-
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory... 2022Duration of antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is most commonly based on expert opinion. Typical administration periods range from 5 to... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION
Duration of antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is most commonly based on expert opinion. Typical administration periods range from 5 to 7 days. A 2-day course with levofloxacin was not previously assessed. We performed a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of 2-day 7-day treatment with levofloxacin in patients with AECOPD.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
Patients with AECOPD were randomized to receive levofloxacin for 2 days and 5 days placebo ( = 155) or levofloxacin for 7 days ( = 155). All patients received a common dose of intravenous prednisone daily for 5 days. The primary outcome measure was cure rate, and secondary outcomes included need for additional antibiotics, ICU admission rate, re-exacerbation rate, death rate, and exacerbation-free interval (EFI) within 1-year follow-up. The study protocol has been prepared in accordance with the revised Helsinki Declaration for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects and Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. The study was approved by ethics committees of all participating centers prior to implementation (Monastir and Sousse Universities).
RESULTS
310 patients were randomized to receive 2-day course of levofloxacin ( = 155) or 7-day course ( = 155). Cure rate was 79.3% ( = 123) and 74.2% ( = 115), respectively, in 2-day and 7-day groups [OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.78-2.2 ( = 0.28)]. Need for additional antibiotics rate was 3.2% and 1.9% in the 2-day group and 7-day group, respectively; ( = 0.43). ICU admission rate was not significantly different between both groups. One-year re-exacerbation rate was 34.8% ( = 54) in 2-day group 29% ( = 45) in 7-day group ( = 0.19); the EFI was 121 days (interquartile range, 99-149) 110 days (interquartile range, 89-132) in 2-day and 7-day treatment groups, respectively; ( = 0.73). One-year death rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups, 5.2% 7.1% in the 2-day group and 7-day group, respectively; ( = 0.26). No difference in adverse effects was detected.
CONCLUSION
Levofloxacin once daily for 2 days is not inferior to 7 days with respect to cure rate, need for additional antibiotics and hospital readmission in AECOPD. Our findings would improve patient compliance and reduce the incidence of bacterial resistance and adverse effects.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Levofloxacin; Patient Readmission; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
PubMed: 35657073
DOI: 10.1177/17534666221099729 -
Microbiology Spectrum Dec 2022Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) has emerged as an alternative method for detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). To provide comprehensive drug...
Development and Assessment of a Novel Whole-Gene-Based Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Detecting the Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to 14 Drugs.
Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) has emerged as an alternative method for detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). To provide comprehensive drug susceptibility information and to address mutations missed by available commercial molecular diagnostics, we developed and evaluated a tNGS panel with 22 whole-gene targets using the Ion Torrent platform to predict drug resistance to 14 drugs, namely, rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA), moxifloxacin (MFX), levofloxacin (LFX), amikacin (AMK), capreomycin (CM), kanamycin (KM), streptomycin (SM), bedaquiline (BDQ), clofazimine (CFZ), linezolid (LZD), and delamanid (DLM). We selected 50 and 35 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with various DR profiles as the training set and the challenge set, respectively. Comparative variant analyses of the DR genes were performed using Sanger sequencing and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) results were used as gold standards. Regarding the limit of detection, the tNGS assay detected 2.9 to 3.8% minority variants in 4% mutant mixtures. The sensitivity and specificity of tNGS were 97.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 93.1 to 98.7%) and 99.1% (95% CI = 97.7 to 99.7%), respectively. The concordance of tNGS with pDST was 98.5% (95% CI = 97.2 to 99.2%), which was comparable to that of WGS (98.7%, 95% CI = 97.4 to 99.3%) and better than that of Sanger sequencing (96.9%, 95% CI = 95.3 to 98.0%). The agreement between tNGS and pDST was almost perfect for RIF, INH, EMB, MFX, LFX, AMK, CM, KM, SM, BDQ, and LZD (kappa value = 0.807 to 1.000) and substantial for PZA (kappa value = 0.791). Our customized novel whole-gene-based tNGS panel is highly consistent with pDST and WGS for comprehensive and accurate prediction of drug resistance in a strengthened and streamlined DR-TB laboratory program. We developed and validated a tNGS assay that was the first to target 22 whole genes instead of regions of drug resistance genes and comprehensively detected susceptibility to 14 anti-TB drugs, with great flexibility to include new or repurposed drugs. Notably, we demonstrated that our custom-designed Ion AmpliSeq TB research panel platform had high concordance with pDST and could significantly reduce turnaround time (by approximately 70%) to meet a clinically actionable time frame. Our tNGS assay is a promising DST solution for providing needed clinical information for precision medicine-guided therapies for DR-TB and allows the rollout of active pharmacovigilance.
