-
Frontiers in Neurology 2024Poststroke seizure is a potential complication of stroke, which is the most frequent acute symptomatic seizure in adults. Patients with stroke may present with an... (Review)
Review
Poststroke seizure is a potential complication of stroke, which is the most frequent acute symptomatic seizure in adults. Patients with stroke may present with an abnormal or aggressive behavior accompanied by altered mental status and symptoms, such as hemiparesis, dysarthria, and sensory deficits. Although stroke manifestations that mimic seizures are rare, diagnosing poststroke seizures can be challenging when accompanied with negative postictal symptoms. Differential diagnoses of poststroke seizures include movement disorders, syncope, and functional (nonepileptic) seizures, which may present with symptoms similar to seizures. Furthermore, it is important to determine whether poststroke seizures occur early or late. Seizures occurring within and after 7 d of stroke onset were classified as early and late seizures, respectively. Early seizures have the same clinical course as acute symptomatic seizures; they rarely recur or require long-term antiseizure medication. Conversely, late seizures are associated with a risk of recurrence similar to that of unprovoked seizures in a patient with a focal lesion, thereby requiring long-term administration of antiseizure medication. After diagnosis, concerns regarding treatment strategies, treatment duration, and administration of primary and secondary prophylaxis often arise. Antiseizure medication decisions for the initiation of short-term primary and long-term secondary seizure prophylaxis should be considered for patients with stroke. Antiseizure drugs such as lamotrigine, carbamazepine, lacosamide, levetiracetam, phenytoin, and valproate may be administered. Poststroke seizures should be diagnosed systematically through history with differential diagnosis; in addition, classifying them as early or late seizures can help to determine treatment strategies.
PubMed: 38660095
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1337960 -
Brain : a Journal of Neurology Apr 2024It is debated whether primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) and progressive agrammatic aphasia (PAA) belong to the same clinical spectrum, traditionally termed...
It is debated whether primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) and progressive agrammatic aphasia (PAA) belong to the same clinical spectrum, traditionally termed non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), or exist as two completely distinct syndromic entities with specific pathologic/prognostic correlates. We analysed speech, language and disease severity features in a comprehensive cohort of patients with progressive motor speech impairment and/or agrammatism to ascertain evidence of naturally occurring, clinically meaningful non-overlapping syndromic entities (e.g. PPAOS and PAA) in our data. We also assessed if data-driven latent clinical dimensions with aetiologic/prognostic value could be identified. We included 98 participants, 43 of whom had an autopsy-confirmed neuropathological diagnosis. Speech pathologists assessed motor speech features indicative of dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AOS). Quantitative expressive/receptive agrammatism measures were obtained and compared with healthy controls. Baseline and longitudinal disease severity was evaluated using the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). We investigated the data's clustering tendency and cluster stability to form robust symptom clusters and employed principal component analysis to extract data-driven latent clinical dimensions (LCD). The longitudinal CDR-SB change was estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Of the participants included in this study, 93 conformed to previously reported clinical profiles (75 with AOS and agrammatism, 12 PPAOS and six PAA). The remaining five participants were characterized by non-fluent speech, executive dysfunction and dysarthria without apraxia of speech or frank agrammatism. No baseline clinical features differentiated between frontotemporal lobar degeneration neuropathological subgroups. The Hopkins statistic demonstrated a low cluster tendency in the entire sample (0.45 with values near 0.5 indicating random data). Cluster stability analyses showed that only two robust subgroups (differing in agrammatism, executive dysfunction and overall disease severity) could be identified. Three data-driven components accounted for 71% of the variance [(i) severity-agrammatism; (ii) prominent AOS; and (iii) prominent dysarthria]. None of these data-driven LCDs allowed an accurate prediction of neuropathology. The severity-agrammatism component was an independent predictor of a faster CDR-SB increase in all the participants. Higher dysarthria severity, reduced words per minute and expressive and receptive agrammatism severity at baseline independently predicted accelerated disease progression. Our findings indicate that PPAOS and PAA, rather than exist as completely distinct syndromic entities, constitute a clinical continuum. In our cohort, splitting the nfvPPA spectrum into separate clinical phenotypes did not improve clinical-pathological correlations, stressing the need for new biological markers and consensus regarding updated terminology and clinical classification.
