-
Frontline Gastroenterology 2022A high-output stoma (HOS) or fistula is when small bowel output causes water, sodium and often magnesium depletion. This tends to occur when the output is >1.5...
A high-output stoma (HOS) or fistula is when small bowel output causes water, sodium and often magnesium depletion. This tends to occur when the output is >1.5 -2.0 L/24 hours though varies according to the amount of food/drink taken orally. An HOS occurs in up to 31% of small bowel stomas. A high-output enterocutaneous fistula may, if from the proximal small bowel, behave in the same way and its fluid management will be the same as for an HOS. The clinical assessment consists of excluding causes other than a short bowel and treating them (especially partial or intermittent obstruction). A contrast follow through study gives an approximate measurement of residual small intestinal length (if not known from surgery) and may show the quality of the remaining small bowel. If HOS is due to a short bowel, the first step is to rehydrate the patient so stopping severe thirst. When thirst has resolved and renal function returned to normal, oral hypotonic fluid is restricted and a glucose-saline solution is sipped. Medication to slow transit (loperamide often in high dose) or to reduce secretions (omeprazole for gastric acid) may be helpful. Subcutaneous fluid (usually saline with added magnesium) may be given before intravenous fluids though can take 10-12 hours to infuse. Generally parenteral support is needed when less than 100 cm of functioning jejunum remains. If there is defunctioned bowel in situ, consideration should be given to bringing it back into continuity.
PubMed: 35300464
DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101108 -
Journal of the American College of... May 2023Minimally invasive, robotic techniques for hepatobiliary procedures offer the potential for accelerated recovery and reduced opioid usage. Robotic...
BACKGROUND:
Minimally invasive, robotic techniques for hepatobiliary procedures offer the potential for accelerated recovery and reduced opioid usage. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is a technically challenging procedure with a complex reconstruction. In this regard, standardization of the pancreaticojejunostomy technique is critical for safe adoption of robotic technology in pancreatic surgery.
STUDY DESIGN:
In this video, we demonstrate the primary steps and associated principles to perform a robotic pancreaticojejunostomy using a modified Blumgart/Nagakawa technique.
RESULTS:
Key steps to this procedure include: 1) exposure and positioning of the pancreatic remnant and jejunal limb; 2) transpancreatic suture placement using augmented sutures with bulldog clamps for organization; 3) duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with well-defined order of suture placement and knot-tying for optimal exposure, tissue handling, and technical ease; 4) completion of the anterior row of transpancreatic sutures using Lapra-TY clips for gentle, but firm tissue apposition; and 5) placement of omental flap and surgical drains in proximity to the reconstruction.
CONCLUSION:
We described our technique for performing a robotic pancreaticojejunostomy, which compensates for the technical limitations of the robotic approach. These adjustments in combination with the magnified surgical vision and augmented skill associated with the robotic platform allow for safe and reliable performance of the pancreaticojejunostomy technique.
Topics: Humans; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Robotics; Pancreatitis, Chronic; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Pancreatic Fistula
PubMed: 36729595
DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000485 -
Radiology Case Reports Oct 2022A 24-year-old woman with anxiety, depression, and emotionally unstable personality disorder was referred to a tertiary center 2 weeks after ingesting multiple foreign...
A 24-year-old woman with anxiety, depression, and emotionally unstable personality disorder was referred to a tertiary center 2 weeks after ingesting multiple foreign bodies. She had undergone a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and a laparotomy for extraction of ingested foreign bodies several years ago. A sagittal CT scan view showed a ballpen and a hair clip in the stomach. A coronal view demonstrated that a second ballpen had penetrated the duodenal wall to enter the liver parenchyma. There was no free intraperitoneal air or fluid or evidence of abscess formation. At laparotomy, a toothbrush, a broken spoon and a ballpen were extracted from the stomach via an anterior gastrotomy. The duodenum was adherent to the liver but the second ballpen had migrated into the distal duodenum, with the tip in the proximal jejunum. This was extracted via an enterotomy and the fistula was not interfered with. The enterotomy and gastrotomy were closed with 3-0 polydioxanone sutures. The hair clip had passed spontaneously and was not detected on intraoperative fluoroscopy. She made an uneventful recovery and postoperative liver function tests remained in the normal range. This is only the fourth reported case of a pen fistulizing between the upper gastrointestinal tract and the liver.
PubMed: 36032213
DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.07.096 -
Journal of Oncology 2022Comparing the effects of C-shaped embedded anastomosis and pancreatic duct-jejunal mucosal anastomosis on the incidence of pancreatic fistula after...
BACKGROUND
Comparing the effects of C-shaped embedded anastomosis and pancreatic duct-jejunal mucosal anastomosis on the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) to find a better pancreaticojejunal anastomosis method that can reduce the occurrence of complications during the operation and benefit the patients.