Topics: Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Antitubercular Agents; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Ethambutol; Rifampin; Amikacin; Levofloxacin; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
PubMed: 36255328
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02605-22 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2020Infective endocarditis is a microbial infection of the endocardial surface of the heart. Antibiotics are the cornerstone of treatment, but due to the differences in... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Infective endocarditis is a microbial infection of the endocardial surface of the heart. Antibiotics are the cornerstone of treatment, but due to the differences in presentation, populations affected, and the wide variety of micro-organisms that can be responsible, their use is not standardised. This is an update of a review previously published in 2016.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the existing evidence about the clinical benefits and harms of different antibiotics regimens used to treat people with infective endocarditis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase Classic and Embase, LILACS, CINAHL, and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science on 6 January 2020. We also searched three trials registers and handsearched the reference lists of included papers. We applied no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of antibiotic regimens for treating definitive infective endocarditis diagnosed according to modified Duke's criteria. We considered all-cause mortality, cure rates, and adverse events as the primary outcomes. We excluded people with possible infective endocarditis and pregnant women.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently performed study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and data extraction in duplicate. We constructed 'Summary of findings' tables and used GRADE methodology to assess the quality of the evidence. We described the included studies narratively.
MAIN RESULTS
Six small RCTs involving 1143 allocated/632 analysed participants met the inclusion criteria of this first update. The included trials had a high risk of bias. Three trials were sponsored by drug companies. Due to heterogeneity in outcome definitions and different antibiotics used data could not be pooled. The included trials compared miscellaneous antibiotic schedules having uncertain effects for all of the prespecified outcomes in this review. Evidence was either low or very low quality due to high risk of bias and very low number of events and small sample size. The results for all-cause mortality were as follows: one trial compared quinolone (levofloxacin) plus standard treatment (antistaphylococcal penicillin (cloxacillin or dicloxacillin), aminoglycoside (tobramycin or netilmicin), and rifampicin) versus standard treatment alone and reported 8/31 (26%) with levofloxacin plus standard treatment versus 9/39 (23%) with standard treatment alone; risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 2.56. One trial compared fosfomycin plus imipenem 3/4 (75%) versus vancomycin 0/4 (0%) (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.47 to 103.27), and one trial compared partial oral treatment 7/201 (3.5%) versus conventional intravenous treatment 13/199 (6.53%) (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.31). The results for rates of cure with or without surgery were as follows: one trial compared daptomycin versus low-dose gentamicin plus an antistaphylococcal penicillin (nafcillin, oxacillin, or flucloxacillin) or vancomycin and reported 9/28 (32.1%) with daptomycin versus 9/25 (36%) with low-dose gentamicin plus antistaphylococcal penicillin or vancomycin; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.89. One trial compared glycopeptide (vancomycin or teicoplanin) plus gentamicin with cloxacillin plus gentamicin (13/23 (56%) versus 11/11 (100%); RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.85). One trial compared ceftriaxone plus gentamicin versus ceftriaxone alone (15/34 (44%) versus 21/33 (64%); RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.10), and one trial compared fosfomycin plus imipenem versus vancomycin (1/4 (25%) versus 2/4 (50%); RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.55). The included trials reported adverse events, the need for cardiac surgical interventions, and rates of uncontrolled infection, congestive heart failure, relapse of endocarditis, and septic emboli, and found no conclusive differences between groups (very low-quality evidence). No trials assessed quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This first update confirms the findings of the original version of the review. Limited and low to very low-quality evidence suggests that the comparative effects of different antibiotic regimens in terms of cure rates or other relevant clinical outcomes are uncertain. The conclusions of this updated Cochrane Review were based on few RCTs with a high risk of bias. Accordingly, current evidence does not support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infective endocarditis.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Endocarditis, Bacterial; Female; Fosfomycin; Humans; Imipenem; Levofloxacin; Male; Penicillins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vancomycin
PubMed: 32407558
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009880.pub3 -
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Oct 2022Pediatric tuberculous meningitis (TBM) commonly causes death or disability. In adults, high-dose rifampicin may reduce mortality. The role of fluoroquinolones remains... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Pediatric tuberculous meningitis (TBM) commonly causes death or disability. In adults, high-dose rifampicin may reduce mortality. The role of fluoroquinolones remains unclear. There have been no antimicrobial treatment trials for pediatric TBM.
METHODS
TBM-KIDS was a phase 2 open-label randomized trial among children with TBM in India and Malawi. Participants received isoniazid and pyrazinamide plus: (i) high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg) and ethambutol (R30HZE, arm 1); (ii) high-dose rifampicin and levofloxacin (R30HZL, arm 2); or (iii) standard-dose rifampicin and ethambutol (R15HZE, arm 3) for 8 weeks, followed by 10 months of standard treatment. Functional and neurocognitive outcomes were measured longitudinally using Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) and Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL).
RESULTS
Of 2487 children prescreened, 79 were screened and 37 enrolled. Median age was 72 months; 49%, 43%, and 8% had stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 58%, 55%, and 36% of children in arms 1, 2, and 3, with 1 death (arm 1) and 6 early treatment discontinuations (4 in arm 1, 1 each in arms 2 and 3). By week 8, all children recovered to MRS score of 0 or 1. Average MSEL scores were significantly better in arm 1 than arm 3 in fine motor, receptive language, and expressive language domains (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS
In a pediatric TBM trial, functional outcomes were excellent overall. The trend toward higher frequency of adverse events but better neurocognitive outcomes in children receiving high-dose rifampicin requires confirmation in a larger trial.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT02958709.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Rifampin; Tuberculosis, Meningeal; Levofloxacin; Ethambutol; Antitubercular Agents; Standard of Care
PubMed: 35291004
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac208 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Feb 2015Azithromycin and levofloxacin have been shown to be efficacious in treating infections. The adverse drug events associated with azithromycin and levofloxacin were... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Azithromycin and levofloxacin have been shown to be efficacious in treating infections. The adverse drug events associated with azithromycin and levofloxacin were considered rare. However, the US FDA released warnings regarding the possible risk of QT prolongation with azithromycin and levofloxacin.
AREAS COVERED
Case reports/case series, observational studies and clinical trials assessing cardiovascular risks associated with azithromycin and levofloxacin were critically reviewed, including 15 case reports/series, 5 observational studies and 5 clinical trials that investigated the cardiac risks associated azithromycin and levofloxacin.
