-
Acta Ophthalmologica Aug 2016Clinical evidence of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations after intra-arterial (IAC) and intravitreal chemotherapy (IViC) of retinoblastoma has been reported.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
PURPOSE
Clinical evidence of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations after intra-arterial (IAC) and intravitreal chemotherapy (IViC) of retinoblastoma has been reported. We, therefore, investigated the cellular toxic effects of melphalan, topotecan and carboplatin on the RPE in a cell culture model.
METHODS
The effects of melphalan, carboplatin and topotecan on ARPE19 cell morphology were examined by phase contrast microscopy. Cell proliferation was quantified by BrdU incorporation, cell viability studied via MTS assays, and cell densities were estimated by Crystal Violet staining, and apoptosis induction studied via caspase 3/7-activity assays after a 24-hr incubation period. Staurosporine, media without fetal bovine serum, diluents of melphalan, carboplatin and topotecan were applied as positive and negative controls, respectively.
RESULTS
We observed a concentration-dependent increase in the number and size of gaps in the ARPE19 cell layer with each drug. There was a significant decrease in proliferative activity and cell viability of RPE cells as well as an increase in apoptosis after 24 hrs culture in media supplemented with melphalan and topotecan. Carboplatin had comparable effects on cell proliferation and cell viability; however, no significant apoptotic impacts were observed. The three cytostatic drugs had insignificant effects on cell density measurements.
CONCLUSIONS
Morphological monitoring and toxicity assays indicate a direct toxic effect of melphalan and the other two cytostatic drugs on ARPE19 cells. Thus, a direct toxic effect of melphalan in vivo after IAC or IViC on the RPE seems probable and may explain the clinical and angiographic RPE alterations observed in some retinoblastoma patients.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Carboplatin; Caspase 3; Caspase 7; Cell Count; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cells, Cultured; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Melphalan; Microscopy, Phase-Contrast; Retinal Pigment Epithelium; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors; Topotecan
PubMed: 26893290
DOI: 10.1111/aos.12990 -
Bone Marrow Transplantation Apr 2019Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a mainstay in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). While the procedure is generally safe, toxicities associated...
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a mainstay in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). While the procedure is generally safe, toxicities associated with high-dose melphalan conditioning are common and significantly affect patient quality of life. Recently, a propylene glycol-free melphalan formulation (PG-free MEL; Evomela®) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as an ASCT-conditioning regimen for MM. PG-free MEL is more soluble and stable than propylene glycol-solubilized melphalan (PG-solubilized MEL; Alkeran®). As such, there is speculation that it could decrease toxicities and increase the efficacy of ASCT. We compared the outcomes of patients conditioned with PG-free MEL (n = 216) to PG-solubilized MEL (n = 200) at our institution. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. After Day +0, there were no differences in terms of hospitalizations, neutropenic fevers, intravenous granisetron requirement, World Health Organization grade ≥ 2 oral/esophageal mucositis, intravenous fluid requirement, or narcotic requirement. However, PG-free MEL patients had a higher incidence of diarrhea, which was mostly C. difficile-negative (82% vs. 71%, P = 0.015*). Day + 100 hematologic responses and progression-free survival after ASCT were comparable. In summary, we demonstrate that switching to PG-free MEL did not significantly reduce short-term complications of ASCT or improve outcomes in MM.
Topics: Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30116014
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-018-0302-6 -
Haematologica Mar 2024Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and safety of melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the randomized, open-label, phase III LIGHTHOUSE study.
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Dexamethasone; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasms, Plasma Cell; Neutropenia; Phenylalanine; Proteasome Inhibitors; Transplantation, Autologous; United States; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37646660
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283509 -
The Journal of Surgical Research Dec 2021Treatment strategies for advanced cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients, resistant or not treatable with novel target and immunotherapeutic drugs, remain a significant...