METHODS
A retrospective subresearch method was used to select the clinical data of patients who have undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from December 2019 to March 2021. The indicators to be collected for this study include gender, age, body mass index, preoperative liver function (total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and albumin), preoperative comorbidities (diabetes, chronic pancreatitis), and pancreatic condition (texture, pancreatic duct diameter). The patients were divided into two groups according to the method of pancreaticojejunostomy: C-shaped embedded anastomosis group ( = 38) and pancreatic duct-jejunal mucosal anastomosis group ( = 30). The duration of pancreaticojejunostomy, biliary-enteric anastomosis, gastrointestinal anastomosis, intraoperative blood loss, upper abdominal surgery history, pathological type, intraoperative blood loss, pancreaticojejunostomy time, combined pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, hemorrhage, and abdominal infection were observed and compared. According to the different methods of pancreaticojejunostomy during operation, they were divided into group A: C-shaped embedded pancreaticojejunostomy group (38 cases), and group B: pancreatic duct-jejunal mucosal anastomosis group (30 cases). The postoperative complications were compared between the two groups, and the observed indicators were analyzed with statistical methods.
RESULTS
The average pancreaticojejunostomy time in group A was 32.13 ± 4.52 min, and the average pancreaticojejunostomy time in group B was 43.23 + 4.31 min. The difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). Neither group A nor group B had a grade C fistula. The incidence of biochemical fistula in group A was 21.05% (8/38), and the incidence of biochemical fistula in group B was 13.3% (4/30). The difference was not statistically significant ( > 0.05). The incidence of grade B fistula in group A was 5.20% (2/38), and the incidence of grade B fistula in group B was 26.67% (8/30). The difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). There were no perioperative deaths in the two groups.
CONCLUSION
According to the results of data analysis, it can be seen that both the two types of pancreaticojejunostomy have good clinical effects, but that in terms of reducing the grade of pancreatic fistula, the C-shaped embedded pancreaticojejunostomy is obviously better and safer. At the same time, the C-shaped embedded pancreaticojejunostomy can shorten the time of pancreaticojejunostomy and is easier to operate, thus worthy of clinical promotion.
PubMed: 35669237
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7427146 -
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban =... Jul 2022Because of its peculiar anatomical location, most patients with hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal cancer are at advanced stage when they visit the hospital. At...
OBJECTIVES
Because of its peculiar anatomical location, most patients with hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal cancer are at advanced stage when they visit the hospital. At present, the treatment for hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal cancer is primarily surgical resection and radiotherapy. However, due to the wide range of surgical resection, it can often lead to a large range of annular defects. Therefore, the upper digestive tract reconstruction after tumor resection is very important. We use the free anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) and free jejunum (FJ) transfer to reconstruct the hypopharyngeal and cervical esophagus, and to investigate the effect of both reconstruction methods on upper gastrointestinal tract defects.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate the clinical data of 42 patients with hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal cancer (Clinical Stage IV) from Jan. 2004 to Jan. 2016 in the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. All patients underwent total laryngopharyngectomy and cervical esophageal resection. The hypopharyngeal circumferential and cervical esophageal defects were reconstructed with free ALT (=22) or FJ (=20). Four patients who underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery did not receive radiotherapy or chemotherapy after surgery. The remaining 38 patients underwent postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. All patients were followed up by telephone or outpatient review, with a follow-up deadline in Jan. 2021. We compared the differences between the 2 groups in postoperative complications, radiotherapy complications, and survival rate. The differences in individual characteristics between 2 groups were analyzed using Fisher test. The differences in postoperative and radiotherapy complications between two groups were analyzed using χ² test. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curve method.
RESULTS
In the ALT group, the postoperative complications mainly included anastomotic fistula, chylous fistula and subcutaneous hematoma of the donor site. The radiotherapy complication was anastomotic stenosis. However, in the FJ group, the postoperative complications mainly included chylous fistula, intestinal obstruction, and intestinal fistula. The radiotherapy complications mainly contained anastomotic fistula and tissue flap necrosis. The cases of postoperative complications in the ALT group and the FJ group were 7 and 5, respectively (=0.625), and the cases of radiotherapy complications were 3 and 4, respectively (=0.563). The 3-year overall survival rates in the ALT group and the FJ group were 52.9% and 46.7%, respectively, and the 5-year total survival rates were 35.1% and 31.9%, respectively (=0.53). The cases of anastomotic stenosis after radiotherapy in the ALT group were more than those in the FJ group (=0.097). However, the cases of jejunal necrosis and anastomotic fistula after radiotherapy in the FJ group were more than those in the ALT group (=0.066).
CONCLUSIONS
There are no significant differences in postoperative and radiotherapy complications and 3-and 5-year survival rates between the ALT group and the FJ group. The reconstruction with ALT is prone to develop anastomotic stricture. The reconstruction with FJ cannot withstand high-dose radiotherapy. The ALT and FJ are effective methods in the reconstruction of hypopharynx and cervical esophagus. The treatment protocol should be carefully chosen based on its advantages and disadvantages of these 2 methods.