EXPERT OPINION
Results are discordant. Two retrospective studies utilizing large databases demonstrated an increased risk of cardiovascular death with azithromycin, when azithromycin was compared with amoxicillin. Two other retrospective studies found no difference in cardiovascular death associated with azithromycin and other antibiotics. For levofloxacin, the increased risk of cardiovascular death was only found in one retrospective study. Therefore, the risks and benefits of antibacterial therapies should be considered when making prescription decisions. This study should not preclude clinicians from avoiding azithromycin and levofloxacin. If a patient has an indication to receive an antibiotic and if azithromycin or levofloxacin is needed, it may be used, but the potential risks must be understood.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Death; Humans; Levofloxacin; Long QT Syndrome
PubMed: 25494485
DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2015.989210 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Oct 2023Levofloxacin is used for treatment and prevention of rifampicin-resistant (RR)-TB in children. Recent data showed higher exposures with 100 mg dispersible compared with... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND
Levofloxacin is used for treatment and prevention of rifampicin-resistant (RR)-TB in children. Recent data showed higher exposures with 100 mg dispersible compared with non-dispersible tablet formulations with potentially important dosing implications in children. We aimed to verify and better characterize this finding.
METHODS
We conducted a crossover pharmacokinetic trial in children aged ≤5 years receiving levofloxacin RR-TB preventive therapy. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done after 15-20 mg/kg doses of levofloxacin with 100 mg dispersible and crushed 250 mg non-dispersible levofloxacin formulations. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed.
RESULTS
Twenty-five children were included, median (IQR) weight and age 12.2 (10.7-15.0) kg and 2.56 (1.58-4.03) years, respectively. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination and transit compartment absorption best described levofloxacin pharmacokinetics. Allometric scaling adjusted for body size, and maturation of clearance with age was characterized. Typical clearance in a 12 kg child was estimated at 4.17 L/h. Non-dispersible tablets had 21.5% reduced bioavailability compared with the dispersible formulation, with no significant differences in other absorption parameters.Dosing simulations showed that current recommended dosing for both formulations result in median exposures below adult-equivalent exposures at a 750 mg daily dose, mainly in children >6 months. Higher levofloxacin doses of 16-30 mg/kg for dispersible and 20-38 mg/kg for crushed non-dispersible tablets may be required in children >6 months.
CONCLUSIONS
The dispersible paediatric levofloxacin formulation has improved bioavailability compared with the crushed non-dispersible adult formulation, but exposures remain below those in adults. We propose optimized age- and weight-based dosing for levofloxacin, which require further evaluation.
Topics: Adult; Child, Preschool; Humans; Biological Availability; Cross-Over Studies; Levofloxacin; Rifampin; Tablets; Infant
PubMed: 37596982
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad257 -
Drugs Feb 2019The inability to use powerful antituberculosis drugs in an increasing number of patients seems to be the biggest threat towards global tuberculosis (TB) elimination.... (Review)
Review
The inability to use powerful antituberculosis drugs in an increasing number of patients seems to be the biggest threat towards global tuberculosis (TB) elimination. Simplified, shorter and preferably less toxic drug regimens are being investigated for pulmonary TB to counteract emergence of drug resistance. Intensified regimens with high-dose anti-TB drugs during the first weeks of treatment are being investigated for TB meningitis to increase the survival rate among these patients. Moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin are seen as core agents in case of resistance or intolerance against first-line anti-TB drugs. However, based on their pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), these drugs are also promising for TB meningitis and might perhaps have the potential to shorten pulmonary TB treatment if dosing could be optimized. We prepared a comprehensive summary of clinical trials investigating the outcome of TB regimens based on moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in recent years. In the majority of clinical trials, treatment success was not in favour of these drugs compared to standard regimens. By discussing these results, we propose that incorporation of extended PK/PD analysis into the armamentarium of drug-development tools is needed to clarify the role of moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin for TB, using the right dose. In addition, to prevent failure of treatment or emergence of drug-resistance, PK and PD variability advocates for concentration-guided dosing in patients at risk for too low a drug-exposure.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Fluoroquinolones; Gatifloxacin; Humans; Levofloxacin; Moxifloxacin; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 30617959
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-018-1043-y -
Biology of Blood and Marrow... Apr 2020Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis has been associated with poor outcomes after intensive therapy. We evaluated the effect of levofloxacin (LEVO), the most commonly used...
Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis has been associated with poor outcomes after intensive therapy. We evaluated the effect of levofloxacin (LEVO), the most commonly used prophylactic antibacterial antibiotic during intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), on the gut microbiota in 2 cohorts of patients, 1 cohort comprising 20 patients with acute leukemia receiving intensive chemotherapy and the other cohort comprising 20 allo-HCT recipients. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of thrice-weekly collected stool samples permitted a comparison between intervals with no antibacterial antibiotic exposure and those with only LEVO exposure. In mixed-effects modeling, the only variables influenced by LEVO were the relative abundances of Parabacteroides (regression coefficient, -.063; 99% confidence interval [CI], -.102 to -.024) and Blautia (regression coefficient, .050; 99% CI, .004 to .095). Other taxa and microbiota diversity were unaffected. Overall, the effect of LEVO on the gut microbiota in these cohorts was mild.
Topics: Dysbiosis; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Levofloxacin; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
PubMed: 31870930
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.722 -
Microbial Pathogenesis Feb 2022The purpose of this article is to study the isolated and combined effect of the peptides Synoeca-MP and IDR-1018 against multi-resistant clinical isolates of K....
The purpose of this article is to study the isolated and combined effect of the peptides Synoeca-MP and IDR-1018 against multi-resistant clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae (Kp2177569 - LACEN) in vitro. The bactericidal activity of the peptide Synoeca-MP in combination with three different classes of commercial antimicrobials and its immunomodulatory potential was also evaluated. Synoeca-MP showed better antimicrobial activity than IDR-1018 and presented synergistic action combined with levofloxacin. Therefore, Synoeca-MP and levofloxacin, and the combination of both, were used in subsequent analyses. In the presence of heat-killed antigens, cellular viability and TNF-α levels was maintained, the production of NO increased and a reduction in IL-10 production was observed. The synergistic antibacterial effect between Synoeca-MP and levofloxacin was effective against multidrug-resistant strains of K. pneumoniae. The association of Synoeca-MP and levofloxacin may present a low modulating action of pro and anti-inflammatory mediators, based on these results.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Levofloxacin; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 35033636
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105403 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2022Fluoroquinolones are potentially effective against Elizabethkingia anophelis. We investigated the MIC, mutant prevention concentration (MPC), and target gene mutations...
Fluoroquinolones are potentially effective against Elizabethkingia anophelis. We investigated the MIC, mutant prevention concentration (MPC), and target gene mutations of fluoroquinolones in . Eighty-five s isolates were collected from five hospitals in Taiwan. The MIC and MPC of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were examined for all s except 17 isolates, in which ciprofloxacin MPC could not be determined due to drug precipitation caused by overly high drug concentration. Mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of DNA gyrase (GyrA and GyrB) and topoisomerase IV (ParC and ParE) in the clinical isolates and fluoroquinolone-selected mutants were examined. Overall, 23.5% and 71.8% of the isolates tested were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively. The MPC of ciprofloxacin was 128 mg/L, and the MPC of levofloxacin was 51.2 mg/L. The MPC/MIC ratio for ciprofloxacin was 64, whereas that for levofloxacin was 25.6. The coefficient of determination between the MPC and MIC for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin was 0.72 and 0.56, respectively, in the linear regression analysis. Preexisting mutations in GyrA (S83I, S83R, and D87Y) were identified in 18 clinical isolates, all of which were resistant to both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Additional amino acid substitutions in GyrA were identified in all ciprofloxacin- and levofloxacin-selected mutants. Furthermore, GyrB alterations (D431N or D431H) were found in nine levofloxacin-treated isolates. Given that maintaining the serum concentrations of fluoroquinolones above MPCs is impossible under presently recommended doses, the selection of mutant strains seems inevitable.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ciprofloxacin; DNA Gyrase; DNA Topoisomerase IV; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Flavobacteriaceae; Fluoroquinolones; Levofloxacin; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mutation
PubMed: 35708332
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00301-22