Topics: Humans; Aphasia, Broca; Dysarthria; Apraxias; Language; Speech; Aphasia, Primary Progressive; Primary Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia
PubMed: 37988272
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad396 -
American Journal of Speech-language... Jun 2021Purpose This study describes motor speech disorders and associated communication limitations in six variants of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Method The...
Purpose This study describes motor speech disorders and associated communication limitations in six variants of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Method The presence, nature, and severity of dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AOS) were documented, along with scores on the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale-Version 3 (ASRS-3) for 77 (40 male and 37 female) patients with PSP. Clinician-estimated and patient-estimated communication limitations were rated using the Motor Speech Disorders Severity Rating (MSDSR) Scale and the Communicative Effectiveness Survey (CES), respectively. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each of these dependent variables. One-tailed tests were conducted to test mean differences in ASRS-3 and CES between participants with and without AOS and between participants with and without dysarthria. Spearman rank correlations were calculated between ASRS-3 scores and clinical judgments of AOS and dysarthria severity and between MSDSR and CES ratings. Results Nine participants (12%) had normal speech. Eighty-seven percent exhibited dysarthria; hypokinetic and mixed hypokinetic-spastic dysarthria were observed most frequently. AOS was observed in 19.5% of participants across all variants, but in only 10% exclusive of the PSP speech and language variant. Nearly half presented with AOS in which neither phonetic nor prosodic features clearly predominated. The mean ASRS-3 score for participants with AOS was significantly higher than for those without and correlated strongly with clinician judgment of AOS severity. Mean ASRS-3 was higher for participants with dysarthria than for those without but correlated weakly with dysarthria severity. Mean MSDSR and CES ratings were lower in participants with AOS compared to those without and moderately correlated with each other. Conclusions Motor speech disorders that negatively impact communicative effectiveness are common in PSP and occur in many variants. This is the first description of motor speech disorders across PSP variants, setting the stage for future research characterizing neuroanatomical correlates, progression of motor speech disorders, and benefits of targeted interventions. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14111837.
Topics: Apraxias; Dysarthria; Female; Humans; Language; Male; Speech; Speech Disorders; Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive
PubMed: 33719524
DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00126 -
Journal of Neurosurgery Sep 2022A motor speech disorder or dysarthria commonly arises in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The impact of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on...
OBJECTIVE
A motor speech disorder or dysarthria commonly arises in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The impact of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on motor speech and the potential of intraoperative motor speech testing to predict outcomes are unknown. This study examined 1) the types and prevalence of motor speech changes observed with STN DBS and their relation to the preoperative condition, 2) the ability of intraoperative testing to predict postoperative changes in motor speech, and 3) the spatial relationship between stimulation sites producing maximal motor improvement, as measured by the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), and maximal motor speech deterioration.
METHODS
Comprehensive preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative motor speech/dysarthria evaluations were performed in consecutive patients with advanced idiopathic PD who underwent STN DBS surgery in the period from 2011 to 2016. Preoperative type of dysarthria and overall dysarthria severity rating along with intraoperative motor speech testing results were evaluated as predictors of postoperative change. Atlas-independent, fully individualized field modeling was used to identify stimulation sites associated with maximal MDS-UPDRS motor improvement and motor speech deterioration.
RESULTS
Forty-three patients with PD treated with STN DBS were prospectively studied. Improved MDS-UPDRS motor scores and worsened dysarthria were demonstrated by a subset of patients (16/43). Preoperative dysarthria characteristics did not predict postoperative deterioration. Intraoperative assessment of motor speech strongly predicted postoperative outcomes (OR 4.4, p = 0.02). Sites of maximal MDS-UPDRS motor improvement and worsened dysarthria were distinct. Worsened dysarthria was associated with capsular stimulation, anterior and ventral to the site of maximal MDS-UPDRS motor improvement.
CONCLUSIONS
The predictive reliability of intraoperative motor speech testing, together with the identification of distinct stimulation sites for motor speech impairment and improved MDS-UPDRS motor function, raise the possibility that DBS lead repositioning or reprogramming could reduce adverse effects on motor speech without impacting MDS-UPDRS motor outcomes in patients undergoing STN DBS.