Topics: Constriction, Pathologic; Esophageal Neoplasms; Fistula; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Hypopharynx; Jejunum; Necrosis; Postoperative Complications; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Thigh
PubMed: 36039585
DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210763 -
BMC Surgery May 2023Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most serious complication and the main reason for morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Currently,...
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most serious complication and the main reason for morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Currently, there exists no flawless pancreaticojejunal anastomosis approach. We presents a new approach called Chen's penetrating-suture technique for pancreaticojejunostomy (PPJ), which involves end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy by suture penetrating the full-thickness of the pancreas and jejunum, and evaluates its safety and efficacy.
METHODS
To assess this new approach, between May 2006 and July 2018, 193 consecutive patients who accepted the new Chen's Penetrating-Suture technique after a PD were enrolled in this study. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated.
RESULTS
All cases recovered well after PD. The median operative time was 256 (range 208-352) min, with a median time of 12 (range 8-25) min for performing pancreaticojejunostomy. Postoperative morbidity was 19.7% (38/193) and mortality was zero. The POPF rate was 4.7% (9/193) for Grade A, 1.0% (2/193) for Grade B, and no Grade C cases and one urinary tract infection.
CONCLUSION
PPJ is a simple, safe, and reliable technique with ideal postoperative clinical results.
Topics: Humans; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Anastomosis, Surgical; Pancreas; Pancreatic Fistula; Postoperative Complications; Suture Techniques
PubMed: 37248522
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02054-y -
Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990) 2020Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodendectomy is still rarely adopted due to its inherent complexity. We hereby present our experience of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy...
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodendectomy is still rarely adopted due to its inherent complexity. We hereby present our experience of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy focused on technical notes. Technical description: A 5 trocars technique is used. Vision is provided by a 30 degree scope with 4K technology for the demolitive phase and 3D for the reconstructive phase. The right colic flexure is mobilized and an extensive Kocher maneuver is carried out exposing the inferior vena cava and left renal vein. The gastric antrum is resected with a mechanical stapler. The common hepatic artery is identified behind the superior pancreatic margin; lymphadenectomy of stations 7, 8, 9, 12 a and b is performed, until the gastroduodenal artery is cleared from the lymphatic tissue; a bull-dog clamp is placed to interrupt the arterial flow through the gastroduodenal artery, in order to exclude aberrant vascularization of the liver from the SMA. The common hepatic duct is transected just above the cystic duct. The pancreas is sectioned with monopolar energy, dividing the main pancreatic duct 2-3 mm distal to the parenchymal transection line with cold scissors, as to leave a stump that will facilitate the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis then the first jejunal loop is sectioned. A complete dissection of the mesopancreas is performed, moving from a caudal to cephalad fashion. Prior to perform the pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis, a fistula risk score based on pancreatic parenchymal texture, tumor type, Wirsung diameter, intraoperative blood loss is assessed. The pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis is carried out using prolene and pds sutures. The end-to-side hepaticojejunostomy is performed about 10 cm distant from the pancreaticojejunostomy. The side to- side gastrojejunostomy is performed using a 60 mm linear stapler. Conclusion: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is a demanding procedure affected by high morbidity rates. The standardization of the technique could lead the way to reduce such rates and favor its adoption.
Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Humans; Laparoscopy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32614295
DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.115.3.385 -
Journal of Visceral Surgery Sep 2017
Review
Topics: Anastomotic Leak; Female; Humans; Male; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Suture Techniques; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28688776
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.06.003 -
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery Dec 2015The main challenge in pharyngoesophageal reconstruction is the restoration of swallow and speech functions. The aim of this paper is to review the reconstructive options... (Review)
Review
The main challenge in pharyngoesophageal reconstruction is the restoration of swallow and speech functions. The aim of this paper is to review the reconstructive options and associated complications for patients with head and neck cancer. A literature review was performed for pharynoesophagus reconstruction after ablative surgery of head and neck cancer for studies published between January 1980 to July 2015 and listed in the PubMed database. Search queries were made using a combination of 'esophagus' and 'free flap', 'microsurgical', or 'free tissue transfer'. The search query resulted in 123 studies, of which 33 studies were full text publications that met inclusion criteria. Further review into the reference of these 33 studies resulted in 15 additional studies to be included. The pharyngoesophagus reconstruction should be individualized for each patient and clinical context. Fasciocutaneous free flap and pedicled flap are effective for partial phayngoesophageal defect. Fasciocutaneous free flap and jejunal free flap are effective for circumferential defect. Pedicled flaps remain a safe option in the context of high surgical risk patients, presence of fistula. Among free flaps, anterolateral thigh free flap and jejunal free flap were associated with superior outcomes, when compared with radial forearm free flap. Speech function is reported to be better for the fasciocutaneous free flap than for the jejunal free flap.
PubMed: 28913234
DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2015.16.3.105