-
British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen...Up to 40% of patients taking opioids develop constipation. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) may limit the adequate dosing of opioids for pain relief and reduce quality... (Review)
Review
Up to 40% of patients taking opioids develop constipation. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) may limit the adequate dosing of opioids for pain relief and reduce quality of life. Health professionals must therefore inquire about bowel function in patients receiving opioids. The management of OIC includes carefully re-evaluating the necessity, type and dose of opioids at each visit. Lifestyle modification and alteration of aggravating factors, the use of simple laxatives and, when essential, the addition of newer laxatives or opioid antagonists (naloxone, naloxegol or methylnaltrexone) can be used to treat OIC. This review discusses the recent literature regarding the management of OIC and provides a rational approach to assessing and managing constipation in individuals receiving opioids.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Disease Management; Enema; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Laxatives; Narcotic Antagonists
PubMed: 27231750
DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.10.S4 -
Advances in Therapy Jul 2021The prescribing and use of opioid analgesics is increasing in Italy owing to a profusion in the number and types of opioid analgesic products available, and the... (Review)
Review
The prescribing and use of opioid analgesics is increasing in Italy owing to a profusion in the number and types of opioid analgesic products available, and the increasing prevalence of conditions associated with severe pain, the latter being related to population aging. Herein we provide the expert opinion of an Italian multidisciplinary panel on the management of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and bowel dysfunction. OIC and opioid-induced bowel dysfunction are well-recognised unwanted effects of treatment with opioid analgesics that can profoundly affect quality of life. OIC can be due to additional factors such as reduced mobility, a low-fibre diet, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. Fixed-dose combinations of opioids with mu (μ) opioid receptor antagonists, such as oxycodone/naloxone, have become available, but have limited utility in clinical practice because the individual components cannot be independently titrated, creating a risk of breakthrough pain as the dose is increased. A comprehensive prevention and management strategy for OIC should include interventions that aim to improve fibre and fluid intake, increase mobility or exercise, and restore bowel function without compromising pain control. Recommended first-line pharmacological treatment of OIC is with an osmotic laxative (preferably polyethylene glycol [macrogol]), or a stimulant laxative such as an anthraquinone. A second laxative with a complementary mechanism of action should be added in the event of an inadequate response. Second-line treatment with a peripherally acting μ opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), such as methylnaltrexone, naloxegol or naldemedine, should be considered in patients with OIC that has not responded to combination laxative treatment. Prokinetics or intestinal secretagogues, such as lubiprostone, may be appropriate in the third-line setting, but their use in OIC is off-label in Italy, and should therefore be restricted to settings such as specialist centres and clinical trials.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Expert Testimony; Humans; Italy; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Quality of Life; Receptors, Opioid, mu
PubMed: 34086265
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01766-y -
Hospital Pharmacy Nov 2016Each month, subscribers to receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to...
Each month, subscribers to receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are are available online to subscribers. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Through the cooperation of publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about , contact Wolters Kluwer customer service at 866-397-3433. The November 2016 monograph topics are apaziquone, crisaborole, irinotecan liposome, plecanatide, and telotristat. The Safety MUE is on methylnaltrexone PO.
PubMed: 27928191
DOI: 10.1310/hpj5110-847 -
Journal of the American Heart... Jan 2019Background Morphine administration is a strong predictor of delayed onset of action of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Background Morphine administration is a strong predictor of delayed onset of action of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, likely because of impaired gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the peripheral opioid antagonist methylnaltrexone could improve pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction receiving morphine. Methods and Results The MOVEMENT (Methylnaltrexone to Improve Platelet Inhibition of Ticagrelor in Morphine-Treated Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with morphine and ticagrelor. Upon arrival to the catheterization laboratory, patients were randomized to a blinded intravenous injection of either methylnaltrexone (8 or 12 mg according to weight) or 0.9% sodium chloride. The proportion of patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity and plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and AR -C124910XX were assessed at baseline (arrival in the catheterization laboratory) and 1 and 2 hours later. A total of 82 patients received either methylnaltrexone (n=43) or placebo (n=39). Median (interquartile range) time from ticagrelor administration to randomization was 41 (31-50) versus 45.5 (37-60) minutes ( P=0.16). Intravenous methylnaltrexone administration did not significantly affect prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity at 2 hours after inclusion, the primary end point, when compared with placebo (54% versus 51%, P=0.84). Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite, the prespecified secondary end points, did not differ significantly between the groups over time. There was no significant difference in patient self-estimated pain between the groups. Conclusions Methylnaltrexone did not significantly improve platelet reactivity or plasma concentrations of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction receiving morphine. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02942550.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Blood Platelets; Cardiac Catheterization; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Naloxone; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Single-Blind Method; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30636504
