-
The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology... Apr 2022The pathogenesis of extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease is complex, and esophageal motility and reflux may be involved in it. In this study, we...
BACKGROUND
The pathogenesis of extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease is complex, and esophageal motility and reflux may be involved in it. In this study, we aimed to compare esophageal motility and reflux characteristics in gastroesopha- geal reflux disease patients with and without extraesophageal symptoms by high-resolution manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring.
METHODS
We retrospectively studied gastroesophageal reflux disease patients between January 2014 and December 2018. All patients had undergone high-resolution manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. The results were compared and analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 59 patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their main complaint: only typical symptoms (group A, n = 11), both typical and extraesophageal symptoms (group B, n = 33), and only extraesophageal symp- toms (group C, n = 15). Compared with group A, the lower esophageal sphincter basal pressure, integrated residual pressure, and lower esophageal sphincter length were lower, and the proximal reflux percentages of a weak acid and non-acid reflux were higher in group B and group C (P < .017). The positive rate of esophageal motility disorders was lower in group A than in other groups (P < .05). The propor- tion of patients with multiple rapid swallows/single swallow-distal contractile integral ratio greater than 1-was higher in group A than in other groups (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure and lower esophageal sphincter length, increased proximal esophageal reflux of weak acid and non-acid reflux, esophageal motility disorders, and decreased peristaltic reserve are involved in the pathogenesis of extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Topics: Esophageal Motility Disorders; Esophageal pH Monitoring; Esophagitis, Peptic; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Manometry; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35550536
DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2022.201040 -
Current Gastroenterology Reports Mar 2017We provide an overview of the clinical application of novel pharyngeal high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) with pressure flow analysis (PFA) in our hands with... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
We provide an overview of the clinical application of novel pharyngeal high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) with pressure flow analysis (PFA) in our hands with example cases.
RECENT FINDINGS
In our Centre, we base our interpretation of HRIM recordings upon a qualitative assessment of pressure-impedance waveforms during individual swallows, as well as a quantitative assessment of averaged PFA swallow function variables. We provide a description of two global swallowing efficacy measures, the swallow risk index (SRI), reflecting global swallowing dysfunction (higher SRI = greater aspiration risk) and the post-swallow impedance ratio (PSIR) detecting significant post-swallow bolus residue. We describe a further eight swallow function variables specific to the hypopharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES), assessing hypo-pharyngeal distension pressure, contractility, bolus presence and flow timing, and UES basal tone, relaxation, opening and contractility. Pharyngeal HRIM has now come of age, being applicable for routine clinical practice to assess the biomechanics of oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction. In the future, it may guide treatment strategies and allow more objective longitudinal follow-up on clinical outcomes.
Topics: Deglutition Disorders; Electric Impedance; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper; Humans; Manometry; Pharynx; Pressure; Viscosity
PubMed: 28289859
DOI: 10.1007/s11894-017-0552-2 -
Revista Espanola de Enfermedades... Apr 2015
Topics: Esophageal Motility Disorders; Female; Humans; Manometry; Middle Aged
PubMed: 25824925
DOI: No ID Found -
Respiratory Medicine Dec 2018Although pleural manometry is a relatively simple medical procedure it is only occasionally used to follow pleural pressure (Ppl) changes during a therapeutic... (Review)
Review
Although pleural manometry is a relatively simple medical procedure it is only occasionally used to follow pleural pressure (Ppl) changes during a therapeutic thoracentesis and pneumothorax drainage. As some studies showed that pleural pressure monitoring might be associated with significant advantages, pleural manometry has been increasingly evaluated in the last decade. The major clinical applications of pleural pressure measurements include: the prevention of complications associated with large volume thoracentesis, diagnosis and differentiation between various types of an unexpandable lung and a possible prediction of the efficacy of chest tube drainage in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. It is well known that the therapeutic thoracentesis might be complicated by cough, chest discomfort, and rarely, by a life threatening condition called reexpansion pulmonary edema (RPE). The serious adverse events of thoracentesis are related to pleural pressure drop rather than to the volume of removed pleural effusion. The use of pleural manometry during pleural fluid withdrawal enables the evaluation of the relationship between withdrawn pleural fluid volume, pleural pressure changes and procedure related complications. Pleural pressure measurement is also an important tool to study the different mechanism of pneumothorax complicating the thoracentesis. Pleural manometry is critical for measurement of pleural elastance, diagnosis of an unexpandable lung and differentiation between trapped lung and lung entrapment. This usually has significant clinical implications in terms of further management of patients with pleural effusion. The paper is a comprehensive review presenting different aspects of pleural pressure measurement in clinical practice.