BACKGROUND
Treatment strategies for advanced cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients, resistant or not treatable with novel target and immunotherapeutic drugs, remain a significant challenge, particularly for patients with unresectable stage IIIC/D disease localized to inferior limbs and pelvis, for whom specific outcomes are rarely considered.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This is a prospective study of multidisciplinary treatments, including locoregional melphalan chemotherapy, in 62 BRAF wild-type CM patients with locoregional metastases in the inferior limbs and pelvis, including inguinal regions. Patients were either in progression following or ineligible for, or not treatable with novel immunotherapy. For exclusively inferior limb-localised disease, patients received locoregional melphalan chemotherapy performed by hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (n = 19) or isolated limb infusion (n = 19), and for synchronous lesions localised to inferior limbs and pelvis, received hypoxic pelvic and limb perfusion (n = 24). Additional multidisciplinary therapy included local, locoregional and systemic treatments and the primary endpoint was tumour response.
RESULTS
The objective response rate following first cycle of locoregional chemotherapy was 37.1% at 3 mo and median progression-free survival was 4-mo, with 12.9% procedure-related complications, 30.6% low-grade haematological toxicity and 11.3% severe limb toxic tissue reactions. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the odds of response were significantly higher for patients ≤ 75 y of age and for patients with locoregional metastases exclusively located in the inferior limbs.
CONCLUSION
In this subgroup of CM patients with BRAF wild-type status, locoregional metastases localized to inferior limbs and pelvis, in progression following or ineligible for immunotherapy, melphalan locoregional chemotherapy demonstrated a safe and effective profile.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01920516; date of trial registration: August 6, 2013.
Topics: Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion; Extremities; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Melanoma; Melphalan; Prospective Studies; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 34253376
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.054 -
Biology of Blood and Marrow... Apr 2019Disease relapse and toxicity are the shortcomings of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). We hypothesized...
Reduced-Intensity Conditioning with Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Total Body Irradiation for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The Effect of Increasing Melphalan Dose on Underlying Disease and Toxicity.
Disease relapse and toxicity are the shortcomings of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). We hypothesized that adding total body irradiation (TBI) to and decreasing melphalan (Mel) from a base RIC regimen of fludarabine (Flu) and Mel would increase cytoreduction and improve disease control while decreasing toxicity. We performed a phase II trial of Flu 160 mg/m, Mel 50 mg/m, and TBI 400 cGy (FluMelTBI-50, n = 61), followed by a second phase II trial of Flu 160 mg/m, Mel 75 mg/m, and TBI 400cGy (FluMelTBI-75, n = 94) as RIC for alloHCT. Outcomes were compared with a contemporaneous cohort of 162 patients who received Flu 125 mg/m and Mel 140 mg/m. Eligibility criteria were equivalent for all 3 regimens. All patients were ineligible for myeloablative/intensive conditioning. The median (range) follow-up for all patients was 51 (15 to 103) months. Day 100 donor lymphoid chimerism and transplant-related mortality, neutrophil and platelet engraftment, acute and chronic graft versus host disease incidence, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were equivalent between FluMel, FluMelTBI-50, and FluMelTBI-75. Stomatitis wasdecreased for FluMelTBI versus FluMel (P < .01). PFS for patients not in complete remission on alloHCT was improved for FluMelTBI-75 versus FluMel (P = .03). On multivariate analysis, OS (P = .05) and PFS (P = .05) were significantly improved for FluMelTBI-75 versus FluMel. FluMelTBI-75 is better tolerated than FluMel, with improved survival and disease control.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Child; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Vidarabine; Whole-Body Irradiation; Young Adult
PubMed: 30300731
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.042 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Aug 2021Fludarabine 30 mg/m/d × 5 and melphalan 140 mg/m × 1 (Flu-Mel140) is a commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We hypothesized that addition of...
Outcomes of Fludarabine, Melphalan and Total Body Irradiation as a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen in Matched Donor Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation.