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010152 -
Cureus Apr 2021The present study discusses opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in advanced cancer patients, focusing on the OIC definition, pathophysiology, and treatment. OIC is any... (Review)
Review
The present study discusses opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in advanced cancer patients, focusing on the OIC definition, pathophysiology, and treatment. OIC is any change from baseline defecation patterns and bowel habits that developed after starting opioid therapy. The condition is characterized by bowel frequency reduction, worsening or development of straining, a sensation of incomplete defecation, or distress associated with bowel habits. OIC is common in advanced cancer patients, with a prevalence of approximately 51%-87% in patients taking opioids for pain management. Patients are likely to experience severe distress, work productivity reduction, poor quality of life, and increased healthcare utilization. OIC has a complex pathophysiology that involves propulsive and peristalsis impairment, intestinal mucosal secretion inhibition, intestinal fluid absorption enhancement, and anal sphincters function impairment. The Rome III criteria are used to assess and diagnose clinical OIC and can also be diagnosed through the Patient Assessment of Constipation (PAC) measures, including the symptom survey (PAC-SYM) and quality of life survey (PAC-QOL). Non-pharmacological treatment of OIC involves lifestyle habits and dietary adjustments, although these interventions might be insufficient to manage the condition. Pharmacological treatments involve the use of traditional laxatives and newer agents like peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor agonists (PAMORAs), including naldemedine, naloxegol, and methylnaltrexone. More novel treatments for OIC that target the pathophysiology are still needed and should be studied carefully for safety and efficacy.
PubMed: 33850679
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14386 -
Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in... 2019Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common adverse effect associated with opioid therapy, with many patients never developing tolerance to this effect. There are many... (Review)
Review
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common adverse effect associated with opioid therapy, with many patients never developing tolerance to this effect. There are many traditional laxatives available to help patients combat this symptom, yet OIC may not reliably respond to conventional treatment. Peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) have a place in the treatment of refractory OIC, when traditional laxatives have not resulted in effective laxation. There are a number of PAMORAs now available, and methylnaltrexone is the only PAMORA indicated for the treatment of OIC in adults with advanced illness, as well as for patients with chronic noncancer pain, including patients with chronic pain related to prior cancer treatment who do not require frequent opioid escalation. Advanced practitioners need to have an understanding of how and when to best use these medications for the different indications in patients with advanced illness or chronic noncancer-related pain.
PubMed: 31308989
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Sep 2015Constipation is a common adverse effect of opioids. As an example, constipation is reported in 52% of people with advanced malignancy, and this figure rises to 87% in... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Constipation is a common adverse effect of opioids. As an example, constipation is reported in 52% of people with advanced malignancy, and this figure rises to 87% in people who are terminally ill and taking opioids. There is no reason to believe that people with chronic non-malignant disease who are prescribed opioids will be any less troubled by this adverse effect.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic overview and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of opioid antagonists for constipation in people prescribed opioids? The population we studied included people with any condition, although most studies were in people with cancer pain. We searched Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review).
RESULTS
At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 162 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 84 records were screened for inclusion in the review. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 47 studies and the further review of 37 full publications. Of the 37 full articles evaluated, two systematic reviews and one RCT were included at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for three PICO combinations.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic overview we categorised the efficacy for three interventions based on information relating to the effectiveness of alvimopan, methylnaltrexone, and naloxone.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Naloxone; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Piperidines; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26360669
DOI: No ID Found -
Current Oncology Reports Oct 2022Antagonists of mu-opioid receptor role in cancer progression remains to be elucidated. The objective of this review was to summarize the available evidence on... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Antagonists of mu-opioid receptor role in cancer progression remains to be elucidated. The objective of this review was to summarize the available evidence on antagonists of mu-opioid receptor effect on tumor progression and prognosis in different types of cancers and an evaluation of the available findings on their mechanism of action.
RECENT FINDINGS
We have found studies related to methylnaltrexone (MNTX) and naltrexone (NTX) usage in cancer outcomes-related setting. We found consistent preclinical evidence of a potential action of MNTX and NTX on cancer growth and spread mediated mainly by effect on the opioid growth factor receptor (OGFr) axis, which results in depressed cell replication. However, clinical results are scarce and limited to poor-quality evidence. Further high-quality studies are warranted to study antagonists of mu-opioid receptor role as a therapeutic option in different types of cancer, especially in patients where the classical treatment causes unacceptable side effects.
Topics: Cell Proliferation; Humans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Neoplasms; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid
PubMed: 35648340
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01295-z