Topics: Diagnosis, Differential; Elasticity; Humans; Manometry; Pleura; Pleural Diseases; Pleural Effusion; Pneumothorax; Pressure; Pulmonary Edema; Thoracentesis
PubMed: 29402510
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.01.014 -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Feb 2022The absence of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) norms in pediatrics limits the assessment of children with dysphagia. This study aimed to describe HREM...
BACKGROUND
The absence of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) norms in pediatrics limits the assessment of children with dysphagia. This study aimed to describe HREM parameters in a cohort of children without dysphagia.
METHODS
Children ages 9-16 years with a negative Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire screen and normal histologic findings underwent HREM after completion of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Ten swallows of 5 ml 0.45% saline boluses per subject were captured in supine position. Analyzed data included resting and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) of lower (LES) and upper (UES) esophageal sphincters, peristaltic contractile integrals, transition zone (TZ) breaks, velocities, and lengths associated with proximal and distal esophagus.
KEY RESULTS
33 subjects (15 female) with mean (range) age 12.9 (9-16) years completed the study. Two of 330 analyzed swallows failed. The UES mean resting pressure, and its 0.2 s and 0.8 s IRPs were 48.3 (95% CI 12.9) mmHg, 2.9 (95% CI 1.9) mmHg, and 12.1 (95% CI 2.5) mmHg, respectively. The LES mean resting pressure and its 4 s IRP were 29.0 (95% CI 4.0) mmHg and 9.2 (95% CI 1.3) mmHg. The mean proximal (PCI) and distal (DCI) esophageal contractile integrals were 231 (95% CI 54.8) mmHg-s-cm and 1789.3 (95% CI 323.5) mmHg-s-cm, with mean TZ break 0.5 (95% CI 0.3) cm.
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES
This is the first study to describe HREM parameters in children without dysphagia. Most of the reported measurements were significantly different and less variable from reported adult norms. This emphasizes the need for child-specific catheters, norms, and protocols to define pediatric esophageal motility disorders.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Deglutition Disorders; Esophageal Motility Disorders; Female; Humans; Manometry; Peristalsis
PubMed: 34089288
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14184 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... May 2022Manometry is the best established technique to assess anorectal function in faecal incontinence. By systematic review, pooled prevalences of anal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Systematic review and meta-analysis of anal motor and rectal sensory dysfunction in male and female patients undergoing anorectal manometry for symptoms of faecal incontinence.
AIM
Manometry is the best established technique to assess anorectal function in faecal incontinence. By systematic review, pooled prevalences of anal hypotonia/hypocontractility and rectal hypersensitivity/hyposensitivity in male and female patients were determined in controlled studies using anorectal manometry.
METHODS
Searches of MEDLINE and Embase were completed. Screening, data extraction and bias assessment were performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed based on a random effects model with heterogeneity evaluated by I .