Fludarabine 30 mg/m/d × 5 and melphalan 140 mg/m × 1 (Flu-Mel140) is a commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We hypothesized that addition of 200cGy total body irradiation (TBI) to Flu-Mel140 may improve antitumor activity and transplant outcomes. Primary objectives was overall survival (OS) at 3 years. Secondary objectives were to assess the cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients receiving Flu-Mel140-TBI followed by HLA-matched donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) using peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-one patients (median age, 58 years) underwent alloSCT between January 2008 and December 2018. Thirty-one percent of patients had a prior transplant, 32% had high or very-high disease risk index, and the donor was unrelated in 70% of patients. Grade 3 to 4 regimen-related toxicities were mucositis (37%), cardiac toxicity (17%), and renal toxicity (10%). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at day +100 was 24.7% and chronic GVHD at 1 year was 51.3%. Median follow-up for survival was 6.1 years. At 3 years, OS was 39.81%, RFS was 31.47%, and relapse rate was 30.5%. One-year NRM was 29.9%. Patients undergoing first transplantation experienced improved OS compared with second or beyond (63.08% versus 42.31%, P = .02). After adjusting for disease subtypes, age (≤55 versus 55), comorbidity index (CI), number of transplant and GVHD prophylaxis, multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any survival difference among disease subtypes. High CI (≥3) was predictive of adverse OS and NRM, whereas older age (>55 years) was associated with high NRM. Our study shows that Flu-Mel140-TBI seems feasible and provides durable disease control. Addition of TBI did not appear to improve outcomes compared to previously published reports of Flu-Mel140. Considerable NRM could result from the inclusion of patients with older age and prior transplants.
Topics: Aged; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Retrospective Studies; Vidarabine; Whole-Body Irradiation
PubMed: 33991722
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.029 -
Emerging Microbes & Infections Dec 2023The rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages mandates a better understanding of viral replication and cross-neutralization among these sublineages. Here we used...
The rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages mandates a better understanding of viral replication and cross-neutralization among these sublineages. Here we used K18-hACE2 mice and primary human airway cultures to examine the viral fitness and antigenic relationship among Omicron sublineages. In both K18-hACE2 mice and human airway cultures, Omicron sublineages exhibited a replication order of BA.5 ≥ BA.2 ≥ BA.2.12.1 > BA.1; no difference in body weight loss was observed among different sublineage-infected mice. The BA.1-, BA.2-, BA.2.12.1-, and BA.5-infected mice developed distinguishable cross-neutralizations against Omicron sublineages, but exhibited little neutralization against the index virus (i.e. USA-WA1/2020) or the Delta variant. Surprisingly, the BA.5-infected mice developed higher neutralization activity against heterologous BA.2 and BA.2.12.1 than that against homologous BA.5; serum neutralizing titres did not always correlate with viral replication levels in infected animals. Our results revealed a distinct antigenic cartography of Omicron sublineages and support the bivalent vaccine approach.
Topics: Humans; Animals; Mice; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Melphalan; Antibodies, Viral; Antibodies, Neutralizing
PubMed: 36594261
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2161422 -
Hematology/oncology and Stem Cell... Jun 2021Most data on autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in myeloma are based on the use of innovator formulation of melphalan. Comparative bioequivalence... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Most data on autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in myeloma are based on the use of innovator formulation of melphalan. Comparative bioequivalence and efficacy studies of generic melphalan are lacking.
METHODS
In this retrospective study, we report long-term outcomes of auto-HCT in myeloma using innovator (Alkeran, Aspen Pharma; n = 41) and generic melphalan (Alkacel, Celon Labs, India; n = 55) formulations. All consecutive patients at a single center from the period 2011-2018 were included.
RESULTS
The median follow-up in the innovator and generic groups was 61.7 and 32.5 months, respectively. Both groups were matched for age, sex, stage, and myeloma response. There were significantly more patients in the innovator melphalan group who were administered melphalan at a reduced dose at physician discretion (26.8% vs. 3.6%, p = .001). There were significantly more patients with grade 3 or higher mucositis (68.3% vs. 38.1%, p < .0001) and grade 3 or higher diarrhea (85.4% vs. 50.1%, p < .0001) in the innovator group. The median duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in the innovator group (19 days vs. 15.5 days, p < .0001). There were significantly more patients in the generic group who received standard maintenance (94.5% vs. 34.1%, p < .0001). Despite the differences in the melphalan dose and post-transplant strategies, the 4-year progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different in the two groups (58% vs. 63%, p = .7, 71% vs. 72%, p = .4, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Long-term efficacy comparison is helpful in the absence of postmarketing bioequivalence studies of generic melphalan.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Substitution; Drugs, Generic; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Myeloablative Agonists; Retrospective Studies; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32622756
DOI: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2020.06.002 -