PubMed: 35090126
DOI: 10.3171/2021.12.JNS211729 -
Evidence-based Complementary and... 2020This study aimed to evaluate the effect of acupuncture intervention and manipulation types on poststroke dysarthria. Electronic database, including PubMed, CENTRAL,... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of acupuncture intervention and manipulation types on poststroke dysarthria. Electronic database, including PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, RISS, and CNKI, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT), treating dysarthria using acupuncture, speech-language therapy (SLT), and general management (GM), published before April 2019. The number, distribution, intensity, depth, and repetition of acupuncture and bleeding therapy on the sublingual veins were considered as manipulation types. Risk of bias of the included trials was evaluated, and their efficacy was assessed using risk ratio (RR) and the standard mean differences in the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment and Speech Function Grading, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Fifteen RCT trials involving 1453 patients were isolated. Electroacupuncture plus SLT and manual acupuncture plus SLT were more effective than SLT only, respectively (RR = 1.520, 95% CI [1.183-1.952], RR = 1.380, 95% CI [1.281-1.488]). The clinical efficacy of acupuncture plus GM was higher than that of GM alone (RR = 1.165, 95% CI [1.050-1.293]). Meta-ANOVA showed that none of the manipulation types increased the clinical efficacy of acupuncture on dysarthria. The methodological quality was low. In conclusion, our study suggests that the effect of acupuncture on poststroke dysarthria may be maximized when manual acupuncture or electroacupuncture is combined with SLT, irrespective of manipulation types.
PubMed: 33005199
DOI: 10.1155/2020/4981945 -
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2024Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical therapy for carefully selected patients with medication refractory essential tremor (ET). The most popular... (Review)
Review
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical therapy for carefully selected patients with medication refractory essential tremor (ET). The most popular anatomical targets for ET DBS are the ventral intermedius nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus, the caudal zona incerta (cZI) and the posterior subthalamic area (PSA). Despite extensive knowledge in DBS programming for tremor suppression, it is not uncommon to experience stimulation induced side effects related to DBS therapy. Dysarthria, dysphagia, ataxia, and gait impairment are common stimulation induced side effects from modulation of brain tissue that surround the target of interest. In this review, we explore current evidence about the etiology of stimulation induced side effects in ET DBS and provide several evidence-based strategies to troubleshoot, reprogram and retain tremor suppression.
PubMed: 38454907
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1353150 -
Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica :... 2021Communication is affected in most people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); up to 80-95% will reach a point where they are no longer able to meet their...
BACKGROUND
Communication is affected in most people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); up to 80-95% will reach a point where they are no longer able to meet their communicative needs with natural speech. The deterioration of speech and communicative abilities presumably has an impact on communicative participation. However, little is known about how these factors relate to each other in this population of patients.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate the association between communicative participation, functional deficits, and severity of dysarthria in individuals with ALS.
METHOD
Thirty people with ALS were rated for (1) communicative participation, using the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB, Swedish); and (2) disability related to the disease, using the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (Swedish). An expert listening panel assessed intelligibility and severity of dysarthria based on recorded text readings and sentences from the Swedish Test of Intelligibility.
RESULTS
CPIB scores were significantly lower for participants with moderate/severe dysarthria than for those with no/mild dysarthria and correlated with bulbar function and intelligibility.
CONCLUSION
The study found that the CPIB provides a means to rate and discuss communicative participation with persons with ALS, which could assist in the planning of further efforts/services.
Topics: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; Communication; Dysarthria; Humans; Speech; Speech Disorders; Speech Intelligibility
PubMed: 31918429
DOI: 10.1159/000505022 -
BMJ Case Reports Feb 2021A 73-year-old man who presented with fever and abdominal discomfort was diagnosed to have a liver abscess. He was treated with antimicrobials which included...
