile and stability.
PubMed: 32104333
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2016.08.007 -
Journal of Complementary & Integrative... Dec 2020This randomized study was aimed at evaluating the additional analgesic effect of Okada Purifying Therapy (OPT) when administered in combination with duloxetine in... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
This randomized study was aimed at evaluating the additional analgesic effect of Okada Purifying Therapy (OPT) when administered in combination with duloxetine in patients with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) and Fibromyalgia (FM).
METHODS
Patients with TMDs visited at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome who were diagnosed with FM were selected for the study. The final sample was composed of 31 patients: 15 patients were treated only with duloxetine (Group I) and 16 patients underwent also OPT treatment (Group II), for eight weeks. Craniomandibular index, total tenderness score, Brief Pain Inventory Modified Short Form, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory and State and Trait Anxiety Inventory-1 were assessed at the beginning (T0), during the course (T1) and after therapy (T2). Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed.
RESULTS
In all the data analyzed, both groups showed an improvement in particular between T0 and T1. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups during the trial, except for the interaction between treatment and time as to the ability of walking at the BPI-I (F=7.57, p=0.002). No side effects due to the duloxetine were recorded in group II compared to group I.
CONCLUSION
The additional complementary treatment (OPT) did not appear to give the patients with TMDs and FM any further benefit but it might improve pharmacological tolerability of the traditional medication.
Topics: Double-Blind Method; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33583165
DOI: 10.1515/jcim-2020-0116