Impact of Dose-Adjusted Melphalan in Obese Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.Biology of Blood and Marrow... Apr 2018Limited guidance exists for dosing melphalan for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the obese patient population, because the current literature reports... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Limited guidance exists for dosing melphalan for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the obese patient population, because the current literature reports conflicting clinical outcomes between obese and nonobese patients. In 2014, the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation published conditioning chemotherapy dosing guidelines for obese patients and recommended dosing of melphalan using actual body weight (ABW) in the body surface area calculation. The practice at Barnes-Jewish Hospital has consistently been to dose melphalan using adjusted body weight (AdBW), with a 20% correction when a patient weighs ≥120% of his or her ideal body weight (IBW). The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of melphalan ASCT in patients with multiple myeloma between obese (≥120% IBW) and nonobese (<120% IBW) populations. This retrospective, single-center study included adult patients with multiple myeloma undergoing first ASCT with melphalan conditioning between January 2009 and December 2012. Patient demographic data, transplantation characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was 3-year event-free survival (EFS). Secondary outcomes included response at 100 days post-transplantation, 3-year overall survival, treatment-related mortality (TRM), time to neutrophil engraftment, and hospital length of stay (LOS). To ensure that melphalan dosage adjustment in the obese population did not impact efficacy, the primary outcome was assessed using a noninferiority design, with a predetermined noninferiority margin of 7%. Assuming a 70% 3-year EFS in the nonobese population, a noninferiority margin of 7%, a power of 80%, and an α value of .05, an analysis of 280 patients was required. A total of 270 patients, including 171 (63%) obese patients and 99 (37%) nonobese patients, met our inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were well matched between the 2 cohorts, including high-risk cytogenetics, disease severity at diagnosis, and use of maintenance therapy, with the only detectable differences related to weight itself. The 3-year EFS was 41% for the total cohort, with fewer events occurring in the obese cohort compared with the nonobese cohort (51% versus 40%; P = .0025). The 95% lower confidence limit established noninferiority. High-risk cytogenetics, disease severity at diagnosis, and therapy response pre- and post-ASCT were all associated with significantly shorter EFS. No between-group differences in TRM, time to engraftment, or hospital LOS were noted. This retrospective, single-center study found that using AdBW to dose melphalan in obese patients was not inferior to the nonobese population in terms of 3-year EFS. This study adds to the limited evidence on melphalan dosing and suggests that transplantation efficacy is not affected by AdBW dosing in obese patients. Further studies are needed to provide additional insight into the pharmacokinetic differences and best dosing practices for obese patients.
Topics: Aged; Autografts; Body Weight; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Obesity; Retrospective Studies; Stem Cell Transplantation; Survival Rate
PubMed: 29225163
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.11.041 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Sep 2014This open-label, randomized, phase 3 study compared melphalan at a dose of 200 mg per square meter of body-surface area plus autologous stem-cell transplantation with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
This open-label, randomized, phase 3 study compared melphalan at a dose of 200 mg per square meter of body-surface area plus autologous stem-cell transplantation with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) and compared lenalidomide maintenance therapy with no maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
METHODS
We randomly assigned 273 patients 65 years of age or younger to high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation or MPR consolidation therapy after induction, and 251 patients to lenalidomide maintenance therapy or no maintenance therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival.
RESULTS
The median follow-up period was 51.2 months. Both progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer with high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation than with MPR (median progression-free survival, 43.0 months vs. 22.4 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.61; P<0.001; and 4-year overall survival, 81.6% vs. 65.3%; hazard ratio for death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.93; P=0.02). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with lenalidomide maintenance than with no maintenance (41.9 months vs. 21.6 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.65; P<0.001), but 3-year overall survival was not significantly prolonged (88.0% vs. 79.2%; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.15; P=0.14). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was significantly more frequent with high-dose melphalan than with MPR (94.3% vs. 51.5%), as were gastrointestinal adverse events (18.4% vs. 0%) and infections (16.3% vs. 0.8%); neutropenia and dermatologic toxic effects were more frequent with lenalidomide maintenance than with no maintenance (23.3% vs. 0% and 4.3% vs. 0%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Consolidation therapy with high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation, as compared with MPR, significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival among patients with multiple myeloma who were 65 years of age or younger. Lenalidomide maintenance, as compared with no maintenance, significantly prolonged progression-free survival. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00551928.).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Consolidation Chemotherapy; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lenalidomide; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neutropenia; Prednisone; Stem Cell Transplantation; Thalidomide; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 25184862
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402888