A 73-year-old man who presented with fever and abdominal discomfort was diagnosed to have a liver abscess. He was treated with antimicrobials which included metronidazole. One month into treatment, he developed neurological symptoms and signs that were suggestive of cerebellar pathology. MRI of the brain showed T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensities involving bilateral dentate, fastigial and interpositus nuclei. After excluding common aetiologies, the possibility of metronidazole-induced neurotoxicity was considered. After stopping metronidazole, his symptoms and signs resolved. A subsequent MRI scan of the brain showed reversal of changes. Neurotoxicity caused by metronidazole is an uncommon adverse effect of a commonly used antimicrobial drug and should be considered in the appropriate clinical scenario.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ataxia; Cerebellar Diseases; Cerebellar Nuclei; Duration of Therapy; Dysarthria; Humans; Liver Abscess; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Metronidazole; Neurotoxicity Syndromes
PubMed: 33526534
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239227 -
Journal of Speech, Language, and... Aug 2023The purpose of this study was to describe, compare, and understand speech modulation capabilities of patients with varying motor speech disorders (MSDs) in a paradigm in...
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to describe, compare, and understand speech modulation capabilities of patients with varying motor speech disorders (MSDs) in a paradigm in which patients made highly cued attempts to speak faster or slower.
METHOD
Twenty-nine patients, 12 with apraxia of speech (AOS; four phonetic and eight prosodic subtype), eight with dysarthria (six hypokinetic and two spastic subtype), and nine patients without any neurogenic MSD completed a standard motor speech evaluation where they were asked to repeat words and sentences, which served as their "natural" speaking rate. They were then asked to repeat lower complexity (counting 1-5; repeating "cat" and "catnip" 3 times each) and higher complexity stimuli (repeating "catastrophe" and "stethoscope" 3 times each and "My physician wrote out a prescription" once) as fast/slow as possible. Word durations and interword intervals were measured. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess differences related to MSD subtype and stimuli complexity on bidirectional rate modulation capacity as indexed by word duration and interword interval. Articulatory accuracy was also judged and compared.
RESULTS
Patients with prosodic AOS demonstrated a reduced ability to go faster; while they performed similarly to patients with spastic dysarthria when counting, patients with spastic dysarthria were able to increase rate similar to controls during sentence repetition; patients with prosodic AOS could not and made increased articulatory errors attempting to increase rate. AOS patients made more articulatory errors relative to other groups, regardless of condition; however, their percentage of errors reduced with an intentionally slowed speaking rate.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest comparative rate modulation abilities in conjunction with their impact on articulatory accuracy may support differential diagnosis between healthy and abnormal speech and among subtypes of MSDs (i.e., type of dysarthria or AOS). Findings need to be validated in a larger, more representative cohort encompassing several types of MSDs.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22044632.
Topics: Humans; Dysarthria; Speech; Apraxias; Phonetics; Speech Production Measurement; Speech Disorders
PubMed: 36780318
DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00286 -
Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal Oct 2020There is a high prevalence of dysphagia in patients with neuromuscular diseases and stroke, and consequences can be profound. However, the correlation of dysarthria and...
There is a high prevalence of dysphagia in patients with neuromuscular diseases and stroke, and consequences can be profound. However, the correlation of dysarthria and oral-oropharyngeal dysphagia remains unclear. This review aimed to define the clinical co-presentation of dysarthria and dysphagia in this population. A PubMed search to identify literature on the prevalence of dysarthria and dysphagia was systematically conducted in the English language literature since 1995. Subjective and objective outcomes instruments were identified for both dysarthria and dysphagia. Studies that included prevalence and co-presentation were included. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA). Of the 1,056 articles identified in the search, 20 articles met the search criteria. An additional 4 articles were examined for a total of 24 articles for analysis. Dysarthria and dysphagia were found to be highly prevalent among patients with neuromuscular disease (NMD). Overall, there was a higher prevalence of dysarthria than dysphagia. Of those patients with dysphagia, some reports estimate 76-90% of patients with NMD also had dysarthria. Dysarthria is a strong clinical clue to the presence of dysphagia. Existing subjective questionnaires may not reveal the presence of oropharyngeal dysphagia, but objective measures are more revealing. Further study to correlate the degree of dysarthria and severity of oral-oropharyngeal dysphagia are warranted.
PubMed: 33044841
DOI: 10.1177/0145561320951647