RESULTS
Of 2116 identified records, only 13 studies (2981 faecal incontinence patients; 1028 controls) met the inclusion criteria. Anal tone was evaluated in 10 studies and contractility in 11; rectal sensitivity in five. Only three studies had low risk of bias. Pooled prevalence of anal hypotonia was 44% (95% CI 32-56, I = 96.35%) in women and 27% (95% CI 14-40, I = 94.12%) in men. The pooled prevalence of anal hypocontractility was 69% (95% CI 57-81; I = 98.17%) in women and 36% (95% CI 18-53; I = 96.77%) in men. Pooled prevalence of rectal hypersensitivity was 10% (95% CI 4-15; I = 80.09%) in women and 4% (95% CI 1-7; I = 51.25%) in men, whereas hyposensitivity had a pooled prevalence of 7% (95% CI 5-9; I = 0.00%) in women compared to 19% (95% CI 15-23; I = 0.00%) in men.
CONCLUSIONS
The number of appropriately controlled studies of anorectal manometry is small with fewer still at low risk of bias. Results were subject to gender differences, wide confidence intervals and high heterogeneity indicating the need for international collective effort to harmonize practice and reporting to improve certainty of diagnosis.
Topics: Anal Canal; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Male; Manometry; Muscle Hypotonia; Rectum
PubMed: 35023242
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16047 -
European Review For Medical and... Sep 2022Esophageal motility is regulated both by coordinated stimulation and inhibition of the circular and longitudinal muscle layers of the esophagus. Although there are many...
OBJECTIVE
Esophageal motility is regulated both by coordinated stimulation and inhibition of the circular and longitudinal muscle layers of the esophagus. Although there are many diseases known to have an effect on esophageal motility, the effect of subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the esophagus on esophageal motility, which is often detected incidentally, remains still unclear. The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of SELs of the esophagus on esophageal motility evaluating it by high-resolution manometry (HRM).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A total of 32 patients with SELs in the esophagus and 12 healthy individuals were included. All patients and controls included in the study underwent HRM using a Unisensor UniTip High Resolution catheter (Laborie, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and endosonographic examination.
RESULTS
The mean age was 52.60±15.56 years (range: 23-79) and the average body mass index (BMI) was 26.63±4.71 kg/m2. Gender, height, weight, and BMI measurements, smoking status, alcohol use, and DM status did not statistically differ significantly between the groups (p>0.05). Of 32 patients with SELs, 65.6% (n=21) had lesions originating in the muscularis propria, while 34.4% had lesions originating in the submucosa. The rate of abnormal motility both in the supine and in upright positions of patients with SELs was found to be significantly higher than in the control group (p=0.001, p<0.01, respectively). In patients with SELs, the incidence of infective motility was higher than the normal group (p=0.001, p<0.01, respectively). As the size of the lesion increases (>2 cm), the probability of abnormal HRM results increased.
CONCLUSIONS
SELs of the esophagus have pathological effects on esophageal motility, mainly ineffective esophageal motility disorder.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Endosonography; Esophageal Motility Disorders; Humans; Manometry; Middle Aged; Radionuclide Imaging
PubMed: 36111931
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202209_29654 -
American Journal of Physiology.... Sep 2022Esophageal peristalsis consists of initial inhibition (relaxation) followed by excitation (contraction), both of which move sequentially in the aboral direction. Initial... (Review)
Review
Esophageal peristalsis consists of initial inhibition (relaxation) followed by excitation (contraction), both of which move sequentially in the aboral direction. Initial inhibition results in receptive relaxation and bolus-induced luminal distension, which allows propulsion by the contraction with minimal resistance to flow. Similar to the contraction wave, luminal distension has unique waveform characteristics in normal subjects; both are modulated by bolus volume, bolus viscosity, and posture, suggesting a possible cause-and-effect relationship between the two. Distension contraction plots in patients with dysphagia with normal bolus clearance [high-amplitude esophageal contractions (HAECs), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), and functional dysphagia (FD)] reveal two major findings: ) unlike normal subjects, there is luminal occlusion distal to bolus during peristalsis in certain patients, i.e., with type 3 achalasia and nonobstructive dysphagia; and ) bolus travels through a narrow lumen esophagus during peristalsis in patients with HAECs, EGJOO, and FD. Aforementioned findings indicate a relative dynamic obstruction to the bolus flow during peristalsis and reduced distensibility of esophageal wall in the bolus segment of the esophagus. We speculate that a normal or supernormal contraction wave pushing bolus against resistance is the mechanism of dysphagia sensation in significant number of patients. Representations of distension and contraction, combined with objective measures of flow timing and distensibility are complementary to the current scheme of classifying esophageal motility disorders based solely on the characteristics of contraction phase of peristalsis. Better understanding of the distensibility of the bolus-containing segment of the esophagus during peristalsis will lead to the development of novel medical and surgical therapies in the treatment of dysphagia in significant number of patients.
Topics: Deglutition Disorders; Esophageal Motility Disorders; Humans; Manometry; Peristalsis; Urinary Bladder Diseases
PubMed: 35788152
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00124.2022 -
Dysphagia Feb 2017Determining intrabolus pressure (IBP) at the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and in the esophagus has given compelling evidence that IBP can be a predictor for...
Determining intrabolus pressure (IBP) at the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and in the esophagus has given compelling evidence that IBP can be a predictor for swallowing dysfunction. Studies have looked most superiorly at the low hypopharynx region but there has been no inquiry into what IBP measures throughout the entire pharynx can tell us. We present a study to describe the pressures within and surrounding the moving bolus throughout the pharynx and into the UES. Simultaneous high-resolution manometry (HRM) and videofluoroscopy were performed in ten healthy subjects swallowing ten 10 mL thin-liquid barium boluses. Three events surrounding bolus movement were tracked via videofluoroscopy, and two additional events were found using manometric measures. As the bolus passes through the pharynx, low pressure is created at and below the head of the bolus. A modest pressure increase is seen as the bolus passes through the pharynx, and finally, high pressure is observed at the bolus tail, followed by an even larger pressure generation of a clearance event. HRM allows for greater resolution in data collection in the pharynx and in this study, aided in identifying semi-unique characteristics around the hypopharynx and the UES which are consistent with the complex anatomy of the regions and the transition of the UES from active closure to relaxed opening. In the future, additional studies designed to look at aged and diseased populations may lead to better understanding of disease etiology, and treatment options.
Topics: Adult; Deglutition; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper; Female; Fluoroscopy; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Manometry; Middle Aged; Pharynx; Pressure; Young Adult
PubMed: 27565155
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-016-9743-5 -
Clinical and Translational... Oct 2023Anorectal manometry (ARM) is the gold standard for the evaluation of anorectal functional disorders, prevalent in the population. Nevertheless, the accessibility to this...
INTRODUCTION
Anorectal manometry (ARM) is the gold standard for the evaluation of anorectal functional disorders, prevalent in the population. Nevertheless, the accessibility to this examination is limited, and the complexity of data analysis and report is a significant drawback. This pilot study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence model to automatically differentiate motility patterns of fecal incontinence (FI) from obstructed defecation (OD) using ARM data.
METHODS
We developed and tested multiple machine learning algorithms for the automatic interpretation of ARM data. Four models were tested: k-nearest neighbors, support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting (xGB). These models were trained using a stratified 5-fold strategy. Their performance was assessed after fine-tuning of each model's hyperparameters, using 90% of data for training and 10% of data for testing.
RESULTS
A total of 827 ARM examinations were used in this study. After fine-tuning, the xGB model presented an overall accuracy (84.6% ± 2.9%), similar to that of random forests (82.7% ± 4.8%) and support vector machines (81.0% ± 8.0%) and higher that of k-nearest neighbors (74.4% ± 3.8%). The xGB models showed the highest discriminating performance between OD and FI, with an area under the curve of 0.939.
DISCUSSION
The tested machine learning algorithms, particularly the xGB model, accurately differentiated between FI and OD manometric patterns. Subsequent development of these tools may optimize the access to ARM studies, which may have a significant impact on the management of patients with anorectal functional diseases.
Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Pilot Projects; Fecal Incontinence; Manometry; Physical Examination
PubMed: 36520781
DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000555